• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Supplementary Table S1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Supplementary Table S1"

Copied!
18
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Table S1. Baseline characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis for the overall population, according to treatment.

Abatacept csDMARDs Total

Overall (n=114) Overall (n=88) (n=202)

Age (years) 65.6±13.7 64.1±13.5 64.9±13.6

Female sex 91 (79.8) 76 (86.4) 167 (82.7)

Disease duration (years) 8.6±10.6 7.5±9.2 8.1±10.0

Steinbrocker Stage / / / Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 33/33/28/20 41/24/16/7 * 74/57/44/27 Steinbrocker Class / / / Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 19/79/15/1 56/27/5/0 * 75/106/20/1

Swollen joint count 6.0±4.3 3.7±2.6 * 5.0±3.8

Tender joint count 5.9±4.8 2.3±3.1 * 4.3±4.5

CRP level (mg/dL) 1.9±2.8 0.5±0.9 * 1.3±2.3

ESR (mm/h) 41.7±29.2 21.9±17.3 * 33.1±26.6

Patient’s global VAS score (mm) 50.7±24.4 34.3±25.4 * 43.6±26.1 Physician’s global VAS score (mm) 46.2±19.9 29.6±14.4 * 39.0±19.5

DAS28-ESR 5.0±1.2 3.6±1.1 * 4.4±1.3

DAS28-CRP 4.4±1.2 3.0±0.9 * 3.8±1.2

SDAI 23.5±11.1 12.8±6.9 * 18.8±10.9

CDAI 21.6±10.1 12.3±6.6 * 17.5±9.9

HAQ score 0.8±0.7 0.4±0.7 * 0.7±0.7

RF-positive 97 (85.1) 63 (71.6) * 160 (79.2)

Anti-CCP-positive 96 (84.2) 65 (73.9) 161 (79.7)

Interstitial pneumonia 15 (13.2) 6 (6.8) 21 (10.4)

Steroid use 52 (45.6) 27 (30.7) * 79 (39.1)

Prednisolone (mg) 5.5±4.2 3.9±1.4 * 4.9±3.5

MTX use 75 (65.8) 51 (57.8) 126 (62.4)

Salazosulfapyridine 26 (22.8) 12 (13.6) 38 (18.8)

Bucillamine 10 (8.8) 20 (22.7) * 30 (14.9)

Tacrolimus 15 (13.2) 5 (5.7) 20 (9.9)

Iguratimod 12 (10.5) 3 (3.4) 15 (7.4)

Mizoribine 1 (0.9) 0 (0) 1 (0.5)

Additional treatment initiated during this study

Abatacept 114 (100) -

1 2 3 4 5

(2)

MTX - 20 (22.7)

Salazosulfapyridine - 9 (10.2)

Bucillamine - 21 (23.9)

Tacrolimus - 7 (8.0)

Iguratimod - 28 (31.8)

Leflunomide - 3 (3.4)

Results are shown as mean  standard deviation or n (%). Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. * p<0.05, abatacept vs csDMARDs

Abbreviations: CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CRP, C-reactive protein; csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28, disease activity score in 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; MTX, methotrexate; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index; VAS, visual analog scale

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(3)

Supplementary Table S2. Detailed efficacy results for the abatacept and csDMARDs overall groups.

Abatacept csDMARDs OR (95% CI)

p-value Overall (n=114) Overall (n=88)

Week 12

Proportion of patients with good

EULAR response (%) 31.6 22.7 1.569 (0.831–

2.964) 0.2168

Proportion of patients with good or

moderate EULAR response (%) 71.1 47.7 2.688 (1.502–

4.811) 0.0013

Change in DAS28-ESR from

baseline −1.565±1.325 −0.600±0.876 <0.0001

Change in SDAI from baseline −12.826±11.232 −4.018±5.356 <0.0001

Change in DAS28-CRP from

baseline −1.520±1.263 −0.537±0.821 <0.0001

Change in CDAI from baseline −11.729±10.473 −3.882±5.350 <0.0001

Week 24

Proportion of patients with good

EULAR response (%) 38.6 23.9 2.005 (1.081–

3.722) 0.0384

Proportion of patients with good or

moderate EULAR response (%) 81.6 43.2 5.827 (3.091–

10.987) <0.0001 Change in DAS28-ESR from

baseline −1.808±1.319 −0.674±1.002 <0.0001

Change in SDAI from baseline −14.520±11.930 −4.669±6.769 <0.0001

Change in DAS28-CRP from

baseline −1.784±1.287 −0.633±0.920 <0.0001

Change in CDAI from baseline −13.195±10.995 −4.479±6.480 <0.0001

Overall change in steroid dose

(mg/day) −1.332±3.081 −0.173±0.373 0.0123

Results are shown as mean  standard deviation unless otherwise stated. Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables.

Abbreviations: CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28, disease activity score in 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index 1

2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(4)

1

(5)

Supplementary Table S3. Baseline characteristics of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis after propensity-score matching to compare between AY and CY, and AO and CO.

AY; n=25 CY; n=25 p-value AO; n=31 CO; n=31 p-value

Age (years) 54.3±9.6 51.7±8.8 0.3222 74.4±6.1 74.5±5.8 0.9157

Female sex 22 (88.0) 22 (88.0) 1.0000 24 (77.4) 27 (87.1) 0.5061

Disease duration (years) 8.0±10.8 6.4±7.7 0.5340 9.0±9.5 9.3±11.3 0.8901

Steinbrocker Stage / / / Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 6/10/4/5 14/7/2/2 0.1282 10/8/7/6 11/9/8/3 0.7595

Steinbrocker Class / / / Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 5/18/2/0 15/9/1/0 Not calculable

7/18/5/1 15/12/4/0 0.1564

Swollen joint count 4.3±2.9 4.1±3.1 0.8140 4.5±4.4 4.0±3.0 0.5932

Tender joint count 2.9±2.6 2.8±3.1 0.9213 4.4±4.3 3.1±4.1 0.2326

CRP level (mg/dL) 0.5±0.8 0.5±0.5 0.9559 0.9±1.0 0.9±1.3 0.9779

ESR (mm/h) 20.3±13.7 20.1±16.8 0.9707 30.5±20.5 31.7±19.4 0.8113

Patient's global VAS score (mm) 37.5±22.9 35.3±21.4 0.7273 44.2±26.3 42.2±28.6 0.7688

Physician's global VAS score (mm) 32.1±15.0 35.2±15.7 0.4880 36.2±17.1 33.8±14.3 0.5446

DAS28-ESR 3.9±0.7 3.7±0.9 0.4125 4.4±1.2 4.2±1.1 0.4708

DAS28-CRP 3.3+0.7 3.2±0.8 0.7199 3.8±1.1 3.5±1.0 0.2335

SDAI 14.6±5.0 14.4±5.8 0.8933 17.8±9.6 15.6±8.3 0.3249

CDAI 14.2±5.0 14.0±5.7 0.8980 16.9±9.3 14.7±8.1 0.3105

HAQ score 0.5±0.6 0.3±0.5 0.2167 0.8±0.8 0.8±0.9 0.8422

RF positive 20 (80.0) 20 (80.0) 1.0000 25 (80.6) 23 (74.2) 0.7613

anti-CCP antibody positive 21 (84.0) 22 (88.0) 1.0000 25 (80.6) 24 (77.4) 1.0000

1 2 3

(6)

steroid use 8 (32.0) 6 (24.0) 0.7528 14 (45.2) 11 (35.5) 0.6046

prednisolone (mg) 5.2±3.3 3.3±2.0 0.2114 6.6±6.2 4.2±1.4 0.1957

MTX use 20 (80.0) 19 (76.0) 1.0000 20 (64.5) 18 (58.1) 0.7943

Results are shown as mean  standard deviation or n (%). Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables.

AO, older patients receiving abatacept; AY, younger patients receiving abatacept; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index;

CO, older patients receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; CRP, C-reactive protein; CY, younger patients receiving conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28, disease activity score in 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; MTX, methotrexate; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index; VAS, visual analog scale

1 2 3 4 5 67

(7)

1

(8)

Supplementary Table S4. Baseline characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis for the overall population after propensity-score matching to compare abatacept and csDMARDs.

Abatacept Overall (n=58)

csDMARDs Overall (n=58)

p value

Age (years) 63.5±12.7 65.7±13.2 0.3618

Female sex 49 (84.5) 51 (87.9) 0.7877

Disease duration (years) 8.2±9.5 7.5±9.3 0.6892

Steinbrocker Stage / / /Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 20/16/12/10 26/14/13/5 0.4535

Steinbrocker Class / / /Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 13/40/4/1 31/23/4/0 0.0047

Swollen joint count 3.9±3.3 4.1±2.8 0.7387

Tender joint count 3.4±2.9 2.8±3.6 0.3681

CRP level (mg/dL) 0.7±1.2 0.7±1.0 0.7782

ESR (mm/h) 25.9±17.8 25.7±19.2 0.9453

Patient's global VAS score (mm) 40.9±23.6 39.9±25.9 0.8198

physician's global VAS score (mm) 33.8±15.3 33.4±14.9 0.8733

DAS28-ESR 4.1±0.9 3.9±1.1 0.3528

DAS28-CRP 3.5±0.8 3.4±0.9 0.3028

SDAI 15.6±5.9 15.0±7.1 0.6406

CDAI 14.8±6.0 14.3±6.9 0.6699

HAQ score 0.6±0.6 0.6±0.8 0.8444

RF positive 44 (75.9) 43 (74.1) 1.0000

anti-CCP antibody positive 46 (79.3) 46 (79.3) 1.0000

steroid use 21 (36.2) 23 (39.7) 0.8482

prednisolone (mg) 5.5±5.3 3.7±1.5 0.1654

MTX use 44 (75.9) 39 (67.2) 0.4104

Results are shown as mean  standard deviation or n (%). Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables.

CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CRP, C-reactive protein;

DAS28, disease activity score in 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; MTX, methotrexate; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index; VAS, visual analog scale

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(9)

Supplementary Table S5. Baseline characteristics of AO and AY groups adjusted after propensity- score matching.

AY; n=38 AO; n=38 p-value

Age (years) 52.2±10.4 74.2±5.7 <0.0001

Female sex 29 (76.3) 26 (68.4) 0.6079

Disease duration (years) 6.7±8.6 5.8±6.1 0.6245

Steinbrocker Stage / / / Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 14/12/7/5 13/11/8/6 0.9712 Steinbrocker Class / / / Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 7/28/3/0 9/28/1/0 NaN

Swollen joint count 5.4±3.3 5.8±5.4 0.6995

Tender joint count 5.4±4.3 4.6±4.3 0.3940

CRP level (mg/dL) 1.7±3.5 1.7±2.3 0.9997

ESR (mm/h) 33.2±29.3 37.7±24.8 0.4778

Patient's global VAS score(mm) 50.1±25.0 46.5±22.6 0.5141 Physician's global VAS score

(mm)

43.7±21.2 42.4±18.7 0.7663

DAS28-ESR 4.7±1.1 4.6±1.3 0.7080

DAS28-CRP 4.1±1.1 4.1±1.1 0.7481

SDAI 22.0±10.2 21.0±11.5 0.7074

CDAI 20.2±9.0 19.3±10.7 0.6796

HAQ score 0.7±0.6 0.7±0.5 0.9801

RF positive 30 (78.9) 30 (78.9) 1.0000

anti-CCP antibody positive 32 (84.2) 31 (81.6) 1.0000

steroid use 14 (36.8) 13 (34.2) 1.0000

prednisolone (mg) 5.3±4.0 5.7±6.1 0.8417

MTX use 29 (76.3) 31 (81.6) 0.7784

Results are shown as mean  standard deviation or n (%). Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables. The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables.

AO, older patients receiving abatacept; AY, younger patients receiving abatacept; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS28, disease activity score in 28 joints; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ, Health Assessment Questionnaire; MTX, methotrexate; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index;

VAS, visual analog scale 1

2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(10)
(11)

Supplementary Figure S1. Changes in absolute number of DAS28-ESR and SDAI.

Error bars represent standard deviations.

Abbreviations: csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28- ESR, disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index

1 2 3 4 5

(12)

1

2

(13)

Supplementary Figure S3. Proportions of EULAR responses at week 24 (a) and changes in DAS28-ESR (b) and SDAI (c) from baseline at week 24 during treatment of older and younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis after propensity-score matching. Proportions of patients with a EULAR good response vs those with a EULAR moderate or no response were compared using the chi-squared test. Error bars represent standard deviations. Comparisons 12

3 4 5

(14)

between groups were performed using Student’s t-test.

Abbreviations: DAS28-ESR, disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism;

SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index 1

2 3 4

(15)

Supplementary Figure S4. Proportions of EULAR responses at week 24 (a) and changes in DAS28-ESR (b) and SDAI (c) from baseline at week 24 during treatment of overall patients with rheumatoid arthritis after propensity-score matching. Proportions of patients with a EULAR good response vs those with a EULAR moderate or no response were compared using the chi-squared test. Error bars represent standard deviations. Comparisons between groups were performed using Student’s t-test.

Abbreviations: csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28-ESR, disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index

12 3 4 5 6 7 8

(16)

Supplementary Figure S5. Proportions of EULAR responses at week 24 (a) and changes in DAS28-ESR (b) and SDAI (c) from baseline at week 24 12

3

(17)

Supplementary Figure S6. Proportions of EULAR responses at week 12 and 24 (a) and changes in DAS28-ESR (b) and SDAI (c) from baseline at weeks 12 and 24 during treatment of A-EO and A-YO groups. Proportions of patients with a EULAR good response vs those with a EULAR moderate or no response were compared using the chi-squared test. Error bars represent standard deviations. Comparisons between groups were performed using Student’s t-test.

Abbreviations: A-EO, elderly-onset patients receiving abatacept; A-YO, young-onset patients receiving abatacept; DAS28-ESR, disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index

12 3 4 5 6 7 8

(18)

1

(19)

Abbreviations: csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28-ESR, disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index

1 2

(20)

Appendix List of collaborators

ABT-ATS study group: Z. Yamada, S. Masuoka, S. Mizutani, S. Yamada, M. Kawazoe, H. Sato, M.

Kaburaki, S. Muraoka, K. Kaneko, T. Nanki, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine (Omori), Tokyo, Japan; W. Hirose, Hirose Clinic of Rheumatology, Saitama, Japan; Y. Kimura, K. Asako, H. Kikuchi, H. Kono, Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; K. Nishimura, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; N. Abe, S. Tanimura, S.

Yasuda, T. Atsumi, Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan; Y. Komano, Department of Rheumatology, Jujo Takeda Rehabilitation Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; H. Kawano, J.

Kishi, Y. Nishioka, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan; T Hidaka, Insutitute of Rheumatology, Zenjinkai Miyazaki-Zenjinkai Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan; S. Nakashima, Y.

Takeuchi, H. Dobashi, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan; T Kasama, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; D. Kanai, A. Ihata, Department of Rheumatology, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan; M. Inoo, Utazu Hospital, Ayauta-gun, Kagawa, Japan; K. Suemori, H. Hasegawa, Department of Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan; T. Okano, M. Tada, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; S. Tsuboi, Department of Rheumatology, Shizuoka Kosei Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan; K. Kubo, T. Sugihara, Department of Medicine and Rheumatology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; S. Tsunoda, H.

Sano, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; R. Yoshimi, Department of Stem Cell and Immune Regulation, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan; Y. Shimizu, S. Fukaya, T. Odani, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan; K. Amano, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan; Y. Inoue, H. Kameda, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine (Ohashi), Tokyo, Japan; T. Nagai, Department of Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan (Currently, T. Nagai, Department of Rheumatology, Minaminagano Medical Center Shinonoi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan) ; K. Ohmura, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; S. Hirata, Department of Clinical Rheumatology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan; K. Takagi, Department of Rheumatology, Sainokuni Higashi Omiya Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Y. Inoue, K. Nakano, K. Saito, Y. Tanaka, The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan; Y. Takahashi, Yu-Family Clinic, Miyagi, Japan; Y. Okano, Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease, Kawasaki Municipal Kawasaki Hospital, kanagawa, Japan; N. Hagino, Department of Rheumatology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan; T. Sawada, Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; T. Tsuru, PS Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan; H. Hagiyama, Department of Rheumatology, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

False positive category of symptoms that did not correlate with enzyme elevation includes cases where there was no temporal association as well as cases that were confounded by

SCLC, small cell lung cancer; LND, lymph node dissected; LNM, lymph node metastasis; NO*, no lymph node dissected.. Supplementary

Kaplan-Meier plot demonstrating 6-month all-cause mortality by timing of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing and outpatient/inpatient status at the time of HIV diagnosis among people

FTO CCAGAACCTGAGGAGAGAATGG CGATGTCTGTGAGGTCAAACGG ALKBH5 CCAGCTATGCTTCAGATCGCCT GGTTCTCTTCCTTGTCCATCTCC ALPL GCTGTAAGGACATCGCCTACCA CCTGGCTTTCTCGTCACTCTCA RUNX2

For IAS: This scenario that is characterized by a preference of regional political solutions, reduced levels of international trade, severe climate and land use changes combined with

Supplementary

Frequency of distinct types of imaging tests performed during the first year after the first visit to the pediatric rheumatologist in patients with a complete year of observation

Table S1 Test of autoregressive correlations for the different traits using a linear mixed model with an effect of provenance, block and provenance by block interaction and using