• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Beurteilung der Funktionsfähigkeit einer Fütterungsanlage mit pneumatischer Futterverteilung

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Beurteilung der Funktionsfähigkeit einer Fütterungsanlage mit pneumatischer Futterverteilung"

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

4.2011 | landtechnik

243

Zacharias, Bernhard; Herzog, Christoph; Schrade, Hansjörg and Schenkel, Hans

Evaluation of the functional capability of a feeder with pneumatic conveying

The functional capability of the feeder can play a pivotal role in providing essential nutrients for animals according to the requirement. Therefore, the functional capability of the feeder in a commercial pig farm was evaluated using the error of dosage, the error of adjustment, the er- ror of mixing, the repeatability and the carry over of the feeder. The error of dosage and the er- ror of adjustement did not exceed 6 %. Dosing 300 g and 600 g of feed, for calcium an error of mixing of 33 and 15 % was found respectively. Dosing 4 000 g of feed the error of mixing was reduced to 8 %. For the carry over of calcium 30.53 % were found. For magnesium and phos- phorus the error of mixing and the carry over indicated an almost homogenous mixing process and a minimized contamination of the feed.

landtechnik 66 (2011), no. 4, pp. 243–245, 4 tables, 6 references

n Mixing and pneumatic conveying of feed using a feeder is a technical challenge for the manufacturers of such systems with respect to the physical properties of the feed [1]. The functional capability of the feeder affects the proper nutrient consumption of the animal according to the requirement. [2].

The functional capability of the feeder in a commercial pig farm was evaluated using the error of dosage and the error of adjustment. Additionally for calcium, magnesium and phos- phorus the error and the repeatability of mixing and the carry over was determined.

Material and Methods

The tested feeder with pneumatic conveying (Spotmix, Schauer Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG) consists primarily of a batch mixer, an air generator, a piping system with switch points and rotation distributors, cyclones at the different feeding points and a process computer. The feeder is used under practical con- ditions at the Baden-Württemberg State experimental station for pig breeding in Boxberg.

Error of dosage and error of adjustment

300 g, 600 g, 1 000 g, 2 000 g and 3 000 g of feed (61 % wheat, 17 % barley, 19 % soybeanmeal, 3 % mineral- and vitamin-pre- mix) were used as target quantity for the transport from the batch mixer to a feeding point. Conveying of feed was repeated 10 times.

The error of adjustment in percent is the absolute difference from the target quantity and the amount dosed at the feeding point. For the error of dosage the coefficient of variation was calculated for the amounts dosed at the feeding point:

absolute difference % =

target quantity - amount dosed at the feeding point --- • 100

target quantity standard deviation coefficient of variation = --- • 100

mean

Error of mixing and repeatability of the mixture

The error of mixing and the repeatability of the mixture was determined using a target diet consisting of 77 % wheat, 20 % soybeanmeal and 3 % mineral- and vitamin-premix. Calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and phosphorus were analysed in the single components of the mixture. Using the analysed values and percentage amounts of the components in the mixture, a target concentration for each element in the mixture was cal- culated. Afterwards 300 g, 600 g and 4 000 g of the mixture were produced. Samples were collected from each mixture and analysed for Ca, Mg and P. The analysed values were compared to the calculated target concentrations.

The error of mixing was calculated for each element from the absolute difference between the analysed concentrations and the target concentrations. The repeatability of the mixture is the coefficient of variation of the analysed values.

(2)

244

4.2011 | landtechnik

livestock and machinery

The error of mixing and the repeatability of mixing for the single elements are presented in table 2. For Ca at target quan- tities of 300 g and 600 g the highest errors of mixing and the poorest repeatability was found. However increasing the target quantity resulted in lower errors of mixing and a better repeat- ability. Compared to the other elements the error of mixing was the lowest for P.

Also the carry over and the error of analysis showed the highest values for Ca as compared to the other elements (30,53

% and 6,88 % respectively). Lowest values were observed for P (table 3 and 4).

Discussion

The range of values found for the error of dosage and the error of adjustment provides an adequate feed supply to the animals.

An error of adjustment below 5 % was also estimated to be suf- ficient for an adequate nutrient supply in earlier studies [4].

Both values are primarily dependent of the feeder itself and the amount of feed to be conveyed into the mixer. Thus the error of dosage and the error of adjustment is mainly determined by the scales weighing to the nearest 10 g, and the inaccuracy of the screw conveyer providing the feed components for the mixing process.

Furthermore components to be mixed and conveyed may vary greatly in characteristics and their nature may influence the errors of dosage and adjustment [5]. As only one mixture was used in our study, this effect can not be discussed here. The same is true for the error of mixing and the carry over.

An influence of the amount of feed to be conveyed on the error of adjustement can also be assumed. With increasing amounts of feed the error of adjustment should decrease as the relative part of an absolute deviation decreases with increasing amounts to be conveyed. In our study this effect could not be observed.

In contrast to the error of adjustment and the error of dos- age, the error of the chemical analysis is a substantial part of the error of mixing and of the carry over of the single elements.

For Ca and Mg the errors of mixing exceeded the errors of analysis at all target quantities. For P the error of mixing fell below the error of analysis only at the target quantity of 4 000 g.

Table 3

Mean of the carry over [%]

Ca Mg P

30,53 3,81 3,06

Table 4

Error of analysis [%}

Ca Mg P

6,88 3,04 2,23

Carry over

For the determination of the carry over of Ca, Mg and P 1 kg of feed (77 % wheat, 20 % soybeanmeal, 3 % mineral- and vita- min-premix) was transported to a feeding point, followed by a 10 time repeated transport of 1 kg of wheat. Ca, Mg and P were analysed in wheat before and after conveying. The concentra- tion of the elements before conveying were used as reference values. The carry over for each element was calculated from the difference between the element concentration after the trans- port and the reference value and is expressed in percent (aver- age of the 10 samples).

Chemical analysis

Mineral and trace elements were analyzed according to the method of Naumann and Bassler [3]. Analysis error is expressed as coefficient of variation from 5 repeated determinations.

Results

The error of dosage and the error of adjustment is presented in table 1. An error of 5 % was only exceeded by the error of adjustment at the target quantity of 300 g. Both errors were not controlled by the target quantity.

Table 1

Error of dosing and error of adjustment Sollmenge

Target quantity Dosierfehler

Error of dosage Einstellfehler Error of adjustment

g % %

300 5,39 3,90

600 4,12 3,48

1000 3,29 4,69

2000 2,06 2,08

3000 3,45 3,42

Table 2

Error and repeatability of mixing [%]

Sollmenge Target quantity

Mischfehler und Reproduzierbarkeit Error and repeatability

of mixing

Ca Mg P

g % % %

300

Mischfehler

Error of mixing 33,23 9,35 5,25

Reproduzierbarkeit

Repeatability 33,66 11,65 4,27

600

Mischfehler

Error of mixing 15,48 6,95 5,18

Reproduzierbarkeit

Repeatability 20,95 9,30 6,04

4000

Mischfehler

Error of mixing 8,14 5,79 1,94

Reproduzierbarkeit

Repeatability 6,35 2,21 2,69

(3)

4.2011 | landtechnik

245

A considerable excess of the error of analysis was observed for the error of mixing of Ca at the target quantity of 300 g. This indicates together with the low value for the repeatability that a homogenous mixing result can only be achieved with difficulty for Ca at a target quantity of 300 g.

For Ca also the highest carry over was found (30,53 %) and the error of analysis was markedly lower (6,88 %).

The high values of the error of mixing and the carry over observed for Ca may not only be due to the feeder itself. Particle size of the mineral- and vitamin-premix may be an important factor influencing the mixing result [6]. Furthermore the er- ror of mixing is reduced at a target quantity of 4000 g. This indicates that the error of mixing is also a function of the target quantity.

As the error of mixing and the carry over for Mg and P was only slightly higher as compared to the error of analysis, a ho- mogenous mixing process with a minimal carry over at convey- ing can be assumed for these elements.

Conclusion

The error of dosage and the error of adjustment seem to be sa- tisfactory for a nutrient supply of the animals according to the requirement. At a practical target quantity of 4000 g the mixing process for Ca, Mg and P is almost homogenous. With the ex- ception of Ca the carry over of the elements is low. But the high carry over of Ca might be caused also by the properties of the mineral- and vitamin-premix used.

Literature

Cui, H.; Grace, J. R. (2006): Pneumatic conveying of biomass particles:

[1]

a review. China Particuol. 4, S. 183–188

Groesbeck, C. N.; Goodband, R. D.; Tokach, M. D.; Dritz, S. S.;

[2]

Nelssen, J. L.; Derouchey, J. M. (2007): Diet mixing time affects nursery pig performance. J. Anim. Sci. 85, S. 1793–1798

Naumann, K.; Bassler, R. (1976): Verband deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher [3]

Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten. Methodenbuch III. Die che- mische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Verlag J. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen, Berlin, Basel, Wien

Hepherd, R. Q.; Randall, M. J.; Lightfoot, A. L.; Armsby, A. W. (1982):

[4]

Field trials of an automatic conveying and dispensing system for pelleted pig feeds. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 27, S. 455–463

McKendry, P. (2002): Energy production from biomass (part 1). Overview [5]

of biomass. Bioresourc. Technol. 83, S. 37–46

Friedrich, W.; Jansen, H. D. (1974): Mischgüte und Mischstabilität als [6]

Qualitätsmerkmale von Mischfutter. Übers. Tierernährung 2, S. 239–257

Authors

Dr. Bernhard Zacharias is responsible for feeding at the Baden- Württemberg State Experimental Station in Boxberg (Bildungs- und Wissenszentrum Boxberg, Seehöfer Strasse 50, 97944 Boxberg- Windischbuch, e-mail: bernhard.zacharias@lsz.bwl.de).

Christoph Herzog is scientific assistant at the Baden-Württemberg State Institute for Agricultural Chemistry at the University of Hohenheim.

Hansjörg Schrade is head of the Baden-Württemberg State Experimen- tal Station in Boxberg.

Prof. Dr. Hans Schenkel is head of the Baden-Württemberg State Institute for Agricultural Chemistry at the University of Hohenheim.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

For partially shared bracketing we can apply the same reasoning and conclude that for example (3), the shared left  bracket is a good indicator for the two instances being

Existing methods for the injection of representative software faults (i.e., the errors gener- ated by injected faults match the effects of real residual software faults in a

Error rates and response times of correct responses were subjected to two-way analy- ses of variance (ANOVAs) with repeated measurement on the variables congruency

Julian Keil, Nathan Weisz, Isabella Paul, Christian Wienbruch Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz,

In the audit engagement, if the auditor gets wind of fraud or error, whose potential effect on the financial statements may be immaterial or material, he must communicate his

Abstract The sensible and latent heat fluxes are obtained, using the modified Bowen ratio method (MBR) and Bowen ratiolEnergy balance method (BREB) with the data

Hypothesis 2 predicted an interaction effect of participants' goal ori- entations with training conditions on performance. More specifically, we expected learning goal orientation to

Turning to our main objective of testing for the direction of causality, from Table 6 we observe the presence of bidirectional causality for Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey