• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

(a) Show that the well-order theorem implies the axiom of choice

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "(a) Show that the well-order theorem implies the axiom of choice"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

EXERCISES 13: LECTURE FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS

Exercise 1. Write down all axioms of ZF set theory which do not give you the creeps.

(Meaning, repeat the what kind of axioms one has.)

Exercise 2. Show that separability implies that subsets are actually sets.

Exercise 3. Show that the class of all sets can not be a set.

Hint: use Exercise 2, and remember Russell.

Exercise 4. Note that this exercise is very difficult.

(a) Show that the well-order theorem implies the axiom of choice.

Hint: LetAbe a set of non-empty sets. Then the setS

Acan be well-ordered. Find a choice function.

(b) Show that Zorn’s lemma implies the well-order theorem.

Hint: Consider the set W(X) of all subsets of X together with a well-order, i.e.

pairs(A, <A) where A⊂X and<Ais a well-order. W(X)is a partially ordered set ((A, <A)<(B, <B)holds, by definition, if <A is obtained by restriction from<B and there existsb∈B such thatA ={a∈B |a <B b}), on which one can apply Zorn’s lemma. Show that this implies (X, <X)∈W(X).

(c) Show that the axiom of choice implies Zorn’s lemma.

Hint: only for the valiant.

No submission of the exercise sheet.

1

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Given an automaton A and a WMSO[&lt;, suc]-formula ϕ, the model checking problem asks whether every word accepted by A satisfies ϕ.. request,

a) Formalize the following statement as a formula in first order predicate logic: If every node has a loop or has at least one other node that it is connected to, then every node

Hint: Remember the HORS from the lecture Exercise 1.2 (Closures of APTAs).. We show the closure of APTAs under

is a coproduct of X and Y in the category of sets. (40) Show that the category of sets

(46) Show that an equivalence of arbitrary categories preserves

In this exercise we want to show that the model construction for FO 2 -formulae from the lecture is optimal in the following sense: in general it does not suffice to take only

b) Show that M is associative. Using a computer program is fine, as long as you provide clear and well-documented code and structure the output in a readable form.. c) Show that

b) Show that M is associative. Using a computer program is fine, as long as you provide clear and well-documented code and structure the output in a readable form.. c) Show that