• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Survey of subjective experiences of discrimination Initial results from test questions in the 2016 SOEP Innova-tion Sample

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Survey of subjective experiences of discrimination Initial results from test questions in the 2016 SOEP Innova-tion Sample"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency’s research projects at a glance:

Survey of subjective experiences of discrimination

Initial results from test questions in the 2016 SOEP Innova- tion Sample

Overview of the study

The test questions examine the prevalence of experiences of discrimination based on all the reasons for protection listed in the General Equal Treatment Act (Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz or AGG) over a period of 24 months before the survey was taken. They also asked about the frequency of experiences of discrimination in selected areas of life (e.g. work life, business activities and ser- vices, housing market, education, etc.). The study was part of a survey of 2,507 people participating in the Innovation Sample of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP-IS): The survey was carried out using Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) in the period from September 2016 until February 2017. These two questions were included in the SOEP-IS upon the Federal Anti-Discrimination Agen- cy’s request. The aim of this project is to develop a module to regularly determine experiences of discrimination as part of a longitudinal survey representative of the general population, such as the SOEP.

Authors, year of publication and title of the study

Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency (Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes) 2019: Survey of subjec- tive experiences of discrimination. Initial results from test questions in the SOEP Innovation Sample 2016, Berlin.

Results

Frequency of experiences of discrimination

 The proportion of survey respondents reporting some form of discrimination against them with respect to at least one criterion in the AGG lies at 13.1% overall. If experiences of dis- crimination are considered that do not correspond with any of the criteria included within the AGG’s scope of protection (e.g. social status), then the proportion of respondents having experienced discrimination rises to 16.1%.

 The results offer significant indication of structural discrimination against particular sub- groups of the population. For instance, women are about four times as likely to report gen- der-based discrimination (5.2%) as men (1.2%).

 In addition, some subgroups are shown to experience a higher risk of discrimination overall:

People with a severe disability or reduction in earning capacity, for instance, not only report discrimination based on a specific disability, but also of discrimination as a whole (independ- ent of any particular criterion).

(2)

Experiences of discrimination in selected areas of life

 The areas of life most applicable to the AGG are also named as those with the most experi- ences of discrimination: Just under half (48.5%) of those affected by discrimination report be- ing discriminated against in their working life, while 35.1% report discrimination against them in terms of access to businesses or services.

 Based on the type of survey, no statements can be made on the frequency of experiences of discrimination due to the differing criteria in individual areas of life. Here the test questions should be developed further.

Correlation with life satisfaction and well-being

 Initial assessments indicate that respondents with experiences of discrimination on average rate their own life satisfaction and state of health considerably lower than people without experiences of discrimination.

 Future analyses must demonstrate to what extent these correlations hold up when control- ling for other potential factors.

Outlook

Based on these test questions, it is possible to illustrate the advantages of regularly including a mod- ule on experiences of discrimination within the main SOEP survey.

Monitoring: Regular collection of data pertaining to discrimination under the same condi- tions (formulation of questions, survey method etc.) would enable changes over time to be traced and evaluated.

Panel design: Since the same people are interviewed by the main SOEP survey every year, it is possible to examine the impact of changes in respondents’ lives through their reported ex- periences of discrimination.

Sample size: Many surveys experience a sampling problem due to small numbers of cases, which often prevents deeper analysis. With a sample size as large as that of the SOEP’s main survey, this is much less of an issue.

Reporting duties: A question module on discrimination would not only provide an important source of data for AGG reporting; the Federal Government could also use the results in the context of country reporting procedures (for example, with reporting duties for the UN hu- man rights conventions or the goals of the 2030 Agenda).

The full survey results can be downloaded => here, available only in German language.

Contact details: Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency Glinkastrasse 24

D-10117 Berlin

Telephone: 030 18555-1855

E-Mail for counselling: beratung@ads.bund.de

E-Mail for general questions: poststelle@ads.bund.de

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

1 трябва да бъде изменена, като се предвиди задължението на работодателя да бъде за равно третиране на всички работници или служители по отношение на условията

Como paso previo para la obtención de resultados de la Encuesta Ardán sobre empresa internacionalizada y la posterior elaboración de un indicador sintético de

С цел по - голяма гарантираност на трудовите права на работника или служителя, предотвратяване на всички форми на дискриминация в трудовия процес и

26 Така например на последователите на Църквата на адвентистите от Седмия ден религиозната норма забранява да работят в съботния ден. 27 Разпределението

In contrast, undergraduate students of Economics at universities of applied sciences are remarkably careful about voicing their approval compared with those at regular

Dies könnte natürlich einfach daran liegen, dass die Promovenden, die mit der Arbeitsmethodik im akademischen Sektor eher einverstanden sind, auch eher eine akademische Karriere

D’après les résultats de ce tableau, nous concluons qu’il existe des preuves solides contre la spécification linéaire de la règle de Taylor et que le comportement du

Survey on the Access to Finance of Enterprises in the euro area − April to September 2018 − External sources of financing and needs of SMEs in the euro area 15 bank loans..