• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Classical and Non-Classical Model Theory Martin Otto Kord Eickmeyer Summer 2013 Exercises No.11

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Classical and Non-Classical Model Theory Martin Otto Kord Eickmeyer Summer 2013 Exercises No.11"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Classical and Non-Classical Model Theory Martin Otto Kord Eickmeyer Summer 2013 Exercises No.11

Exercise 1 [warmup: expressive power of MSO]

Which of the following queries are MSO definable?

(i) Reachability of a green node (e.g., in directed, finite graphs).

(ii) Acyclicity of directed, finite graphs.

(iii) Mirror symmetry of finite coloured linear orderings.

(iv) Planarity of finite graphs.

Exercise 2 [Deterministic Finita Automata and the Theorem of Myhill-Nerode]

Let Σ be a finite alphabet. A deterministic finite automaton (DFA) A is a tuple (Q, δ, q0, A) consisting of

(i) a finite set Q(the set of states of the automaton), (ii) a function δ:Q×Σ→Q (the transition function), (iii) a stateq0 ∈Q (the initial state), and

(iv) a set A⊆Q of accepting states.

We define the extended transition functionδ: Q×Σ →Q by δ(q, ε) :=q,

δ(q, wa) :=δ(δ(q, w), a)

forq∈Q,a∈Σ andw ∈Σ. The automaton is said toaccept a wordwiffδ(q0, w)∈A.

The language accepted by A is defined as

LA :={w∈Σ: A acceptsw}.

Let L⊆Σ be a language. Then t.f.a.e.:

(i) Lis regular (i.e., L=LA for some DFA A), (ii) ≈L has finite index

(iii) ∼L has finite index

(iv) Lis a union of classes for some finite index right-invariant equivalence relation on Σ.

Hint: To show that (iv) implies (i), construct a DFA with Σ/∼ as state space and transition function ([w], a)7→[wa]. What makes the latter well-defined?

Suggested Homework Exercises

Exercise 3 [MSO-definable subsets of N]

For S ⊆ N consider the class ORD(S) of those finite linear orderings whose length is inS. Show that ORD(S) is MSO-definable if, and only if, S is periodic in the sense of being a finite union of sets of the form{a+np: n ∈N} for suitable a, p∈N.

Hint: The elements of ORD(S) can be viewed as strings over a unary alphabet. In Exercise 2, we showed that there is DFAAwith ORD(S) = LA. Examine the structure of this DFA.

(2)

Exercise 4 [Hanf’s Theorem with cut-off]

Letσ be a finite relational signature and `∈N. For a σ-structure A and a∈ A, the `- neighbourhood type ι`A(a) is the isomorphism type of (AN`(a), a). For a neighbourhood typeι and structure Awe set

|A|ι,` :=|ι(A)|=|{a ∈A: ι`A(a) = ι}|.

Define`(m) by

`(0) := 1

`(m+ 1) := 3·`(m) + 1,

i.e., `(m) = (3m+1−1)/2.

Let A and B be two σ-structures and m ∈ N. Suppose that for some e ∈ N, the

`(m)-neighbourhoods in A and B have less than e elements, and that for each `(m)- neighbourhood typeι

|A|ι,`(m)=|B|ι,`(m) or |A|ι,`(m),|B|ι,`(m) >e·m.

Show thatA≡m B.

Hint: Show that (Ij)j6m defined by

Ij :=n

¯

a 7→¯b: A[

N`(j)(ai),¯a '

B[

N`(j)(bi),¯b

and length(¯a)6m−jo

defines a partial isomorphism between A and B, with the convention that

Im ={()7→()}

contains the single mapping which maps the empty tuple to the empty tuple. When extending a partial mapping ¯a 7→¯b∈Ij, distinguish two cases according to whether the

`(m−j)-neighbourhood of the newly chosen element touches the`(m−j)-neighbourhood of some previously chosen element or not.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Show the existence of countable, algebraically closed (respectively real closed) fields of characteristic zero.. These cam be obtained as limits of suitable chains of substructures

Classical and Non-Classical Model Theory Martin Otto Kord Eickmeyer Summer 2013 Exercises No.3.. Exercise 1

For this exercise consider graph-like structures with a finite relational vocabulary σ consisting of binary and unary relation symbols (think of edge- and vertex-coloured

(b) Investigate the completions and the type spaces of the (incomplete) theory of one equivalence relation ∼ (to be continued in Exercise 5 below).. Suggested

Show that T cannot have any atomic models, but that all models of T are ω-homogeneous (and even

Show that FO has a 0–1 law over the class of finite tournaments, and that the almost sure theory of tournaments is the ω-categorical theory of the Fra¨ıss´ e limit of the class

Try to think of counter-examples for some of the classical results seen so far if we read them in the sense of finite model theory (fmt), where logical equivalence,

[r]