• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Additional problems, week 6 Example 15. Solve the wave equation for u(x, 0) = ex,

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Additional problems, week 6 Example 15. Solve the wave equation for u(x, 0) = ex,"

Copied!
4
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Additional problems, week 6

Example 15. Solve the wave equation for u(x,0) =ex, ut(x,0) = sin(x).

Example 16. Solve the wave equation for u(x,0) = ln(1 +x2),ut(x,0) = x−4.

Example 17. Solve the wave equation utt −uxx = 0 for 0 < x < 1, t > 0 for the initial conditionsu(x,0) = sin(πx), ut(x,0) = sin(2πx).

Example 18. Solve the wave equation

utt−∆u= 0, t >0, u(x,0) = 0,

ut(x,0) =p(x).

forx∈R3 with p(x1, x2, x3) =x1x2 using Kirchhoff’s formula.

12

(2)

Solutions for the additional problems Solution 15. We get

u(x, t) = ex+t+ex−t

2 +1

2 Z x+t

xt

sin(ξ) dξ

= 1

2 ex+t+ext+ (−cos(ξ))|x+txt

= 1

2 ex+t+ext−cos(x+t) + cos(x−t) .

Solution 16. We get

u(x, t) = 1

2 ln(1 + (x+t)2) + ln(1 + (x−t)2) +1

2 Z x+t

xt

ξ−4 dξ u(x, t) = 1

2ln (1 + (x+t)2)(1 + (x−t)2) +1

2 ξ2

2 −4ξ

x+t

xt

| {z }

(∗)

.

Computation of the last part

(∗) = 1 2

(x+t)2

2 −4(x+t)− (x−t)2

2 + 4(x−t)

= 1 2

1

24xt−8t

=xt−4t.

The final solution reads u(x, t) = 1

2ln (1 + (x+t)2)(1 + (x−t)2)

+xt−4t.

-4 1 -2

0.5 2 0

0 0 -2

13

(3)

Solution 17. We get

u(x, t) = sin(π(x+t)) + sin(π(x−t))

2 +1

2 Z x+t

xt

sin(2πξ) dξ

= sin(π(x+t)) + sin(π(x−t))

2 +1

2

−cos(2πξ) 2π

x+t

xt

= sin(π(x+t)) + sin(π(x−t))

2 − 1

4π (cos(2π(x+t))−cos(2π(x−t))).

-1 2

1.5 0

1 1

0.5 0

1

0 -1

Solution 18. In order to solve the wave equation in R3 we use Kirchhoff’s formula. For the sperical coordinates

y1 =x1+tcos(ϕ) sin(θ), y2 =x2 +tsin(ϕ) sin(θ), y3 =x3+tcos(θ)

the solution can be computed as

u(x, t) = 1 4πt

Z π 0

Z 0

(p(y1, y2)t2sin(θ) dϕdθ.

The integration t2sin(θ) dϕdθ is caused by the transformation from cartesian to sperical coordinates. In particular the part t2sin(θ) comes by computing the Jacobean-matrix of the coordinate transformation from

x

S(x,t)

p(y) dσy,

where S(x, t) denotes the sphere with radius t and center x in the three-dimensional space, i.e., S(x, t) = {y∈R3 : |y−x|=t}to

Z π

0

Z

0

p(y1, y2t2sin(θ) dϕdθ.

14

(4)

Let therefore be (x, y, z) =g(t, ϕ, θ). The Jacobean-matrix reads

Jg =



cos(ϕ) sin(θ) tcos(ϕ) cos(θ) −rsin(ϕ) sin(θ) sin(ϕ) sin(θ) tsin(ϕ) cos(θ) rcos(ϕ) sin(θ)

cos(θ) −rsin(θ) 0



with orthogonal columns and its determinant reads det(Jg) =grgϕgθ = 1·t·sin(θ) =t2sin(θ).

For p=x1x2 we get

u(x, t) = 1 4πt

Z π 0

Z 0

(x1+tcos(ϕ) sin(θ))(x2+tsin(ϕ) sin(θ))t2sin(θ) dϕdθ

= t 4π

Z

0

Z π

0

x1x2sin(θ) +x1tsin(ϕ) sin2(θ)

| R{z }

=0

+x2tcos(ϕ) sin2(θ)

| R{z }

=0

+t2cos(ϕ) sin(ϕ) sin2(θ) dθdϕ

= x1x2t 4π

Z 0

Z π 0

sin(θ) dθdϕ+ t3

Z 0

Z π 0

cos(ϕ) sin(ϕ) sin2(θ)

| {z }

1

2sin(2ϕ) sin2(θ)

dθdϕ

=x1x2t+ 0

and the solution simply reads u(x, t) =x1x2t.

15

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In [6] an improved version for the setting of FE-HMM-L, the finite element HMM scheme for long time wave propagation described in Chapter 6 was used.. The theorems presented below

The paper deals with approximate and exact controllability of the wave equation with interior pointwise control acting along the curve specified in advance in the

Indeed, it even coincides with the solution trajectory corresponding to an optimization horizon of length 2L/c = 2 which is needed in order to show finite time controllability..

Receding horizon control (RHC), also known as model predictive control (MPC), is a well established technique in order to deal with optimal control problems on an infinite time

Second, we aim using the well-known direct integration on the reduced nonlinear ordinary differential equation obtained after using the travelling wave transformation on the

Recently, many powerful methods have been estab- lished and developed to carry out the integrations of NLPDEs of all kinds, such as the subsidiary ordinary differential equation

The action of a free particle in flat space will always be minimized by the path with the shortest distance between

Solutions for the additional problems Solution 1.. So the pde