Hand in y our solutions un til F rida y , June 29, 8.30 am (PO b o x 183 in V3-128)
total points: 20
Prof. Dr. Moritz Kaßmann Fakultät für Mathematik
Sommersemester 2018 Universität Bielefeld
Partial Differential Equations III Exercise sheet XII, June 23
Exercise XII.1 (4 points)
Let(µn)be a sequence of probability measures and µa probability measure on a metric spaceX. Show that the following assertions are equivalent:
(i) µn converges weakly to µ, i.e.,´
fdµn→´
fdµ for everyf ∈Cb(X).
(ii) lim sup
n→∞
µn(A)≤µ(A) for every closed setA.
(iii) lim inf
n→∞ µn(O)≥µ(O) for every open set O.
(iv) lim
n→∞µn(B) =µ(B) for every Borel setB withµ(∂B) = 0.
Hint: You do not need to invoke any very deep result from measure theory. One option to establish the equivalencies, is to prove the following implications:
(ii)⇔(iii),(ii) + (iii)⇒(iv),(iv) =⇒ (ii),(i)⇔(ii).
For Exercises XII.2 and XII.3, letE be a Dirichlet form onL2(X, m)and(Tt)and(Gλ)be the corresponding semigroup resp. resolvent onL2(X, m). Givenα >0, we call a function u∈L2(X, m) α-excessive if for everyt >0 the inequalitye−αtTtu≤u holds truem-a.e.
Exercise XII.2 (4 points) Prove the following observations:
(i) If uis α-excessive, then u≥0.
(ii) Forf ∈L2(X, m), f ≥0, the function Gαf isα-excessive.
(iii) If u1 ≥0 andu2≥0 areα-excessive, then so areu1∧u2 andu1∧1.
(iv) Let u ∈ L2(X, m), u ≥ 0, be α-excessive. Assume v ∈ D(E) with u ≤ v. Then u∈D(E) and Eα(u, u)≤ Eα(v, v).
Hint: The proofs of (i), (ii) and (iii) are simple.
Exercise XII.3 (4 points)
Letu∈D(E) andα >0. Show that the following statements are equivalent:
(i) u is α-excessive
(ii) Eα(u, v)≥0for every nonnegativev ∈D(E).
Exercise XII.4 (8 points)
The classical Sobolev inequality reads kfk
L
2d
d−2 ≤ck∇fkL2 (f ∈Cc∞(Rd)). (1) With the help of the Hölder inequality one can deduce from (1) the following inequality:
kfk1+
2 d
L2 ≤ck∇fkL2kfk
2 d
L1 (f ∈Cc∞(Rd)). (2) Alternatively, one can derive from (1)
kfk1+
2 d
L2(1+ 2d)
≤ck∇fkL2kfk
2 d
L2 (f ∈Cc∞(Rd)). (3) (i) Derive (2) and (3) from (1).
(ii) Derive (1) from (2). (Alternatively, you may decide to derive (1) from (3).)
Hint: Part (i) is simple. Part (ii) is not simple. You may restrict yourself to the case d ≥ 3 and to nonnegative functions f. One option is to apply (2) to the function fk = (f −2k)+∧2k for k∈ Z. If you setBk = {x ∈Rd|2k ≤f(x) <2k+1},q = d−22d , ak= 2qk|{f ≥2k}|,bk= ´
Bk
|∇f|2, then you can observe
X
k∈Z
bk≤ k∇fk2L2, (2q−1)X
k∈Z
ak≥ kfkqLq,
which turns out to be helpful.
2