• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Comparison of two VIS-NIR instruments based on reflectance or interactancemode for fruit quality measurements

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Comparison of two VIS-NIR instruments based on reflectance or interactancemode for fruit quality measurements"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

ACW | 2011

Comparison of two VIS-NIR instruments based on reflectance or interactance mode for fruit quality measurements

S. Gabioud Rebeaud, D. Baumgartner, B. Kamm, A. Bozzi Nising Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil Research Station

severine.gabioud@acw.admin.ch Introduction

Determining fruit quality using classical destructive methods time consuming, costly and only a limited number of fruits be processed. Since instruments based on different measurement modes are commercially available, it needs assessed which one is the most suitable for each particular situation.

Objective of the study

Testing the performance of two instruments working interactance or reflectance mode for the measurement of soluble solids of eight types of fruit differing in:

NC

Apple 80 12.3 1.7 8.8-17.2 MSC

Pear 96 12.1 1.4 9.1-15.7 MSC

Peach 100 9.4 1.2 6.6-12.1 MSC

Nectarine 85 9.9 1.0 7.4-12.6 SNV

Tomato 94 4.6 0.8 3.1-6.6 SG 5-2

Apricot 205 14.5 2.0 8.8-21.4 MSC

Melon 56 11.1 2.1 6.7-14.5 SNV

Strawberry 78 7.6 1.2 3.8-10.4 SNV

Pre-treatment Number of

samples Mean S.D. range

Results

Typical spectra of the eight types of fruit obtained with NIR The main spectral differences between the different fruit instruments.

Based on the values of R2, RMSECV and RPD of the cross a higher perfomance in terms of accuracy for measuring TSS soluble solids of eight types of fruit differing in:

• calibre(strawberry vs. melon)

• water content(tomato vs. pip fruit)

• skin thickness (melon vs. stone fruit)

Table 1. Cross-validations of the NIR calibrations for total soluble solids QualitySpec® Pro, R2: coefficient of determination, RMSECV: root mean

A

1.6

1.8 Apple

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

350 550 750 950

Reflectance

Wavelength [nm]

Apple Pear Apricot Peach Nectarine Melon Tomato Strawberry

Figure 1. Examples of average spectra of the measured range of fruit (apple, pear, apricot, peach, nectarine, melon, tomato, strawberry) obtained with NIR Case (interactance) and B: QualitySpec® Pro (reflectance).

A

B

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

350 550 750 950

Absorbance

Wavelength [nm]

Apple Pear Apricot Peach Nectarine Melon Tomato Strawberry

Material and Methods

• 8 types of fruit (apples, pears, apricots, peaches, nectarines, melons, tomatoes, strawberries).

• NIR measurements (350-1100 nm) using (1) NIR Case (SACMI, Italy) and (2) QualitySpec® Pro (ASD, USA). Same fruit batches were measured on both instruments.

• Reference values: total soluble solids (TSS, °Brix).

NIR instruments based on reflectance mode for fruit quality measurements

S. Gabioud Rebeaud, D. Baumgartner, B. Kamm, A. Bozzi Nising

Research Station ACW, CH-8820 Wädenswil; www.agroscope.ch severine.gabioud@acw.admin.ch

methods is fruits can different needs to be particular

working in of total

NC QS NC QS NC QS NC QS

MSC SG 5-2 0.92 0.83 0.48 0.67 3.5 2.5

MSC SG 5-2 0.90 0.88 0.43 0.47 3.2 2.9

MSC SG 5-2 0.87 0.82 0.44 0.51 2.7 2.3

SNV SG 5-2 0.94 0.86 0.25 0.39 4.1 2.6

SG 5-2 SNV 0.90 0.79 0.26 0.39 3.2 2.4

MSC SG 1-5-2 0.90 0.88 0.58 0.71 3.5 2.8

SNV SG 5-2 0.89 0.84 0.70 0.87 3.0 2.4

SNV SG 5-2 0.94 0.88 0.32 0.44 3.9 2.8

RPD

Pre-treatment R2 RMSECV

NIR Case respectively QualitySpec® Pro are shown in figure 1.

types are in the region between 450 and 950 nm for both cross-validations (table 1) the NIR Case instrument (NC) showed

TSS of fruit compared to QualitySpec® Pro (QS).

• Reference values: total soluble solids (TSS, °Brix).

• Statistical analyses: PLS regression in the wavelength range 650-970 nm.

Conclusions

solids (°Brix) obtained for the measured range of fruit. NC: NIR Cas e, QS:

square error of cross-validation, RPD: residual predictive deviation.

1150

Conclusions

• The NIR Case instrument based on interactance mode is more accurate for measuring TSS of fruit than the QualitySpec® Pro instrument based on reflectance mode.

• The NIR Case instrument showed a good accuracy for very different fruit types such as tomatoes (high water content), melons (thick skin and large calibre) and strawberries (small calibre).

• The good performance is also a result of the instrumental setup of the NIR Case which has been especially designed for fruit quality measurements.

(apple, with: A:

1150

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

trends, improve understanding of processes, pollution sources, water quality model

(a) few of the existing programs using economic instruments were designed to achieve an incentive effect on polluter behavior; (b) there are no pure incentive

The calibration tests presented in this paper show that the water potential in unsaturated granodiorite, a crystalline rock, can be measured very sensitively and

of the carbon footprint label (lowest rank in quasi-experiment, ranking task and Likert

Ethylene production of 1-MCP treated and non-treated ‘Golden Delicious’ apples picked at two harvest times in 2007 (optimum and late) and stored under regular atmosphere

The table 1 presents the calibration (with cross-validation) results and the figure 1 shows how the reference and the predicted values fit in the calibration step

The present study aimed at developing a hand-held near infrared spectroscopic technique to non-destructively follow the fruit development of two apricot varieties: Bergarouge

Among plant protection treatments, the untreated control showed a significantly higher amount of CFU/cm 2 compared to the LI and the IP treatment indicating a prolonged effect of