• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

5) Smith Bay

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "5) Smith Bay"

Copied!
38
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

1

Pikka‐Horseshoe, Willow & Smith Bay

Unraveling Three New Discoveries with Publicly Available Data

Presented by: Joe Chmielowski Alaska Division of Oil & Gas April 24th, 2018

(2)

1) Introduction

2) Regional Geology 3) Pikka‐Horseshoe 4) Willow

5) Smith Bay

6) Key Takeaways

2

A GENDA

(3)

• State of Alaska, DNR:

o Paul Decker o Ken Helmold

o Seismic Tax Credit Team:  Heather Heusser, Kelsey Tucker Don Krouskop, Holly Fair & Kirk Morgan

o Geological Materials Center (GMC)

• State of Alaska, AOGCC

• Conoco‐Phillips, Oil Search, Repsol, Armstrong

• Dave Houseknecht (USGS)

3

T HANK Y OU

(4)

4

O RGANIZATION C HARTS

State of Alaska

Department of Natural Resources

Oil & Gas Geological &

Geophysical Surveys

Mining, Land &

Water

Parks &

Outdoor Recreation Forestry

Agriculture

Others

Department of Revenue Department of

Administration

Tax Division

Permanent Fund

Others AOGCC

Finance DMV

Others

U.S. Department of the Interior

Bureau of Land

Management Bureau of Safety

& Environmental Enforcement Bureau of

Ocean Energy Management

USGS U.S. Fish &

Wildlife Service

(5)

5

N ORTH S LOPE S TRATIGRAPHIC C OLUMN

Modified by Alaska Division of Oil and Gas from Bird and Houseknecht (2002) and Houseknecht (2003)

(6)

6

N ORTHERN A LASKA L OCATOR M AP

NPRA

ANWR

1002 Area

Smith Bay

Willow Pikka - Horseshoe

Image from Paul Decker, State of Alaska (DNR)

(7)

7

N ORTH S LOPE B ROOKIAN D ISCOVERIES

25 mi Horseshoe 1, 1A  (2017)

Three Brookian discoveries at different stages of maturity

Significant appraisal in 2018

Note the scale

Image from Paul Decker, State of Alaska (DNR)

(8)

8

M AJOR R ECENT B ROOKIAN D ISCOVERIES

Pikka/Horseshoe Willow Smith Bay

Operator Oil Search ConocoPhillips Caelus

Reservoir Formation Nanushuk Fm Nanushuk Fm Torok Fm Location Onshore Colville Delta Federal Onshore

Northeast NPRA

State Waters Offshore of NPRA Road/Pipeline Tie‐in ~ 20 miles ~ 28 miles ~ 125 miles

Trap type Topset

Stratigraphic Topset

Stratigraphic Turbidite Stratigraphic

Net Pay < 225 ft 42‐72 ft 183‐223 ft

(unconfirmed)

Oil Gravity 30 deg API 44 deg API 40‐45 deg API (est)

Test Rate ~ 2,100 bopd vertical;

4,600 bopd horizontal < 3,200 bopd vertical No Flow Tests Contingent

Recoverable Resource 1.2 BBO 300 MMBO 1.8‐2.4 BBO (est) Expected Production

(Operator Releases) < 120,000 bopd 40,000‐100,000 bopd < 200,000 bopd

Image from Paul Decker, State of Alaska (DNR)

(9)

9

B ROOKIAN D EPOSITION S YSTEM

Image from David Houseknecht, USGS

1,000 KM

(10)

10

M AJOR R ECENT B ROOKIAN D ISCOVERIES

Image from David Houseknecht, USGS; 

courtesy GeoExpro and Western‐Geco  Multiclient

West East

New Discoveries

Russia

Canada

1,000 KM

(11)

L OWER B ROOKIAN D EPOSITIONAL S YSTEMS

Nanushuk‐Torok progradation illustrated as series of advancing shelf margins

Sea‐level fluctuations repeatedly set up potential for reservoir and stratigraphic traps

Play extends across western and central North Slope

NPRA

ANWR

11 Image from Paul Decker, State of Alaska (DNR)

(12)

12

B ROOKIAN S EQUENCE AND P LAYS

Clinoform: A sloping depositional surface commonly associated with strata prograding into deep water:

Geometry:

Topsets: sand‐prone coastal plain and shallow marine shelf

Foresets: muddy slope and sandy turbidite channels and slope apron fans

Bottomsets: sandy basin‐floor turbidites, organic‐rich condensed shales

Nanushuk – Torok: topsets are Nanushuk Formation; time‐equivalent foresets and bottomsets represent the Torok Formation.

Reservoir Quality: Nanushuk tends to have superior reservoir quality due to less compaction and depositional environment.

Image from Paul Decker, State of Alaska (DNR)

Topsets

Bottomsets

(13)

13

N ORTH S LOPE T HOUGHT E XPERIMENT

Colville River

Sag River

Delta

Delta Delta

Delta

Staines River

Basin Floor

Gulleys

(14)

14

T IME S LICE

*Fullstack Time Slice at 1156ms Tofkat 1, 1A, 1B

Itkillik River Unit 1 Horseshoe

1 & 1A

Highlights:

1) Shelf Margins 2) Progradation

Direction

(15)

15

S EMBLANCE S LICE

Fullstack Semblance Timeslice at

1084ms

Tofkat 1, 1A, 1B

Itkillik River Unit 1 Horseshoe

1 & 1A

X

X’

Highlights:

1) Shelf Breaks 2) Faulting

3) Poor Data (Lakes)

*Fullstack Semblence Time Slice at 1084ms

(16)

16

D IP L INE : N ANUSHUK S HELF E DGES

NAN 1

NAN 2 NAN 3

NAN 4

NAN 0

NAN -1

NAN -2

• Nanushuk Formation versus Torok Formation

• Time horizons carried from Nanushuk through the Torok

NA N. To ro k

(17)

17

P IKKA D ISCOVERY ‐ N ANUSHUK F M

Repsol Qugruk 3, P&A 4/1/2013

Sealing transgressive shale Nanushuk Fm

(seismic topset facies)

Torok Fm

(sandy lowstand wedge, seismic upper slope facies)

Known pay, 30 deg API on MDT Potential pay

upper facies tested 4,600 bopd in horizontal Q301 offset well

500 ft

(18)

18

P IKKA ‐H ORSESHOE D ISCOVERY

Image from Oil Search presentation 12/14/17

http://www.openbriefing.com/OB/Oil-Search- Limited/2017/12/14/Oil-Search-Alaska- Strategy-Seminar/2713.aspx

Q3

Putu 2/2A

Horseshoe  1/1A Stony Hill 1

Highlights:

1) Nan3 Shelf Break

2) Exploration Wells

3) Arcuate Geometry

4) Slump

(19)

19

P IKKA N ANUSHUK G EO ‐M ODEL

Adapted from Oil Search Alaska Strategy Seminar, December 14th 2017

Shelf

Slope

Toe‐of‐slope & Basin floor 1) Clinoform Geometry

2) Reservoir Quality 3) Communication 4) Depletion Plan

5) Fullfield Economics

(20)

20

N ANUSHUK 3 T WO ‐W AY ‐T IME H ORIZON

B

B’

Horseshoe 1 & 1A

Itkillik River Unit #1 Stony Hill 1 

A

A’

Tofkat 1, 1A, 1B Putu 2 & 2A

C

C’

Nan3 Two-Way Time Horizon

Fullstack EES Volume

Picked on 5X5 Grid

TWT range: 0.95 to 1.45 sec

(21)

21

P UTU P ROSPECT

Top Nanushuk

Nan 3 Nan 2

Nan 1

Nan 0

Tofkat 1B Tofkat 1 Tofkat 1A Putu 2 & 2A

TD? TD?

Tofkat 1B, 1, 1A

A

A

A’

Tofkat 1, 1A, 1B Putu 2 & 2A

A’

(22)

22

S TONY H ILL : N ANUSHUK T ARGET

B

B’

Itkillik River  Unit #1 Stony Hill 1 

B Stony Hill 1 B’

TD Jurassic

Top Nanushuk

Nan 1 Nan 2

HRZ

Nan 3 Nan 4

LCU

Itkillik River Unit #1

(23)

C

Horseshoe 1 & 1A C’

C C’

23

H ORSESHOE P ROSPECT

C C’

Top Nanushuk

Nan 3 Nan 2

Nan 4

? ?

Horseshoe1 & 1A

(24)

24

N ANUSHUK 3 A MPLITUDE E XTRACTION

Horseshoe 1 & 1A

Itkillik River Unit #1 Putu 2 & 2A

Far Stack Volume

RMS Amplitude Extraction

+20ms offset, 60ms window

B

B’

A

A’

C

C’

Stony Hill 1 & 1A

Cronus 1

Meltwater  North 2A

D D’

(25)

25

R EGIONAL 2D L INE #1

Itkillik River

Unit #1 Cronus 1

Horseshoe 1 & 1A

D D’

2D Seismic Line: Arco80‐07W

Meltwater North 2A Terminal

Nanushuk/Torok Shelf Margin

(26)

26

B ROOKIAN E ROSION M AP

Image from Ken Helmold, State of Alaska (DNR), map contours based on data from USGS.

(27)

Image from Ken Helmold,  27

D UCTILE D EFORMATION A LASKA ‐S TYLE

~ 8,000 ft Dmax

~ 4,000 ft Dmax

~ 0 ft Dmax

Depositional Environment

• Grain Size

• Sorting

• Clay Content

• Ductile Grains

Drilling Technology

Completion Types

Multi‐Stage

Fracturing

(28)

28

W ILLOW D ISCOVERY ‐ N ANUSHUK F M

Lower part of Nanushuk Fm (basal topset facies)

Top Torok Fm

(uppermost slope facies)

ConocoPhillips Hunter A, P&A 3/26/2002

Lowstand shoreface/

shelf margin sandstones

Sealing transgressive shale

Willow interval: secondary objective with light oil/gas shows; Tinmiaq 2 and 6 wells confirmed discovery with up to 3,200 bopd test.

100 ft

• 2002: Hunter A discovery well

• 2017: Tinmiaq 2 & 6 confirm Willow discovery

• Play Type: Nanushuk Fm lowstand shoreface shelf margin

(29)

29

2D S EISMIC L OCATOR M AP

Tulimaniq 2 Tulimaniq 1

Noatak 1

Tinmiaq 6 Tinmiaq 9

Horseshoe 1 Pioneer 1

Rendezvous 2

E

E’

(30)

30

R EGIONAL 2D L INE #2

2D Seismic Line: NPRA USGS 1981‐16‐81‐migrated

Tinmiaq 6

Horseshoe 1

TD?

TD?

Tinmiaq 9

E E’

(31)

31

S MITH B AY S EISMIC D ATA

Tulimaniq 2

Tulimaniq 1

Noatak 1

Tinmiaq 6 Tinmiaq 9

Horseshoe 1 Pioneer 1

Rendezvous 2

F’

F

Puviaq 1

Ikpikpuk  Test Well

E

E’

(32)

32

S MITH B AY : T OROK F AN S YSTEM

Puviaq 1 Ikpikpuk

Test Well

Caelus Tulimaniq 1

2D Seismic Line: USGS NPRA Regional 2D‐R‐7‐original

F F’

(33)

33

C OMPOSITE S EISMIC 2D L INE

Toolik Fed 1 Meltwater

North 2A Horseshoe 1

Smith Bay Discovery

Willow Discovery G

KRU PBU

CRU

G’’

Trailblazer A‐01

T6 CT1

G’

(34)

TrailBlazer A-01

Meltwater North 2A

G

Seismic

“Bend”

G’ G’’

Pikka - Horseshoe

(H1)

Toolik Fed 1 Smith Bay

(CT1)

Willow (T6)

34

C OMPOSITE S EISMIC 2D L INE

KRU CRU

(35)

Smith Bay 2.0 Bn

35

N ORTH S LOPE F IELDS

Pikka‐Horseshoe 1.2 Bn

Willow 0.3 Bn

Endicott 0.49 Bn CRU 0.55 Bn PBU 12.8 Bn bbls = 11.5“

KRU 2.7 Bn bbls = 5.2“

PTU 1.4 Bn boes = 3.8 “

NSU 0.17Bn

Nikaitchuq 0.04 Bn

Oooguruk 0.03 Bn GMT  0.10Bn

MPU 0.34 Bn

Liberty 0.15Bn

(36)

36

U NDISCOVERED R ESOURCES

2017 Reassessment: onshore NPRA (USGS) and offshore (BOEM)

Undiscovered Resources: mean, technically recoverable, conventional

Brookian: far more prospective than previously recognized

Example: Willow (~300 MMBO) alone exceeds the 2010 USGS upside estimate of ~249 MMBO (F5 case)

2017 USGS Fact Sheet ISSN‐6916 and 2017 BOEM Fact Sheet RED‐2017‐12b

Play 2017 USGS 2017 BOEM

Nanushuk 6,100 MMBO 1,100 MMBO

Torok 2,600 MMBO 150 MMBO

Onshore & SOA Waters Federal OCS Waters

(37)

37

K EY T AKEAWAYS

Regional Understanding:  Nanushuk‐Torok system

2018 Exploration Wells:  why they are where they are

New Discoveries:

o Varying levels of exploration/appraisal maturity o Large in‐place volumes

o Under‐explored region

Tax Credit Program:  high quality 2D/3D seismic currently 

available with several more released per year until 2025

(38)

38

Q UESTIONS

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The main focus was put into the investigation of parameters that influence the total dispersion (physical and numerical) in the simulated models: grid-block size, calculation

The differential process describes the change in the volumetric and phase behavior of the system at reservoir temperature and under equilibrium conditions, where any decrease in

• The model is based on the dual porosity – single permeability approach; the fluid distribution is balanced vertically in the fracture but not in the matrix column.. • The

Based on this average saturation, the position of the grid point z i will be chosen on the vertical saturation distribution function and the block pressure will be interpolated

(2008), “Coupling upland watershed and downstream water body hydrodynamic and water quality models (SWAT and CE-QUAL-W2) for better water resources management in complex

Der schwarze Strich an der linken Seite des Behälters stellt in photographischer Aufnahme einen im Vordergrunde befindlichen bl:itterlosen Baum

Then, the results are used in Sections 5 and 6 to point out feasible and efficient operating rules of the double objective management problem.. Finally, Section 7 deals with

Bottom-Up Test Top-Down Test Sandwich Test Control Flow-Oriented. (C0-,C1-,