• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

AnUnbiasedParetoImprovementstrategyforpovertyalleviation Zaman,MdMonowaruz MunichPersonalRePEcArchive

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "AnUnbiasedParetoImprovementstrategyforpovertyalleviation Zaman,MdMonowaruz MunichPersonalRePEcArchive"

Copied!
26
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

An Unbiased Pareto Improvement strategy for poverty alleviation

Zaman, Md Monowaruz

31 December 2010

Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27800/

MPRA Paper No. 27800, posted 04 Jan 2011 13:23 UTC

(2)

An Unbiased Pareto Improvement Strategy for Poverty Alleviation

Abstract

!

" "

# ! $# !%

&

' (!)( $( ! ) ( %

1.0 Introduction

& * +

, -

&

. / '

0 * +

$- " %

# " &

* & +

' , ' 1 2

.

" &

$1 " 34 %5

(3)

6 7 6

8 7 9

7 0

2.0 The Challenge of Poverty Alleviation

)

/ : $ %

"

8 $ % ;

"

. 8 ' < <=

> ? '

8 1

0 &

8

"

" /

& -

34 8

@ / &

- " "

A

2 5 "

$3B? B %"

&

(4)

C 8

D & "

! '

"

" E . "

/ " > < =

8

! " "

8

A & 6

" &

& " . 7

,

" &

$/ " %

" " & &

" / =4 4 33 3

>3 4

! "

? A "

C / 6

- + &2 5

$- " F%

9 ! ;. 1 $9!;1% / / 1

(5)

>

3.0 Why is Unbiased Pareto Improvement?

*

0 C+

' 1 +

9 " 1 $ 33 % 21 +

0 G

$ % 5 9 " - +

$- " B% 0

-

6

!

$E6 % .

. .

! E6 "

!

2 5 ! "

$H " 3% ;

) $ ;)%

! 1 $ !1% ! "

!1 0 $!;/% &

!;/

;) ;) !1

I J

C' K K

(6)

=

2 $D %5

' 2 $ D%5 D

' . "

! D $

% $ %

2 : $ :%5 $H " 3% ! :

E :

1 $ 33 %

& 9 " .

.

! 2; ! / $;!/% ! '

' 5

!

*

$- " B%+

! 8

$H " % ' -

$ B% " *

" " " +

. "

* $H " %+

* +

D

(7)

F

" * 5

$H " 3% !1

!;/ ! :"

D " !;/

"

! "

0 .

'

!1 !

. " /

! $/ !% A "

# !

$# !% ' / ! 9

9 " : "

;

E "

" # ! '

/ ! # !

E " / !

# !"

" D

.

! .

" # ! E . "

A +

6 . # !

$1 " 33B%

(8)

B .

" # !

)

A "

&

. ' . " !

. .

/ ! ' # ! =

/ ! "

& 6 # !

' " (!)( $( ! ) ( %

>

4.0 Real Income to Contribution Ratio

! * +"

"

"

>

E > I ( ! ) , ;

(9)

4

! "

0 $H " 3%

1 "

$! ) L % $! ) M % !

$! ) L %

. H $ 4%

: $ :%

; :

9 " :"

"

! "

"

" 8

& '

" " "

E > I ( $(!)A%

(10)

3

" 0 "

" * +

,

*Real Income to Contribution Ratio (RICR)+ !

" (!)( L

E > : (!)(

(!)( " λ"

; !

0 !

" " 0

$H " 4% & ' " :

' 1 ; ' " &

. * + ' "

(!)( λλ' E >

' . "

/ ? ?" 4?

'

"

"

λλ'' (!)( Lλ E > 6

'

0 7 :

' (!)( $ %λλ' , N

" (!)( O

$

2 5 % ! 8

& O (!)( =

.

(11)

" 8

= '

E . "

/ < =

<>=

<B= # "

(!)( F

8

(!)( = F E . " + .

0 9

? ? "

. 3? ! " (!)(

0 !

3?

' (!)( .

.

5.0 The Strategy

!"##$%

5.1 The Objectives

6 8 (!)(

" " " "

8 8

. "

(12)

!

"

(!)("

'

# ! $# !%"

"

' . "

A

' "

/ !

5.2 Greenhouse Care Economics

"

. 0

* $# !%+

* 0 $!;/%+

&

,

(!)( ' . " < 4

/ 8 A "

8 .

"

!

"

' "

(13)

. "

.

&

@ )

$@ );% $H " =% @ );

"

@ );

6

0 " @ );

. . A

"

5.3 Greenhouse Care Economics Framework

8 =

@ ); @

) ; E $@ );E% $H " % ' @ );E

8

+ 8

"

8 = " @ );E

0 ' 0

@ );E

! /

& !

@ );E"

" *

$H " %+

E " "

(14)

C

&

" "

&

@ );

:

0 '

0 @ );E

*

$D %+ @ ); "

0 ' " 0

'

@ );

E . "

$( 1 " 3BF%

# !

" .

0

A 8 "

.

1 @ );E

' !

" A

" ! " +

(15)

>

' +

0

7 ' .

@ );E

@ );E

;

+

"

. &

'

* +

A "

@ );

; " " "

! "

. &

@ );E

.

. "

- $- " B% !

!

$ %

(16)

=

" +

"

/

9

"

+ .

" +

:

" +

! + "

! "

. 0

. ; "

1

6

' " "

"

9 $ " %

9

8 . ,

"

/

(17)

F .

5.4 Greenhouse Care Economics Institute

' @ ) ; $@ );% 0

@ );E ' @ )

; ! $@ );!%

@ );E

$H " 3% " " + "

" " " " 0 "

@ );! P

@ );

* $D %+

!

@ );E @ );!

! "

. 1

. " @ );!

2 0 5

! " @ );!

@ );E '

= C" @ );E

( D

E ' 1

C 9 " ; ;

> 6 1 ! 6

(18)

B

= 1 /

F 1 / 1

B )

" >" = F

" "

C B

$ = C% @ );!

" " @ );

@ );E !

0 @ );E

@ );E @ );!

"

# ,

, @ );!

@ );!

.

E . " D

! " 2

5 "

! "

0 @ );!

0 0 "

" !

/

(19)

4

6.0 A Prototype Implementation

! @ ) ; $H " %"

/

@ );E = C

6.1 Inception Phase

@ );E ( D $(PD%

) (PD

0

# ! "

' @ );!

. @ );E &

" " $ "

% 6 .

7 ! / "

"

'

"

'

0

6.2 Development Phase

A " @ );E

. 8

(20)

3

@ );!

.

! "

"

" & '

& &

'

&

@ );E

. &

E "

9 8

- $- " B% 1 "

@ );!

8

' @ );E 0

" .

@ );! Only improving management efficiency of the government hospitals,

the medical services can be made far better than existing private clinics since they already have better doctors, technicians and equipments. The contribution of the insurance policies will not be significant from monetary perspective but they must ensure the

(21)

intended services by means of better co-ordination, surveillance and monitoring of the service delivery.

6.3 Maturity Phase

9

' . " / "

3B 34 " &

=

$ % ;

2 5

2 5

&

: & "

8 . '

! + " + * $1 " 34 %+

!

+ @ );E"

& /

&

' = C"

0 .

" +

$ %

E . " ?

. " ? > ? . "

4? ! "

E F

(22)

2 5

= C

,

"

. ' . = C

" "

/ .

: .

B" +

1 " +

> ! =?

. $ % > ? . "

. " =? !

= ? . " 3

+ F /

+ 4 0

$ >? %

(23)

E F I +

6

7 ' 9 "

8

"

'

@ );E ; 0

; @ );E"

7.0 Conclusion

. &

* +

* + $1 " 33B% A "

(!)(

8

' 6

9 "

!

$1 " 33B% 9 "

6

0 0

'

(24)

C

(

@ " / " Q ; 1 $ 34F%" & & '

' ' ( " R Q ; " )!" 3N F>

9 " @ $ F% ' " Q ; ! " S:" & & >

9 " @ $ B% ( ( ' " Q

; " >I " & F

9 " Q ( $ 3> % ) ' " ; " =& >

T " , $ 3C3% * & + ' ,

- " ; Q " 1 3C3" >3 =>3&==

T " $ 33 % . ( " , / ; ( "

6 , > 3" ) " '

" 6 $ % 2/ I 1 ' 8 / 5 (

;. 1 ' / " # TI &

! ; '

) " $ 3%" 1 / 1 9 + ;

Q 5" @ ) / E " ! )A" , / " )'

" 9 $ 33C% / ' 0 " 6 , B>"

9 ( ;

, " - &T $ 34>% 1 * ' " ' ; (

B>I CC& =

, " D ) " $ 33 % ' 2 ' , 2 & * "

, - I ) #

, " D ) " $ 33 % , * " Q

$>%I C==&FB

, " D ) " $ 33>% & * " ' ;

( " U 4>" , C" &C=3&CF4

" ) T 9 "1 : $ % / 3 * " 1

O / " ! F

( " E $ F% & 4 5 "

$ I A %

1 " ' $ 34 %" E I ' ; ; D "

A. I )

1 " ' $ 33B%" 6 V D 1 7" :1; 1 !);(D (

, D;D 1 C" : " $ I C %

(25)

>

1 " @ Q $ 3FB%"' , ( " Q ; "

:SSU" CN =

1 " Q ; $ 3B>%" **! ( 1 1 "++ (

; 1 " S:!" 3N ==

1 " Q ; $ % , & '

, & " R Q ; " , " & >> &

>B4

1 " Q ; $ 33 % ' 0 ( & " ,

/ ; ( 2 " ) " 6 , &CF>

1 " Q ; $ 34B% , , 6 . 1

* " Q ; : " SSU" & &>4

6 " ; ( $ 34=% 7 &6 8 2 0

* ( & " ) #

- " $ F% * 4 * * 9 5 :;;<+" A

E 1 " 1

- " $ B% , * 8 3

/ , " ' " , -

- " $ % 3 3 " ' " , -

H " $ 334% ( = ( 7 , "

H " $ % 7 , * 4 & .

( * * & " Q / ' "

U B" , CP>

H " $ % 7 9 7 , * & "

, 1 " >F ) " ! ; " D " /

H " $ =% 7 , & 8 *

. ( " C ' ; ) " - ; + E "

, 1 #

H " $ F% , > & 8 >

' 2 ? * ' . " ('

$ I & F > %

H " $ 4% ( @ = . A B*

* ( " ) ; ! 1 & ) " !)E'!

H " $ 3%

6 " A. / ; ) " A. # " 3

H " $ % & ' 3 '

* " UD U D W T " @

(26)

=

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In addition, the secondparas of the telemetry group considered the present labor less painful than the previous one signifi- cantly more often than the controls.. Among the

Methods: This study used data from the 2015 Nepal Services Provision Assessment. A total of 523 pregnant and 309 postpartum women were included for the analysis of utilisation

Instead, a methodology based on a social constructivist approach to learning would have analysed the main discourses or story-lines in the employment field in the various

Moreover a third component (Fig. 1b, top) was identified which forms short nanoslabs built from adjacent layered structural motifs. Taking into account EDX analyses and the distance

ƒ The latest model for the provision of discrete troposphere delays, the Vienna Mapping Func- tions 3 (VMF3; Landskron and Böhm, 2018a, [5]), is provided for all GNSS, VLBI and DORIS

The very idea of dual co∼event means, has become the development of two concepts: mean-measure set [16] 2 and mean-probable event [20, 24], which were fi rst introduced as

It provides an overview of the basic features and recent developments in intergovernmental fiscal relations and accountability mechanisms, and examines the implications of

The results of the above GEOSS scenario for ecosystem service and biodiversity assessment provides important information on the current status and capacity of the ecosystems of