• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Hand in y our solutions un til W ednesda y , No v em b er 1 , 2.15 p m (PO b o x of y our T A in V3-128)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Hand in y our solutions un til W ednesda y , No v em b er 1 , 2.15 p m (PO b o x of y our T A in V3-128)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Hand in y our solutions un til W ednesda y , No v em b er 1 , 2.15 p m (PO b o x of y our T A in V3-128)

total points: 20

Prof. Dr. Moritz Kaßmann Fakultät für Mathematik

Wintersemester 17/18 Universität Bielefeld

Partial Differential Equations II Exercise sheet III, October 25

The aim of this exercise sheet is to get useful insights into Hölder spaces.

Exercise III.1 (5 points)

Show that the Banach spacesCα([a, b]),0< α <1, and C0,1([a, b]) are not separable.

Exercise III.2 (5 points)

Let us begin with some definitions.

(1) Givenk∈N0, u∈Ck(Rd), andy∈Rd, define the Taylor-Polynomial Tyku:Rd→R as follows:

Tyku(x) = X

|γ|≤k

1

γ!∂γu(y)(x−y)γ.

(2) LetPk denote the set of all polynomialsRd→Rof degree less or equal to k.

(3) For a ball Br(x0)⊂Rd, a functionu:Rd→Randk∈N0, define Ek(u;Br(x0)) = inf

p∈Pk sup

x∈Br(x0)

|u(x)−p(x)|.

Assume 0< α≤1 andk∈N0. Show that the quantity [u]0Ck,α = sup

r>0,x0Rd

r−k−αEk(u;Br(x0))

is comparable to the seminorm[u]Ck,α for sufficiently regular functions u.

Exercise III.3 (5 points)

For bounded domains Ωwith a nice boundary, the inclusion

Cm,α(Ω)⊂Ck,β(Ω) (1)

holds true ifm+α > k+β. This exercise shows that this natural inclusion might fail if the domain has a ”bad“ boundary. Let Ω⊂R2 be defined by

Ω ={(x, y)∈R2|y <p

|x|, x2+y2<1}. Define a function u: Ω→Rby

u(x, y) =

(sgn(x)yγ if y >0,

0 if y≤0,

for some γ∈(1,2). Use this function in order to show that (1) fails in general.

(2)

Exercise III.4 (5 points)

Given f ∈ Cα(Ω), where Ω ⊂ Rd is some domain, we have seen that solutions u to the equation ∆u = f in Ω satisfy u ∈ C2,α(Ω0) for Ω0 b Ω1. This is called interior regularity. Let us prove a simple first result on boundary regularity. Recall the definition M+=M∩Rd+={x∈M|xd>0} for any setM ⊂Rd.

Let’s writeBr instead ofBr(0)for r >0. Assumef ∈Cα(B2+) for someα ∈(0,1). Show

NB+

2 f ∈C2,α(B1+), [D2NB+

2f]Cα(B1+)≤c[f]Cα(B+2), wherec is some positive constant independent of f.

1Note that this implication is false forα= 0, cf. Exercise XII.3 from the first PDE lecture last term.

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Let (µ n ) be a sequence of probability measures and µ a probability measure on a metric space X.. Part (ii) is

It is sufficient if you provide the proof in the case d = 1 and guess the result for general d.. Show that it does not satisfy CD(ρ, n) for any

More generally, you could assume that ∂Ω does not contain isolated points. In any case, some tricky construction

Using the previous exercise, formulate and prove an existence result for the Dirichlet problem in bounded domains, which are as general as possible. The next exercise deals with

The aim of this exercise sheet is to prove some technical results that are related to the lecture on Friday, November 3. Every exercise is worth

The aim of this exercise sheet is to prove some technical results that are related to the lecture on Friday, November 10. Every exercise is worth

Partial Differential Equations II Exercise sheet VI, November 16. Every exercise is worth

The first two exercises concern L ∞ -bounds for (sub)solutions to elliptic equations in bounded domains. As always, assertions need to