• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

slid[MPa]w [mm]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "slid[MPa]w [mm]"

Copied!
20
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

and Exposition

Interaction of Sliding, Shear, and Flexure for Earthquake Design of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls

Dr. Burkhart Trost, Institute of Civil Engineering, FHNW

Prof. Dr. Harald Schuler, Institute of Civil Engineering, FHNW

Prof. Dr. Bozidar Stojadinovic, Institute of Structural Engineering, ETHZ

(2)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Outline

- Sliding Problem

- Experimental Investigation - Sliding Model

- Wall Model

- Interaction Diagram of Sliding, Shear, and Flexure

- Design Recommandation

(3)

and Exposition

Sliding Damage after Earthquakes

1985 -Vina del Mar, Chile

2010 – Santiago, Chile

[1] [1]

(4)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

E-Defense Shake Table, Japan, 2006

[3] [3]

[3]

(5)

and Exposition

Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading

2 nd half cycle: Sliding 1 st half cycle: Pre-cracking

compact sliding specimen

compact

sliding

specimen

(6)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Compact Sliding Specimen

Fabrication:

Specimen types:

- Type 1, ρ

s

=0.85%,

420/420/120 mm, d

s

= 8 mm - Type 2, ρ

s

=0.47%,

420/420/120 mm, d

s

= 6 mm - Type 3, ρ

s

=1.13%,

420/420/80 mm, d

s

= 8 mm

(7)

and Exposition

Test Setup

Phase 1: Pre-cracking Phase 2: Sliding

Loading protocol:

β

=45o

w ρ

s

= 0.46% ρ

s

=

0.83% ρ

s

= 1.11% Loading protocol

1 mm PK09,

PK10 Cyclic 1

2 mm

PK21,PK2 2

PK02, PK03, PK04

PK17,

PK18 Cyclic 1 PK07,

PK08 Cyclic 2

PK05, PK11

Monotoni c

Compact sliding specimens:

(8)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Sliding Shear-Displacement Response

0.0 MPa 1.6 MPa 5.3 MPa 6.5 MPa 1.8 MPa

uslid[mm]

τslid[MPa]w [mm]

uslid[mm]

PK05

(9)

and Exposition

Results

(10)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Sliding Model

( , ) ( , )

( , ) ( , )

c slid s slid

c slid s slid

u w u w

tan β u w u w

τ τ

σ + σ

= +

Aggregate interlock model

Deformation of reinforcement bars

(11)

and Exposition

Validation

uslid[mm]

τslid[MPa]w [mm] τslid[MPa]w [mm]

uslid[mm]

PK05, PK10, ρ

s

=0.85 %, w

0

=1.28 mm

PK02, PK03, PK04, ρ

s

=0.85 %, w

0

=1.34 mm Cyclic behaviour

(12)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Wall Model

Integration of M-κ relationship

Compression field theory

Sliding model

0 0

(

x

, )

flex

( , )

x shear

(

x

, )

slid

(

x

, , , ) u F N = u F N + u F N + u F w β x

u flex u shear u slid

u

shear

u flex

F

max

u

Luna SW8:

h=1.65 m l=3.05 m t=0.2 m f

c

=24.1 MPa ρ

s,v

=1.5%

ρ

s,h

=1.5%

(13)

and Exposition

Salonikios LSW2 and LSW3:

h=1.3 m l=1.2 m t=0.1 m

f

c,LSW2

=21.6 MPa f

c,LSW3

=23.9 MPa ρ

s,v,boundary

=1.3%

ρ

s,v,web

=0.28%

ρ

s,h

=0.28%

Salonikios LSW2 (N=0.00)

Salonikios LSW3 (N=0.07 A

c

f

c

)

[6]

Luna SW8:

h=1.65 m l=3.05 m t=0.2 m f

c

=24.1 MPa ρ

s,v

=1.5%

ρ

s,h

=1.5%

[7]

Validation

(14)

The Concrete Convention

The Concrete Convention and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Interaction Diagram of

Sliding, Shear, and Flexure

1

st

half cycle

2

nd

half cycle

(15)

and Exposition

Variation of the concrete strength

(16)

The Concrete Convention

The Concrete Convention and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Variation of the horizontal and

vertical reinforcement ratios

(17)

The Concrete Convention and Exposition

Variation of the reinforcement

bar diameter

(18)

The Concrete Convention

The Concrete Convention and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Variation of the concrete

aggregate grain mix

(19)

and Exposition

Design Recommendation

(20)

The Concrete Convention

and Exposition

Institute of Structural Engineering, Structural

University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Dr. Burkhart Trost

Thank you for your attention!

[6] B. N. LUNA, J. P. RIVERA, AND A. S. WHITTAKER, Seismic Behavior of Low- Aspect-Ratio Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls, ACI Structural Journal, (2015), pp. 593–604.

[5] P. SOROUSHIAN, K. OBASEKI, AND M. C. RONJAS, Bearing Strength and Stiffness of Concrete Under Reinforcing Bars, ACI Materials Journal, (1987), pp. 179–184.

[4] J. C. WALRAVEN AND H. W. REINHARDT, Theory and experiments on the mechanical behaviour of cracks in plain and reinforced concrete subjected to shear loading, vol. 26, Heron, Delft, 1981.

[3] Hyogo Earthquake Engineering Research Center, E-Defense shake table tests , 2016.

[2] H. KATO, S. TAJIRI, AND T. MUKAI, Preliminary Reconnaissance Report of the Chile Earthquake 2010, Japan, 2010.

[1] EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUT, The chile earthquake of march 3, 1985: Performance of structures, Earthquake Spectra, (1986), pp. 293–371.

[7] T. N. SALONIKIOS, A. J. KAPPOS, I. A. TEGOS, AND G. G. PENELIS, Cyclic Load Behavior of Low-slenderness Reinforced Concrete Walls: Design Basis and Test Results, ACI Structural Journal, (1999), pp. 649–660..

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The last approach deals with the use of grouted duct connections (IIb) for connecting precast elements, where reinforcement bars protruding from one precast unit are grouted

We define abstract rules as a certain kind of functions, provide them with a semantics in terms of (abstract) stable models, and explain how concrete normal logic programming rules

([191], [55]) for the steeper inclination of the compression strut under fatigue loading is the progressive deterioration of the concrete at the crack lips, leading to a

The model is calibrated using response data from the monotonically tested compact sliding specimens, PK05 and PK11 and validated using the response data from the cyclically

Fracture Mechanics Model Applied to Shear Failure of Reinforced Concrete Beams Without Stirrups.. ACI Structural

4 Cylinder samples φ150/300 mm preserved in normal conditions as the test beams were tested after 52

The highly restricted approach for fail-safe optimization requires an extremely large computational effort, due to the large number of failure cases and the corresponding

In particular effects of initial stresses corresponding to simulated static conditions of a sliding surface on excess pore water pressure generation and shear resistance reduction