• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Given the widely recognized connection between Golgi and cell migration, it is somehow surprising that studies on Golgi and tumor progression are still very scarce. It is known that most highly invasive tumors have elevated levels of the O-GalNac glycan Tn on the cell surface

83. The presence of glycans at the plasma membrane is known to promote adhesion of cells 84 and could also be involved in the recognition of tumor cells by immune cells 85. Interestingly, tumors with high Tn levels at the plasma membrane show a relocalization of N-acetylgalactosamine-transferases (GalNAc-Ts) from the Golgi to the ER and this causes cells to form more invadopodia and to migrate better 83. Relocalization of several glycosyltransferases was described to happen as a consequence of Golgi fragmentation in prostate cancer 86. Tumors cells often display a fragmented Golgi 87 and we could speculate that Golgi fragmentation is induced to promote cell motility and invasion. However, Golgi fragmentation results in most of the cases in impaired migration of cells in a wound assay, meaning that cells with a fragmented Golgi have a polarity defect. It should be tested whether Golgi fragmentation increases the speed of randomly migrating cells, as it is the case for other conditions where polarity is disrupted. Petrosyan et al. showed that Rab6a associates with

Discussion - 166

NMIIA (non-muscle myosin IIA) and NMIIA prevents Rab6 association with Giantin, necessary to maintain Golgi structure. If NMIIA is depleted, the Golgi becomes compact again, mislocalized glycosyltransferases relocalize to the Golgi and cancer cells become more susceptible to galectin-1 induced apoptosis 86.

Our data confer the Golgi protein GM130 a main role in controlling cell polarity and migration.

We showed that GM130 is progressively lost in colon cancer and often downregulated in breast cancer and thus we speculate an involvement of the Golgi in metastatic spreading.

GM130 depleted cells retain a compact Golgi, but are defective in directional migration.

Despite being not directional, GM130 depleted cells move faster than control cells and become more invasive. GM130 depletion alters two pathways, Cdc42 and Ras. Cdc42 and Ras are both important in cell migration and we could show that inhibition of Ras together with GM130 depletion resulted in a stronger decrease in the ability of the cells to close a wound.

This implies that Cdc42 and Ras affect migration via two different pathways. MDA-MB-231 cells, which have a consitutively active Ras, didn’t migrate faster and didn’t become more invasive after GM130 depletion, whereas cell lines with no mutation in the Ras pathway became faster and more motile upon GM130 depletion. We speculate that a constitutively active Ras might mask the effect of GM130 depletion on cell motility.

How does GM130 control cell velocity? Depletion of the polarity protein Scribble gives phenotypes very similar to the ones observed upon depletion of GM130, thus it is tempting to speculate that GM130 might control Scribble. Scribble connects β-catenin and E-Cadherin and it was shown that the increase in cell velocity caused by loss of Scribble could be dampened by rescuing the interaction between β-catenin and E-Cadherin. GM130 could control Scribble expression levels or alternatively, it could control its localization. It was reported a role for Cdc42 in sorting proteins from the TGN to apical or basolateral membranes

18, therefore we could speculate that by regulating Cdc42 activity at the Golgi, GM130 regulates Scribble positioning. However, it is not known if the same happens when Scribble is mislocalized or if instead it is necessary to lose Scribble to increase cell velocity.

Discussion - 167

References

1. Preisinger, C. et al. YSK1 is activated by the Golgi matrix protein GM130 and plays a role in cell migration through its substrate 14-3-3zeta. J Cell Biol 164, 1009-1020 (2004).

2. Yuan, H., Michelsen, K. & Schwappach, B. 14-3-3 Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins. Current Biology 13, 638-646 (2003).

3. O'Kelly, I., Butler, M.H., Zilberberg, N. & Goldstein, S.A.N. Forward Transport: 14-3-3 Binding Overcomes Retention in Endoplasmic Reticulum by Dibasic Signals. Cell 111, 577-588 (2002).

4. Yadav, S., Puri, S. & Linstedt, A.D. A Primary Role for Golgi Positioning in Directed Secretion, Cell Polarity, and Wound Healing. Molecular Biology of the Cell 20, 1728-1736 (2009).

5. Kodani, A., Kristensen, I., Huang, L. & Sütterlin, C. GM130-dependent Control of Cdc42 Activity at the Golgi Regulates Centrosome Organization. Molecular Biology of the Cell 20, 1192-1200 (2009).

6. Salazar, M.A. et al. Tuba, a Novel Protein Containing Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs and Dbl Homology Domains, Links Dynamin to Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 49031-49043 (2003).

7. Kovacs, E.M., Makar, R.S. & Gertler, F.B. Tuba stimulates intracellular N-WASP-dependent actin assembly. J Cell Sci 119, 2715-2726 (2006).

8. Puthenveedu, M.A., Bachert, C., Puri, S., Lanni, F. & Linstedt, A.D. GM130 and GRASP65-dependent lateral cisternal fusion allows uniform Golgi-enzyme distribution. Nat Cell Biol 8, 238-248 (2006).

9. Diao, A., Frost, L., Morohashi, Y. & Lowe, M. Coordination of golgin tethering and SNARE assembly: GM130 binds syntaxin 5 in a p115-regulated manner. J Biol Chem 283, 6957-6967 (2008).

10. Simpson, J.C. et al. Genome-wide RNAi screening identifies human proteins with a regulatory function in the early secretory pathway. Nat Cell Biol 14, 764-774 (2012).

11. Puthenveedu, M.A. & Linstedt, A.D. Evidence that Golgi structure depends on a p115 activity that is independent of the vesicle tether components giantin and GM130. The Journal of Cell Biology 155, 227-238 (2001).

12. Lee, I. et al. Membrane adhesion dictates Golgi stacking and cisternal morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 1849-1854 (2014).

13. Gilchrist, A. et al. Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of the Secretory Pathway. Cell 127, 1265-1281 (2006).

14. Michaelson, D. et al. Differential Localization of Rho Gtpases in Live Cells: Regulation by Hypervariable Regions and Rhogdi Binding. The Journal of Cell Biology 152, 111-126 (2001).

15. Chen, L. et al. CHD1L promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and metastasis in mice and is associated with these processes in human patients. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 120, 1178-1191 (2010).

16. Shapiro, I.M. et al. An EMT–Driven Alternative Splicing Program Occurs in Human Breast Cancer and Modulates Cellular Phenotype. PLoS Genet 7, e1002218 (2011).

17. Struckhoff, A.P. et al. PDZ-RhoGEF is essential for CXCR4-driven breast tumor cell motility through spatial regulation of RhoA. Journal of Cell Science 126, 4514-4526 (2013).

Discussion - 168

18. Müsch, A., Cohen, D., Kreitzer, G. & Rodriguez-Boulan, E. cdc42 regulates the exit of apical and basolateral proteins from the trans-Golgi network. The EMBO Journal 20, 2171-2179 (2001).

19. Lacoste, C. et al. Iodide Transporter NIS Regulates Cancer Cell Motility and Invasiveness by Interacting with the Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor LARG. Cancer Research 72, 5505-5515 (2012).

20. Ariake, K. et al. GCF2/LRRFIP1 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis and liver invasion through integrin-dependent RhoA activation. Cancer Lett 325, 99-107 (2012).

21. Kitzing, T.M. et al. Positive feedback between Dia1, LARG, and RhoA regulates cell morphology and invasion. Genes & Development 21, 1478-1483 (2007).

22. Sato, Y. et al. The novel PAR-1-binding protein MTCL1 has crucial roles in organizing microtubules in polarizing epithelial cells. Journal of Cell Science 126, 4671-4683 (2013).

23. Sato, Y. et al. MTCL1 crosslinks and stabilizes non-centrosomal microtubules on the Golgi membrane. Nat Commun 5 (2014).

24. Efimov, A. et al. Asymmetric CLASP-Dependent Nucleation of Noncentrosomal Microtubules at the trans-Golgi Network. Developmental Cell 12, 917-930 (2007).

25. Rivero, S., Cardenas, J., Bornens, M. & Rios, R.M. Microtubule nucleation at the cis-side of the Golgi apparatus requires AKAP450 and GM130. The EMBO Journal 28, 1016-1028 (2009).

26. Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., Chávez de Ramírez, B. & Cereijido, M. Tight junction formation in cultured epithelial cells (MDCK). The Journal of Membrane Biology 86, 113-125 (1985).

27. Nigam, S.K., Rodriguez-Boulan, E. & Silver, R.B. Changes in intracellular calcium during the development of epithelial polarity and junctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89, 6162-6166 (1992).

28. Fam, N.P. et al. Cloning and characterization of Ras-GRF2, a novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras. Molecular and Cellular Biology 17, 1396-1406 (1997).

29. Farnsworth, C.L. et al. Calcium activation of Ras mediated by neuronal exchange factor

		Ras-GRF. Nature 376, 524-527 (1995).

30. Mattingly, R.R. & Macara, I.G. Phosphorylation-dependent activation of the Ras-GRF/CDC25Mm exchange factor by muscarinic receptors and G-protein [beta][gamma]

subunits. Nature 382, 268-272 (1996).

31. Kiyono, M., Kaziro, Y. & Satoh, T. Induction of Rac-Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Activity of Ras-GRF1/CDC25Mm following Phosphorylation by the Nonreceptor Tyrosine Kinase Src. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 5441-5446 (2000).

32. Kesavapany, S. et al. p35/Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 Phosphorylation of Ras Guanine Nucleotide Releasing Factor 2 (RasGRF2) Mediates Rac-Dependent Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activity, Altering RasGRF2 and Microtubule-Associated Protein 1b Distribution in Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience 24, 4421-4431 (2004).

33. Mattingly, R.R., Saini, V. & Macara, I.G. Activation of the Ras-GRF/CDC25Mm Exchange Factor by Lysophosphatidic Acid. Cellular Signalling 11, 603-610 (1999).

34. Yang, H. et al. Phosphorylation of the Ras-GRF1 Exchange Factor at Ser916/898 Reveals Activation of Ras Signaling in the Cerebral Cortex. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 13278-13285 (2003).

35. Calvo, F. et al. RasGRF suppresses Cdc42-mediated tumour cell movement, cytoskeletal dynamics and transformation. Nat Cell Biol 13, 819-826 (2011).

36. McCaffrey, Luke M., Montalbano, J., Mihai, C. & Macara, Ian G. Loss of the Par3 Polarity Protein Promotes Breast Tumorigenesis and Metastasis. Cancer Cell 22, 601-614 (2012).

Discussion - 169

37. Iden, S. et al. Tumor Type-Dependent Function of the Par3 Polarity Protein in Skin Tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 22, 389-403 (2012).

38. Feigin, M.E. et al. Mislocalization of the Cell Polarity Protein Scribble Promotes Mammary Tumorigenesis and Is Associated with Basal Breast Cancer. Cancer Research 74, 3180-3194 (2014).

39. Xue, B., Krishnamurthy, K., Allred, D.C. & Muthuswamy, S.K. Loss of Par3 promotes breast cancer metastasis by compromising cell–cell cohesion. Nat Cell Biol 15, 189-200 (2013).

40. Zhan, L. et al. Deregulation of Scribble Promotes Mammary Tumorigenesis and Reveals a Role for Cell Polarity in Carcinoma. Cell 135, 865-878 (2008).

41. Lobo, N.A., Shimono, Y., Qian, D. & Clarke, M.F. The biology of cancer stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23, 675-699 (2007).

42. McCaffrey, L.M. & Macara, I.G. The Par3/aPKC interaction is essential for end bud remodeling and progenitor differentiation during mammary gland morphogenesis.

Genes & Development 23, 1450-1460 (2009).

43. Iden, S. et al. aPKC phosphorylates JAM-A at Ser285 to promote cell contact maturation and tight junction formation. The Journal of Cell Biology 196, 623-639 (2012).

44. Archibald, A., Mihai, C., Macara, I.G. & McCaffrey, L. Oncogenic suppression of apoptosis uncovers a Rac1/JNK proliferation pathway activated by loss of Par3.

Oncogene 0 (2014).

45. Nolan, M.E. et al. The Polarity Protein Par6 Induces Cell Proliferation and Is Overexpressed in Breast Cancer. Cancer Research 68, 8201-8209 (2008).

46. Nishimura, T. et al. PAR-6-PAR-3 mediates Cdc42-induced Rac activation through the Rac GEFs STEF/Tiam1. Nat Cell Biol 7, 270-277 (2005).

47. Liu, X.-F., Ishida, H., Raziuddin, R. & Miki, T. Nucleotide Exchange Factor ECT2 Interacts with the Polarity Protein Complex Par6/Par3/Protein Kinase Cζ (PKCζ) and Regulates PKCζ Activity. Molecular and Cellular Biology 24, 6665-6675 (2004).

48. Fields, A.P. & Justilien, V. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Ect2 is an oncogene in human cancer. Advances in Enzyme Regulation 50, 190-200 (2010).

49. Saito, S. et al. Deregulation and mislocalization of the cytokinesis regulator ECT2 activate the Rho signaling pathways leading to malignant transformation. J Biol Chem 279, 7169-7179 (2004).

50. Paget, J.A. et al. Repression of cancer cell senescence by PKC[iota]. Oncogene 31, 3584-3596 (2012).

51. Baas, A.F. et al. Complete Polarization of Single Intestinal Epithelial Cells upon Activation of LKB1 by STRAD. Cell 116, 457-466 (2004).

52. Partanen, J.I., Nieminen, A.I. & Klefstrom, J. 3D view to tumor suppression: Lkb1, polarity and the arrest of oncogenic c-Myc. Cell Cycle 8, 716-724 (2009).

53. Shaw, R.J. et al. The LKB1 tumor suppressor negatively regulates mTOR signaling. Cancer Cell 6, 91-99 (2004).

54. Mohseni, M. et al. A genetic screen identifies an LKB1–MARK signalling axis controlling the Hippo–YAP pathway. Nat Cell Biol 16, 108-117 (2014).

55. Cordenonsi, M. et al. The Hippo Transducer TAZ Confers Cancer Stem Cell-Related Traits on Breast Cancer Cells. Cell 147, 759-772 (2011).

56. Caussinus, E. & Gonzalez, C. Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 37, 1125-1129 (2005).

57. Tomasetti, C. & Vogelstein, B. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science 347, 78-81 (2015).

Discussion - 170

58. Huo, Y. & Macara, I.G. The Par3-like polarity protein Par3L is essential for mammary stem cell maintenance. Nat Cell Biol 16, 526-534 (2014).

59. Varelas, X. et al. The Crumbs Complex Couples Cell Density Sensing to Hippo-Dependent Control of the TGF-β-SMAD Pathway. Developmental Cell 19, 831-844 (2010).

60. Nagasaka, K. et al. The cell polarity regulator hScrib controls ERK activation through a KIM site-dependent interaction. Oncogene 29, 5311-5321 (2010).

61. Nagasaka, K. et al. A Novel Interaction between hScrib and PP1γ Downregulates ERK Signaling and Suppresses Oncogene-Induced Cell Transformation. PLoS ONE 8, e53752 (2013).

62. Li, X., Yang, H., Liu, J., Schmidt, M. & Gao, T., EMBO Reports Vol. 12(8) 818-824 (2011).

63. Norman, M. et al. Loss of Scribble causes cell competition in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 125, 59-66 (2012).

64. Chen, C.-L., Schroeder, M.C., Kango-Singh, M., Tao, C. & Halder, G. Tumor suppression by cell competition through regulation of the Hippo pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 484-489 (2012).

65. Wang, Y., Seemann, J., Pypaert, M., Shorter, J. & Warren, G. A direct role for GRASP65 as a mitotically regulated Golgi stacking factor. Embo j 22, 3279-3290 (2003).

66. Maag, R.S., Mancini, M., Rosen, A. & Machamer, C.E. Caspase-resistant Golgin-160 Disrupts Apoptosis Induced by Secretory Pathway Stress and Ligation of Death Receptors. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16, 3019-3027 (2005).

67. Lowe, M., Lane, J.D., Woodman, P.G. & Allan, V.J. Caspase-mediated cleavage of syntaxin 5 and giantin accompanies inhibition of secretory traffic during apoptosis. J Cell Sci 117, 1139-1150 (2004).

68. Lane, J.D. et al. Caspase-mediated cleavage of the stacking protein GRASP65 is required for Golgi fragmentation during apoptosis. The Journal of Cell Biology 156, 495-509 (2002).

69. Chiu, R., Novikov, L., Mukherjee, S. & Shields, D. A caspase cleavage fragment of p115 induces fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus and apoptosis. The Journal of Cell Biology 159, 637-648 (2002).

70. Scott, K.L. et al. GOLPH3 modulates mTOR signalling and rapamycin sensitivity in cancer.

Nature 459, 1085-1090 (2009).

71. Farber-Katz, Suzette E. et al. DNA Damage Triggers Golgi Dispersal via DNA-PK and GOLPH3. Cell 156, 413-427 (2014).

72. Hosoya, N. & Miyagawa, K. Targeting DNA damage response in cancer therapy. Cancer Science 105, 370-388 (2014).

73. Zhou, Y. et al. The Mammalian Golgi Regulates Numb Signaling in Asymmetric Cell Division by Releasing ACBD3 during Mitosis. Cell 129, 163-178 (2007).

74. Qin, Y., Capaldo, C., Gumbiner, B.M. & Macara, I.G. The mammalian Scribble polarity protein regulates epithelial cell adhesion and migration through E-cadherin. The Journal of Cell Biology 171, 1061-1071 (2005).

75. Camand, E., Peglion, F., Osmani, N., Sanson, M. & Etienne-Manneville, S. N-cadherin expression level modulates integrin-mediated polarity and strongly impacts on the speed and directionality of glial cell migration. J Cell Sci 125, 844-857 (2012).

76. Coussens, L.M., Fingleton, B. & Matrisian, L.M. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer: trials and tribulations. Science 295, 2387-2392 (2002).

77. Li, C.-Y. et al. Initial Stages of Tumor Cell-Induced Angiogenesis: Evaluation Via Skin Window Chambers in Rodent Models. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 92, 143-147 (2000).

Discussion - 171

78. Lichtner, R.B. et al. Ligand mediated activation of ectopic EGF receptor promotes matrix protein adhesion and lung colonization of rat mammary adenocarcinoma cells.

Oncogene 10, 1823-1832 (1995).

79. Wyckoff, J. et al. A Paracrine Loop between Tumor Cells and Macrophages Is Required for Tumor Cell Migration in Mammary Tumors. Cancer Research 64, 7022-7029 (2004).

80. Patsialou, A. et al. Intravital multiphoton imaging reveals multicellular streaming as a crucial component of in vivo cell migration in human breast tumors. Intravital 2, e25294 (2013).

81. Gligorijevic, B., Bergman, A. & Condeelis, J. Multiparametric Classification Links Tumor Microenvironments with Tumor Cell Phenotype. PLoS Biol 12, e1001995 (2014).

82. Muinonen-Martin, A.J. et al. Melanoma Cells Break Down LPA to Establish Local Gradients That Drive Chemotactic Dispersal. PLoS Biol 12, e1001966 (2014).

83. Gill, D.J. et al. Initiation of GalNAc-type O-glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum promotes cancer cell invasiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, E3152-E3161 (2013).

84. Casey, R.C. et al. Cell membrane glycosylation mediates the adhesion, migration, and invasion of ovarian carcinoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis 20, 143-152 (2003).

85. van Gisbergen, K.P.J.M., Aarnoudse, C.A., Meijer, G.A., Geijtenbeek, T.B.H. & van Kooyk, Y. Dendritic Cells Recognize Tumor-Specific Glycosylation of Carcinoembryonic Antigen on Colorectal Cancer Cells through Dendritic Cell–Specific Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-3–Grabbing Nonintegrin. Cancer Research 65, 5935-5944 (2005).

86. Petrosyan, A., Holzapfel, M.S., Muirhead, D.E. & Cheng, P.-W. Restoration of Compact Golgi Morphology in Advanced Prostate Cancer Enhances Susceptibility to Galectin-1–

Induced Apoptosis by Modifying Mucin O-Glycan Synthesis. Molecular Cancer Research 12, 1704-1716 (2014).

87. Weller, S.G. et al. Src kinase regulates the integrity and function of the Golgi apparatus via activation of dynamin 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 5863-5868 (2010).

Acknowledgements - 173

Acknowledgements

The journey that is told in this thesis started 4 years ago and has been one of my most intense periods, with a new research to discover, a new country to explore and new people to know.

My ways crossed with the ways of so many other people that it would take hundreds pages to thank everyone, but everybody I met in this time has somehow contributed to this work.

First of all I want to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Hesso Farhan for of all the energy and time (and money… a lot of money!) that he invested on me. I learnt that the most effective way of teaching is to provide an example and he does exactly this. He showed me how it is to be a scientist but not only this. He contributed to my personal growth by stimulating new interests and by teaching me how to think critically. Thanks to him, after this PhD I have a new vision of science! A work that is also a passion permeating through all the aspects of your life. I feel really lucky because I am one of the few privileged who like their work and this is all merit of Hesso. Together with Hesso, a special thank goes to all the people of the BITg. Veronika, with her infinite patience, Valentina, especially on Thursdays (got it?), Kerstin, Mark, Ricarda, Johanna, Julia and Cristina with whom “I am on the same boat”, literally translated from Italian, an expression with a thousand meanings that can be summarized in: “we walk together, you all know what a PhD is like, we share stressful times as well as parties and this bonds us”. And speaking about Italy, thanks to Nico and Annette who made me feel at home! Without Nico I would probably have died of starvation! Thanks to Dr. Daniel Legler who has been extremely kind with me since when I came for my interview and a special thanks to him because he found the time to be on my thesis committee. Thanks to Josepha, one of the pillars of the BITg, to Ilona, always ready to help, to Edith and Alexandra and to the last arrived Vladimir. Thanks to Conny and Marianne, who make our lab life easier.

Thanks also to Barbara, another positive example during my PhD. Thanks to the Groettrup group at the university, always very available and helpful. An enormous thanks goes also to Dr. Ian Macara, for giving me the opportunity to stay in his lab, where I met new friends like Armelle and Yongliang.

Even if I am work addicted, there are many people living outside the walls of the lab that I have to thank. The Italians Nicola and Nina (now officially Itaian), Paolo, Alessia e Alessio, Giovanni (Losannese!) Ambrogio, Carmelo, Michele, Giorgia (she is probably inside other lab walls) e di nuovo Valentina: è una faticaccia insegnarvi l’italiano, ma d’altronde in qualità di toscano devo diffondere la lingua del sì e le sue parole più importanti come “lapis”,

Acknowledgements - 174

“spengere” e simili! To all the flat mates and friends Carlos, Maria, Kim and Michael and Melanie, with whom I am having a wonderful time at home. When work becomes too much, family and friends are always there to rescue me. Of course, a big thank goes to my parents, who supported me throughout all this time. The “funniest sentence award” goes to my mother who, after a few month I left Italy, discovered the world of Skype and internet and declared: “lo sapevi che col computer si possono fare un sacco di cose?”. And since I wrote in English, she won’t be able to understand! Thanks also to my brothers and the rest of my family, who still don’t know what I do all day, but they think it is cool! Thanks to all my scout friends that share my same pathways even from far away. My old friends Leo, Ale, Andrea, Eli, Bene and the not so old friends Helga and Marco all of them shared several adventures with me during this time. Eli, all the best for the big news of these days! We’ll see each other in Helsinki! Leo, since you are the one who came more often to Konstanz, you win a bonus to come to Paris whenever you like (I like to think that you did not came only for the beer!)! A big thank to the always present (and always late) Filippo, who also embarked himself in the

“spengere” e simili! To all the flat mates and friends Carlos, Maria, Kim and Michael and Melanie, with whom I am having a wonderful time at home. When work becomes too much, family and friends are always there to rescue me. Of course, a big thank goes to my parents, who supported me throughout all this time. The “funniest sentence award” goes to my mother who, after a few month I left Italy, discovered the world of Skype and internet and declared: “lo sapevi che col computer si possono fare un sacco di cose?”. And since I wrote in English, she won’t be able to understand! Thanks also to my brothers and the rest of my family, who still don’t know what I do all day, but they think it is cool! Thanks to all my scout friends that share my same pathways even from far away. My old friends Leo, Ale, Andrea, Eli, Bene and the not so old friends Helga and Marco all of them shared several adventures with me during this time. Eli, all the best for the big news of these days! We’ll see each other in Helsinki! Leo, since you are the one who came more often to Konstanz, you win a bonus to come to Paris whenever you like (I like to think that you did not came only for the beer!)! A big thank to the always present (and always late) Filippo, who also embarked himself in the