• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Hand in y our solutions un til F rida y , June 29, 8.30 am (PO b o x 183 in V3-128)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Hand in y our solutions un til F rida y , June 29, 8.30 am (PO b o x 183 in V3-128)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Hand in y our solutions un til F rida y , June 29, 8.30 am (PO b o x 183 in V3-128)

total points: 20

Prof. Dr. Moritz Kaßmann Fakultät für Mathematik

Sommersemester 2018 Universität Bielefeld

Partial Differential Equations III Exercise sheet XII, June 23

Exercise XII.1 (4 points)

Let(µn)be a sequence of probability measures and µa probability measure on a metric spaceX. Show that the following assertions are equivalent:

(i) µn converges weakly to µ, i.e.,´

fdµn→´

fdµ for everyf ∈Cb(X).

(ii) lim sup

n→∞

µn(A)≤µ(A) for every closed setA.

(iii) lim inf

n→∞ µn(O)≥µ(O) for every open set O.

(iv) lim

n→∞µn(B) =µ(B) for every Borel setB withµ(∂B) = 0.

Hint: You do not need to invoke any very deep result from measure theory. One option to establish the equivalencies, is to prove the following implications:

(ii)⇔(iii),(ii) + (iii)⇒(iv),(iv) =⇒ (ii),(i)⇔(ii).

For Exercises XII.2 and XII.3, letE be a Dirichlet form onL2(X, m)and(Tt)and(Gλ)be the corresponding semigroup resp. resolvent onL2(X, m). Givenα >0, we call a function u∈L2(X, m) α-excessive if for everyt >0 the inequalitye−αtTtu≤u holds truem-a.e.

Exercise XII.2 (4 points) Prove the following observations:

(i) If uis α-excessive, then u≥0.

(ii) Forf ∈L2(X, m), f ≥0, the function Gαf isα-excessive.

(iii) If u1 ≥0 andu2≥0 areα-excessive, then so areu1∧u2 andu1∧1.

(iv) Let u ∈ L2(X, m), u ≥ 0, be α-excessive. Assume v ∈ D(E) with u ≤ v. Then u∈D(E) and Eα(u, u)≤ Eα(v, v).

Hint: The proofs of (i), (ii) and (iii) are simple.

Exercise XII.3 (4 points)

Letu∈D(E) andα >0. Show that the following statements are equivalent:

(i) u is α-excessive

(ii) Eα(u, v)≥0for every nonnegativev ∈D(E).

(2)

Exercise XII.4 (8 points)

The classical Sobolev inequality reads kfk

L

2d

d−2 ≤ck∇fkL2 (f ∈Cc(Rd)). (1) With the help of the Hölder inequality one can deduce from (1) the following inequality:

kfk1+

2 d

L2 ≤ck∇fkL2kfk

2 d

L1 (f ∈Cc(Rd)). (2) Alternatively, one can derive from (1)

kfk1+

2 d

L2(1+ 2d)

≤ck∇fkL2kfk

2 d

L2 (f ∈Cc(Rd)). (3) (i) Derive (2) and (3) from (1).

(ii) Derive (1) from (2). (Alternatively, you may decide to derive (1) from (3).)

Hint: Part (i) is simple. Part (ii) is not simple. You may restrict yourself to the case d ≥ 3 and to nonnegative functions f. One option is to apply (2) to the function fk = (f −2k)+∧2k for k∈ Z. If you setBk = {x ∈Rd|2k ≤f(x) <2k+1},q = d−22d , ak= 2qk|{f ≥2k}|,bk= ´

Bk

|∇f|2, then you can observe

X

k∈Z

bk≤ k∇fk2L2, (2q−1)X

k∈Z

ak≥ kfkqLq,

which turns out to be helpful.

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Partial Differential Equations III Exercise sheet IX, June 11. Exercise IX.1

1 The definition of the Fourier transform is slightly different from the one that we used in the study of Sobolev spaces. The definition used here is the standard one on the area

Functional inequalities like the Poincaré inequality of the Sobolev inequality play an important role in the study of Markov semigroup and Dirichlet forms. The constant appearing

It is sufficient if you provide the proof in the case d = 1 and guess the result for general d.. Show that it does not satisfy CD(ρ, n) for any

More generally, you could assume that ∂Ω does not contain isolated points. In any case, some tricky construction

Using the previous exercise, formulate and prove an existence result for the Dirichlet problem in bounded domains, which are as general as possible. The next exercise deals with

The aim of this exercise sheet is to prove some technical results that are related to the lecture on Friday, November 3. Every exercise is worth

The first two exercises concern L ∞ -bounds for (sub)solutions to elliptic equations in bounded domains. As always, assertions need to