• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

India’s Joint Andaman and Nicobar Command is a Failed Experiment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "India’s Joint Andaman and Nicobar Command is a Failed Experiment "

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

EastWestCenter.org/APB Number 289 | November 17, 2014

Asia Pacific Bulletin

India’s Joint Andaman and Nicobar Command is a Failed Experiment

BY ANIT MUKHERJEE

In October 2001, with much fanfare, India announced the crea on of a joint command in the Andaman and Nicobar island chain, which dominates the western approach to the Malacca strait. From the perspec ve of jointness and from what was originally envisaged by its architects, the Andaman and Nicobar Command (ANC) has turned out to be a failed experiment. However, this episode sheds light on the Indian military, its higher defense management and also provides insights about India’s Look East policy and its military engagements and capabili es in the South China Sea.

India’s model of civil‐military rela ons leaves opera onal and organiza onal ma ers almost en rely to the military. The ANC was India’s first joint command, but the individual services were opposed to the idea as they feared a loss of power and a cutback on senior officer billets. They did everything they could to prevent this experiment from succeeding. This was done mainly by denying service assets to the ANC. The only major assets it gained in its 13 years of service were an amphibious landing ship, INS Kesari, and a naval offshore patrol vehicle, INS Saryu, a few fast a ack boats and some Dornier aircra . Other problems included a bi er inter‐service dispute over land and a failure to agree upon a common military code. The peculiar system of rota on of the command among the three services resulted in a rapid turnover in the post of the commander‐in‐chief, Andaman and Nicobar command (CINCAN), with 12 of them appointed since 2001, averaging a li le over a year in command. To be er appreciate these difficul es, one has to analyze the mo va on of individual services.

Due to its mari me impera ve the Indian Navy has historically claimed ownership of the island chain and un l 2001 all military units sta oned there func oned under a naval commander. In 2001, in an act of magnanimity, the Indian Navy willingly offered this post for the joint command “experiment.” The leadership at that me believed that the success of this ini a ve would lead to other joint opera onal commands. But, over me, the Navy came to see this decision as a mistake as no more joint commands were formed. According to reports the navy is currently lobbying the government to revert this command back to them. While denying assets to the ANC, the Indian navy has strengthened Eastern Naval Command (ENC), based in Visakhapatnam, which has emerged as India’s most important naval command. Indeed, the strategic dimensions of India’s Look East policy—in terms of visits and exercises of the Indian Navy in the South China Sea—are conducted by elements from the ENC instead of the

geographically proximate ANC.

The Indian Air Force was ini ally enthusias c about the ANC and went about enlarging its bases on the islands. A er the 2004 tsunami, which devastated Car Nicobar air Anit Mukherjee, Assistant

Professor at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, explains that “Not only has [the Andaman and Nicobar Joint Command] failed to usher in more joint commands, but the experience might be cited by those within the military community who are opposed to [such

cooperation].”

The East-West Center promotes better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. Established by the US Congress in 1960, the Center serves as a resource for information and analysis on critical issues of common concern, bringing people together to exchange views, build expertise, and develop policy options.

Asia Pacific Bulletin

Asia Pacific Bulletin

(2)

base, leading to the loss of 116 air force personnel and their families, their enthusiasm waned. The air force has since discarded plans to permanently base aircra on the islands and has currently designated Kalaikunda air force sta on, more than 1000 kilometers away on the Indian mainland, to provide air cover. The imprac cality of this arrangement is seemingly lost on defense planners. The army has li le role to play and few pla orms to deploy on the islands. Notably, it has added only a

Territorial Ba alion to the ANC while building up an amphibious brigade capability in Thiruvananthapuram on the mainland.

The Andaman and Nicobar Joint Command therefore has been a “grand failure” in terms of what was envisaged by its architects. Not only has it failed to usher in more joint commands, but the experience might be cited by those within the military community who are opposed to this idea. Among former Commanders in Chief of the ANC the common refrain was that the experience represented not only a missed opportunity but an overall “sad story.” Significantly, civilians have played no role in either building up the ANC or pushing for more joint commands. In fact, as noted by a report of the standing commi ee on defense, civilians did not even fill up mandated posts in the ANC, including a diploma c post, as “no one wanted to go there.”

This is not to say that no capabili es have been built up on the islands. In terms of infrastructure development, there has been some steady progress. A naval air base was established at Campbell Bay and runway extensions planned for another naval base at Shibpur. There are plans to build Opera onal Turn Round (OTR) bases at Campbell Bay, Dighpur and Kamorta while facili es at Port Blair, including a second floa ng dock, are being upgraded. These ini a ves, though welcome, do not address the lack of assets under the ANC. The current CINCAN, Vice Admiral PK Cha erjee, recently stated that the ANC needs “Command and Control Ships and submarines…we require an en re fleet.”

The failure of the ANC also reflects on the ongoing debate about India’s es to broader East Asia. Some analysts argue that ANC will con nue to suffer from neglect unless a considered, and strategically significant, decision is taken to economically develop the island chain. Currently, only 7% of the land, spread over 570 islands, is available for revenue purposes as the rest consists of protected forests and water bodies. There are no interna onal flights to Port Blair, thereby constraining tourism.

Environmental concerns, including protec on of indigenous tribes, therefore have trumped economic development due to which the islands, despite obtaining 30% of India’s total Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), depend upon the central government for its fiscal outlays. One of the big ideas that could transform the region has been debated for a while—the crea on of a transhipment hub at Car Nicobar. If implemented this can be a strategic game changer, as it could rival the ports of Singapore and Colombo and give India enormous economic and strategic leverage.

Naturally, such an investment will need to be protected and so ANC will be

strengthened, giving it the capability to dominate the sea lanes of the Indo‐Pacific. On the other hand, some in India oppose such a vision not just on environmental grounds but also argue that having a low military footprint in the Andaman and Nicobar islands is diploma cally advantageous so that other countries in Southeast Asia do not feel threatened. Resolving this debate will offer some clues to the outlines of the Indian counter‐reac on to China’s foray into the Indian Ocean and more asser ve stance in the South China Sea.

Asia Pacific Bulletin | November 17, 2014

“One of the big ideas that could transform the region has been debated for a while—the creation of a transhipment hub at Car Nicobar. If implemented this can be a strategic game changer, as it could rival the ports of Singapore and Colombo and give India enormous economic and strategic leverage.”

The Asia Pacific Bulletin (APB) series is produced by the East-West Center in Washington.

APB Series Editor: Dr. Satu Limaye APB Series Coordinator: Alex Forster

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the East- West Center or any organization with which the author is affiliated.

Anit Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor in the South Asia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He can be reached at isamukherjee@ntu.edu.sg.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

(i.e., alphanumerics, rectangles, figure placement, etc.). Commarrl primitives are specified to the driver by the application program via the comnand channel

metic from right to left. In order to propagate carries during arithmetic proc- esses, the internal information transfers are made in a right-to-Ieft manner. Thus,

esses such as automatic assembly. Furthermore, the lead time required to get a newly designed weapon con- trol system in to production would be shorter. Another

to trigger the modulator. The delay between the two pulses would be controlled by an electromechanical connection from a sealed aneroid altimeter in the aircraft. In the TOA

At present, using the Cambridge Computer whioh has only 1600 magnetio drum storage registers, this vooabulary is limited for most purposes to 83 spoken words

The unique features of the ITT 525 include the sharing of one core memory for input, output and processing functions; the serial bit at a time assembly and

The EDSAC at the University of Manchester was probably the first stored program Electronic Computer in oper- ation (1949). The classic text on programming the EDSAC, by

Inhibition of either the register sender recognition logic or register re- ceiver recognition logic by a local processing clock prevents information transfer and