• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Bounded Cohomology and Representations of Surface Groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Bounded Cohomology and Representations of Surface Groups"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Bounded Cohomology and Representations of Surface Groups

Anna Wienhard

Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago 5734 S. University Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

Mathematische Arbeitstagung June 22-28, 2007 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Mathematik, Bonn, Germany

In this talk I report on joint work with M. Burger and A. Iozzi [1, 2].

Let Σ be a compact connected oriented surface of negative Euler character- sticχ(Σ)<0. The representation variety

Hom(π1(Σ), G)/G,

where G is a semisimple Lie group with finite center and no compact factors, is isomorphic to the moduli space of flat G-bundles on Σ and, by choosing a complex structure on Σ, also to the moduli space of (polystable) G-Higgs bundles on Σ with vanishing Chern classes.

Our study of Hom(π1(Σ), G)/G is motivated by the well known fact that when Σ is a closed surface andG= PSL(2,R), the Teichm¨uller space of Σ em- beds as a connected component into Hom(π1(Σ),PSL(2,R))/PSL(2,R). This connected component is homeomorphic to a ball and consists entirely of discrete and faithful representations.

There are two families of Lie groupsGfor which “higher Teichm¨uller spaces”

in Hom(π1(Σ), G)/G are known to exist.

If G is a split real form and Σ a closed surface Hitchin defined in [5] the Hitchin component HomHit(π1(Σ), G)/G⊂Hom(π1(Σ), G)/Gand showed that it is homeomorphic to a ball. Recently, Labourie [6] showed that all represen- tation in

HomHit(π1(Σ),PSL(n,R))/PSL(n,R)

are discrete, faithful and loxodromic. At the same time Fock and Goncharov introduced in [3] the set of positive representations

Hompos(π1(Σ), G)/G⊂Hom(π1(Σ), G)/G,

whenGis a split real form, and showed that positive representations are discrete and faithful. For closed surface HomHit(π1(Σ), G)/G= Hompos(π1(Σ), G)/G.

When Gis a Lie group of Hermitian type, we define (using bounded coho- mology) a continuous bounded function, the Toledo invariant

τ : Hom(π1(Σ), G)/G→R.

(2)

The Toledo invariant satisfies a Milnor-Wood-type inequality

|τ| ≤rG(Σ)|,

where rG denotes the real rank of G. The set of maximal representations Hommax1(Σ), G)/GHom(π1(Σ), G)/G

is defined as the level set τ−1(rG(Σ)|).

WhenG= PSL(2,R), thenτequals the Euler number and Goldman showed in [4] that for closed surfaces Hommax(π1(Σ),PSL(2,R))/PSL(2,R) is the im- age of the embedding of Teichm¨uller space.

We show that for every G of Hermitian type the set of maximal represen- tations consists entirely of discrete and faithful representation. Further results and details of the proofs can be found in [2].

ForG= Sp(2n,R), the unique Lie group which is both a split real form and of Hermitian type, we show that HomHit(π1(Σ), G)/Gand Hompos(π1(Σ), G)/G are proper subsets of Hommax(π1(Σ), G)/G.

References

[1] M. Burger, A. Iozzi, and A. Wienhard,Surface group representations with maximal Toledo invariant, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, S´er. I336(2003), 387–

390.

[2] M. Burger, A. Iozzi, and A. Wienhard,Surface group representations with maximal Toledo invariant, preprint, available atarXiv:math.DG/0605656. [3] V. Fock and A. Goncharov, Moduli spaces of local systems and higher Teichm¨uller theory, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. (2006), no. 103, 1–211.

[4] W. M. Goldman, Topological components of spaces of representations, Invent. Math. 93(1988), no. 3, 557–607.

[5] N. J. Hitchin, Lie groups and Teichm¨uller space, Topology 31 (1992), no. 3, 449–473.

[6] F. Labourie,Anosov flows, surface groups and curves in projective space, arXiv:math.DG/0401230, Invent. Math.165 (2006), no. 1, 51–114.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In Chapter 2, a special attention is paid to the notion of ϕ-related tensor fields on smooth manifolds, which allows us to define a dragging of tensor fields (including vector

2 boils down to classify Z ≥0 -valued matrices satisfying certain polynomial-type relations.. This is my favourite part of

These notes are written for the seminar representation theory of finite groups at Uni- versity of Zurich, Fall Semester 2019, supervised by Dr.. All definitions, proofs and theorems

In the rest of this section we answer question 1 and question 2 for algebraic curves using topological methods. In the case of curves we use genera instead of Hilbert polynomials,

nite group is of this type, known as the inverse Galois problem (see [MM99℄).. A

It is currently strongly debated which brain region contributes to which specific function in temporal processing. Traditionally, it was believed that the cerebellum is responsible

Mapping class group, Modular group, Representation variety, Maximal representations, Toledo invariant, Teichm¨ uller space.. The author was partially supported by the

Surface group representations with maximal Toledo invariant provide therefore a class of geometrically meaningful Kleinian groups acting on higher rank Hermitian symmetric spaces..