In A W s a (C c d a 2 G im w a In to o M In c c G w S w t t t m E M s (s C a t u e R U 5 s
‐ Departm
Inve
ntroduction At the Depa Westphalia U
eries of inves a compound Cumbasil® M
hicken mite distribution a and natural 2019a), as we GARMEISTER &
mages were t were examine and possibly b n this study, o be assesse order to asses Material & M n order to te control by Cu collected in Germany) by which were f Subsequently with the corr he electron he Cumbasil imes, 500 magnification Edwards; Sca Model VEGA ufficient int secondary e Cumbasil® M and ventral v he sputter a up to 5,000 t examined for Results Using electro 5,000 times, urface (cutic
ment of Agricult
estigation
R
artment of niversity of A stigations wa d of microm
Mite, Wittel e. After det and the runn
surfaces (cf ell as light m
& BOELHAUVE taken. First, t ed with regar blocked joints the invasive ed using elec ss the initial s Methods
est the effect umbasil® Mi
a laying h y nocturnal further inve y, the red ch responding s
microscopic l® Mite prep
times an ns (Sputter anning Elect A SBH, Tes trinsic condu electron mic Mite and con view were f and recorded times. The su
r changes an
on microscop no changes le) of the ch
ture and Depart
on the inv
Roderich Gar
Agriculture Applied Scien
s carried out minerals of er, Germany ermining th ning behavio f. GARMEISTER
microscopic ex 2019b) scan the extremiti rd to damage s.
ness of Cum ctron micros suspicion of a
tiveness of t te, red chick hen farm (
non‐invasiv estigated on
icken mite w stages of dev c examinatio paration was nd 2000 t Coater Mo tron Micros
can) after uctivity in t croscopy). Bo ntrol mites f
first vaporize d in various urfaces of th d peculiaritie
py up to a m could be d icken mites.
Rese
tment of Mech www4.fh‐sw
vasivenes (Derm
rmeister, An
of the So nces (SWUAS on the effec natural ori y) on the
e particle s our on artifi
R & BOELHA
xaminations nning electro
es and the he es to the cut
basil® Mite w copic images a biocidal effe
he prophylac ken mites w
Bioland, NR ve mite tra the same d was determin velopment.
on, a sample s recorded 1 times in t odel S 150
cope for SE determining he SEM mo oth mites w rom the dor ed with gold magnificatio e animals w es.
magnification etected on Cumbasil® M
arch No
anical Engineer wf.de/cms/fors
ss of Cumb manyssus g
ne Schulz‐Be
uth S), a t of igin red size cial
AUVE (cf.
onic ead ticle
was s in ect.
ctic ere RW, aps, day.
ned For e of 100 the B, EM, g a ode with rsal d in ons ere
n of the Mite
ad (Fi eve Mo ica pe we
Fig Cum (rig
Dis ME
pa bru flo the
Fig Ori tom Ch tle
otes
ring and Autom schungsnotizen
basil® Mit gallinae)
eenken and
hesion can b gs. 1 and 2).
en after sim ost of the pa al impact. Als
netrated pa ere to be obse
. 1 (left): Elec mbasil® Mite g ght): Same view
scussion
EWIS and ULR
rticles were ushing off t our beetles).
e invasive eff
. 3: Image from ginal signature mic particles (Fo
icken mites a es, but a larg
N
mation Technolo n/
te on the r
Marc Boelh
be described Some of the mple treatme
rticles were d so with the s rticles and/o erved.
ctron microsco roup. Dorsal vie w. Magnification
ICHS (1999) r difficult to heir experim
Electron mi fect of these p
m the publicatio e: REM. Detail o
ossil Shield ®) su are significan er photo (5,0
No. 4/Marc
ogy, Soest – ISS
red chicke
hauve
as superficia ese particles ent with a d detached wit simply wash or injuries of
pe image of a ew. Magnificat n 5,000x.
reported that remove whe mental anima icroscopic im particles (Fig
on of Mewis an of the Coxa yo unk into the cu ntly smaller t 000 times) s
h 2019
SN 2567‐0484 ‐
en mite
l, non‐invasiv have adhere drop of wate thout mecha
ed animals n f the Kutiku
a mite from th ion 2,000x. Fig.
t the kieselgu en washing o als (grain an mages showe
. 3).
nd Ulrichs (1999 on T. molito. Di uticle.
han flour be hows no dam
ve ed er.
n‐
no ula
he . 2
ur or nd ed
9).
ia‐
e‐
m‐
a (F F a s S 4 in in
F g c S
F in th im o In M w e t w t
‐ Departme age to the c Figs. 1 and 2) Furthermore, as it has be
ive/biocidal STADLER et a 4 shows this.
n Fig. 5 at 7,0 n Fig. 2 at 5,0
ig. 4: Diatomic rain beetle. Ma ation by Stadle . oryzae expose
ig. 5: Wax efflo n a rice grain b
he publication mage of a wax oryzae individua n addition, t Mite was 63 whereas the et al. (2017) w
hickness of 4 with the large ion at 350 nm
nt of Agricultur cuticle or pe
).
the typical w en described particles (M l., 2017). A c
The spherica 000x magnifi 000x magnific
soil on the fron agnification 40
r et al. (2017).
ed to 500 ppm
orescence after beetle. Magnific by Stadler et a x bloom (Wx) o al exposed to 50 the average
μm (cf. GARM
average size was 10 μm.
45 nm and a er portion at m (0.35 μm).
re and Departm enetrated cu
wax effloresc d several tim MEWIS and
omparison o al wax bloom
cation should cation.
nt part of the b 0x. Picture tak Original signatu DE.
r contact with a cation 7,000x. P l. (2017). Origi on the abdom 00 ppm NSA tre
particle size
MEISTER & BO
of diatoms The aluminu bimodal len 1.5 μm and t The alumini
Resear
ment of Mechan www4.fh‐swf mbasil partic
cence is missi mes with in ULRICHS, 19 f Fig. 2 with ms clearly visi
d also be visi
reastplate of a en from the pu ure: Prosternum
aluminium pow Picture taken f nal signature: S inal sterna of eated wheat e of Cumba
ELHAUVE 2019 used by STAD
um plates ha ngth distribut the smaller p um powder w
rch Note
nical Engineerin f.de/cms/forsch cles
ing, nva‐
999;
Fig.
ible ible
rice ubli‐
m of
wder rom SEM a S.
sil®
9b),
DLER d a tion por‐
was
sig tha Th pe ab cut ou Cu the tha of de ob wh Cu On tio Cu Fin Wit me
Ref Ga infl en No Ga size silic Res Ga infl chi 6/2 Me ato der Pes 113 Sta Na a n
es
ng and Automat hungsnotizen/
gnificantly mo an diatomace is renewed nds primaril sence of the ticle, wax ef t here, suppo mbasil® Mite e electron m at Cumbasil®
chicken mit hydration. T servation of hich remaine
mbasil® Mite n the basis o ons, a purely mbasil® Mite
nancial support tteler (Rüthen, ents of good sci
ferences rmeister, R. & B luence of Cumb mite (Dermany . 5/2019, SWUA rmeister, R. & B e distribution o cate preparatio search Notes, N rmeister, R. & B luence of Cumb cken mite (Der 2019, SWUAS ewis, I., Ulrichs, omeenerden au r abrasiven sow st Science 72 (1 3‐121
adler, T., López nostructured a ovel insecticide
No.
tion Technology ore effective eous earth (ST
indication th y on the pa e typical inva fflorescence) ort the assum e has no bioc microscopic im
Mite has no es in the for This is also
the continu ed viable ev e (cf. GARMEIS
of the above mechanical m e product can
t: This work w , Germany) an entific practice
Boelhauve, M. ( basil® Mite on t yssus gallinae) o AS
Boelhauve, M. ( f Cumbasil® Mi ons for the cont No. 3/2019, SW Boelhauve, M. ( basil® Mite on t manyssus gallin
C. (1999): Wirk uf vorratsschädl wie sorptiven Ef 1999), Blackwel
García, G.P., Gi lumina: Biocida e powder. Bulle
. 4/March 2
gy, Soest – ISSN e against rice
TADLER et al., hat the bioci article size, a
asive feature in the test mption that th
cidal effect. O mages, it ca o direct effec
rm of injurie underlined b uing activity ven after po
STER & BOELHA
and mentio mechanism o n be assumed
was financed b nd was subject e.
(2019a): Invest the movement on feathers. Re
(2019b): Invest ite in comparis trol of the red c WUAS
(2019c): Invest the migration a nae). Research
kungsweise am liche Insekten.
ffekte. Az. Schä ll Wissenschafts
itto, J., Buteler, al properties an etin of Insectolo
2019
2567‐0484 ‐ e grain beetle
2017) idal effect d as well as th es (penetrate series carrie he preparatio On the basis o
n be assume ct on the bod es followed b by the simp
of the mite ollination wit
AUVE 2019c).
oned investig of action of th d.
by the compa t to the requir
igation on the of the red chick search Notes,
tigation on the on to other chicken mite.
igation of the ctivity of the re Notes, No.
morpher Di‐
Untersuchung dlingskunde / J s‐Verlag, Berlin
M. (2017):
nd mechanism o ogy 70 (1): 17‐2
es
e‐
he ed ed on of ed dy by ple es, th
a‐
he
ny re‐
k‐
ed
J.
n,
of 25
