• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Implications, contributions and ways forward

Im Dokument HIGHER EDUCATION (Seite 155-160)

When taken as a whole, the literature reviewed for this chapter clearly confirms that institutional culture is a crucial consideration that must inform any discussion of how higher education can contribute to the public good in South Africa. Although it presents a largely pessimistic picture, which suggests that institutional cultures have proven largely resistant to change and have therefore largely served as a barrier to the uptake of more transformative approaches to pedagogy, there are individual stories of hope which can be identified, particularly within some of the more recent literature examining successful departmental-level and cross-institution

initiatives (e.g. Bozalek, Carolissen, Leibowitz, Nicholls, Rohleder, & Swartz, 2010) implemented by some of the better resourced institutions in the sector.

The review also makes some important theoretical contributions. First, it underscores the highly contextual (and political) nature of the concept of institutional culture. As such, it problematises the common practice of uncritically applying theoretical understandings of institutional culture, developed within particular systems of higher education, to contexts with fundamentally different experiences with – and histories of – higher education. Although often acknowledged as problematic, the practice remains widespread, due to the dominance of particular countries within the internationally accessible published literature. Although some analysis of institutional culture is broadly applicable across national borders, much is context-specific and assumes an understanding of the conditions giving rise to the theoretical perspectives advanced. Such nuance is often missing in literature that relies on theoretical understandings developed outside of the local context in question, particularly when those understandings are part of the dominant (i.e. Western) canon.

At the same time, the review offers an important reminder of the potential wider benefit of theoretical understandings emerging from parts of the world less traditionally represented on the global stage. The literature on institutional culture presented in this chapter has much to offer to those interested in the concept outside of South Africa, including in the traditionally dominant USA and UK. The notion of institutional culture as ‘whiteness’, for instance, is a concept which could usefully inform many of the contemporary debates about racism on American university campuses, which – although prolific – tend not to explicitly position institutional culture in such racially specific terms. Indeed, given the fact that higher education has served to exclude populations in countries around the world, a frank engagement with the ways in which university cultures continue to model particular privileged norms and behaviours would be a welcome addition to the field in many contexts.

The South African literature on mergers also offers useful insights for the field as a whole.

Although mergers occur within all systems of higher education, with inevitable impacts on institutional culture, the fact that the South African mergers were effected with the explicit intention of changing cultural norms and values renders this literature particularly valuable for those interested in the possibilities of pedagogical change. The South African literature also offers a useful perspective on the ways in which institutional culture changes (or remains static) during marked periods of transition within a higher education system, a topic which is rarely acknowledged or discussed in the Western literature. Another relatively minor theme within the SAJHE literature, which nonetheless offers substantial scope for broadening international discussions on the topic, is the discussion of how institutional culture tends to be particularly entrenched (and, therefore, difficult to change) in contexts in which academics spend their entire academic life – from doctoral study through to full-time employment – within the same institution (or institutional type). Although this situation clearly arises in other contexts, it is rarely mentioned in the dominant literature, despite the fact that acknowledgement of the ways in which such norms around academic training and

HigHer education PatHways

recruitment can impact on attempts to change pedagogy would significantly enhance our broader understanding of how institutional cultures can affect teaching and learning.

The pragmatic implications of this review are harder to define, aside from the obvious acknowledgement that institutional cultures play a crucial role in any attempt to change pedagogy. Given that institutional culture has long been positioned as the ‘keyword’ in South Africa’s higher education transformation agenda, this finding alone is not new. It is, however, a useful reminder that universities must acknowledge and engage with the most problematic aspects of their histories and identities in order to effect any meaningful pedagogical change on their campuses. The ‘success stories’ represented in the literature reviewed for this chapter all managed to do this by working within departments to effect change at the local level. Some focused this work within the boundaries of a particular academic department (e.g. Heydenrych &

Case, 2015); others chose to connect departments with similar disciplinary backgrounds at institutions of different types, as an explicit attempt to find common ground across historically entrenched boundaries (e.g. Bozalek et al., 2010). These lessons could prove useful to others attempting to transform pedagogy within their institutions. The gaps identified by the review are also important for practitioners to acknowledge, as they highlight our limited knowledge about how culture might affect academic identities, motivations and behaviours within the profiles of institutions that are less frequently researched. The fact that nearly all of the articles identified within the SAJHE focused solely on the links between institutional culture and academic behaviour, stopping short of any analysis of how institutional culture may directly or indirectly affect student learning, is another crucial gap for practitioners to acknowledge.

Ultimately, the question of whether or not institutional culture can be changed to allow for more transformative pedagogies reflects a deeper question around whether higher education merely reproduces the norms of the society in which it resides or can act to shape what that society might become in the future. In other words, is higher education simply reproductive or is it potentially transformative? On balance, the literature reviewed for this chapter suggests that Walker (2015) might be correct when she argues that it can be both and, indeed, positions institutional culture as fundamentally implicated in either possibility. Although sometimes dismissed as too vague a concept to be of any pragmatic use or theoretical value, we clearly ignore the influence of institutional cultures at our peril.

References

Ashwin, P. (2009). Analysing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency. London: Continuum.

Badat, S. (2009). Theorising institutional change: Post-1994 South African higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 455–467.

Baloyi, M. C., & Phago, K. G. (2012). Structural functional analysis of Tshwane University of Technology:

Post merger implications. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(5), 873–890.

Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines.

Bury St Edmunds: SRHE & Open University Press.

Bester, M., & Scholtz, D. (2012). Mapping our way to coherence, alignment and responsiveness. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(2), 282–299.

Bhorat, H., Mayet, N., & Visser, M. (2010). Student graduation, labour market destinations and employment earnings. In: M. Letseka, M. Cosser, M. Breier, & M. Visser (Eds.), Student retention and graduate destinations: Higher education and labour market access and success (pp. 97–124). Cape Town: HSRC Press.

Bitzer, E. M. (2010). A university department as a community of practice: A quality promotion perspective.

South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(1), 15–31.

Bozalek, V., Carolissen, R., Leibowitz, B., Nicholls, L., Rohleder, P., & Swartz, L. (2010). Engaging with difference in higher education through collaborative inter-institutional pedagogical practices. South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(6): 1023–1037.

Bozalek, V., & Dison, A. (2013). Using the human capabilities approach as a normative framework to evaluate institutional teaching and learning interventions at UWC. South African Journal of Higher Education, 27(2), 383–400.

Clark, B. R. (1972). The organisational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 178–184.

Council on Higher Education (Eds.). (2007). Review of higher education in South Africa: Selected themes.

Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.

Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K., Reason, R. D., & Terenzini, P. T. (2011). A culture of teaching. Research in Higher Education, 52, 808–829.

Deacon, R., Osman, R., & Buchler, M. (2009). Audit and interpretative analysis of education research in South Africa: What have we learnt? Pretoria: National Research Foundation.

Department of Education (1997). Education White Paper 3: A programme for the transformation of higher education. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education.

Duthie, S. R., & Freeman, L. (2015). From marginal to mainstream: An argument for locating education development in the academic department. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(5), 78–92.

Garnett, A., & Pelser, T. (2007). Organisational barriers to creativity in South African higher education institutions.

South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(1): 50–67.

Hemson, C., & Singh, P. (2010). Shadows of transformation: Inclusion and exclusion of academic staff at a university of technology. South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(6), 935–952.

Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Heydenrych, H., & Case, J. M. (2015). Academic development in the mainstream: A case study in an undergraduate engineering programme in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(5), 179–200.

Higgins, J. (2007). Institutional culture as keyword. In Council on Higher Education (Eds.), Review of higher education in South Africa: Selected themes (pp. 97–122). Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.

Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 28(4). New York: John Wiley, & Sons, Inc.

Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York, NY: Routledge.

Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching.

Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 69–83.

Leibowitz, B. (2016a). In pursuit of socially just pedagogies in differently positioned South African higher education institutions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(3), 219‒234.

Leibowitz, B. (2016b). Professional academic development – The influence of context on motivation.

South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(6), 191‒206.

Leibowitz, B., & Adendorff, H. (2007). Teaching and learning strategies as mechanisms to advance change at university level: A case study. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(1), 112–128.

Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organisations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

McKinney, C. (2007). Caught between the ‘old’ and the ‘new’? Talking about ‘race’ in a post-apartheid university classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(2), 215–231.

HigHer education PatHways

McLean, M., Walker, M., Dison, A., & Vaughan, R. (2008). Strengthening professionalism for the public good:

Implications for professional education. Working Paper 3: Development Discourses: Higher Education and Poverty Reduction in South Africa. London: DFID.

Mgqwashu, E., & Bengesai, A. (2015). Exploring an analytical framework for a discursive construction of teaching and learning: The case of academic literacy in an engineering faculty. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(4): 211–227.

Ntshoe, I., Higgs, P., Higgs, L. G., & Wolhuter, C. C. (2008). The changing academic profession in higher education and new managerialism and corporatism in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(2): 391–403.

Park, T., & van der Merwe, A. (2009). The transformative role of ICT in higher education: A case study of the alignment of educational technology utilization with the vision of Stellenbosch University. South African Journal of Higher Education, 23(2), 356–372.

Pithouse-Morgan, K., Masinga, L., Naicker, I., Hlao, T., & Pillay, D. (2016). ‘Sink or swim?’: Learning from stories of becoming academics within a transforming university terrain. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(1), 224–244.

Reddy, T. (2007). Staff perceptions of the merger between two South African regional technikons. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(3): 485–502.

Rothmann, S., Barkhuizen, N., & Tytherleigh, M. Y. (2008). Model of work-related ill health of academic staff in a South African higher education institution. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(2), 404–422.

Roy, I. J. (2007). Staff developers’ perceptions on building a culture of teaching and learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(7), 907–918.

Sattar, K., & Cooke, L. A. (2012). A conceptual framework for the quality assurance of programme design at the Durban University of Technology. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(2), 372–390.

Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Schendel, R. (2016a). Adapting, not adopting: Barriers affecting teaching for critical thinking at two Rwandan universities. Comparative Education Review, 60(3), 549–570.

Schendel, R. (2016b). Constructing departmental culture to support pedagogical change: Evidence from a case study in Rwanda. Higher Education, 72(4), 487–504.

Small, R., Smith, J., Williams, C., & Fataar, A. (2011). Social regulation and shifting institutional culture in higher education: A reflective account of a Faculty of Education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(3), 554–467.

South African Journal of Higher Education (n.d.). Focus and scope. Retrieved from http://www.journals.ac.za/

index.php/sajhe/about/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope

Thaver, B. (2009). Transforming the culture of higher education in South Africa. Academe, 95(1), 28–30.

Tierney, W. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organisational decision making: Theory and practice in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Trowler, P. (2005). A sociology of teaching, learning and enhancement: Improving practices in higher education.

Revista de Sociologia, 76, 13–34.

Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 221–240.

Unterhalter, E. (2010). Considering equality, equity and higher education pedagogies in the context of globalisation. In E Unterhalter & V Carpentier (Eds.), Global inequalities and higher education: Whose interests are we serving? Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Vandeyar, S. (2010). Shifting selves: Constructing and negotiating academic identities. South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(6), 914–934.

Walker, M. (2015). Imagining STEM higher education futures: Advancing human well-being. Higher Education, 70, 417–425.

Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2010). Making lives go better: University education and ‘professional capabilities’.

South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(5), 847–869.

Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organisations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.

THE LENSES WE USE TO

Im Dokument HIGHER EDUCATION (Seite 155-160)