EastGRIP ice down to 2121m - fabric and microstructure
EastGRIP Steering Committee 2019
Ilka Weikusat & Nicolas Stoll
Johanna Kerch, Ina Kleitz, Jan Eichler, Wataru Shigeyama, Tomoyuki Homma, Daniela Jansen, Maddalena Bayer-Giraldi, Ernst-Jan Kuiper, Julien Westhoff, Tomotaka Saruya, Sebastian Hellmann, Steven Franke, Pia Götz, Kumiko Goto-Azuma, Nobuhiko Azuma, Sérgio Henrique Faria, Sepp Kipfstuhl, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen
2
F. Steinbach, Uni Tübingen
Introduction
3
• Different planes in crystal è easiest deformation along basal plane (perpendicular to c-axis)
• C-axes projected as pole figures, core axis is represented through the centre of the circle
• Eigenvalues portray c-axis distribution as the three principal axes of an ellipsoid
After Hondoh (2000),
displayed by Faria et al. (2014) I. Hewitt, course material Rheology of Ice
Moldflowinsight.com (2017)
Introduction
c-axis
4
Introduction
5
Introduction
Large Area
Scanning Macroscope
1 cm
9.6 cm
Processed Data
• Grain shape & shape- preferred orientations
• Grain boundaries &
Sub-grain boundaries
• Grain-size
• Number of grains
• …
6
A B
Introduction
Fabric Analyser G50
Processed Data
• c-axes orientations
• Eigenvalues
• Woodcock
Parameter
• Grain-size
• Number of grains
• Subgrain structure
I. Hewitt, course material Rheology of Ice
1 cm
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
7
Eigenvalues
NEEM (Eichler, 2013, Montagnat, 2014)
GRIP (Thorsteinsson et al., 1997) EDML (Weikusat et al., 2017)
Studies before EGRIP
e1 e2 e3
e1: Minimum
e2: Intermediate
e3: Maximum
Anisotropy
strain ellipsoid
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
8
Eigenvalues
EGRIP
e1 e2 e3
NEEM (Eichler, 2013, Montagnat, 2014)
GRIP (Thorsteinsson et al., 1997) EDML (Weikusat et al., 2017)
3000 m
e1: Minimum
e2: Intermediate
e3: Maximum
strain ellipsoid
Anisotropy
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
9
Eigenvalues
2121 m
EGRIP
NEEM (Eichler, 2013, Montagnat, 2014)
GRIP (Thorsteinsson et al., 1997) EDML (Weikusat et al., 2017)
e1 e2 e3
e1: Minimum
e2: Intermediate
e3: Maximum
• High-resolution data (full bag every 5-15m)
• 15 volume cuts (= 3x vertical + 2x horizontal)
strain ellipsoid
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
10
Eigenvalues
e1 e2 e3
Steven Franke, AWI
I. Hewitt, course material Rheology of Ice
EGRIP
= Horizontal section
e1: Minimum
e2: Intermediate
e3: Maximum
strain ellipsoid
11
Steven Franke, AWI
Crystal preferred orientations
Combine different scales
12
Crystal preferred orientations
Broad single
maximum Type I crossed girdle
symmetric Type I crossed girdle
asymmetric Developed girdle Strong girdle
Broad single Maximum
Developed Girdle
Strong Girdle Crossed Girdle
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 755 427_1
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 597 866_1
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 596 1096_1
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 1252 1377_1
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 1091 1637_6
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 891 2026_1
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 1124 2475_4
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 2165 2846_1
0 30
60
90
120
150 180 210 240 270
300 330
N = 2177 3117_6
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Eigen alue
Strong Girdle with horizontal maxima
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
Broad single
maximum Type I crossed girdle
symmetric Type I crossed girdle
asymmetric Developed girdle Strong girdle
e1: Minimum
e2: Intermediate
e3: Maximum
strain ellipsoid
13
Crystal preferred orientations
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma Equal Area
Lower Hemisphere
N = 1468
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere
N = 2177
Thorsteinsson et al. (1997)
Paterson (1994)
Broad Single Maximum ->
Vertical Compression from above
Girdle ->
Extensional deformation
14
Crystal preferred orientations
15
Crystal preferred orientations
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) -> information about a-axes
Miyamoto et al. (2005)
c-axis
a-axes
After Hondoh (2000),
displayed by Faria et al. (2014)
16
Crystal preferred orientations
c-axes a-axes
preliminary a-axes data for EGRIP at 1360 m
M. Drury and D. Wallis, Utrecht University flow direction
• uniaxial extension and dominant basal slip
• hard orientation of slip-plane -> harder to deform
recrystallized grains (?) ->
larger resolved shear stress
The Arc, 2019
17
Deformation modes
0m 196m
294m
500m
1150m
1260m
2121m
?
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Mean grain area in mm2
Depth in m
18
Grain size
= Mean grain area of
one thin section (400 - 4000 grains) Increase
Decrease
Increase Constant
Grain size variability
19
Grain size
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
Mean grain area in mm2
Depth in m
NEEM EDML EGRIP
End of last Glacial
20
Grain size
100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Mean grain area in mm2
Depth in m
100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Mean grain area in mm2
Depth in m
NEEM EGRIP
21
Grain size & crystal orientations
1 cm 2010 m
22
Outlook - Micro-Cryo-Raman Spectroscopy
• Impurities influence physical properties of ice matrix
-> lack of data regarding in-situ spatial distribution and incorporation of impurities
Eichler (2019)
23
Outlook - Micro-Cryo-Raman Spectroscopy
Eichler (2019) C.Weikusat
• Micro-cryo-Raman spectroscopy on EastGRIP ice core + data about microstructure
• aim: to identify location, phase and composition of small inclusions
0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000
546.7546.8546.9547.0547.1547.2547.3
Dust in ml
0 1 2 3
546.7546.8546.9547.0547.1547.2547.3
Conductivity
0 5 10 15 20 25
546.7546.8546.9547.0547.1547.2547.3
Ca
0 50 100 150 200 250
546.7546.8546.9547.0547.1547.2547.3
NH4
0 10 20 30
546.7546.8546.9547.0547.1547.2547.3Depth in m
Na
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
546.70
546.75
546.80
546.85
546.90
546.95
547.00
547.05
547.10
547.15
547.20
547.25
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
546.70
546.75
546.80
546.85
546.90
546.95
547.00
547.05
547.10
547.15
547.20
547.25
Mean grain area in mm^2
Outlook - Micro-Cryo-Raman Spectroscopy 24
CFA/ICP-MS data by T. Erhardt & C. Jensen, Uni Bern Visual Stratigraphy by J. Westhoff, CIC
EGRIP bag 995 (546.7-547.25m)
25
Thanks to everyone involved!
Questions?
Weikusat et al. (2009)
26
426 m 723 m
1361 m
Dynamic Recrystallisation
2093 m
1 cm
27
Dynamic Recrystallisation
277 m 1 cm 338 m 1 cm
Passchier & Trouw (2005)
Dynamic
Recrystallisation
Urai et al. (1986)
28
Grain size & crystal orientations
1 cm 1614 m
bag 1346 29
739.78-740.3m
0e+00 2e+04 4e+04 6e+04 8e+04 1e+05
739.70739.75739.80739.85739.90739.95740.00740.05740.10740.15740.20740.25740.30
Dust in ml
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
739.70739.75739.80739.85739.90739.95740.00740.05740.10740.15740.20740.25740.30
Conductivity
0 5 10 15 20
739.70739.75739.80739.85739.90739.95740.00740.05740.10740.15740.20740.25740.30
Ca
0 10 20 30
739.70739.75739.80739.85739.90739.95740.00740.05740.10740.15740.20740.25740.30
NH4
0 5 10 15 20 25
739.70739.75739.80739.85739.90739.95740.00740.05740.10740.15740.20740.25740.30Depth in m
Na2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
739.78
739.83
739.88
739.93
739.98
740.03
740.08
740.13
740.18
740.23
740.28
Eigenvalue
Depth in m
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
739.78
739.83
739.88
739.93
739.98
740.03
740.08
740.13
740.18
740.23
740.28
Mean grain area in mm^2
CFA/ICP-MS data by T. Erhardt & C. Jensen, Uni Bern Visual Stratigraphy by J. Westhoff, CIC
30
Grain size
828 m 1444 m
Core breaks?
1 cm
31
Perimeter Ratio
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700
0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90
Perimeter Ratio
Depth in m
Perimeter ratio = measure for grain irregularity
Weikusat et al. (2009)
Weikusat et al. (2009)
Further down to 2121 m?
EDML
32
different slip-systems influence different parts of the crossed girdle
Passchier & Trouw (2005) Coaxial (pure shear)= principal axes of strain rotate
Non-Coaxial (simple shear) = strain
remain fixed with respect to the material
Deformation modes
Van Der Pluijm and Marshak (2004)
->EBSD?
33
After Schmid and Casey (1986) and Lister and Hobbs (1980), displayed by Vernooji (2005)
Crystal preferred orientations
Schmid and Casey (1986)
Coaxialy deformed quartz:
- CPOs predicted by a theoretical model for dislocation glide -> based on the Taylor-Bishop-Hill analysis (Lister et al. 1978, Lister and Hobbs 1980)
- These theoretical CPOs are supported by both experimental studies (Tullis et al. 1973, Tullis 1977) and analysis of naturally deformed quartzites (Price 1985, Schmid and Casey 1986)
34
Deformation modes
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 1468 Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 921 Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 740 Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 585 Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 891Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 696 Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma
Equal Area Lower Hemisphere N = 574
118 m 196 m 234 m 241 m 289 m 328 m 398 m
After Schmid and Casey (1986) and Lister and Hobbs (1980),
displayed by Vernooji (2005)
- in many naturally deformed rocks, a spatial transition of
symmetrical crossed girdles to asymmetrical single girdles occurs
- related to an increasingly non-coaxial strain path
- this transition marks the bulk finite strain at which grains in
unfavourable orientations for continued intracrystalline slip are 1) partially substituted through grain boundary migration of more favourably oriented grains and
2) partially reoriented by selective recrystallisation (Schmid and Casey, 1986)
EGRIP
35
Crystal preferred orientations
Crossed girdle in quartz
Type I
Type II
Law et al. (1986), modified
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma Equal Area
Lower Hemisphere
N = 766
234 m
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma Equal Area
Lower Hemisphere
N = 631
240 m
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma Equal Area
Lower Hemisphere
N = 716
250 m
Kamb Contours C.I. = 2.0 Sigma Equal Area
Lower Hemisphere
N = 1371
272 m