• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Fra¨ıss´ e limits

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Fra¨ıss´ e limits"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Fra¨ıss´ e limits

theorem (Fra¨ıss´e)

if K is an ≃-closed class of finite σ-structures in finite relational σ with (HP), (JEP), (AP), and with arbitrarily large finite members, then there is a countable σ-structure A s.t.

• K is the class of finite substructures of A (K = age(A))

• K is strongly ω-homogeneous:

every finite partial isomorphism extends to an automorphism this Fra¨ıss´e limit of K is unique up to ≃; its FO-theory Th(A)

• is ω-categorical

• and has quantifier-elimination

so that A is also the unique countable atomic as well as the unique countable ω-saturated model of Th(A)

Model Theory Summer 13 M Otto 39/42

random structures, Fagin’s theorem, 0–1 laws

idea: consider the asymptotic behaviour for n → ∞

of probabilities µn(ϕ) := |Modn(ϕ)|

|Modn(⊤)|

that a uniformly random σ-structure of size n on {1, . . . ,n} satisfies ϕ, e.g. for ϕ ∈ FO0(σ)

• L has a limit law if µ(ϕ) := limn→∞µn(ϕ) exists for all ϕ ∈ L

• L has a 0–1 law if moreover µ(ϕ) ∈ {0,1}

theorem (Fagin)

for all finite relational signatures σ, FO0(σ) has the 0–1 law;

and the almost sure theory

ϕ ∈ FO0(σ) : µ(ϕ) = 1 is satisfiable and ω-categorical (hence complete), and coincides with the theory of the Fra¨ıss´e limit of the class of all finite σ-structures

Model Theory Summer 13 M Otto 40/42

(2)

example: the random graph/Rado graph

for σ = {E}, consider not the class of all (finite) σ-structures, but the class of all (finite) simple graphs, i.e., models of

ϕ0 := ∀x∀y(¬Exx ∧Exy ↔ Eyx)

• FModn0) has as its Fra¨ıss´e limit the random graph or Rado graph R

• its theory is axiomatised by the set of the ϕ0-compatible extension axioms Ext[ϕ0]

• ϕ ∈ Ext[ϕ0] is almost surely true in finite ϕ0-models:

µ(ϕ) := |Modn0 ∧ϕ)|

|Modn0)| = 1

⇒ Th(R) = Ext[ϕ0]|= is the almost sure theory of graphs

Model Theory Summer 13 M Otto 41/42

some further results on asymptotic probabilities

• full analogues of Fagin’s result for graphs can be obtained for any parametric class of finite σ-structures,

e.g., the class of finite tournaments (→ exercises)

• FO has a 0–1 law over every class K of arbitrarily large

finite graphs with (HP), (JEP) and (AP), but the almost sure theory need not coincide with the theory of the Fra¨ıss´e limit, nor need it be ω-categorical

→ results and survey in [Kolaitis–Pr¨omel–Rothschild 87]

• for a signature σ with at least one non-unary relation symbol, finite σ-structures are almost surely rigid; the same holds true, e.g., of finite graphs, and even w.r.t. the asymptotic measure based on no. of ≃-types rather than no. of realisations on [n]

→ e.g. [Ebbinghaus–Flum: Finite Model Theory]

Model Theory Summer 13 M Otto 42/42

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Classical and Non-Classical Model Theory Martin Otto Kord Eickmeyer Summer 2013 Exercises No.11?. Exercise 1 [warmup: expressive power

Show the existence of countable, algebraically closed (respectively real closed) fields of characteristic zero.. These cam be obtained as limits of suitable chains of substructures

Classical and Non-Classical Model Theory Martin Otto Kord Eickmeyer Summer 2013 Exercises No.3.. Exercise 1

For this exercise consider graph-like structures with a finite relational vocabulary σ consisting of binary and unary relation symbols (think of edge- and vertex-coloured

(b) Investigate the completions and the type spaces of the (incomplete) theory of one equivalence relation ∼ (to be continued in Exercise 5 below).. Suggested

Show that T cannot have any atomic models, but that all models of T are ω-homogeneous (and even

Show that FO has a 0–1 law over the class of finite tournaments, and that the almost sure theory of tournaments is the ω-categorical theory of the Fra¨ıss´ e limit of the class

[r]