• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

A Brief Overview of Demographic, Geographic, and Energy Characteristics of the German Democratic Republic, Rhone-Alpes, and Wisconsin

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "A Brief Overview of Demographic, Geographic, and Energy Characteristics of the German Democratic Republic, Rhone-Alpes, and Wisconsin"

Copied!
31
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF DEMOGRAPHIC, GEOGRAPHIC, AND ENERGY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GERMAN

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, RHbNE-ALPES, AND WISCONSIN

A. Holzl W.K. Foell

June 1975 WP-75-65

Working Papers are not intended for distribution outside of IIASA, and are solely for discussion and infor- mation purposes. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of IIASA.

(2)
(3)

This paper is one of a series describing a multidisciplinary IIASA research program on Integrated Energy System Modelling

and Policy Analysis. The initial phase of this research program is focused on the energy systems of three regions: the State of Wisconsin in the U.S.A.; the German Democratic Republic; and the Rhone-Alpes Region in France. The primary purposes of the study are at least three-fold:

(1) To identify existing patterns of regional energy use and supply at appropriate levels of disaggregation.

(2) To compare alternative methodologies for regional energy forecasting, planning, and policy development.

(3) To use the above methodologies to examine alternate energy policy strategies for each of the regions, to explore their implications from various perspectives using sets of indicators related to environmental impacts, energy use efficiency, etc., and to evaluate the adequacy of the alternative methodologies as

policy tools.

Out of these above three items should evolve improved methodologies for energy systems research and policy analysis.

The comparative method, intersecting the different disciplines and nations which would be involved in this project, should serve as a powerful tool to the mutual benefit to the partici- pating nations as well as to other countries facing similar

energy problems. It could also serve as a prototype for similar studies on other resources such as materials, water, air, i.e.

as a vehicle for development of an approach for improved resource management.

W.K. Foell

(4)

(1) Foell, W.K. "Integrated Energy System Modelling and

Policy Analysis: A Description of an IIASA Research Program"

IIASA Working Paper WP-75-38, April 1975.

(2) Dennis, R.L. and Ito, K. "An Initial Framework for Describing Regional Pollution Emissions in the IIASA Integrated Energy System Research Program" IIASA Working Paper WP-75-6l, June 1975.

(3) Weingart, Jerome, "preliminary Data Requirements lor a Feasibility Study of the Solar Option in the Rhone-Alpes Region of France" IIASA Working Paper, June 1975.

(4) Holzl, A. and Foell, W.K. "A Brief Overview of Demographic, Geographic, and Energy Characteristics of the German

Democratic Republic,Rh$ne-Alpes, and Wisconsin" IIASA Working Paper, June 1975.

(5)

Table of Contents I. Introduction

II. Some Demographic and Geographic Characteristics A. German Democratic Republic (GDR)

1. Map of GDR

2. Map with Administrative Regions ("Bezirkell , "Kreisell)

3. Table of Regional Population Density

4. Map with Regional Population Distribution

"

B. Rhone-Alpes

1. Map of Regions in France

2. Map of Urban Regions within Administrative Regions of

"

Rhone-Alpes C. Wisconsin

1. Map of Wisconsin and Surrounding States 2. Map of Wisconsin Counties

3. Table of Regional Population Density

III. Comparison of GDR, Rh~ne-Alpes and Wisconsin A. Demography

l. Table of Land Area and Population 2. Table of Population Growth

3. Graph of Population Growth

4. Cities and Towns by Population Categories B. Transportation Systems

1. Table of Railway, Road and Waterway Mileage 2. Motor Vehicle Registration

3. Freight and Mass Transport IV. Energy Use

A. Table of Total Use by Sector 1972

(6)

- Rhone-AlpesA

- Wisconsin

B. Table of Total Use by Source 1972

- GDR

- Rh8ne-Alpes - Wisconsin

(7)

I. Introduction

One of the primary objectives of the Integrated Energy System Modelling and Policy Analysis Research Program at IIASA is to identify usage and supply patterns in each of the three regions under study. This paper is a first step in that direc- tion. It provides an initial overview of some of the important demographic, geographic and energy characteristics of the German Democratic Republic, the Rh~ne-Alpes region of France, and The State of Wisconsin in the U.S.A. The data are meant to reveal some similarities and differences among the three regions as well as to provide a foundation for assessing modelling techniques which will be used in this research program

and to formulate the policy questions which will form a corner- stone of the comparative approach.

The data listed here represent only a small fraction of that available from the region. The disaggregation of the data presented here is not meant to imply that i t will be used directly in the models or information systems under development for this project. Rather i t gives an indication of the overall characteristics of the energy systems in each of the three

regions and to a lesser degree gives the reader an idea of the types of data readily available.

Most of the data given in this paper is presented in graphical or tabular form with only a minimum of explanation.

In general the data are presented according to each of the respective regions and then in some cases, compared across the regions. The data were collected from several primary sources

(8)

for each of the regions. The most important of these sources were:

GDR - StatistLsches Jahrbuch 1974 der DDR

Rh~ne-Alpes - Annuaire Rhbne-Alpes 1974

Wisconsin - 1974 Survey of Energy Use in Wisconsin The data given in this paper have not been checked nor verified by scientists from each of the respective regions, and therefore may contain some errors. They are presented here as a starting poi.nt for further discussion and comparison, and as the focus of the research project continues to evolve

and sharpen, i t is expected that this report will be considerably supplemented. A second paper is under preparation which con- tains considerably more detail on transportation use and in- dustrial use of energy.

(9)

-3-

II. Some Demographic and Geographic Charac"Lel.l.~jtic::,

A. German Democratic Republic (GDR) 1. Geographic Location Map of GDR

DEUTSCHE DEMOKRATISCHE REPUBLIK

r--'----~---~<--- Verkehr

---_._._~---..

B R

B D

s s

m

z

1.-. ."._.,_.,, --1

~r::h,ff1)"rl:t:1ul1str'acke

,t g,'ehd!!c/'

~ ~,.-t"'.utler'Jdngspur,kl EJsenbahn81recke mil

If'\lernetJonalem Persone"verilehr Schnell- u EillUgverkehr Fl!lhrhnl.

Autobahn Femverteehr"ls,treBe Tr&flI!uUtlef\e

+

mlernatJOnalc Fluglin1e Inlandnuglinle Flughafen

,-,.Q.C/IU tll.nch YVdrlhl:l

"'JLnill<.

Grenzubergitngspl.lnkl mit Verlo:ehrs·

beSLhrankung entsprtlchend den geselzhchenBe~tJmmungendel' DOR

Grenluberyany1m

EI!>enbdhnpersonell~~'"eh, EI',enbehnguLer'We rk ai'll' St, aAenverkehr Sch,ffs'lerkehi

o 20 ~o 60km

L _ _~'_ _~'_~

- "t - 'Staalsgrenze

BttllrKr.gr!"r)l1!!' tr1urt BezlrKr.heuptsladt

(10)

2. The Administrative Regions of the GDR

Bezirke und Kreise der Oeutschen Dernokratischen Republik

Stand 1 Jan\lar 1914

Sraatsgrenze 8szlrksgrenze Kreisgrenze

~ St8dUcreiS

Bezirke:

1Berlin 2COlt/xls

3Dresden

4ENurt

5Frankfurt

6Ger4

7 H.,1e

8KBrf-M8rx-SUldl

9LeipZJ9

1 0MBgdeoorg 11Neubrondenburg

12Potsdam

13Rostock

14Schwenn

15SuM

1: 3 000onl] '_. J.,.~_._ • Ico. I1J

'--

(11)

-5-

3. GDR Regional Population Density

Area 1973 Population Density

"Bezirk" (kIn2) (persons) (persons/km 2 )

Berlin 403 1,088,827 2,702

Cottbus 8,262 870,748 105

Dresden 6,738 1,859,255 275

Erfurt 7,349 1,252,285 170

Frankfurt 7,185 687,771 96

Gera 1,004 7,404,470 185

Halle 8,771 1.908,143 217

Karl-Marx-Stadt 6,009 2,016,422 334

Leipzig 4,966 1,471,818 295

Magdeburg 1l,5:!S J ,308,165 113

Neubrandenburg 10,792 612,903 59

Potsdam 12,r)'j/~ 1f 129 753 90

Rostock "/,014 865,831 122

Schwerin

n,

(j'l'2 ~:'95,062 69

-~-"._'._-'---.".. ~.-. ~ ..'--'-~'-.- -'---'--~'._-- - - -

108,178 1,6,979,620 151

Source: Statistisch(-~s ,Jahrbuch 1914 der DDR, Staatsverlag del' Deutscllen lJertlukral-iscllen Republik, Berlin 1974.

(12)

4. GDR Regional Population Distribution

Wohnbevolkerung der Bezirke nach Altersgruppen und Geschlecht 1972

mlinnlich I weiblich

[

'.-Y-.--'"l 6,,,,..60JBhretmdBHPr

J

1m RenlenBller

.

"j'~ 1Q!lis25"vnler65J,Stm.:JBhre6IJJ. 1mfilhigenAllerarbeNs.

;··...' 1 5 ' · 2 5 ·

, 6 ' . ' '15' JKinder

I I.;-:.-;l...~- I I I unf'lr6 '

1086420246610 T_end I?rsonen

je Altersjtlhr

(13)

t;lj

.

f-' :::IJ =r ::0O~ (1);:l <.0(1) ...I 0~ ;:lf-' Ul"d (1) PJUl ;:l p.. 0 (1) "d PJ IiI

g

-J I (1) ;:l n- Ul ... ;:l I-Ij Ii PJ ;:l () (1)

.... Pa,·d.-C.",;·\~t

..\

,R;;'D"'_.'. ...59.I A"n;.:::'No<d'It"., Som",.,tJ( 10~'AI[N~;,i-\. e,;',-.. p,CAItD,E'.1<"...",.... ·.•r;:.i.'~~.r:••• 60

0/;. :.

L"'"AIde"....'-:'":"~~\ .•..:'A""...55;Alel_'--~

~~, ORM~~·D'E~...:

2

~~,~ .~:.

M.U"R"R}

1{~' T~

E

;::)~

...."] ,Lo,·.;C.,••do.EUfI95"N'-:.l.U..~'I."...C.,,:8.~~:, BAS5E....'t7

E~,ru. ~

RE

~

I.Osm,,,",i.:1t,ALV"'",j.;,..."I....J..;."51

~

'"7 .,''\--f.0··_..e',.~~••.''..'Om.'10~78:.Marn.it.,..'IM,

.,.;"o,.II. "

NRMAN0I.E\......1A'R'5.'ENNE

I.. ". .. ,., .. ~

54....

l

c,,61

i

..r"...

!.~n~."

..:,.;,'61)28,,,91.'

~'''J''''~C

HAM'AGNE':""'l'...as

i;:

E 35

~

,"',,11"'"

~

77,1,10ef,...,·,",'H..U."••'r

vo,,, .,

.!

~

J53'ySt....~.I, ",•.•"Vrlain.\PA.'.•~~,EUf."-Lo;,,:

.5.:;,....""" . ...

Aub..'~..:'z....,."'-/• ..

~

.•.•·,'-,o".i""....,."",._

'J";'~I

Iiu"'·<h,?-:....

~.:.

H'lI'.: .,."""..J...,\'...6'."'",.""~Yo"...----li2./1'1,·5_,~"':R,.." :May.n"",."72l:.'..,.,..';.l, ,0."JSa"n..•LO,,.,,'-,',Lo".''".."21""...

~

.'90•.,68: ...-f"OJ'"".1'..Ch.,,·t89COI••cf'"-'\.,10.,'.

r

DELA".l..r--.l;....•...··....l....

~

FRANCHf_

~

44 49.;".:,.,.'J41~.""'...:'" .f'',..,..'''RE\58'""".e.,' M.m.-e'·Loir.

f

31C.'E..~..}.18\B0UR·G..0GNE;39... DouO2~,"

°

IRE...-Ind,.·.t·Lo".:\.-:.COMTE',..".."'.,'36"e."''''''''.',"".'., '.•--'.;.,'"'':.c-"L. ":,"""'"i·na,..Chiif'•.N'e.,.,11lJUt,

,.0

';79:'\',

~~"

..,...Je..'f \POI.'T

°

l'".r',.".>','.''Ii.1sao-.•.•,-Lc",.t.,I•.• ..'....86\.".Iou'''''.'""p~~:D.u.·....,...'t..., !.,'11""~"..•.I,_/ ,Sj.,...'L__-...All,.,~"."",..""'~:P'

..

14..~::.."-.nv'.~. .':~""".'t'.,Vltnn..",.-Crflus.....·..·f3:_--:'""t:.H.S.._, ,~81'...'I......~~"":N._ .".~3,,~,.H....0..", .~LIM

°

USIN•.:6~.::........'.~: CHARENTES.J.23."...LOI,e"..'.\.;.''...

'i)'

'.;H.v,~nnfl'.('c,<~~'••~·~42.6ge/...~:'....:~•._'":_',..

~\ Cha::.~re- Ch:,~~~:j.t-....!'·\. ,,'-,' '.

19\

~

q.

~,;,~.~.

.''-:.;.;:'."

:~;:

•....:.:..

S~~

17:'16t'":\.,Carr".;-.i:~'...,.'~""l'':'~"~-':'...'.. ...'....l\.I':-.'..'""',H.-La.,....-,.__.~.:.~.'. ;'·.r~.~'./.;)Canl.,:"."...':S'"\: •......;.,.:....

,.~" ~

15:43"

.l. ""rE ~.S ~

\c',24~...""t....I:-.4.......".~'...,.'r;:;rI-I....

,pe. '.

33.:':lol~,.:'''~'.:,...~,.'.': ...:Dordo"n...,\.

./"~;

Loze',t1.26r;'.'..,' '.

~

...'...,.....46..l..·..-

I~

48\,.D,am.,r·.

~,' t

G"on"...,...."."....,",df'ch.,I>..:.,'"'" "LOl-fll.Ga,.:,

T2'("

f.):

~_,~~.

.a....

I~.

''.,....". \..~._.I-_0 41...,';,....I0''''''-_

:,~

..'-....t....Ie.,4.

"'pes."'.'.,.

\.....M;..,..'.-vauclu...., "....,.....1arn:e;-82.".".'r'iJn:.,..,30G..<I

~)

•.84..P.R0VE'N..C:

~

.... 40...~,..Ga,on~.81,".I!:',."....••••.'"'.".'.

.;) ... ~ ,. r"',f~

·.t",.,1.;n··...::•••!.I...

3~··"\"· fa :dU-R";;~' ~':":

.',,"'i" !.\.,'101-'01-E5.'Col.ii"C0TED'Al,URn-'....3'Py,RI:NI:.Jool'~..0..~ ...,..t..,z.e'.\.;).

~r-_1J

..._,,;',;':""

'_~'

.',;,,"'.......,1'1..'4""1'v

~

.·<C.."O.,RS

~

64-:..t

~'-.

....

'~r' ~.. ~ -. . .

.

'..

":\-....lH.~GI,on,.._.:,,

- ...

-'\."",'-~ !B

.P".n...

~..65'31:'""-9_\

Aud. ",-'

II...~'.r ••••••:tI.·P,repee..,.•-:\.....

..

'.,."".. ...-.:....-:•••••,A".g.

to"

68.'

... .1.... ,.• -.. ..

~~

t::

Pyr..IIMoS-O,•••~

,

..;

,.,-'

..

Va,'·de·o\If'drns:· .:. Euonne

.

,

91

.:.)p.• .'"....

Seine·9:1": .'92';S'..~enos. >Ha~u'5~.t'·.'','It.," ...:':e .;'.Seme.:94 .;-, ". Numerodudeparte.l1cnl Chef.lieudedepil,tell1ent Prefectucece\l.onale Metcopoled'equ,libce

lllniledf!le~lIon NomIluoepilrtement

linlliededepart-ment

78 Yv.lm.J 40

"*

'.

lo"·el·Cher

...• ..

Laregionparaslenne {sauflaSeine·et·Marne) ;..

,

:..."~

.,. ... -...

\

.. , "

,~-:~

: "'.. .1·.

iVa/-d'O'

M...

..,... " .' ,., .

"\ I ~} I "\,

\>

I i..

..

I <0. f .""\

-.

:

.-

j

. . ...

:

---

,.). i."!,~.. '.

,..'

!..

1_..

('l ~I:'.•';'."

(14)

.

,

..

~

W/A.

..Pri".. o

Autoroutes Routes Limitesdepartel)1entales L~~1dE:.~~-,ntl'~lj",le~ AgglomeratIons definition68INSEE Regionsurbaines delametropole Villesdeplus de10·000habitants horsdesagglomerations etreGionsurbaines

'""'1. /... ;.:... ...

Thonon•••• ~11 /

~I.\f/:,':./... ~.<..-.:,/,.••••:..~"-'l~'JV-,;..,:: "i

<-.;/

.0oon../'"

r?'" "n.m",. ,....

"""-'"\...I'

~

"';-'

BOUR~/

v

~'~~~;

.,'.:•

'\ /( ...:;. > C,.'", .. '" ~ ~'),.-"1-A .,,f~

A

j \

jr-HAU'tESAVO'ELv}

(' .~:,.H~ ~, ~ANNECY I' ~.:

\HONE'-e""'"".",,'\,)

.~

••"FPANN.

~'

R

ViI,,",,'h. r~.,lA",h"". '., ' ", \ : \ ~~~.kA:..,. ~"7J (~;~Yi/~.'J!wl4l(( ~i If d~~nec,

('-")

0. '~

<"".

"~.t;;ot: ~.l(;.~,,~.. i1~"/:I~'7j,ZJ.i

(

~

\J\.••I"'"T...'<"

~,

,.',.'i

'!i,,;;. , ~ "

''y'';';'

I~ig '~&, ,.,~

'---r

~,

.••••• '7"'";1);11",,,,,

,,~. ''''-'ry?e

Iberlvllle: IRE

~

V<.

V()N~:;

.•.•.:.f'it..;.'

.f/~.

r:;.71'.\Peorgt\

\Ai~.les.bams \JF\~ !

rLli .t

"!"/':{:d~

,1""

J'~

)I.IMBER

\~.

";~-.

r-...,..

~

"''J••

?},!:::~o;{ '~<~;:;j~. . ~HA

•••••• :'''''',.-r'r·;:"-''1.'.-,·.

IJj,,;~,

,.....1.,'11{;..\••'••,.."."....117,'••'1(..1,

'l!l~

,..,_:'/-1,/'".." .":P;'"

~, '-'~'''''''l'''''i''''''''''''''''

v•',

"¥I~~"

..,'..

111 '" ,i"*A.o.,o~'

"',:

~ontbrI50n

..

¥\7.~,f;;I/:%~i7\1

-.

~J1Y.';I

..

?!~: t·~i??~'Ytj'.". ~

.::t-.".17

f;~ ..·.... J~

SAV0IE:'".,",-.1.-".:;..1f'y,,,nn.-""'","\.<"./"'""\

,%1/~,/II"

Nr.·'r,,.

'~;'~Vr ~~...

"-..

I:'~'~'fj;,;, : '~jij,~'3>'~' ;>::'J!Jm ,4/1171 jf!l/lfi%f!' ... _

1.///,1"

'~;'

SCI.'"

~(

};;(;:';'f.

/z;:rk~::f{ A-

I"\'ISERE'",

W; ",7,;l#» ••' " ,Sl,'TI'""}-' \, .~, '<l!p.' ',f/It

<'•••,...il'",c

l- ~ • r~~ ~~ ;;f~ t.r't---L....,\, .• j

Annoo",

1\\\ ) L '~

\.;I

Romar~ ~ s/\

1

t. I\i:=---, --rJ 5' ~VALE"C'! •./_

_/AROECHE

t ~~ ,.3 ,. '--j

"",DROME, J

m. r ~ n"lim.."

\Aub.n..

,r---' \\~ :.1 (l'l """-~ t.., "I .. r·.. 'v~ '--.. r\S

'V.',-,,'"

I\,)

.

t:l CD 00 f,lJ Ii

!J

CD ::l IT CIl 0 I-tI ~ ::r 0>- ::l CD I :t- I-' to CD CIl ~ t-'. IT ::r c:: Ii tr OJ ::l :;0 CD I.Q t-'. 0 ::l CIl

(15)

-9-

3. Regional Population Density of Rhone-Alpes

Ar

1

a 1973 Population Density

~ (persons) (persons/krn 2)

Departement (kID )

Ain 5,785 360,000 62

Ardeche 5,565 265,000 48

Drome 6,560 368,000 56

Isere 7,882 840,000 107

Loire 6,807 750,000 110

Rhone 1,259 1,451,000 1,153

Savoie 6,270 320,000 51

Haute Savoie 4,839 450,000 93

44,967 4,804,000 106

Source: Annuaire Rh$ne-Alpes 1974, Principaux Resultats

Statistiques en 1973, Supplement de no. 9 de la revue

"Points d'Appui pour l'Economic Rhone-Alpes"

(16)

c

. W'lsconsin

1. W'lsconsin and Surround'lng States

\.) T . )

<t

z

<{

o

(f)

o z

3

~ o

z

<{

C)

I U

-

:E

z -

(f)

o

Z

U

(f)

-

~

~~,

...J :>

~ ~----,-

::I:

V-

(17)

-11-

2. Map of Wisconsin Counties and Population Densities

Milwaukee.:, 1703 p/km2

ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS- JANESVILLE, BELOIT,

WISCONSIN INTERSTATE

-- ._.... ~~~

_ 50-99

L--.J

100--199

Population density (p/km2 )

l. J

],.ess than 10

I J

10-19

'lll1l11illNll

20- 2 9

~

30-39

~

40-49

(18)

3. Wisconsin Regional Population Density

(The aggregation of counties corresponds roughly to the Air Quality Control Regions defined by the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission - see map)

Region

Duluth-Superior Interstate

North Central Wisconsin Intrastate

Southeast Minnesota- La Grosse Wisconsin

Interstate 1) Lake Michigan

Intrastate

Southern Wisconsin Intrastate 2)

Southeastern Wisconsin Intrastate

28,454 26,641

35,456 28,011 19,906 6,961 145,429

1970 Population (persons) 154,879 327,142

556,094 912,814 711,068 1,756,086 4,418,083

Density 2 (persons/kID )

5

12

16 33 36 252 30

l)Grant is included here 2)Rock is included here

Sources:

The State of Wisconsin 1973 Blue Book

"Regional Air Quality Maintenance Planning Program Prospectus", Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 1974.

(19)

-13-

III. Selected Comparison of GDR, Rhone--Alpes, Wis-;onsin A. Demography

1. Land Area and Population

GDR Rhone-AlpesA Wisconsin Gross Area (km2

) 108,178

4

4 ,967 145,320

Population (1973) 16,980,000 4,804,000 4,565,000 Density (p/km2

) 157 107 31

2. Population Growth

Average Annual

Year Population Change (%)

GDR: 1950 18,388,000

1960 17,298,000 - 0.6%

1965 17,020,000 - 0.3%

1970 17,058,000 0.0%

1973 16,980,000 - 0.2%

Rhone-Alpes:

Wisconsin:

1962 1968 1974

1950 1960 1970

4,019,000 4,423,000 4,884,000

3,435,000 3,953,000 4,418,000

1. 6%

1. 7%

1. 4%

1.1%

(20)

3. Graph of Population Growth 20.0

17.5

15.0

12.5

10.0

7.5

5.0

o

2.5

1970 1973

1960 1965 1955

0.0

-1---.----...- - -...---...--...- - - -

1950

YEAR

o GERMAN DEMOCRAT I C REPUBLI C

o RHONE-ALPES/FRANCE

~

WISCONSIN

(21)

4.CitiesandTownsbyPopulationCategories 1)A2)3) GDRRhone-AlpesWisconsin SizeNumberof%ofTotalNumberof%ofTotalNumberof%ofTotal MunicipalitiesI'opulationMunicipalities?opulationMunicipalitiesPopulation 1,000,000ormore16.4%124.3% 500,000to999,99926.4%

- ---

I16.2% 100,000to499,9991010.5%215.0%13.9% 50,000to99,999187.1%59.1%812.5% 20,000to49,999... 8215.1%1510.8%1712.6%J1 I 10,000to19,9991078.9%288.7% 40.8% Lessthan10,00045.6%56546.0% 100.0%100.0%100.0% 1)Datafrom1973 Source:StatistischesJahrbuchderDDR1974,StaatsverlagderDeutschenDemokratischenRepublik, Berlin1974. 2)Datafrom1968 Source:AnnuaireRhone-Alpes1974,PrincipauxResultatsStatistiquesen1973,Supplement deno9delarevue,"Pointsd'Appuipourl'EconomieRhGne-Alpes" 3)Datafrom1970 Source:TheStateofWisconsin1973BlueBook

(22)

B. Transportation Sys~ems

1. Railway-, Road and Waterway "Mileage" (1972) Unit: kIn

DDR Rhone-AlpesA Wisconsin Roads:

State Truck County Truck Municipal Total Rail

12,364 6,844 19,182

33,208 22,3?3 31,544

80,764 42,584 114,123

126,336 71,781 164,849

14,384 3,518

*

14,314

Waterways River

Ship canal Total

1,144 358

1,502 454

*

Estimated as 10% of the figure given for the total of France

Sources:

(1) Statistisches Jahrbuch 1974 der DDR, Staatsverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, Berlin 1974.

(2) Annuaire Statistique de la France 1974 Resultats de 1972

Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE) (3) The State of Wisconsin 1973 Blue Book

(23)

~otorVehiclesRegistration

'"

DDRRhone-Alpes 1970197219691972 **** Autos1,159,7781,400,3901,150,0001,340,000 Buses16,68617,7746,9418,818 ****** Motorcycles1,374,0061,372,901550,000502,000 Trucks228,885255,478267,872328,047 ** Tractors194,024202,7136,00010,580 Trailers491,278579,11232,44713,567 Wisconsin 1970 *** 1,858,428 7,932 54,306 361,450 68,308

1972 *** 1,969,430 9,522 69,878 375,865 76,545

*

(1970)(1972) Smallmotorcycles:1,538,022-1,698,818

I I-' -:J I ** Estimatedas10%ofthetotalofFrance *** Privateandmunicipallyowned Sources: (1)"StatistischesJahrbuch1974derDDR,StaatsverlagderDeutschenDemokratischenRepublik, Berlin,1974. (2)AnnuaireStatistiquesdelaFrance1974,R~sultatsde1972,InstitutNationaldela StatistiqueetdesEtudesEconomiques(INESS). (3)EnergySystemsandPolicyResearchReportNo.3,1974SurveyofEnergyUseInWisconsin, InstituteforEnvironmentalStudies,Univ.ofWisconsin-Madison.

(24)

3. Freight and Mass Transport

GDR Freight Transport

Unit: 1000t

Mode 1960 1965 1970 1971 1972 %of

Total 1972

Rail 237,789 260,430 262,901 268,473 274,448 32.8

Truck 270,346 345,821 463,567 497,082 518,302 61. 9

Ship 14,008 18,372 22,171 23,045 23,550 2.8

Other (1) 5 3,837 15,376 17,614 20,872 2.5

Total 522,148 628,460 764,015 806,214 837,172 100.0

GDR Mass Transit

Unit: 6

10 passengers

Mode % of

1960 1965 1970 1971 1972 Total 1972

Rail 943 684 ( 626 630 641 17.8

Bus 688 941 1,137 1,177 1,223 33.9

Urban BUs, 1,967 1,888 1,714 1.727 1,738 48.1

Tram

Other(2) 9 9 7 9 9 0.2

Total 3,607 3,522 3,486 3,543 3,611 100.0

(l)A'lr:

(2)A'lr:

Source:

19,049t (1972)

925,900 passengers (1972)

Statistisches Jahrbuch 1974 der DDR. Staatsver1ag der Deutschen Demokratischen Repub1ik, Berlin 1974

(25)

-19- GDR Freight Transport

unit:106

ton-krn.

Mode 1960 1965 1970 1971 1972 % of Total

1972

Rail 32,860 38,868 41,513 44,033 44,710 33.3

Truck 5,002 7,213 12,233 12,993 13,647 10.2

Ship 12,772 32,400 73,079 74,269 72,940 54.3

Other (1) 3 116 1,183 2,552 3,118 2.3

Total 50,637 78,597 128,008 13'3,847 134.,415 100.0

GDR Mass Transit

Unit: 6

10 pass.-krn

Mode 1960 1965 1970

Rail 21,888 17,446 17,611 18,407 19,932 42.6

Bus 9,935 13,507 17,284 18,184 18,964 40.6

Urban Bus, 7,.365 6,972 6,304 6,347 6,463 13.8

Tram

Other (2) 686 1,326 1,350 1,382 3.0

Total 39,004

*

38,611 42,525 44,288 46,741 100.0

(1) Air: 29,229 ton-krn (1972) Pipeline: 3,089 x 106

ton-krn (1972) (2)Air: 1,098.5 pass.-krn (1972)

*

Double counting with bus - urban bus

(26)

IV. Energy Use

A. 1972 Total Energy Use by Sector

Conversion:

"

27,295,000 BTU) 0.25314kcal ) 6,909,456.3 kcal 1 tEC

1 BTU ~

1 tEC ~

(27)

-21- WISCONSIN

1012

1012 % of region

BTU kcal total

Residential

Coal 18.62 4.713

Natural Gas 125.42 31.749

Petroleum 109.31 27.671

Electricity 114.65' 29.023

Total 368.00 93.156 28.8%

Commercial

Natural Gas 54.93 13.905

Petroleum 46.8S 11.860

Electricity :17./00 2·~.1-::4

_.

_

. . -

Total 189.1.1 4 '/ .889 14.8%

Industrial

Coal 78.59 19.894·

Natural Gas 183.88 46.547

Petroleum 14.92 3.777

Electricity 87.40 22.124

Total 364.79 92.343 28.6%

Transportation Petroleum

Motor vehicles 289.75 73.347

Other modes 27.95 7.075

Total 317.70 80.423 24.7%

Others

Natural Gas 19.74 :i.997

Petroleum 7.fil 1.926

Electricity 9.25 2.342

Total 36.60 9.265 2.9%

TOTAL USE 1,276.27 323.075 100.0%

Conversion: 1 BTU ~ 0.25314 kcal

Source: Energy Systems and Policy Research Report No.3.

"1974 Survey of Energy Use in Wisconsin" Institute for Environmental Studies. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

(28)

B. 1972 Total Energy Use by Source

GDR

Coal, Lignite Electric Gen.

Oven coke

Transportation, Retail Total

Natural Gas

*

Petroleum

1012

kcal

% of

1000 tEC state total

60,626.5 418.8962

7,664.0 52.9541

12,184.5 84.1883

80,475.0 556.0386 77.4%

1,052.7 7.2736 1.0%

Transportation Motor vehicles Other modes Nontransportation Total

Hydro

Electric Gen.

Nuclear

Electric Gen.

TOTAL ENERGY

7,377.0 14,910.0 22,287.0

153.0

103,967.7

50.9711 103.0200 153,9911

1.0571

718.3604

21.4%

0.1%

99.9%

*

Figure given for the import in 1973 Conversion:

Original unit tEC Coal, Coke

Lignite Briquets

Crude oil, liquid fuels Natural gas

l t l t l t l t 1000m3

1.0 0.3333 0.6667 1.5 1.332 {11 tEC

BTU 1 tEC

: 27,295,000 BTU)}

0.25314 kcal )

~ 6,909,456.3 kcal Source:

"Statistisches Jahrbuch der DDR 1974", Staatsverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Reoublik. Berlin ]974.

(29)

,/\,

RHONE ALPES

-23-

1000 tEC

% of region total

Solid Fuels Electric Gen.

Oven coke

Other industry Retail

14.9 647.9 685.9

4.5050 0.1030 4.7392

Total 1,352.8 9.3472 6.2%

Natural Gas

Residential, Commercial Industrial

478.0 815.4

3.3027 5.6340

Total 1,293.4 8.9367 5.9%

Petroleum

Transportation Motor vehicles Other modes Nontransport

2,959.6 8,914.1

20.4492 61.5916

Total 11,873.7 82.0408 54.2%

Electric Gen. 7.384.0 51.0194 33.7%

Nuclear

Electric Gen.

TOTAL ENERGY USE 21,903.4 151.3440 100.0%

Conversion:

A 27,295,000 BTU)

"-

0.25314 kcal ) 6,909,456.3 kcal 1 tEC

1 BTU 1 tEC ,/\,

Source: Annuaire Rh~ne-Alpes 1974

Principaux R~sultats Statistiques en 1973

Suppl~ment de no. 9 de la revue "Points d'Appui pour l'Economie Rh~ne-Alpes"

(30)

WISCONSIN

1012 1012

kcal

% of region

BTU total

Coal,

Electric Gen. 235.24 59.549

Oven coke 10.26 2.597

Retail 18.62 4.713

All others 68.33 17.297

Total 332.45 84.156 26.2%

Natural Gas

Residential 125.42 31.749

Commercial, Industrial 238.81 60.452

All others 19.74 4.997

Total 383.97 97.198 30.0%

Petroleum

Transportation

Motor vehicles 289.75 73.347

Other transport 27.95 7.075

Nontransportation 184.83 46.788

Total 502.53 127.210 39.4%

Hydro

Electric Gen. 22.50 5.696

Nuclear

Electric Gen. 35.52

TOTAL ENERGY USE 1,276.97

8.992 323.252

2.8%

100.0%

Change 1971/72:

Coal

Natural Gas Petroleum Hydro Nuclear

-1.6 +10.3 +0.9 +10.3 -3.2 Conversion: 1 BTU

39 0.25314 kcal

Source: Energy Systems and Policy Research Report. "1974 Survey of Energy Use in Wisconsin." Institute for Environmental Studies. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

(31)

-25-

References

Annuaire Rh~ne-Alpes 1974, Principaus Resultats Statistiques en 1973. Supplement de no. 9 de la revue "Points d'Appui pour l'Economic Rhone-Alpes".A

Annuaire Statistique de la France 1974, Resultats de 1972.

Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE).

Energy Systems and Policy Research Report No.3 "1974 Survey of Energy Use in Wisconsin" Institute for Environmental Studies, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

"Regional Air Quality Maintenance Planning Program Prospectus".

Southwestern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Waukesha, Wisconsin 1974.

Statistisches Jahrbuch 1974 der DDR. Staatsverlag der Deutschen Dernokratischen Republik, Berlin 1974.

The State of Wisconsin 1973 Blue Book.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The aim of my research is to write a comparative social history of the ruling communist parties in the GDR and in Czechoslovakia between 1945 and 1989.. Up to now the two parties

Da die Biograf/innen für sich eine erzählbare Geschichte über die politische Haft konstruiert haben und diese im sozialen Umfeld Anerkennung findet, können und wollen sie es

K. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organi- zations supporting the

The multi- regional demographic analysis of fertility, mortality, and internal migration, performed for a system of five long- term economic planning regions, reflects the

[151 Statistisches Jahrbuch 1968, Deutsche Demokratische Republik, Staatsverlag, Berlin,

In addition ot the proper consumption of the sector, the consumptions to be satisfied are disintegrated in three groups of consumters (industry, transport, domestic fur- naces),

11.3 Some Characteristics of Wisconsin Industry Value Added in Wisconsin by Manufacture Industrial Employment and Value

An in~_tial and very p:r: 011minary 8xamination of the potential for use of solar conversion syst~ns in a region could be carried out after some initial data un patterns of