• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Supplemental Material for “Evolution of the Atlantic Multidecadal

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Supplemental Material for “Evolution of the Atlantic Multidecadal"

Copied!
13
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Supplemental Material for “Evolution of the Atlantic Multidecadal

1

Variability in a model with an improved North Atlantic Current”

2

Annika Drews

3

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

4

Richard J. Greatbatch

5

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany,

6

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany

7

Corresponding author address: Annika Drews, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research

8

(2)

ABSTRACT

This document contains supporting figures for the main document.

11

(3)

References

12

Ebisuzaki, W., 1997: A Method to Estimate the Statistical Significance of a Correlation When

13

the Data Are Serially Correlated. J. Climate,

10 (9), 2147–2153, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1997)

14

010h2147:AMTETSi2.0.CO;2.

15

Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, C. K. Folland, L. V. Alexander, D. P. Rowell, E. C.

16

Kent, and A. Kaplan, 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night

17

marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res.,

108 (D14), 4407,

18

doi:10.1029/2002JD002670.

19

(4)

LIST OF FIGURES

20

Fig. 1. Mean sea surface height (in m, model years 300–999). The global mean sea level is removed. . 5

21

Fig. 2. Regression maps of surface turbulent (sensitive and latent) heat flux (positive into the at-

22

mosphere) on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Figure 6 in the main

23

text). However, here, an 11 year running mean filter was applied to the data, instead of a 5

24

year low pass filter. Units are Wm−2K−1. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients

25

are significantly different from zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki

26

(1997). . . 6

27

Fig. 3. Regression maps of winter (January-February-March) sea level pressure on the AMV index

28

at different lag times in years (same as Figure 15 in the main text). However, here, an 11

29

year running mean filter was applied to the data, instead of a 5 year low pass filter. Units

30

are hPa/K. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients are significantly different from

31

zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997). . . 7

32

Fig. 4. Regression maps of SST on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Figure 3

33

in the main text). Here, a smaller region was chosen to highlight the East Greenland Current

34

region. . . 8

35

Fig. 5. Mean March mixed layer depth (blue colors, in meters) and 15% sea ice extent (black line)

36

in the model (model years 300–999), and 15% sea ice extent from observations (red dashed

37

line; HadISST, 1948–2013, Rayner et al. (2003)). . . 9

38

Fig. 6. Mean Atlantic Meridional Overturning streamfunction in the model (in Sv, model years

39

300–999). . . 10

40

Fig. 7. Regression maps of surface sensible and latent heat flux (positive into the atmosphere) from

41

the uncorrected model on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Fig. 6 in

42

the main text, but for the uncorrected model). Units are Wm−2K−1. Hatching denotes that

43

the correlation coefficients are significantly different from zero at the 95% level according

44

to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997). Note the striking difference between this plot and Figure

45

6 in the main text. . . 11

46

Fig. 8. Mean barotropic streamfunction in the model (in Sv, model years 300–999). . . 12

47

Fig. 9. Regression maps of sea surface height on the AMV index at different lag times in years.

48

Units are cm/K. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients are significantly different

49

from zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997). . . 13

50

(5)

FIG. 1. Mean sea surface height (in m, model years 300–999). The global mean sea level is removed.

(6)

FIG. 2. Regression maps of surface turbulent (sensitive and latent) heat flux (positive into the atmosphere) on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Figure 6 in the main text). However, here, an 11 year running mean filter was applied to the data, instead of a 5 year low pass filter. Units are Wm−2K−1. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients are significantly different from zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997).

51

52

53

54

55

(7)

FIG. 3. Regression maps of winter (January-February-March) sea level pressure on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Figure 15 in the main text). However, here, an 11 year running mean filter was applied to the data, instead of a 5 year low pass filter. Units are hPa/K. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients are significantly different from zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997).

56

57

58

59

(8)

FIG. 4. Regression maps of SST on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Figure 3 in the main text). Here, a smaller region was chosen to highlight the East Greenland Current region.

60

61

(9)

FIG. 5. Mean March mixed layer depth (blue colors, in meters) and 15% sea ice extent (black line) in the model (model years 300–999), and 15% sea ice extent from observations (red dashed line; HadISST, 1948–

2013, Rayner et al. (2003)).

62

63

64

(10)

FIG. 6. Mean Atlantic Meridional Overturning streamfunction in the model (in Sv, model years 300–999).

(11)

FIG. 7. Regression maps of surface sensible and latent heat flux (positive into the atmosphere) from the uncorrected model on the AMV index at different lag times in years (same as Fig. 6 in the main text, but for the uncorrected model). Units are Wm−2K−1. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients are significantly different from zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997). Note the striking difference between this plot and Figure 6 in the main text.

65

66

67

68

69

(12)

FIG. 8. Mean barotropic streamfunction in the model (in Sv, model years 300–999).

(13)

FIG. 9. Regression maps of sea surface height on the AMV index at different lag times in years. Units are cm/K. Hatching denotes that the correlation coefficients are significantly different from zero at the 95% level according to the method of Ebisuzaki (1997).

70

71

72

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The proportion of the total observed atmospheric variability ex- plained by the NAG-related flux anomalies is largest in win- ter, exceeding 50% for the surface heat flux

Four World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) repe•t cruises (October 1990 to M•rch 1994) in the tropical Atlantic off Brazil •re used to study the spatial •nd

As the mixed layer deepens, entrainment alone cannot supply enough heat to balance the heat loss to the atmosphere, which also increases because of melting, leading to thinner ice

Methods for ground heat flux determination and reference depths applied at the micrometeorological measurement sites of the LITFASS-2003 experiment (GC: combination

Campbell; Gaburro 1986). SoluŃiile adoptate în macromodelul economiei române ti de tranziŃie sunt sistematizate în Figura 5. a) Versiunea 1996 a introdus conceptul de

[ 7 ] Here, both the effect of a seasonal decoupling of air- sea heat flux and abiotically induced gas exchange by penetrating solar radiation and the generation of a mean gas

Results of detailed faunal analysis and sea surface temperatures, derived from changes in foraminiferal diversity using Modem Analogue Technique (MAT), as well as records of

The size and even the sign of the air-sea flux of anthropogenic carbon within the northern North Atlantic therefore results from balance between two counteracting processes;