• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Diversity of hydrolytic enzymes among Arctic deep-sea sediment bacteria

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Diversity of hydrolytic enzymes among Arctic deep-sea sediment bacteria"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Acknowledgements: We thank the captain and crew of RV Polarstern expedition PS85 for their excellent support in the field. This study was funded by the European Research Council Advanced Investigator grant no. 294757 to Antje Boetius and the Alfred-Wegener-Institut grant no.

AWI_PS85_07.

Diversity of hydrolytic enzymes among Arctic deep-sea sediment bacteria

Josephine Z. Rapp1,2, Christina Bienhold1,2, Halina E. Tegetmeyer2,3, Claudia Pala2, Pierre Offre2,4 & Antje Boetius1,2,5

5500 m 3500 m 2500 m 1200 m

GH1 GH31 GH32 GH38 GH39 GH43 GH47 GH48 GH57 GH59 GH63 GH76 GH108 GH127GH65GH30GH28GH26GH20GH18GH16GH15GH13GH10GH9GH5GH4GH3GH2

lowest gene count per GH highest gene count per GH

European Research Council

Established by the European Commission

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

EGIEGIIEGIIIEGIVHGIVHGIIIHGIIHGI

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

EG_IEG_IIEG_IIIEG_IVHG_IXHG_VIHG_VHG_IVHG_IIIHG_IIHG_I orgC [%]

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

EG_IEG_IIEG_IIIEG_IVHG_IXHG_VIHG_VHG_IVHG_IIIHG_IIHG_I orgC [%] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

EGIEGIIEGIIIEGIVHGIXHGVIHGVHGIVHGIIIHGIIHGI Phaeo [µg/ml]Chl a [µg/ml]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

EGIEGIIEGIIIEGIVHGIXHGVIHGVHGIVHGIIIHGIIHGI Phaeo[µg/ml]Chl a [µg/ml] 0.00E+00 5.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.50E+09 2.00E+09 2.50E+09 3.00E+09 3.50E+09

HGIXHGIVHGVHGVIHGIIIHGIIHGI 0.00E+00 5.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.50E+09 2.00E+09 2.50E+09 3.00E+09 3.50E+09

HGIXHGIVHGVHGVIHGIIIHGIIHGI orgC [%]

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

µg/ml

HGI 1200 m

water depth

0 1*109 2*109 3*109

cells/ml sediment

HGIX 5500 m

Gammaproteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Cytophagia

Gemmatimonadetes Flavobacteriia

SAR202 clade Acidimicrobiia

Betaproteobacteria JTB23

others

Deltaproteobacteria

others

unclassified Xanthomonadales (GP) unclassified Kl89A clade (GP)

unclassified Rhodospirillaceae (AP) unclassified Flammeovirgaceae (C) Marinicella (GP)

unclassified OM1 clade (A) unclassified SAR202 clade Pseudospirillum (GP)

unclassified BD2.11 terrestrial group (G) unclassified Halieaceae (GP)

unclassified BD7.8 marine group (GP)

unclassified JTB255 marine benthic group (GP) unclassified Sh765B.TzT.29 (DP)

100

80

60

40

20

0

DNA cDNA HGI X 5500 m

DNA cDNA HGVI 3500 m

DNA cDNA HGV 3000 m

DNA cDNA HGI V 2500 m

DNA cDNA HGI I I 2000 m

DNA cDNA HGI I 1500 m

DNA cDNA HGI 1200 m

21044 72 236

14508 63 208

21111 81 316

99297 89 362

27406 86 329

16578 80 281

32706 86 312

19035 75 288

161165 92 383

17146 77 299

42946 82 343

9079 60 235

27336 86 322

19040 77 302 nSeq

nC nG 100

80

60

40

20

0 Gammaproteobacteria

Alphaproteobacteria Cytophagia

Gemmatimonadetes Flavobacteriia

SAR202 clade Acidimicrobiia

Betaproteobacteria JTB23

others

Deltaproteobacteria

others

unclassified Xanthomonadales (GP) unclassified Kl89A clade (GP)

unclassified Rhodospirillaceae (AP) unclassified Flammeovirgaceae (C) Marinicella (GP)

unclassified OM1 clade (A) unclassified SAR202 clade Pseudospirillum (GP)

unclassified BD2.11 terrestrial group (G) unclassified Halieaceae (GP)

unclassified BD7.8 marine group (GP)

unclassified JTB255 marine benthic group (GP) unclassified Sh765B.TzT.29 (DP)

100

80

60

40

20

0

DNA cDNA HGI X 5500 m

DNA cDNA HGVI 3500 m

DNA cDNA HGV 3000 m

DNA cDNA HGI V 2500 m

DNA cDNA HGI I I 2000 m

DNA cDNA HGI I 1500 m

DNA cDNA HGI 1200 m

21044 72 236

14508 63 208

21111 81 316

99297 89 362

27406 86 329

16578 80 281

32706 86 312

19035 75 288

161165 92 383

17146 77 299

42946 82 343

9079 60 235

27336 86 322

19040 77 302 nSeq

nC nG 100

80

60

40

20

0

RNA RNA RNA RNA RNA RNA RNA

1Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, HGF-MPG Group for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, Bremerhaven, Germany, 2Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, HGF-MPG Group for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, Bremen, Germany, 3Bielefeld University, Center for Biotechnology - CeBiTec, Bielefeld, Germany, 4Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research - NIOZ, Texel, Netherlands,5MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Figure 2 - Biogenic sediment compounds and bacterial cell numbers in surface sediments in 2014. Chlorophyll A represents the contribution of fresh material, phaeopigments represent more degraded material.

Introduction

- benthic communities are dominated by bacteria of mostly unknown identity and metabolism

- most deep-sea ecosystems are sustained by exported organic material from the productive, sunlit surface ocean

- organic matter availabilty generally decreases with increasing water depth

- previous studies showed a correlation between changes in bacterial community structure and organic matter availability

Figure 1 - Samples were taken in 2014 at the Arctic Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) site HAUSGARTEN in Fram Strait. Red dots indicate the four sites that were included in this study, located along a water depth gradient from 1200 m down to 5500 m depth. WSC:

West Spitsbergen Current; RAC: Return Atlantic Current; YB: Yermak Branch; Svalbard Branch; EGC: East Greenland Current.

Results from the different molecular appriaches were in good agreement and suggested similar community sturctures with the same dominant members.

- high turnover across the depth gradient at species level - the active community showed a higher turnover

Organic carbon Chlorophyll A + Phaeopigments Cell numbers

Main Questions

- Do we find differences between dominant and dominant active bacterial groups in Arctic deep-sea surface sediment at different water depth?

- Do communities residing at different water depths exhibit different capabilities to break down organic matter?

- Can we link specific hydrolytic enzymes to individual taxonomic groups?

Figure 3 - Dominant bacterial genera as determined by DNA and RNA tag sequencing.

- similar community composition along slope at low taxonomic resolution

- typically predominant sediment taxa, i.e. the JTB255 marine group, the Sh765B.TzT29 group or the OM1 clade, were

underrepresented in the active part of the community

- other usually low-abundant taxa, i.e. Flavobacteriia and the

Figure 4 - Community turnover along the slope at OTU level.

Displayed are Jaccard dissimilarities and OTUs > 99 reads.

Figure 5 - Heat map of protein family gene counts associated with specific glycoside hydrolases (GH). Only GHs that could be detected both in metagenomes and - transcriptomes are displayed.

Conclusion

- Benthic bacterial communities vary with water depth and exhibit a distinct enzyme machinery for the breakdown of polysaccharides depending on the type of exported material

- communities at shallower depths show a greater proportion of protein domains involved in degradation of fresh algae material - communities at deeper stations show a greater proportion of

protein domains involved in breakdown of recalcitrant material and

bacterial cell walls DNA tags

RNA tags MetaT

MetaG

CARD-FISH

Figure 6 - Community composition on class level as resolved by the different molecular approaches.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Here we employ a recently compiled global data set of 230 Th-normalized fluxes with an updated database of seafloor surface sediment composition to derive atlases of the

Sediment type was always found to be the most significant factor explaining variation in enzymatic activity and bacterial community structure as compared to the effects of

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of fertilizer application and sampling time on structure and diversity of the active (RNA level) and the entire (DNA level)

To select a suitable primer set for studying microbiomes of various Arctic marine habitats (sea ice, surface water, marine snow, deep ocean basin, and deep-sea sediment), we

Around Antarctica typical deep-sea taxa are found colonizing shallow waters on the continental shelf (polar emergence) as well as shelf species descending into the deep

It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the scavenging deep-sea amphipod Eurythenes gryllus might exhibit two metabolic conditions: a resting stage resembling the kind of

Unter der Annahme, da Chrom im Meerwasser entweder als lösliche Cr042- oder Cr(H20)4(OH)2+ vorliegt und im Meerwasser gelöste Sauerstoff sich im Gleichgewicht mit

The iSIS system is tuned for a particular image sequence (i.e. a transect) using a small subset of the images, in which megafauna taxa positions were previously marked by an expert.