• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Migrants’ experiences of discrimination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Migrants’ experiences of discrimination"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency’s research projects at a glance:

Migrants’ experiences of discrimination

Overview of the expert opinion

This expert opinion investigates the experiences of discrimination had by persons with and with- out a migrant background living in Germany. The survey focused on the personal, subjective expe- rience of discrimination over the previous 12 months. The questions covered eight aspects of life in which discrimination occurs: education, work, public offices and public authorities, neighbour- hood, exercise of religion, recreational activities, public transport as well as house hunting. The list is based on the ‘Integration Barometer’ – Data Collection by the Expert Council of German Founda- tions on Integration and Migration (SVR).

Title and Authors of the Expert Opinion

The Expert Council of German Foundations on Integration and Migration (SVR): Discrimination Experiences of Persons with and without a Migrant Background including an East/West Compari- son.

Who was interviewed?

 A total of 9,200 persons took part in the telephone survey, 76.8 percent of whom were per- sons with a migrant background and 23.2 percent without.

 The survey was conducted in summer 2011 in the West German Rhine-Ruhr, Stuttgart and Rhine-Main regions and in the East German regions of Berlin-Brandenburg and Halle-Leipzig.

 Of the respondents of migrant background, 13.3 percent were of Turkish origin, 17.4 percent originated from EU Member States, 16.1 percent from European states outside of the EU and 14.6 percent were of African, Asian and Latin America origin.

 The survey was also offered in Russian, Turkish and Vietnamese.

Results

 Persons with a migrant background reported almost twice as often that they experienced dis- crimination compared with the majority population. Some 41.9 percent of respondents with a migrant background and around 25 percent of respondents without a migrant background stated that they had been the victim of discrimination in the previous 12 months.

 Of the respondents with a migrant background, 9.4 percent indicated that they had experi- enced “very strong” or “rather strong” discrimination while house hunting, 10 percent while job hunting, 6.5 percent in education and 9 percent at public offices and authorities. However, not all of the areas of life investigated – such as education or house hunting – were equally rel- evant for the respondents at the time of the survey.

 In absolute figures, most respondents indicated that they had experienced discrimination at public offices and authorities (1,339 respondents) as well as on the labour market (1,156 re- spondents).

(2)

Contact details: Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency Glinkastrasse 24

D-10117 Berlin

Telephone: 030 18555-1855

E-Mail for counselling: beratung@ads.bund.de E-Mail for general questions: poststelle@ads.bund.de

Especially visible minorities and Muslims report discrimination

 Especially visible minorities, such as persons with a Turkish migrant background and persons of African/Asian/Latin America origin, experienced discrimination comparatively often: 31.3 per- cent of respondents with a Turkish migrant background and 33.3 percent of respondents of Af- rican/Asian/Latin American origin experienced discrimination on the employment market.

More than one-third of the respondents from these groups also experienced discrimination at public offices and/or authorities (Turkish background: 31.6 percent; African, Asian, Latin Amer- ican background: 31.5 percent). Also while seeking accommodation, almost one-third of the respondents in these groups felt they had been discriminated against (Turkish origin: 30.6 per- cent; African/Asian/Latin American origin: 27.9 percent). Alarmingly, moreover, 23.7 percent of respondents with a Turkish migrant background, as well as 20.9 percent of respondents of African/Asian/Latin American origin experienced discrimination in their neighbourhood.

 The group of ethnic German immigrants and late repatriates experienced the greatest discrim- ination on the labour market with 23.1 percent.

 Muslims indicated a significantly higher number of discrimination experiences. For example, 38.2 percent of respondents from the group of African/Asian/Latin American origin who be- longed to the Muslim confession experienced discrimination on the labour market (Christians:

31.6 percent; non-religious: 28.8 percent).

No difference between East and West

 An East Germany – West Germany comparison revealed no significant difference in the per- sonal experience of discrimination.

The majority population takes a sceptical view of diversity

 The majority population, for the most part, is more sceptical of ethnic diversity than the immi- grant population. For example, the approval of diversity in the neighbourhood, the education system and at the workplace is lower among persons without a migrant background than among persons with a migrant background.

What can the Federal Laender and the municipalities do?

The results of the expert opinion demonstrate the need to consistently work against discrimina- tion. This is only feasible with the support of the Federal Laender and the municipalities. To this end, the Federal Anti-discrimination Agency has created a ‘Coalition against Discrimination’ to de- velop joint strategies against discrimination:

 Protection against discrimination must be established as a responsibility at Land and municipal level.

 Migrants must have access to the best possible counselling in the event of discrimination.

 Public offices and authorities must apply, more than has hitherto been the case, the instru- ments intended to promote equality and combat discrimination.

More Information (available only in German language)

 The expert opinion ‘Discrimination Experiences of Persons with and without a Migrant Back- ground including an East/West Comparison’ can be accessed => here.

 Information on the ‘Coalition against Discrimination’ (Koalition gegen Diskriminierung) can be accessed => here.

 Information on the project ‘Verifying (Equal) Opportunities Right Away – Diversity Mainstream- ing for Public Authorities’ can be accessed => here.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

And since performance appraisals play an important role in individual careers of civil servants and public organisations, it is important to understand the process and

Three main factors for these countries’ positions towards ESDP have been identified: (a) member states’ military spending and budgetary constraints (b) public support for a

In the EU project Integrated Assessment of Spatial Economic and Network Effects of Transport Investments and Policies (IASON) a model of regional socio-economic devel- opment

1) Subgroups of farms are formed based on country, farm type and a priori credit rationing status. 2) Cobb Douglas production functions for the subgroups are estimated, allowing for

Looking for analogy with the school of ‘Variety of Capitalism’ (VoC), 4 we can identify the essential segments which impact both the economic activity and the creation of

Regarding the workflow of property confiscation: when a confiscation order is final, the public prosecutor executes it. Confiscated money is transferred to the public

In turn, in the data prepared by the Ageing Working Group (AWG), benefits which typically are not taken into account in other classifications, such as care

In general, BEEPS indicates that borrowing from local private banks seems to be more important than borrowing from state-owned banks (including state development banks), which