• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Restricted 3-body problem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Restricted 3-body problem"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik 8. Mai 2013 TU Bergakademie Freiberg

Prof. Dr. O. Rheinbach/Dr. M. Helm

Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations Initial Value Problems (III)

Exercise 1

Restricted 3-body problem

We consider a satellite in the gravity field of earth and moon. We assume that the movement of the three bodies takes place within a fixed plane, and that the two heavy bodies are rotating around their barycenter with constant distance and with constant angular velocity. This means, the influence of the satellite on the orbits of earth and moon can be omitted - that’s why this is called a restricted 3-body problem.

With respect to a coordinate system which is coupled to this rotation (i. e. earth and moon have fixed positions in this system), the satellite’s orbit (x, y) = (x(t), y(t)) can be described by a system of second order differential equations:

x

00

= x + 2y

0

− µ x + µ

[(x + µ)

2

+ y

2

]

3/2

− µ x − µ [(x − µ)

2

+ y

2

]

3/2

, y

00

= y − 2x

0

− µ y

[(x + µ)

2

+ y

2

]

3/2

− µ y

[(x − µ)

2

+ y

2

]

3/2

.

Here, µ = 1/82.45 is the ratio between the mass of the moon and the cumulative mass of earth and moon, and µ = 1 − µ. The length unit is the distance between earth and moon. The earth is placed in the origin and the moon on the positive real axis. The time unit is chosen in a way, that the angular velocity of the rotation is one, i. e. the moon needs 2π time units for one orbit.

a) Rewrite the second order differential equation system as a first order system. Apply the substitutions y

1

(t) = x(t), y

2

(t) = y(t) and y

3

(t) = x

0

(t), y

4

(t) = y

0

(t).

b) Solve the first order ODE system using the Matlab routine [t,y] = ode45(@f,y0,[0 tend],options)

with the following initial values y0 in t = 0:

y

1

(0) = 1.2, y

2

(0) = 0, y

3

(0) = 0, y

4

(0) = −1.04935750983031990726.

Therefore choose an appropriate end tend for the integration interval.

c) Specify or control via the fourth input parameter options:

– the tolerances RelTol and AbsTol for the stepsize control of ode45, – the plot function for the phase plot (y

1

, y

2

) (corresponds to (x(t), y(t))),

– the detection of local minima and maxima of the orbit/trajectory (points with horizontal or vertical tangent) by use of an event function.

Hint: Analyze the additional output parameters in the statement [t,y,te,ye,ie] = ode45(@f,y0,[0 tend],options).

d) Observe what happens if

– tend will be enlarged or reduced,

– the fourth component in the initial condition y

4

(0) is rounded (for instance) to −1.05?

(2)

Initial Value Problems II 2

e) Modify the event function so that ode45 terminates after the calculation of a closed trajec- tory.

f) Solve the 3-body problem with a classical Runge-Kutta method of fourth order and constant stepsize h = (t

end

−t

0

)/n. How many integration steps n are needed to get a similar trajectory as with ode45?

Hint: Use the plot statement to generate a picture of the orbital trajectory.

g) Solve the 3-body problem a second time with ode45 using the following data µ = 0.012277471,

y

1

(0) = 0.994, y

2

(0) = 0, y

3

(0) = 0, y

4

(0) = −2.00158510637908252240537862224.

Determine a value for tend resulting in a closed trajectory. How many integration steps are needed for the associated integration interval?

Hint: The number of integration steps in ode45 depends on the chosen tolerances RelTol and AbsTol.

h) Try to reproduce the second orbit with the classical Runge-Kutta method with fixed stepsize.

Exercise 2

Determine the characteristic polynomials ρ(ζ) und σ(ζ) for the following linear multistep methods.

Verify the conditions

r

X

j=0

α

j

= 0 and

r

X

j=0

j

=

r

X

j=0

β

j

for

a) the 3–step Adams–Bashforth method, b) the 3–step Adams–Moulton method, c) 2–step Simpson method.

Exercise 3

Determine the order of consistency for

a) the explicit Nyström method with r = 2 (midpoint rule) y

n+1

− y

n−1

= 2hf(t

n

, y

n

), b) the implicit Nyström method with r = 2 (Simpson rule)

y

n+2

− y

n

= h 3

n f (t

n

, y

n

) + 4f (t

n+1

, y

n+1

) + f (t

n+2

, y

n+2

) o . Exercise 4

Which of the following linear multistep methods are convergent? If a method is not convergent: is it not consistent, not zero-stable, or neither?

a) y

n+2

=

12

y

n+1

+

12

y

n

+ 2hf (y

n+1

) b) y

n+1

= y

n

c) y

n+4

= y

n

+

43

h

f (y

n+3

) + f (y

n+2

) + f (y

n+1

) d) y

n+3

= −y

n+2

+ y

n+1

+ y

n

+ 2h

f (y

n+2

) + f (y

n+1

) .

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

According to Alejandro Quiroz Flores, the modern state holds two comparative advantages over other forms of political organization — it is far better at directing large and

The point is that only the human sciences are entangled with normativity in a special and much more far-reaching way, namely simply because only the human sciences deal

Nel senso che certamente la teoria walrasiana è una teoria dell’equilibrio generale; mentre non è esattamente vero l’opposto. Hicks nel suo articolo IS-LM: An

The red-green government of Chancellor Gerhard Schröder enforced promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and the gradual restriction of

Note that the combined conditions that σ[M ] be locally finitely presented and that σ[M ] fp be contained in mod-R are equivalent to there being a cofinal set of finitely

With suitable rock samples in hand the petrologists will be able to obtain geochemical and age informa- tion after the cruise from along the Discovery and Shona volcanic chains..

Since 2002, the “GRACE” satellite mission measures the gravity field of the Earth accurately enough to determine such variable mass fluxes on the surface (GRACE = Gravity

The visibility was impaired by light snowfall when we could observe a layer of grease ice to cover the sea surface.. It was swaying in the damped waves and torn to pieces by