• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Multidimensional DiscriminationOverview of the expert opinions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Multidimensional DiscriminationOverview of the expert opinions"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency’s research projects at a glance:

Multidimensional Discrimination

Overview of the expert opinions

The Federal Anti Discrimination Agency - FADA has commissioned two expert opinions to investi- gate, first, the terms, concepts and court decisions related to multidimensional discrimination.

Second, narrative interviews discuss whether any combinations of categories are particularly likely to result in discrimination experiences, in which spheres of life these tend to occur and which is- sues arise for counselling work.

Authors, titles and year of publication of the expert opinions

Prof. Dr. Susanne Baer, Melanie Bittner, Anna Lena Göttsche: Mehrdimensionale Diskriminierung – Begriffe, Theorien und juristische Analyse (2010) (multidimensional discrimination - terms, theories and legal analysis)

Prof. Dr. Susanne Dern, Prof. Dr. Lena Inowlocki, Prof. Dr. Dagmar Oberlies, Dr. Julia Bernstein:

Mehrdimensionale Diskriminierung – Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand von autobiografisch- narrativen Interviews (2010) (multidimensional discrimination - an empirical analysis using autobi- ographical narrative interviews).

Results

The results of the legal opinion

 The grounds for discrimination that are included in the General Equal Treatment Act -AGG -

“race“, ethnic origin, gender, religion or belief, disability, age and sexual orientation - reflect realities of life. These grounds for discrimination determine social opportunities, cause individ- uals to be stereotyped and assessed. They are categorisations.

 These categorisations are not isolated, but are intersectionally intertwined, interdependent and interlinked. Discrimination does not occur one-dimensionally, i.e. it is not based on only one ground, but exists in complex forms. Therefore, multidimensional discrimination is rather the rule. A one-dimensional view stereotypes, distorts and simplifies the actual problems on hand.

 Which legal consequences result from multidimensional discrimination has largely been un- known. The AGG does not define multidimensional discrimination.

 The analysis of selected court decisions shows that courts tend not to recognise multidimen- sional discrimination or do not appropriately take it into account.

Results of the empirical opinion

 While age, origin, gender and sexual orientation are mutually reinforcing dimensions , disabil- ity usually dominates life experiences and so “overrides” them. Frequently, the dimensions

“age and disability“ as well as “precarious living conditions and ethnic origin” co-occurred.

 The family is reported as the setting where the majority of the frequently long-lasting adverse experiences took place. At the same time, the family is cited as the most important resource in coping with discrimination.

(2)

Contact details: Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency Glinkastrasse 24

D-10117 Berlin

Telephone: 030 18555-1855

E-Mail for counselling: beratung@ads.bund.de E-Mail for general questions: poststelle@ads.bund.de

 Individuals with a migrant background as well as gay and lesbian persons experience discrimi- nation mainly in school. They also experience discrimination when looking for a training place or internship, an apartment or a job as well as when dealing with authorities. These experi- ences are frequently reported by persons with a migrant background - often compounded by discrimination on grounds of gender.

 Violence and assaults are mainly motivated by people’s origin, gender and sexual orientation.

 It is alarming that people seeking advice do not always meet counselling centre staff who are appropriately qualified, i.e. who have a methodological training, reflect on their own attitudes and prejudices or factor in differences.

 Only in rare instances do advice-seeking persons take legal action. The underlying reasons are fear of further stigmatisation, doubts over the success of court action and self-blame for what happened.

Authors’ recommendations for action The authors recommend the following in respect of Research

 the development of better methodological instruments to more fully understand multidimen- sional discrimination,

 the systematic consideration of multidimensional discrimination when collecting complaints- related data.

Public Relations

 the communication of multidimensional discrimination as a broad-based societal problem.

Law making and enforcement

 an open list of discrimination grounds in the AGG and countering hierarchisation of categories,

 a jurisprudentially convincing approach to sanctions where multidimensional discrimination is not considered as an add-on aspect but in light of the circumstances of each case,

 the removal of barriers to the access to law.

Social work and counselling

 guidance for affected persons in finding a counselling centre,

 training concepts for counsellors.

Implementation of positive action

 checking for intersectionality to reveal whether privileges are reproduced.

More information

 The legal opinion is accessible => here, available only in German language.

 The empirical opinion is accessible => here, available only in German language.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

To enhance the quality of this document, the project consortium created an international scientific (epistemic) network which includes both state and non-state actors.. “The

We develop a reputational cheap talk model where the principal can cancel an action initially started on the advice of an expert if she gets an unfavorable interim news.. But if

While the logic of discovery focuses on the formulation of theories, the logic of justification refers to the justification of why a certain approach generates trustworthy

The United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions (OROLSI) convened an Expert Workshop on ‘Measuring the Impact of

In summary, we applied CPLEX and a MA to approximate cores of hard to solve bench- mark instances and observed that using approximate cores of fixed size instead of the original

1998] relaxed the condition of summarizability to enable modeling of generalization hierarchies by defining a generalized multidi- mensional normal form (GMNF) as a

• Three applications illustrated the flexibility of multidimensional scaling and its scalability to larger problems: The joint visual analysis of impor- tance and hierarchy in

Keywords: Workplace learning, Digital learning, Best practice actions, Scenario planning, Mentoring, Problem-Based Learning (PBL), e-Portfolio, Evaluation Map,