• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Fact sheet: Demonstration of feasibility; components and signi-ficance

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Fact sheet: Demonstration of feasibility; components and signi-ficance"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Eidgenössisches Departement für

Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation UVEK Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Sektion Entsorgung radioaktive Abfälle

\\adb.intra.admin.ch\Userhome$\BFE-01\U80768984\config\Desktop\Fact sheet_Demonstration of feasibility_components and significance.docx

1.11.2011

Fact sheet: Demonstration of feasibility; components and signi- ficance

The term "demonstration of feasibility" refers to the provision of evidence that it is fundamentally possi- ble to dispose of radioactive waste in Switzerland in a specific geological layer. It does not constitute a licence or a choice of location. The intention is to demonstrate that there is a sufficient volume of rock with the required properties, and that, based on other exploration work and subsequent positive findings, the construction of a deep geological repository would appear feasible.

A demonstration of feasibility comprises the following components:

Evidence of safety: Here it must be demonstrated that the host rock possesses the neces- sary geological and hydrological properties, and that the long-term safety of the deep geo- logical repository can be guaranteed through the use of artificial barriers.

Evidence of site suitability: Here it must be demonstrated on the basis of findings from studies that there is a sufficient volume of host rock with the properties called for in the evi- dence of safety so that the construction of a deep geological repository would appear feasi- ble.

Evidence of feasibility: Here it must be demonstrated that it is possible to construct and operate a deep geological repository (and subsequently seal it over the long term) in the chosen host rock with the currently available technical resources, while meeting the applica- ble safety requirements.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Table 3 Main methodological differences between the GRADE approach [54], and approaches taken by the 3rd World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research Expert

This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation with the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science under

If one writes down the simplest relativistic forms of mass and energy-momentum balance for the case where there is only an electromagnetic force present, it is found that, if the

As a part of a project directed at the chemical characterization of Phlomis species growing in Turkey, we have isolated an iridoid glu- coside, lamiide, and four phenylethanoid

Studying workload when milking under practical conditions with CUELA and a sufficiently large group of test subjects in combination with the extensive recording and analysis

That same year the Federal Council announced its decision regarding Nagra's 1985 submission of a demonstration of feasibility ("Gewähr" Project), stating that Nagra

For the site selection procedure as defined in the Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories, crite- ria were specified for the assessment of host rock properties in

Die mittels RocTopple unter Berücksichtigung der Schwankungen der Trennflächenorientierungen errechneten Ausnutzungsgrade schwankten zwischen 62% und 118%, je nachdem ob