• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

MEETING THE 2030 GOALS:

Im Dokument SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FOR ALL (Seite 107-110)

INVESTMENT OUTLOOK AND NEEDS

Supply-side energy efficiency investments are embedded in power generation, transmission, and distribution, and are essentially impos-sible to separate out and track over time.

Those on the demand side are projected to rise strongly, relative to current levels, in the WEO New Policies Scenario. Over the period to 2030, average annual energy efficiency

investments are $919 billion, with 70% of this in the transport sector in response to increas-ingly pervasive and stringent fuel economy standards, especially for passenger vehicles (IEA  2016a). Investment in more efficient buildings and in their appliances, lighting, heating and cooling systems requires a fur-ther 25% of the total. In the IEA 450 Sce-nario, tighter minimum energy performance standards for a range of energy-using equip-ment, higher fuel efficiency standards, wide-spread implementation of net zero-energy

buildings, and other initiatives push up cumu-lative spending on efficiency improvements to $1,402  billion annually, more than 50%

higher than in the New Policies Scenario (IEA 2016a).

Renewable energy investment averaged

$283  billion in 2010–15 (IEA 2016a), close to the level of around $300  billion in aver-age annual investment projected in the New Policies Scenario (although, as technology costs come down, this investment procures increased capacity). The investment needed to achieve the SEforALL renewable energy objective would have to be much higher, how-ever. Average global annual investments for renewables in the 450 Scenario amount to

$503 billion, but do not achieve the SEforALL renewable energy objective. The REmap Dou-bling Case, which is framed around SEforALL objectives, costs an average $770 billion a year just for renewables in the power sector, district heating, industry, buildings, and transport, with a further $650  billion needed for energy efficiency efforts. Table  6.4 summarizes the investment gap for relevant IEA and IRENA scenarios.

Comparable estimates of current financ-ing trends and future investment needs for achieving universal access to electricity and to clean cooking are sparser. The most recent IEA figures (IEA 2011) provided a high-level esti-mate of investment needs of $45 billion a year, against actual investment flows at that time estimated at $9 billion a year. For clean cook-ing, the IIASA Global Energy Assessment (2012), estimated investment needs of $71  billion annually, though it gives no figures for actual investments.

The World Bank’s Access Investment Model provides detailed bottom-up estimates of the cost of reaching universal access in each of 15 countries with large energy access deficits.

They reflect differences in population and geog-raphy as well as local unit costs, and can be extrapolated to give a global estimate of access investment needs (World Bank and IEA 2015).

The model, based on the Multi-Tier Framework (World Bank 2015), allows users to choose the tier of access used to meet the universal access objective, and illustrates how dramatically this choice affects the costs of electrification.

Reaching universal access at Tier 1 (enough to light a few light bulbs and charge a mobile tele-phone) would require investments of $1.5  bil-lion annually up to 2030. By contrast, reaching universal access at Tier 5 (full grid power all day, every day) would require investments of

$50 billion annually.

FIGURE 6.5

IRENA’s REmap: The renewable share in total final energy consumption, 2014–30

Renewable energy share in total final energy consumption (%)

0 Source: IRENA 2016.

TABLE 6.3 Penetration of renewables in end uses in REmap

Percent

2014 Reference Case REmap Options Doubling Case

Industry 11 15 26 35

Buildings 13 22 38 58

Transport 3 5 11 15

Source: IRENA 2016.

TABLE 6.4 Annual investment needs for clean energy based on IEA and IRENA analyses

$ billion

2015

investments IEA New Policies

Scenario IEA 450

Scenario IRENA Doubling Case

Energy efficiency 221 919 1,402 650

Renewable energy 283 299 503 770

Source: IEA 2016a; and IRENA 2015; 2016.

NOTES

1. The IEA uses concept of modern cooking and not clean cooking, one of the objectives of SEforALL. Modern cooking is defined as any cooking not done using traditional biomass uses, while clean cooking is a narrower category excluding certain polluting fuels (e.g., kerosene).

2. See the IEA’s most recent World Energy Outlook Energy Access Database at http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/resources/energydevelopment /energyaccessdatabase/.

REFERENCES

Bonjour, S., et al. 2013. “Solid Fuel Use for Household Cooking: Country and Regional Estimates for 1980–2010.” Environmental Health Perspectives 784 (7): 784–90. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205987.

Cameron, C., S. Pachauri, N. D. Rao, D. McCollum, J. Rogelj, and K. Riahi. 2016.

“Policy Trade-offs between Climate Mitigation and Clean Cook-stove Access in South Asia.” Nature Energy 1 (15010). doi:10.1038/NENERGY .2015.10.

Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF. 2016. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2016. Frankfurt: Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.

IEA (International Energy Agency). 2010. Energy Poverty — How to Make Modern Energy Access Universal? (Special early excerpt of the World Energy Outlook 2010 for the UN General Assembly on the Millennium Develop-ment Goals.) Paris: OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)/IEA.

———. 2011. Energy for All — Financing Access for the Poor. (Special early excerpt of the World Energy Outlook 2011.) Paris: OECD/IEA.

———. 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris: OECD/IEA.

———. 2014. World Energy Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD/IEA.

———. 2015. India Energy Outlook: World Energy Outlook Special Report. Paris:

OECD/IEA.

———. 2016a. World Energy Outlook 2016. Paris: OECD/IEA.

———. 2016b. Energy and Air Pollution: World Energy Outlook Special Report.

Paris: OECD/IEA.

———. 2016c. World Energy Model Documentation (2016 Version). Paris:

OECD/IEA.

———. 2016d. Energy Technology Perspectives 2016: Towards Sustainable Urban Energy Systems. Paris: OECD/IEA.

IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis). 2012. Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge, UK, and Lax-enberg, Austria: Cambridge University Press and IIASA.

IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). 2015. Synergies between Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency: A Working Paper Based on REmap 2030. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

———. 2016. REmap — Roadmap for a Renewable Energy Future, 2016 Edition.

Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

Pachauri, S. 2014. “Household Electricity Access a Trivial Contributor to CO2 Emissions Growth in India.” Nature Climate Change 4: 1073–76. doi: 10.1038 /NCLIMATE2414.

Pachauri, S., B. J. van Ruijven, Y. Nagai, K. Riahi, D. P. van Vuuren, A.

Brew-Hammond, and N. Nakicenovic. 2013. “Pathways to Achieve Uni-versal Household Access to Modern Energy by 2030.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (024015). doi:10.1088/1748–9326/8/2/024015.

World Bank. 2015. Beyond Connections; Energy Access Redefined. ESMAP (Energy Sector Management Assistance Program) Technical Report.

Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank and International Energy Agency. 2015. Progress toward Sus-tainable Energy 2015: Global Tracking Framework Report. Washington, DC:

World Bank.

World Energy Council. 2016. World Energy Scenarios 2016: The Grand Transi-tion. London: World Energy Council.

Im Dokument SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FOR ALL (Seite 107-110)