• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Global estimation of the 1-m soil water content using microwave measurements from satellite

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Global estimation of the 1-m soil water content using microwave measurements from satellite"

Copied!
22
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Global estimation of the

1-m soil water content using microwave measurements from

satellite

R. Lindau & C. Simmer

University of Bonn

(2)

Soil Moisture Measurements

50 stations in the former SU provide:

Soil moisture in the uppermost meter

Total number: 17748

Frequency: 10-daily

Period: 1952 - 1985

(3)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

ANOVA

(4)

Illustration of decomposition

Total variance External variance Internal variance

= Variance between + Mean variance the means of the within the

subsamples subsamples

(5)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

ANOVA Soil Moisture

Soil moisture within the uppermost meter measured at 48 stations in the former Soviet Union

Total number of observations: 7009

Total variance: 10682 mm

2

Varian ce in mm

2

Numbe r of bins

Error of the

total mean

Seemin g externa

l varianc

e

Error of external

means

Internal variance

True externa

l varianc

e

Relative external variance

Annual

Cycle 36 2 388 51 1034

3 338 3.16

%

Interstati

on 48 2 913

3 10 1558 912

3 85.40

%

Interannu

al 8 2 39 12 1065

4 26 0.25

%

(6)

Local longtime means

single cumulative

Climatolog. rain 58.6 58.6

Soil texture 0.5 69.0

Vegetation 37.7 72.8

Terrain slope 2.8 73.0

73% of the soil moisture variance

is explained by four parameters :

(7)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Temporal Anomalies

In a second step 10 Ghz measurements are used to retrieve the remaining

temporal part of the variance.

A correlation of 0.609 is

attained .

(8)

Radio Frequency Interference

Time series of 6 GHz

brightness temperature from SMMR in France

Until 1981 the normal annual cycle is found.

After 1981 the 6 Ghz signal is

completely unusable due to

noise.

(9)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Westward intensification

The scatter is low in Sibiria, increases westward and

reaches maximum values near St.

Petersburg

(10)

Two-step Retrieval

Longterm local mean of soil moisture

Longterm mean of precipitation

Soil texture

Vegetation density

Terrain slope

Anomaly against the longterm local mean

Brightness temperatures at 10 Ghz

Anomalies of rain and air temperature

(11)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Soil Moisture

C lim at o lo g ic a l m ea n Temporal

anomalies

+

(12)

Algorithm test Illinois

Verification by independent measurements from Illinois

(13)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Algorithm test China

Underestimation of the mean soil moisture by

74mm. (200 mm / 274 mm)

Correlation low with 0.523

Mainly due to four desert

stations.

(14)

10-years mean soil moisture

REMO Algorithm

(15)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Oder Catchment

REMO

Stronger interannual variability

Stronger annual cycle

Annual cycle

delayed

(16)

AMSR Data

August

• Humid winter in SH

• Constant moisture in tropics

Summer monsoon in NH

Dry-out in NH mid-latitudes

(17)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Annual Cycle 2003

Tropics:

constant moisture

India:

Monsoon increase

Europe:

Summer dry-out

But spatial differences dominate anyhow

Brazzaville Bombay

Budapest

(18)

Conclusions

Pure spatial variance dominates the soil moisture variability

Two step algorithm for soil moisture

Local longterm mean

Anomalie (temporal variation at each site)

10 GHz channel is used, because 6 GHz is disturbed by RFI

Verification of the algorithm by Illinois and Chinese data

Application

Validation of REMO (1979-1988) with SMMR

(19)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

Chinese Soil Moisture Data

40 Stations

Measurements of 1m soil

moisture for the period 1981 -

1999

(20)

Comparison of monthly maps

REMO Dez 1979 Algo

REMO Sep 1985 Algo

(21)

Measuring Soil Water Contents at Different Scales – FZ Jülich – 17th November 2005

4 Input Parameters

Original resolution:

Vegetation 0.01°

Rain 2.5°

Soil texture 1.0°

Terrain slope 1.0°

w(d) = exp(-d/d

0

)

d

0

= 50 km

(22)

Difference REMO-Algorithm

REMO dry in South Europe and Scandinavia

REMO wet in Poland and the Ukraine

REMO extremly wet, where

peat is prescribed

Abbildung

Illustration of decomposition

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The average value of water scarcity index ( Scarcity ) , drought index ( Drought ) and groundwater depletion ( GW Depl ) ; access to sanitation ( Sanit ) and access to drinking water

Health impacts for outdoor and household air pollution are independently calculated using the fractions of disease that can be attributed to ambient air pollution exposure and

Cne of the keys to understanding and quantifying the role of soils in global change i s to have a global soils anl terrain digital database which i s accurate,

Since the covariance matrix can be estimated much more precisely than the expected returns (see Section 1), the estimation risk of the investor is expected to be reduced by focusing

Using this alternative estimation approach we derive in Section 3 the condi- tional distribution of the estimated portfolio weights and the conditional distributions of the

Globally, soil erosion by water accounts for the greatest loss of soil directly associated with other global change drivers, like land use (e.g., clear-cutting, intensification

As a part of these liaison activities research needs of the operations program are assembled by the Soil Conservation Service and relayed to the Federal Soil and Water

Based on these results, we recommend (i) carrying out repeated samplings under similar soil conditions, (ii) recording water content and bulk density of the fine earth