Appendix A
Concrete Properties of Test Beams
A1. Compressive strength
3 cubic samples 150 mm preserved in water conditions were tested after 28 days (06/04/2009)
Sample Dimension (mm) Weight (kg)
Density (kg/m³)
Force (kN)
fc,cube
(MPa) a B h
1 151,8 150,1 150,1 8,161 2.386 1.392 61,1 2 151,2 150,1 150,0 8,158 2.396 1.450 63,9 3 151,5 150,0 150,0 8,129 2.385 1.442 63,5
Mean value 2.389 62,8
Table A.1−Tests of cubic samples for compressive strength after 28 days
fc,cube is the mean value of compressive strength of cubic samples tested in the laboratory.
The characteristic compressive strength of cylinder at 28 days fck is determined as follows:
,
0, 75 0,95 4
ck c cubic
f = f − MPa
where : 0,75/0,95: conversion factors from cubic sample to cylindrical sample.
4 MPa : conversion value from mean value to characteristic value in laboratory.
3 cubic samples 150 mm preserved in normal conditions as the test beams was tested after 52 days (30/04/2009)
Sample Dimension (mm) Weight (kg)
Density (kg/m³)
Force (kN)
fc,cube
(MPa) a b h
1 150,9 150,0 150,1 8,015 2.359 1.466 64,8 2 151,2 149,9 149,9 8,008 2.357 1.500 66,2 3 151,8 150,0 149,9 8,122 2.380 1.528 67,1
Mean value 2.365 66,0
Table A.2− Tests of cubic samples for compressive strength after 52 days
3 cubic samples 150 mm preserved in normal conditions as the test beams was tested after 101 days (18/06/2009)
Sample Dimension (mm) Weight (kg)
Density (kg/m³)
Force (kN)
fc,cube
(MPa) a b h
1 152,2 150,0 150,0 8,039 2.347 1.669 73,1 2 152,1 150,0 150,0 8,024 2.345 1.637 71,8 3 151,3 149,9 150,0 8,001 2.352 1.699 74,9
Mean value 2.348 73,3
Table A.3− Tests of cubic samples for compressive strength after 101 days A2. Modulus of elasticity and compressive strength
4 Cylinder samples φ150/300 mm preserved in normal conditions as the test beams were tested after 52 days (30/04/2009).
Sample
Dimension
(mm) Weight (kg)
Density (kg/m³)
σo
(MPa) σu
(MPa) εo
mm/m εu
mm/m Ec
(MPa)
Force (kN)
fc,cyl
(MPa) (dry) φ h
1 150,0 299,0 12,46 2.358 - - - - - 958 54,2
2 149,9 300,0 12,490 2.359 17,8 0,5 0,574 0,033 32.071 957 54,2 3 150,0 299,3 12,478 2.359 17,8 0,5 0,592 0,035 31.098 953 53,9 4 150,0 300,0 12,521 2.362 17,8 0,5 0,603 0,039 30.712 946 53,5
Mean value 2.360 31.294 54,0
Table A.4− Tests of cylinder samples for modulus of elasticity and compressive strength after 52 days
A3. Tensile strength
3 cylinder samples φ150/300mm preserved in normal conditions as the test beams were tested after 101 days (18/06/2009).
Sample Dimension (mm) Weight (kg)
Density (kg/m³)
Force (kN)
fct,sp
(MPa)
Ø h (dry)
1 150,0 299,8 12,447 2.349 253,2 3,58 2 150,0 299,9 12,462 2.351 244,6 3,46 3 150,0 299,8 12,405 2.341 264,2 3,74
Appendix B
Test Results
TEST SAMPLE: 1L1 60 60 30
49 60 60 49
60 90
34 90 60 34
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
4 6 8 10 12
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368 4
6 8
10 12
Figure B.1L1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
0 30 60 90
40 80 120 160
Time [min]
F [kN]
F F [kN]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 40
80 120 160
wm wl
wr
Displacement [mm]
wl wm wr
Figure B.1L1.2- The Time – Load graph Figure B.1L1.3−The Load – Displacement
graph
F
l1 l2
l3
-1.4 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 Strain [mm/m]
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε ε ε
F
F [kN]
r1
r2 r3
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε ε ε
0 40 80 120 160
-1.4 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
Strain [mm/m]
Figure B.1L1.4− The Load – Strains graph at top surface of beam
F F [kN]
64 108 12
Strain [mm/m]
4 6 8
9 11 12
0 0 40 80 120
160 S E
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7
F F [kN]
0 0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
46 810
12
4 5
6 8
9 12 10
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7
S E
Figure B.1L1.5− The Load – Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=150.9kN
Figure B.1L1.6− Crack propagation of beam 1L1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 1L2
rm 60 60 30
49 60 60 49
60 90
34 90 60 34
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
4 6 8 10 12
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368 4
6 8
10 12
Figure B.1L2.1− The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system F [kN]
30 60 90 120
0 40 80 120 160
Time [min]
F
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 40
80 120 160
wl wm wr
Displacement [mm]
F [kN]
wm wr
wl
Figure B.1L2.2− The Time – Load graph Figure B.1L2.3− The Load – Displacement graph
F
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 rm
Crack width [mm]
rm
Figure B.1L2.4− The load – crack width graph
F
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
-1.5 -1.3 -1.1 -0.9 -0.7 -0.5 -0.3 -0.1
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3Strain [mm/m]
0
ε ε
l1
ε
l2 l3
F
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
-1.4 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 Strain [mm/m]
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3Figure B.1L2.5− The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
45
6 7
8 10
64 108 12
Strain [mm/m]
F
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 S
E
0.1 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.1 S
E 8 7 4
46 810
12
Strain [mm/m]
F
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Figure B.1L2.6− The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=158.4kN
Figure B.1L2.7− Crack propagation of beam 1L2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 2L1 61.5
63.5 49
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
61.5 63.5 30 49
60 90
34 90 60 34
rm
6 4 108 12
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368 4 6
810 12
Figure B.2L1.1− The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
0 30 60 90 120
40 80 120 160
Time [min]
F [kN]
wl wm wr
Displacement [mm]
F [kN]
F
wm wr
wl
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
40 80 120 160
Figure B.2L1.2− The Time – Load graph Figure B.2L1.3−The Load – Displacement graph
rm F F [kN]
80 120
160 rm
-1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3160
-1.4 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120 160
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3Figure B.2L1.5− The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4 5 78
9 1112
4 6 8 10 12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
F
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
S E 10 118 69 5 4
4 6
8 10
12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F
Figure B.2L1.6− The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=150.4kN
Figure B.2L1.7− Crack propagation of beam 2L1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 2L2 61.5
63.5 49
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
61.5 63.5 30 49
60 90
34 90 60 34
rm
6 4 108 12
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368 4 6
810 12
Figure B.2L2.1− The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
0 30 60 90 120
40 80 120 160
Time [min]
F [kN]
wm wr
Displacement [mm]
F [kN]
F
wm wl
wr
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
40 80 120
160 wl
Figure B.2L2.2−The Time – Load graph Figure B.2L2.3−The Load – Displacement graph
rm
Crack width [mm]
F F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
rm
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Figure B.2L2.4−-The load – crack width graph
-1.4 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1160
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3
-1.4 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120 160
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3Figure B. 2L2.5− The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4 6 8 10 12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
4 5 6 8
9 10
F
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
S E
4 6
8 10
12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F
4 5 6
711 9 8 10
Figure B.2L2.6− The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=149.2kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
Figure B.2L2.7− Crack propagation of beam 2L2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 3L1 52
75.5 41.5
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
52 75.5 30 41.5
60 90
34 90 60 34
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3rm
4 6
8 10
12 4
6
8 10
12
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368
Figure B.3L1.1− The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
0 30 60 90 120
40 80 120 160
Time [min]
F [kN]
wm wl
wr
wl wm wr F
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Displacement [mm]
F [kN]
40 80 120 160
Figure B.3L1.2− The Time – Load graph Figure B.3L1.3−The Load – Displacement graph
rm
F F [kN]
40 80 120 160
F
0 40 80 120
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1160
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
-1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120 160
-1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
Figure B.3L1.5− The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4 5 6 97 8
4 6 8 10 12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
4 5
6 8 7
109 12 11
0
4 6
8 10
12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
S E
Figure B.3L1.6− The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=133kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
Figure B.3L1.7− Crack propagation of beam 3L1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 3L2 52
75.5 41.5
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
52 75.5 30 41.5
60 90
34 90 60 34
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3rm
4 6
8 10
12 4
6
8 10
12
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368
Figure B.3L2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
30 60 90 120
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [min]
wl wm wr F
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Displacement [mm]
F [kN]
wm wl
wr
40 80 120 160
Figure B.3L2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.3L2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
rm
Crack width [mm]
F F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Figure B.3L2.4-The load – crack width graph
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1160
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120 160
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
Figure B.3L2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4 6 8 10 12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F
4 5
6 97 10
0 0.2 0.4
S E
4 5
6 7 8
9 4
6 8
10 12 F [kN]
0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F
S E
0 0.2
Figure B.3L2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=138.6kN
Figure B.3L2.7- Crack propagation of beam 3L2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 4L1
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
32 33 30 104
60 90
34 90 60 34
rm
32
33 104
4 6
8 10
11
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368 4
6
8 10
11
Figure B.4L1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40
80 120 160 200 F [kN]
0
Time [min]
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 40
80 120 160 200
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wr
wm
wl
Figure B.4L1.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.4L1.3-The Load – Displacement graph
80 120 160 200 F [kN]
rm F
-2.0 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1 F0 40 80 120 160 200
ε
l1ε
l3ε
l2
-2.0 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120 160 200
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε
r1ε
r3ε
r2Figure B.4L1.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
SE9 6 85 10 4
F
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Strain [mm/m]
4 6 8 10 11
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 S
E 9 8 67105 11 4
F
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Strain [mm/m]
4 6
8 10
11
Figure B.4L1.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=160kN
F=170kN
F=180kN
F=190kN
F=200kN
F=206.7kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
TEST SAMPLE: 4L2
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
32 33 30 104
60 90
34 90 60 34
rm
32
33 104
4 6
8 10
11
9x10 20
84 9x10 84
368 4
6
8 10
11
Figure B.4L2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40
80 120 160 200 F [kN]
0
Time [min]
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 0
40 80 120 160 200
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wr
wl
Figure B.4L2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.4L2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Crack width [mm]
rm F
rm
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Figure B.4L2.4-The load – crack width graph
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1 F0 40 80 120 160 200
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
-3.2 -2.8 -2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
0 40 80 120 160 200
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε
r1ε
r3ε
r2-2.8 -2.4 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4
Figure B.4L2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4
6 8 10 11
4 5
6
711 8 10
0
F
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Strain [mm/m]
S E
4 6
7 8 9 1110
0
F
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Strain [mm/m]
4 6
8 10
11 S
E
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Figure B.4L2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN F=206.9kN
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=160kN
F=170kN
F=180kN
F=190kN
F=200kN
Figure B.4L2.7- Crack propagation of beam 4L2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 5L1 27.5
40 101.5
rm
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
27.5 40 30 101.5
60 90
34 90 60 34
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3
4 6
8 10
12
9x10 74
368 4 6
8 10
12
9x10 40 74
Figure B.5L1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40
80 120 160 200 F [kN]
0
Time [min]
wm wr wl
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 0
40 80 120 160 200
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
44 Figure B.5L1.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.5L1.3-The Load – Displacement graph
rm
F
40 r 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
-4 -3.2 -2.4 -1.6 -0.8 0
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1 FF [kN]
40 80 120 160 200
Strain [mm/m]
ε
l1ε
l3ε
l2
-4.4 -3.6 -2.8 -2 -1.2 -0.4 F
F [kN]
40 80 120 160 200
Strain [mm/m]
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r30
ε
r1ε
r3ε
r2Figure B.5L1.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
12
0 40 80 120 160 200
Strain [mm/m]
4 5 6
7 9 11 8 10 12
F F [kN]
4 6 8 10
4
5 8 7 109 6 11
12
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
F 4
6 8
10 12
Strain [mm/m]
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Figure B.5L1.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=206.4kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=160kN
F=170kN
F=180kN
F=190kN
F=200kN
TEST SAMPLE: 5L2 27.5
40 101.5
rm
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3wl wm wr
27.5 40 30 101.5
60 90
34 90 60 34
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3
4 6
8 10
12
9x10 74
368 4 6
8 10
12
9x10 40 74
Figure B.5L2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40
80 120 160 200 F [kN]
0
Time [min]
wm wl wr
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 0
40 80 120 160 200
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
44 Figure B.5L2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.5L2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
0.5 1 1.5 2
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Crack width [mm]
rm F
rm Figure B.5L2.4-The load – crack width graph
ε
l3ε
l2-4 -3.2 -2.4 -1.6 -0.8 0
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1 FF [kN]
40 80 120 160 200
Strain [mm/m]
ε
l1
-4 -3.2 -2.4 -1.6 -0.8 0 F
F [kN]
40 80 120 160 200
Strain [mm/m]
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3ε
r1ε
r3ε
r2Figure B.5L2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 S
E 910 78 12 6 11 4
F F [kN]
4 6 8 10 12
0 40 80 120 160 200
Strain [mm/m]
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
S
E 10 9 6 7 4 58 1112
0 40 80 120 160 200 F [kN]
Strain [mm/m]
F 4
6 8
10 12
Figure B.5L2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=207kN
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=160kN
F=170kN
F=180kN
F=190kN
F=200kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
Figure B.5L2.7- Crack propagation of beam 5L2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 1K1 30 30 30
49
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r330
30 49
40
50 34
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248 4
6 8
10 11
8x10 34
Figure B.1K1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0 40 80 120
160 wl wm wr
F F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wr wl
Figure B.1K1.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.1K1.3-The Load – Displacement graph
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
rm F
rm
-0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1 F40 80 120 160
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3
-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
40 80 120 160
εr1 εr2 εr3
εr1 εr2 εr3
Figure B.1K1.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4
5 6
7 F [kN]
F 4 6 8 10 11
Strain [mm/m]
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0
40 80 120 160 ES
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
S E65 7 4
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Strain [mm/m]
F 4
6 8
10 11
Figure B.1K1.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=151.3kN
Figure B.1K1.7- Crack propagation of beam 1K1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 1K2 30 30 30
49
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r330
30 49
40
50 34
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248 4
6 8
10 11
8x10 34
Figure B.1K2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 40 80 120
160 wl wm wr
F F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wr wl
Figure B.1K2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.1K2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15 0
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
rm
Crack width [mm]
F
Figure B.1K2.4-The load – crack width graph
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3-0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
ε
l3ε
l2ε
l1 F40 80 120 160
0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
40 80 120 160
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3-0.8
ε
r1ε
r2ε
r3-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1
Figure B.1K2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 S
E 7 6 4
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F 4 6 8 10 11
-0.1
Strain [mm/m]
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
S E
47 5 6
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F 4
6 8
10 11
Strain [mm/m]
Figure B.1K2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=140kN
F=134.1kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
Figure B.1K2.7- Crack propagation of beam 1K2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 2K1
31.5 30
46
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r340
50 34
31.5 31.5 31.5 46
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248 4
6 8
10 11
8x10 34
Figure B.2K1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 40
80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 40
80 120 160
wl wm wr
F F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wr wl
Figure B.2K1.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.2K1.3-The Load – Displacement graph
rm F
80 120 160 F [kN]
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
εl3 εl2 εl1 F
40 80 120 160
εl1
εl2 εl3
-1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
40 80 120 160
εr1 εr2 εr3
εr1 εr2 εr3
Figure B.2K1.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
5
6 7
8
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
-0.2 0 0.2 0.4
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
S E 6 7 5 4
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
Figure B.2K1.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=160kN
F=167.1kN
Figure B.2K1.7- Crack propagation of beam 2K1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 2K2
31.5 30
46
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r340
50 34
31.5 31.5 31.5 46
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248 4
6 8
10 11
8x10 34
Figure B.2K2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 40
80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 40
80 120 160
wl wm wr
F F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wr wl
Figure B.2K2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.2K2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
rm
Crack width [mm]
F
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Figure B.2K2.4-The load – crack width graph
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
εl3 εl2 εl1 F
40 80 120 160
εl1 εl2 εl3
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
40 80 120 160
εr1 εr2 εr3
εr1 εr2 εr3
Figure B.2K2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4
5 7 8 6
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
S
E 4
5 7 6
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Figure B.2K2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=160kN
F=170kN F=140kN
F=150kN
Figure B.2K2.7- Crack propagation of beam 2K2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 3K1 32 33 30
44
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r340
50 34
32
33 44
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248
6 10
8x10 34
4 8 11
Figure B.3K1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0 40 80 120 160
wm
wr
wl
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
Figure B.3K1.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.3K1.3-The Load – Displacement graph
80 120 160 F [kN]
rm
F
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
εl3 εl2 εl1 F
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
40 80 120 160
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F εr1 εr2 εr3
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
εr1 εr2 εr3
Figure B.3K1.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
S
E 8 6 4
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
S E
-0.20
4
5 6
8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Figure B.3K1.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=140kN
F=150kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=158.7kN
Figure B.3K1.7- Crack propagation of beam 3K1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 3K2 32 33 30
44
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r340
50 34
32
33 44
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248
6 10
8x10 34
4 8 11
Figure B.3K2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
80 100 120 140 0
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
20 40 60
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0 40 80 120 160
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wl
wr
Figure B.3K2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.3K2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
rm
Crack width [mm]
F
Figure B.3K2.4-The load – crack width graph
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
εl3 εl2 εl1 F
εl1 εl2 εl3
εr1
εr2 εr3
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F εr1 εr2 εr3
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2
Figure B.3K2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
0 0.2 0.4
S E
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
0
4 5 7
9 F
4 6
7 9
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
0 S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Figure B.3K2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=140kN
F=150kN
F=159.9kN
Figure B.3K2.7- Crack propagation of beam 3K2 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 4K1 27.5
40 41.5
27.5 40 30 41.5
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r340
50 34
4 8 11
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248
6 10
8x10 34
Figure B.4K1.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0
40 80 120 160 F [kN]
Time [Min]
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 40
80 120 160
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm wr
wl
Figure B.4K1.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.4K1.3-The Load – Displacement graph F [kN]
rm
80 120 160
F
εl1
εl2 εl3
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
εl3 εl2 εl1 F
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
40 80 120 160
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F
εr1
εr2 εr3
εr1 εr2 εr3
Figure B.4K1.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
4
5 8 6
10 11
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
-0.1 0.3 0.5
F
4 6
8 10 11
0.1
Strain [mm/m]
0 0.2 0.4
S E
S E
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 4 569 87 1011
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10
11
-0.1 -0.2
Strain [mm/m]
Figure B.4K1.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=169.5kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=160kN F=140kN
F=150kN
Figure B.4K1.7- Crack propagation of beam 4K1 after each load step.
TEST SAMPLE: 4K2 27.5
40 41.5
27.5 40 30 41.5
40 50
34
wm rm
wl wr
ε
l1ε
l2ε
l3ε
r1ε
r2ε
r340
50 34
4 8 11
4 6 8 10 11
8x10 20 34
248
6 10
8x10 34
Figure B.4K2.1- The detailed arrangement of the data acquisition system F [kN]
Time [Min]
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0
40 80 120 160
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 40
80 120 160
wl wm wr F
F [kN]
Displacement [mm]
wm
wl
wr
Figure B.4K2.2-The Time – Load graph Figure B.4K2.3-The Load – Displacement graph
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0
40 80 120 160
F F [kN]
Crack width [mm]
rm
Figure B.4K2.4-The load – crack width graph
εl1
εl2 εl3
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
εl3 εl2 εl1 F
εr2 εr3
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
40 80 120 160
Strain [mm/m]
F [kN]
F εr1 εr2 εr3
εr1
Figure B.4K2.5-The Load –Strains graph at top surface of beam
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10 11
Strain [mm/m]
-0.2
4 5
6 7 9
10 S E
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
4 5
6
7 8 9
10 11
0 40 80 120 160 F [kN]
F
4 6
8 10
11
Strain [mm/m]
-0.1
-0.2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 S
E
Figure B.4K2.6- The Load –Strains graph at mid-depth of beam
F=167.8kN F=140kN
F=150kN F=0kN
F=10kN
F=20kN
F=30kN
F=40kN
F=50kN
F=60kN
F=70kN
F=80kN
F=90kN
F=100kN
F=110kN
F=120kN
F=130kN
F=160kN
Figure B.4K2.7- Crack propagation of beam 4K2 after each load step.