• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Additional file 9: Table S9: Relative risk and ratio of relative risk between document sources for total AEs and SAEs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Additional file 9: Table S9: Relative risk and ratio of relative risk between document sources for total AEs and SAEs"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Additional file 9: Table S9: Relative risk and ratio of relative risk between document sources for total AEs and SAEs

Source CSR Journal publication Registry report Ratio of RRs

Treatme nt arm

Treatm

ent Placebo Estima te

Treatm

ent Placebo Estima te

Treatm

ent Placebo Estima

te Source comparison Outcom

e

Eve

nts N Eve

nts N RR (95%

CI) Eve

nts N Eve

nts N RR (95%

CI) Eve

nts N Eve

nts N RR (95%

CI)

CSR vs.

Pub

CSR vs.

Reg

Pub vs.

Reg

Total AEs

443 4

64 22

232 3

36 31

1.05 (1, 1.1)

229 6

64 22

114 2

36 31

1.08 (1.02, 1.15)

747 64

22 514 36

31 1.15 (1.04, 1.27)

0.97 (0.90, 1.05)

0.91 (0.81, 1.02)

0.94 (0.84, 1.06)

Total

SAEs 650

64

22 444 36

31 0.75 (0.64, 0.87)

82 64

22 81 36

31 0.87 (0.56, 1.35)

130 64

22 158 36

31 0.57 (0.42, 0.77)

0.86 (0.54, 1.37)

1.32 (0.94, 1.85)

1.53 (0.89, 2.60)

Relative difference*

CSR vs.

Pub

CSR vs.

Reg

Pub vs.

Reg

Total AEs

1.93 (1.86, 2.00)

5.94 (5.54, 6.36)

3.07 (2.85, 3.31)

Total SAEs

7.93 (6.32, 9.95)

5 (4.16, 6.02)

0.63 (0.48, 0.83)

CSR: clinical study report; RRs: relative risks; N: total number of patients in treatment group; CI: confidence interval; AEs:

adverse events; SAEs: serious adverse events; Pub: Journal publication; Reg: Registry report

*Relative risk was calculated based on harm caused by any antipsychotic intervention (excluding harm from placebo) and used the total number of patients n=6422 as the denominator.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Employing an experimental design, Experiment 2 demonstrated that feelings of relative deprivation cause greater risk-taking among low agency-thinking individuals, providing

Figure S1B: Treatment algorithm for patient randomized to ketamine 5 Table S2: Feasibility thresholds (progression criteria) and intervention stopping rule for other

[r]

As shown in Table A1, p-value for the Bartlett’s test is small enough to reject the null hypothesis of an identity matrix of correlations and KMO values are all greater than 0.5

We next show how an intensified distaste at experiencing low relative wealth (a concern at having low social status) reduces relative risk aversion, which, in turn, results in

A utility function exhibits nonincreasing relative risk aver- sion if the quotient of the riskless asset's share and wealth does not increase with the wealth level w.. We prove in

Contribute to transforming the way societies manage risks to economic, ecological, and social systems while confronting the global trends that are amplifying these risks..

The four choice situations employed in the experiment can be alternatively presented using the conventional microeconomic apparatus of indifference curves and choice sets