• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1Division into subgroups of endometriosis patients.SubgroupEndometriosis locationPeritonealEndometriomaDIEAdenomyosis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1Division into subgroups of endometriosis patients.SubgroupEndometriosis locationPeritonealEndometriomaDIEAdenomyosis"

Copied!
6
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1

Division into subgroups of endometriosis patients.

Subgroup

Endometriosis location

Peritoneal Endometrioma DIE Adenomyosis

1 Yes Yes Yes Yes

2 Yes Yes Yes No

3 Yes Yes No Yes

4 Yes Yes No No

5 Yes No Yes Yes

6 Yes No Yes No

7 Yes No No Yes

8 Yes No No No

9 No Yes Yes Yes

10 No Yes Yes No

11 No Yes No Yes

12 No Yes No No

13 No No Yes Yes

14 No No Yes No

15 No No No Yes

16 No No No No

To build subgroups, all possible combinations of endometriosis locations (peritoneal, yes/no; ovarian endometriosis, yes/no; deeply infiltrating endometriosis, yes/no; adenomyosis, yes/no) were used.

DIE, deeply infiltrating endometriosis.

(2)

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1 Flow chart of patients included.

Of the 1576 patients enrolled in whom endometriosis was diagnosed at surgery, 356 had missing data or an imprecise surgical diagnosis and were excluded. A further 144 patients were excluded because information about the type and location of the endometriosis was missing.

(3)

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2

Area-proportional Venn diagram of the groups.*

The Figure shows the distribution of all 1076 patients according to the four criteria (peritoneal endometriosis, endometrioma, deep infiltrating endometriosis, adenomyosis).

* Due to mathematical reasons (more degrees of freedom are needed) the overlap between more than two circles cannot always correspond exactly with the number of IDs it represents.

DIE, deeply infiltrating endometriosis.

(4)

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 3 Age at first diagnosis.

The analysis included all enrolled patients. The mean age at first diagnosis in years and the 95 % CI for each of the five groups (1, peritoneal endometriosis only; 2, peritoneal endometriosis and

adenomyosis; 3, adenomyosis only; 4, peritoneal and DIE-dominant; and 5, endometrioma-dominant) is shown.

(5)

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 4 Pregnancies at first presentation.

The analysis included all patients with known pregnancy and birth rates. The diagram shows the percentage distribution of the pregnancy rates within the five groups (1, peritoneal endometriosis only; 2, peritoneal endometriosis and adenomyosis; 3, adenomyosis only; 4, peritoneal and DIE- dominant; and 5, endometrioma-dominant). The pregnancy rates were grouped into three categories (≥ 2 pregnancies, 1 pregnancy, without pregnancy).

(6)

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 5 Live births at first presentation.

The analysis included all patients with known pregnancy and birth rates. The diagram shows the percentage distribution of the live birth rates within the five groups (1, peritoneal endometriosis only;

2, peritoneal endometriosis and adenomyosis; 3, adenomyosis only; 4, peritoneal and DIE-dominant;

and 5, endometrioma-dominant). The live birth rates were grouped into three categories (≥ 2 live births, 1 live birth, without live birth).

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Total patients in RISE represents patients in RISE, aged 18 years and older, at least 2 visits with >= 30 days apart during the study period with

Variables included in the raw (Univariate) model and variables in the adjusted model (Multivariate).. HR:

Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer development, especially clear cell and endome- trioid carcinoma.. Although clear cell and endometrioid

Since no single genetic abnormality can predict the development of endometriosis in all exposed daughters, DES was prob- ably the major risk factor for the endometriosis present in

Some studies have investigated the relationship between patient characteristics and endometriosis [12], but no attempts have previously been made to correlate patient

Patients were included if they were 18–45 years old at the time of surgery; had a laparoscopic diagnosis of DE with a histopathological exam- ination; had undergone a

Gastrointestinal Injuries from Magnet Ingestion in Children --- United States, 2003—2006 Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.. Strickland M, Rosenfield D,

V.] (DGGG) Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics [Österreichische Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe] (ÖGGG) German Society for Gynecological Endocrinology