welcome bienvenu
Willkommen
Study of energy efficiency in air handling units
Heat recovery and electric power efficiencies in AHU ´ s Dr.-Ing. Christoph Kaup
c.kaup@umwelt-campus.de
distribution of air flow rates
Air flow distribution
0,00%
1,00%
2,00%
3,00%
4,00%
5,00%
6,00%
7,00%
8,00%
9,00%
10,00%
130.000 110.000 90.000 70.000 50.000 40.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 1.000 500
Air flow in m³/h
Air flow as %
Study 1 Study 2
heating and cooling devices of 13.893 units
supply units 13,3 %
exhaust units 5,8 %
combined units 80,9 %
heating devices installed (11.083 units) 79,8 % cooling devices installed (5.630 units) 40,5 %
average heating capacity 96,3 KW
average cooling capacity 88,9 KW
energy devices
pressure losses
average external pressure loss supply air 587 Pa
External pressure - flow rate distribution
y = 74,9Ln(x) - 90,517
0 200 400 600 800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600 1.800 2.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
Pressure in Pa
External pressure to supply air flow rate
Logarithmic (External pressure to supply air flow rate)
pressure losses
average external pressure loss exhaust air 544 Pa
External pressure - flow rate distribution
y = 49,564Ln(x) + 74,601
0 200 400 600 800 1.000 1.200 1.400
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
Pressure in Pa
External pressure to exhaust air flow rate
Logarithmic (External pressure to exhaust air flow rate)
pressure losses
average supply air total pressure 1.115 Pa
Total pressure - flow rate distribution
y = 149,26Ln(x) - 235,56
0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
Pressure in Pa
Total pressure to supply air flow rate
Logarithmic (Total pressure to supply air flow rate)
pressure losses
average exhaust air total pressure 902 Pa
Total pressure - flow rate distribution
y = 130,94Ln(x) - 35,585
0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
Pressure in Pa
Total pressure to exhaust air flow rate
Logarithmic (Total pressure to exhaust air low rate)
efficiencies
average fan efficiency supply air 0,692 with Ps = 6,18 KW
Fan efficiency - flow rate distribution
y = 0,9723Ln(x) + 60,515
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
η as %
Fan efficiency to supply air flow rate
Logarithmic (Fan efficiency to supply air flow rate)
efficiencies
average fan efficiency exhaust air 0,693 with Ps = 4,84 KW
Fan efficiency - flow rate distribution
y = 1,4537Ln(x) + 56,114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
η as %
Fan efficiency to exhaust air flow rate
Logarithmic (Fan efficiency to exhaust air flow rate)
efficiencies
average system efficiency supply air 0,545 with Pm = 7,30 KW
System efficiency - flow rate distribution
y = 4,2626Ln(x) + 15,774
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
η as %
System efficiency to supply air flow rate
Logarithmic (System efficiency to supply air flow rate)
efficiencies
average system efficiency exhaust air 0,538 mit Pm = 5,75 KW
System efficiency - flow rate distribution
y = 4,6099Ln(x) + 12,736
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Flow rate in m³/h
η as %
System efficiency to exhaust air flow rate
Logarithmic (System efficiency to exhaust air flow rate)
specific fan power
average supply air SFP 1.916 W/(m³/s)
SFP - flow rate distribution
y = 2042,8e-5E-06x
0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500 5.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Air flow in m³/h
SFP in W/(m³/s)
SFP-values to supply air flow rate
Exponential (SFP-values to supply air flow rate)
specific fan power
average supply air SFP 1.799 W/(m³/s) (without add. SFP-values)
SFP - flow rate distribution
y = 1819,1e-6E-06x
0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500 5.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Air flow in m³/h
SFP in W/(m³/s)
SFP-values to supply air flow rate
Exponetial (SFP-values to supply air flow rate)
specific fan power
average exhaust air SFP 1.571 W/(m³/s)
SFP - flow rate distribution
y = 1517,5e7E-08x
0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500 5.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Air flow in m³/h
SFP in W/(m³/s)
SFP-values to exhaust air flow rate
Exponential (SFP-values to exhaust air flow rate)
specific fan power
average ehaust air SFP 1.512 W/(m³/s) (without add. SFP-values)
SFP - flow rate distribution
y = 1454e-4E-07x
0 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500 5.000
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Air flow in m³/h
SFP in W/(m³/s)
SFP-values to exhaust air flow rate
Exponetial (SFP-values to exhaust air flow rate)
specific fan power
Average SFP-values
1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
SFP in W/(m³/s)
Supply Exhaust
heatrecovery
average transfer efficiency 0,624 at a 52,4 % use of HR
Transfer efficiency - Flow rate distribution
y = 1,2874Ln(x) + 48,249
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Air flow in m³/h
Transfer efficiency as %
Transfer efficiency to air flow rate
Logarithmic (Transfer efficiency to air flow rate) h
heatrecovery
average HR pressure loss 168 Pa (supply) and 177 Pa (exhaust)
HR dP - Flow rate distribution
y = 22,602Ln(x) - 42,783
0 100 200 300 400
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000
Air flow in m³/h
dP in Pa
HR pressure loss to air flow rate
Logarithmic (HR pressure loss to air low rate)
heatrecovery development
average transfer efficiency 0,624 (UCB) and 0,628 (Hoval 2009) Distribution of heat recovery transfer efficiency
0,0%
5,0%
10,0%
15,0%
20,0%
25,0%
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 > 80,0
HR transfer efficiency
Transfer efficiency as a %
Environmental Campus study Hoval AG Survey
heatrecovery development
Average HR transfer efficiency
50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Years
Transfer efficiency as %
Average HR transfer efficiency 50,0
55,0 60,0 65,0 70,0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
20,0%
25,0%
30,0%
35,0%
40,0%
45,0%
50,0%
55,0%
60,0%
65,0%
70,0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
heatrecovery development
The use of heatrecovery
heatrecovery development
Average HR pressure loss
100 120 140 160 180 200
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Years
Pressure loss in Pa
Average pressure loss 100
120 140 160 180 200
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
heatrecovery
Transfer efficiency - pressure drop distribution
y = 0,0012x3 - 0,1586x2 + 7,8077x
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Transfer level in %
Pressure drop in Pa
Transfer efficiency to air flow rate
Polynomic (Transfer efficiency to air flow rate)
market datas RLT (survey RLT)
31,1 11.108
43.759 27,2
88,1 323,8
2006
36,7 12.873
43.217 27,4
101,9 373,6
∅
45,5 15.569
42.236 25,8
111,3 431,4
2008
33,4 11.941
43.656 29,1
106,2 365,5
2007
HR
% with
HR Units
Export
% Export
Mio.€
Turn- over Mio.€
Year
general market values
market datas RLT (survey RLT)
45,5 15.569
42.236 25,8
111,3 431,4
2008
55,3 16.836
37.396 25,9
101,9 400,4
∅
67,0 19.791
36.476 26,4
103,2 390,4
2010
55,1 15.148
33.476 25,5
96,6 379,4
2009
HR
% with
HR Units
Export
% Export
Mio.€
Turn- over Mio.€
Year
general market values
market datas RLT (survey RLT)
turnover of association 400,4 Mio. €
additional turnovers 167,6 Mio. €
total 568,0 Mio. €
ratio RLT 70,5 %
(acc. Dissertation Dr. Beck 2000 University Kassel 70 %)
general market values
market datas RLT
possible Units (AHU) with heatrecovery 80,5 %
(Study Dr. Kaup 2009 UCB university of applied science Trier)
average overall ratio HR (RLT ∅ 08 bis 10) 44,5 %
Possible ratio HR 55,3 %
strong positiv development
2010 ratio 55,1 % in total or (possible units) 67,0 %
heatrecovery
Statistik Wärmerückgewinnung air flow rate distribution
Distribution of air flow rates AHU
0,00%
2,00%
4,00%
6,00%
8,00%
10,00%
12,00%
130.000 110.000 90.000 70.000 50.000 40.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 1.000 500
air flow rates in m³/h
Air flow rates as %
Manufacturer A Amnufacturer B
Statistik Wärmerückgewinnung air flow rate distribution
Average distribution of air flow rates AHU
0,00%
1,00%
2,00%
3,00%
4,00%
5,00%
6,00%
7,00%
8,00%
9,00%
10,00%
130.000 110.000 90.000 70.000 50.000 40.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 1.000 500
Air flow rates in m³/h
Air flow rates as %
Distribution of air flow rates AHU
y = 2E-06x4 - 0,0001x3 + 0,0028x2 - 0,0151x + 0,0201
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
80,00%
90,00%
100,00%
150.000 130.000 110.000 90.000 70.000 50.000 40.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 1.000
Air flow rates in m³/h
Distribution as %
Air flow rates (Distribution summ) Polynomic air flow distribution EnEV
= 7.500 m³/h
∅
Statistik Wärmerückgewinnung air flow rate distribution
heat energies
specific energy for heating (24 h/d) 31,33
kWh/(m³/h)/a(Disseration Dr. Beck 2000 University Kassel)
operating time (average) 2.350 h
(Disseration Dr. Beck 2000 University Kassel)
specific energy for heating at 2.350 h 8,4
kWh/(m³/h)/alifetime of the units 20,0 years
rated lifetime (base interest 2 %) 13,4 years
(1 % new units [38.000 in ´97 to 43.200 in ´09] + 1 % waste rate)
energy consumption of heating
energy consumption of heating
Distribution of energy for heating
y = 4E-09x6 - 5E-07x5 + 2E-05x4 - 0,0004x3 + 0,0031x2 - 0,002x + 0,0045
0,00%
1,00%
2,00%
3,00%
4,00%
5,00%
6,00%
7,00%
135.000 115.000 95.000 75.000 55.000 42.500 32.500 26.750 21.250 18.500 16.500 14.500 12.500 10.500 8.500 6.500 4.500 2.500 875
Air flow rates in m³/h
Distribution as %
Distribution of energy for heating Polynomic (Distribution of enery for heating)
Summ of energy for heating
y = 3E-07x5 - 3E-05x4 + 0,0009x3 - 0,0108x2 + 0,0061x + 0,9451
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
70,0%
80,0%
90,0%
100,0%
105.000 85.000 65.000 47.500 37.500 28.750 23.750 19.500 17.500 15.500 13.500 11.500 9.500 7.500 5.500 3.500 1.500
air flow rates in m³/h
Distribution as %
Distribution of energy for heating Polynomic (Distribution of energy for heating) EnEV
= 28.750 m³/h
∅
energy consumption of heating
energy saving potential in Germany 2010
AHU´s 53.043 units
airflow 2010 (without export) 562,5 Mio. m³/h
heat energy demand 4.724.806 MWh/a
HR-ratio 54,3 %
efficiency 67,2 %
HR potential 1.722.716 MWh/a
CO
2Saving 566.774 to/a
installed electric power 492.633 KW/a
AHU general market values
energy linked to the Gross domestic product
electroenergy demand in germany 492.633 kW/a
GDP Germany 3.667,5 Bil. $
value = 492.633 / 3.667,5 • GDP
AHU general market values
AHU electric power demand EU
7.384 0,3%
54,97 0,1%
493.300 Luxembourg
6.354 0,3%
47,30 0,7%
3.354.700 Lithuania
4.574 0,2%
34,05 0,5%
2.261.294 Latvia
310.810 12,6%
2.313,89 12,1%
60.245.846 Italy
36.715 1,5%
273,33 0,9%
4.239.848 Irland
359.193 14,5%
2.674,09 12,3%
61.113.205 Great Britain
48.027 1,9%
357,55 2,2%
11.141.740 Greece
384.935 15,6%
2.865,73 12,6%
62.793.432 France
36.802 1,5%
273,98 1,1%
5.326.314 Finland
3.120 0,1%
23,23 0,3%
1.342.000 Estonia
492.633 19,9%
3.667,51 16,4%
81.882.342 Germany
46.064 1,9%
342,93 1,1%
5.475.791 Denmark
6.983 0,3%
51,99 1,5%
7.606.551 Bulgaria
68.020 2,8%
506,39 2,1%
10.666.860 Belgium
kW/a Bil. $
demand GDP
population base 2008
AHU electric power demand EU
2.470.561 100,0%
18.392,61 100,0%
498.371.164 sum
3.150 0,1%
23,45 0,2%
950.000 Cyprus
20.992 0,8%
156,28 2,0%
10.020.000 Hungary
29.159 1,2%
217,08 2,1%
10.501.197 Czechia
216.499 8,8%
1.611,77 9,4%
46.661.950 Spain
7.339 0,3%
54,64 0,4%
2.019.614 Slovenia
12.814 0,5%
95,40 1,1%
5.455.407 Slowakia
65.086 2,6%
484,55 1,9%
9.269.986 Sweden
26.820 1,1%
199,67 4,3%
21.498.616 Romania
32.841 1,3%
244,49 2,1%
10.617.575 Portugal
70.619 2,9%
525,74 7,7%
38.153.389 Poland
55.787 2,3%
415,32 1,7%
8.376.761 Austria
116.719 4,7%
868,94 3,3%
16.493.156 Netherlands
1.120 0,0%
8,34 0,1%
410.290 Malta
kW/a Bil. $
demand GDP
population base 2008
AHU saving potential in europe 2011
electroenergy demand 77,80 TWh/a
base Lifetime 13,4 a and 2.350 h/a
CO
2equivalent 42,09 Mil.to/a
Base 541 g/kWh Mix.
saving potential 15,56 TWh/a
Base 20 % increase of efficiency
CO
2saving 8,42 Mil.to/a
AHU general market values EU
units linked to the gross domestic product
AHUs in germany 53.043 units
GDP Germany 3.667,5 Bil. $
value = 53.043 / 3.667,5 • GDP
link to population
value = 53.043 / 81.882.342 • P
AHU general market values
AHU market EU
795 0,3%
54,97 0,1%
493.300 Luxembourg
684 0,3%
47,30 0,7%
3.354.700 Lithuania
492 0,2%
34,05 0,5%
2.261.294 Latvia
33.466 12,6%
2.313,89 12,1%
60.245.846 Italy
3.953 1,5%
273,33 0,9%
4.239.848 Irland
38.675 14,5%
2.674,09 12,3%
61.113.205 Great Britain
5.171 1,9%
357,55 2,2%
11.141.740 Greece
41.447 15,6%
2.865,73 12,6%
62.793.432 France
3.963 1,5%
273,98 1,1%
5.326.314 Finland
336 0,1%
23,23 0,3%
1.342.000 Estonia
53.043 19,9%
3.667,51 16,4%
81.882.342 Germany
4.960 1,9%
342,93 1,1%
5.475.791 Denmark
752 0,3%
51,99 1,5%
7.606.551 Bulgaria
7.324 2,8%
506,39 2,1%
10.666.860 Belgium
Bil. $
units GDP
population base 2008
AHU market EU
266.011 100,0%
18.392,61 100,0%
498.371.164 sum
339 0,1%
23,45 0,2%
950.000 Cyprus
2.260 0,8%
156,28 2,0%
10.020.000 Hungary
3.140 1,2%
217,08 2,1%
10.501.197 Czechia
23.311 8,8%
1.611,77 9,4%
46.661.950 Spain
790 0,3%
54,64 0,4%
2.019.614 Slovenia
1.380 0,5%
95,40 1,1%
5.455.407 Slowakia
7.008 2,6%
484,55 1,9%
9.269.986 Sweden
2.888 1,1%
199,67 4,3%
21.498.616 Romania
3.536 1,3%
244,49 2,1%
10.617.575 Portugal
7.604 2,9%
525,74 7,7%
38.153.389 Poland
6.007 2,3%
415,32 1,7%
8.376.761 Austria
12.567 4,7%
868,94 3,3%
16.493.156 Netherlands
121 0,0%
8,34 0,1%
410.290 Malta
Bil. $
units GDP
population base 2008
AHU market 2011
number of production 266.011 units +34,8 % CHRV units 356.455 units
AHU´s + CHRV´s 320.000 units
base Lot 6 / Task 2
check (link to population) 322.843 Units (AHU)
435.192 Units (incl. CHRV)
AHU general market values EU
AHU market 2011
AHU general market values EU
source: Lot 6 / Task 2
energy linked to the gross domestic product
thermal energy saving in germany 1.722.716 MWh/a
GDP Germany 3.667,5 Bil $
average temp. in Germany 9,0 °C
heatrecovery use • efficiency 36,4 %
nominal supply temperature 21,0 °C
heatrecovery value (U) = 36,4 % / (21 – 9) • (21 – T) energy = 1.722.716 / 3.667,5 / 36,4 • U
• GDP / (21 – 9) • (21 – T)
AHU general market values
AHU heat consumption EU
25.821 70.817
9,0 36,4
54,97 Luxembourg
32.440 73.631
6,5 44,0
47,30 Lithuania
26.341 56.295
5,6 46,7
34,05 Latvia
318.896 1.614.684
14,5 19,7
2.313,89 Italy
107.883 322.784
10,0 33,4
273,33 Irland
1.055.459 3.157.913
10,0 33,4
2.674,09 Great Britain
10.497 115.157
18,0 9,1
357,55 Greece
934.792 3.076.569
11,0 30,3
2.865,73 France
228.791 470.620
5,0 48,5
273,98 Finland
20.630 41.150
4,5 50,1
23,23 Estonia
1.722.716 4.724.806
9,0 36,4
3.667,51 Germany
189.048 478.608
8,0 39,4
342,93 Denmark
18.697 58.606
10,5 31,9
51,99 Bulgaria
199.871 598.011
10,0 33,4
506,39 Belgium
MWh/a MWh/a
°C
% Bil. $
target 21°C
HR heat
average HR (U)
GDP base 2008
6.572.614 19.742.781
10,9 33,2
18.392,61 sum
0 0
21,0 0,0
23,45 Cyprus
65.094 189.589
9,7 34,3
156,28 Hungary
121.518 305.297
7,9 39,7
217,08 Czechia
84.121 692.141
17,0 12,1
1.611,77 Spain
21.176 63.939
10,1 33,1
54,64 Slovenia
61.868 144.411
6,9 42,8
95,40 Slowakia
288.062 702.269
7,5 41,0
484,55 Sweden
86.137 246.514
9,5 34,9
199,67 Romania
12.760 104.991
17,0 12,1
244,49 Portugal
385.863 846.630
6,0 45,5
525,74 Poland
179.167 512.758
9,5 34,9
415,32 Austria
374.857 1.0772.801
9,5 34,9
868,94 Netherlands
109 1.791
19,0 6,1
8,34 Malta
MWh/a MWh/a
°C
% Bil. $
target 21 °C
HR heat
average HR (U)
GDP base 2008
AHU heat consumption EU
AHU saving potential in europe 2011
heating demand 19.724.781MWh/a
heatrecovery 6.572.614MWh/a
CO
2saving 2.162.195 to/a
base 329 kg/MWh
electroenergy demand 2.470.561 KW/a
AHU general market values EU
AHU saving potential in europe 2011
heating demand during lifetime 264,55 TWh/a
base Lifetime 13,4 a and 2.350 h/a
heatrecovery 88,00 TWh/a
state of the art 2010
CO
2saving equivalent 28,98 Mil.to/a
base 329 kg/MWh
average heatrecovery 53,28 TWh/a
0,58 average efficiency and 47 % use
max. potential heatrecovery 146,62 TWh/a
base 0,75 efficiency and 81 % balanced units
AHU general market values EU
energy linked to the gross domestic product
colth energy saving in germany 111.273 MWh/a
GDP Germany 3.667,5 Bil. $
average temp. in Germany 9,0 °C
nominal ODA temperature for cooling 25,0 °C cooling factor relativ to germany f = (25 – 9) / (25 – T)
energy demand = 111.273 / 3.667,5 • GDP • f
(sensible capacity without dehumification)
energy recovery = energy • U
AHU general market values EU
AHU colth consumption EU
1.668 4.582
1,00 36,4
54,97 Luxembourg
1.500 3.410
0,86 44,0
47,30 Lithuania
1.093 2.341
0,82 46,7
34,05 Latvia
57.946 293.893
1,52 19,7
2.313,89 Italy
8.109 24.301
1,07 33,4
273,33 Irland
79.329 237.750
1,07 33,4
2.674,09 Great Britain
6.199 68.120
2,29 9,1
357,55 Greece
82.806 272.988
1,14 30,3
2.865,73 France
8.867 18.269
0,80 48,5
273,98 Finland
756 1.511
0,78 50,1
23,23 Estonia
111.273 305.694
36,4 1,00 3.667,51
Germany
10.609 26.902
0,94 39,4
342,93 Denmark
1.523 4.782
1,10 31,9
51,99 Bulgaria
15.023 45.022
1,07 33,4
506,39 Belgium
MWh/a MWh/a
factor
% Bil. $
target 16 °C / 25 °C
HR colth
colling HR (U)
GDP base 2008
516.828 1.872.662
33,2 18.392,61
sum
0 7.818
4,00 0,0
23,45 Cyprus
4.669 13.622
1,05 34,3
156,28 Hungary
6.727 16.930
0,94 39,7
217,08 Czechia
32.601 268.688
2,00 12,1
1.611,77 Spain
1.617 4.891
1,07 33,1
54,64 Slovenia
3.006 7.029
0,88 42,8
95,40 Slowakia
15.121 36.926
0,91 41,0
484,55 Sweden
5.993 17.180
1,03 34,9
199,67 Romania
4.945 40.757
2,00 12,1
244,49 Portugal
16.791 36.902
0,84 45,5
525,74 Poland
12.465 35.734
1,03 34,9
415,32 Austria
26.080 74.764
1,03 34,9
868,94 Netherlands
112 1.854
2,67 6,1
8,34 Malta
MWh/a MWh/a
factor
% Bil. $
target 16 °C / 25 °C
HR colth
cooling HR (U)
GDP base 2008
AHU heat consumption EU
AHU electric power demand EU+
7.372 1,4%
54,88 3,4%
10.829.175 Serbia-Montenegro
66.168 13,0%
492,60 2,4%
7.701.900 Swiss
159 0,0%
1,18 0,0%
31.538 San Marino
225.206 44,1%
1.676,59 44,4%
142.400.000 Russia
61.282 12,0%
456,23 1,5%
4.825.500 Norway
822 0,2%
6,12 1,4%
4.455.421 Moldava
1.285 0,3%
9,57 0,6%
2.063.122 Macedonia
9.313 1,8%
69,33 1,4%
4.489.409 Croatia
2.958 0,6%
22,02 1,5%
4.693.892 Georgia
2.481 0,5%
18,47 1,4%
4.552.000 Bosnia-Herzegovina
8.098 1,6%
60,29 3,0%
9.489.000 Belarus
470 0,1%
3,50 0,0%
83.888 Andorra
1.741 0,3%
12,96 1,0%
3.170.048 Albania
kW/a Bil. $
demand GDP
population base 2008
AHU electric power demand EU+
510.632 sum
662 0,1%
4,93 0,0%
35.789 Lichtenstein
493 0,1%
3,67 0,0%
32.796 Monaco
24.142 4,7%
179,73 14,3%
45.994.247 Ukraine
97.981 19,2%
729,44 23,7%
75.863.600 Turkey
kW/a Bil. $
demand GDP
population base 2008
AHU heat consumption EU+
456,23 6,12
17.902 58.918
11,0 30,3
54,88 Serbia-Montenegro
267.395 682.206
8,1 39,1
492,60 Swiss
163 823
14,5 19,7
1,18 San-Marino
1.330.932 2.807.908
5,4 47,3
1.676,59 Russia
334.847 734.694
6,0 45,5
Norway
3.220 8.344
8,3 38,5
Moldava
3.777 11.301
10,0 33,4
9,57 Macedonia
22.615 74.431
11,0 30,3
69,33 Croatia
4.713 19.148
12,9 24,6
22,02 Georgia
4.880 17.846
12,0 27,3
18,47 Bosnia-Herzegovina
47.860 100.972
5,4 47,3
60,29 Belarus
1.381 4.133
10,0 33,4
3,50 Andorra
1.057 6.957
16,0 15,2
12,96 Albania
MWh/a MWh/a
°C
% Bil. $
HR heat
average use
GDP base 2008
2.258.142 5.314.100
8,5 42,5
3.801,51 sum
1.706 5.451
10,7 31,2
4,93 Lichtenstein
253 1.812
16,4 14,0
3,67 Monaco
114.910 270.134
7,0 42,5
179,73 Ukraine
100.530 509.019
14,5 19,7
729,44 Turkey
MWh/a MWh/a
°C
% Bil. $
HR heat
average use
GDP base 2008
AHU Heat consumption EU+
for your Attention
Thank you
Study of energy efficiency in air handling units
Heat recovery and electric power efficiencies in AHU ´ s Dr.-Ing. Christoph Kaup
c.kaup@umwelt-campus.de
LCC influence - location
LCC Total in €
0 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 250.000 300.000
Berlin Munich Hamburg Frankfurt
LCC influence - location
LCC heating in €
0 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000 70.000 80.000 90.000 100.000
Berlin Munich Hamburg Frankfurt
LCC influence - conditions
18 / 16 °C
High cooling demand 20 / 26 °C
Higher load 5
22 / 20 °C
High heat demand 18 / 24 °C
Lower load 4
20 / 18 °C
Lower heat demand 20 / 26 °C
Higher load 3
21 / 19 °C
Higher heat demand 18 / 24 °C
Lower load 2
21 / 19 °C
Higher heat demand 20 / 26 °C
Higher load 1
supply air conditions
winter/summer extract air
conditions
winter/summer calculation
variant
LCC influence - conditions
LCC heating in €
0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000 120.000 140.000 160.000
21/19 21/19 20/18 22/20 18/16
20/26 18/24 20/26 18/24 20/26
target values / exhaust conditions (winter/summer)
LCC influence - conditions
LCC cooling in €
0 5.000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000
21/19 21/19 20/18 22/20 18/16
20/26 18/24 20/26 18/24 20/26
target values / exhaust conditions (winter/summer)
LCC influence - conditions
LCC Total in €
0 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 250.000 300.000 350.000
21/19 21/19 20/18 22/20 18/16
20/26 18/24 20/26 18/24 20/26
target values / exhaust conditions (winter/summer)