• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

A new phase in the control of BoHV1 in the Netherlands - an update on the progress -

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "A new phase in the control of BoHV1 in the Netherlands - an update on the progress -"

Copied!
12
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

A new phase in the control of BoHV1 in the Netherlands

- an update on the progress -

Frederik Waldeck1, Inge Santman-Berends1, Jet Mars1, Linda van Duijn1 Paul Wever1 & Gerdien van Schaik1,2

1GD Animal Health, 2Utrecht University

11. Stendaler Symposium ‒ 04. April 2019, Stendal, Germany

(2)

Background

Germany

June 2017: officially free of BoHV1 ( EU article 10)

The Netherlands

2015 end milk quota era, shift to phosphate regulations

decreasing numbers of cattle

(temporarily) movement of (young)stock to Germany

Although discrepances… same goal

gE gB

(3)

Trade NL-D #2017

550.411 calves aged <2 months (73% total) 16.209 cattle aged >2 months (26% total)

10.500 cattle >2 months old (5x #2013)

(4)

History

• BoHV1 first reported in 1973

• Nineties: a lot of scientific research

(5)

History

• BoHV1 first reported in 1973

• Nineties: a lot of scientific research

• 1997 national eradication programme (all cattle) ~herdprevalence 84%

• 1999 suspension programme (BVDV2 contaminated IBR-vaccine)

• 1999-2018 voluntary certification programmes ~herdprevalence 16%

• 2015 start discussion new eradication plans

• April 2018 national mandatory eradication programme (dairy farms)

 3 routes to a IBR-free herd

 license to produce

 basics: “Vaccinate unless… free or unsuspected status”

(6)

IBR-vaccination certification

Herds with high prevalence (>10%) mostly

Intake:

• Whole herd vaccination with gE-deleted IBR- markervaccine (all animals >3 months of age)

Maintaining vaccinated status:

• Prolonged when whole herd is vaccinated every six months therafter

01.01.2019

20%

herds vaccinated

(7)

IBR-free certification

Intake:

• Individual bloodtesting all cattle gE-antibodies

 no antibodies: IBR-free certificate

 antibodies: cull + 1 month later bulkmilktesting

Monitoring free status:

• Automatic monthly bulkmilktesting gE-antibodies

no test is perfect. Risk-based!

Purchase of cattle: loss of free status, obligatory testing Clinical signs: nasal swabs

Abortions: bloodtesting

When outbreak confirmed: tracing down cattle

01.01.2019

49%

herds free

(8)

IBR-unsuspected certification

Herds with low prevalence (<10%) Intake:

• negative bulkmilktest gE-antibodies Monitoring unsuspected status:

• Automatic monthly bulkmilktesting gE-antibodies Purchase of cattle: obligatory testing

Abortions: bloodtesting Clinical signs: nasal swabs

Shortened route to IBR-free:

• Minimum 2 years “unsuspected”

• Testing: animals > 6 years

 no antibodies: IBR-free certificate

 antibodies: cull + 1 month later bulkmilktesting

01.01.2019 30%

herds

unsuspected

See POSTER!

(9)

• 16.052 dairy farms in total ~99.5% participation

free + unsuspected herds ~80%

• 0.4% of free herds infected in 2018

Results so far

(10)

• 16.052 dairy farms in total ~99.5% participation

free + unsuspected herds ~80%

• 0.4% of free herds infected in 2018

• 1.2% of unsuspected herds infected in 2018

• 1% of traded animals from non-free herds seropositive and eliminated

• total amount of clinical outbreaks decreased (28 herds PCR+ nasal swabs)

• stable % of herds sending nasal swabs; 13% PCR+

Results so far

(11)

17.239 non-daiy farms ~9.6% herdprevalence

01.01.2019: 23% IBR-free on voluntary basis

separate programme since 1997 based on individual bloodtesting all cattle gE-antibodies; monitoring if possible via slaughterhouse sampling

can participate in vaccination route

2019? National implementation of IBR-eradication for all bovine herds by the Ministry of Agriculture 202..? Request for EU article 9

Future

(12)

Thank you for your attention!

Questions?

f.waldeck@gdanimalhealth.com

gdanimalhealth.com

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

That is not to say that we should err on the side of complacency and col- lude with the client’s defenses. Defenses and resistances must be pointed out.. and recognized such.

The piezoelectric charge coefficient values for selected compositions show that higher values are obtained close to the phase boundaries rather than away from them.. The

The role which anger plays as a consequence of loss of control experiences as well as how it impacts subsequent risk‐related decision making is traced in Study II in an attempt

At the Parallel Sessions of the UN Commission on the Status of Women in March 2014, the Department launched the Cities for CEDAW Campaign with the NGO Committee on the Status of

My colleagues and I designed a novel defibrillation method, Syncrolation, that is based on the same approach: A sequence of electric far field pulses synchronizes the heart tissue

The growers ‘type top’ had significantly higher root and sugar yield, resulting in significantly higher revenues (481 € ha -1 difference) compared to ‘type average’, although

Thus, for our study’s objective of investigating the consequences of subjective loss of control experiences on risk-taking behavior, the effects of anger are particularly interesting

In the sec(md part, we disCllSS findings on how people can use imple- mcntation intentions in an attempt to prevent straying off-course Ihnll goal attainment..