• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Reading Papers for a Seminar

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Reading Papers for a Seminar"

Copied!
24
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Reading Papers for a Seminar

Thomas Gross

(2)

Outline

General comments

5 Steps

OverviewSkim

ReadInterpretSummarize

Prepare presentation

(Next week)

(3)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Seminar talks

Practice scientific presentation

Based on primary literature

» Articles in journals, papers at conferences

» Find additional (relevant) material Engage in discussion with audience

Practice scientific exchange

Learn to ask questions to clarify misunderstandingsLearn to ask questions to fill in missing knowledgeReflect on contents

» Do you have supporting evidence?

» Do you have conflicting evidence?

(4)

Seminar talks

You talk about some else’s work

Not advocate but investigative reporter

Pick a topic/paper

Selection by instructorRange of topics

Personal preferences, background

Understand the topic/paper

Plan presentation

(5)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Seminar talks

You talk about some else’s work

Not advocate but investigative reporter

Pick a topic/paper

Selection by instructorRange of topics

Personal preferences, backgroundShort paper vs long(er) paper

Understand the topic/paper

Plan presentation

(6)

Kinds of papers

Reviewed vs. "informal" paper

Reviewed: screened by a group of experts

No guarantee that paper is correct

Experts are sometimes graduate students (in computer science)

Either presented at event (conference, workshop) or appeared in journal/book

Informal: anything else

Sometimes presented at event (conference, workshop)Sometimes published in journal

Sometimes self-published ("technical report", technical note)

Sometimes uploaded to forum/server (e.g, arXiv)

(7)

© Thomas Gross 2019

PoP

Publish or perish

Academics need to publish to get known

Industry experts want to publish to get

known, to recruit, to establish precedence

Reviewed vs. informal

(8)

PoP

Publish or perish

Academics need to publish to get known

Industry experts want to publish to get

known, to recruit, to establish precedence

Reviewed vs. informal

Reviewed better chance to be noticedBut there are exceptions …

First informal publication, then reviewed

publication

(9)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Beware: predatory journals

(Almost) Nobody works for free

Journals are published by

Educational organizations (universities, academies)For-owner-profit companies

(10)

Beware: predatory journals

(Almost) Nobody works for free

Journals are published by

Educational organizations (universities, academies)Professional organizations (channeled profit)

For-owner-profit companies

(11)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Understand a paper

Multiple steps

Step 0: what is this paper about

(12)

Step 0: Overview

Read abstract

What does the paper present

TechniqueAlgorithmSystemTool

Retrospective

(13)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Understand a paper

Multiple steps

Step 0: what is this paper about

Step 1: Skim

(14)

Step 1: Skim

Get the big picture

Read paper but skip complicated formulae

Look at the graphs (if present)

Identify terms you don't know

Do not take detailed notes, focus on flow

(15)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Understand a paper

Multiple steps

Step 0: what is this paper about

Step 1: Skim

Step 2: Read carefully

(16)

Step 2: Read

What is the message of the paper?

(17)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Structure of many papers

Introduction

What is interesting/relevant?

Problem statement

What problem is solved by the authors

Solution to problem

Algorithm

Software system

Hardware/software system

Evaluation

Related work

Previous (partial) (non) solutions

Other problems that might be confused with this problem

Conclusions

Implications

(18)

Contents of the paper

What is the paper about

Write a 1-3 sentence summary of paper

What problem(s) do(es) the paper attempt to solve/address

How does the paper support its claims?

SimulationMeasurement

Theory/Reasoning

(19)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Understand a paper

Multiple steps

Step 0: what is this paper about

Step 1: Skim

Step 2: Read carefully

Step 3: Interpret

(20)

Step 3: Interpret

Examine graphs, tables, algorithms carefully

Look for key issues, findings

Take notes

(21)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Assessment of paper

Do you believe the author(s)?

Rational arguments in the paperDo the data support the claims

What are the key ideas/findings

Your talk: presentation of paprer + reflection

Contents of paper (not all – key ideas)Critique

Assessment

» Important idea? Why?

» Incremental work?

» Bogus?

(22)

Understand a paper

Multiple steps

Step 0: what is this paper about

Step 1: Skim

Step 2: Read carefully

Step 3: Interpret

Step 4: Summarize

Do you have all the information you need?

(23)

© Thomas Gross 2019

Understand a paper

Do you need background info??

Get it

Read paper again

Carefully

Mark/record parts that you don’t understand

Get help on parts you don’t understand

More background materialSearch internet

Ask professor, assistant (or friends)

(24)

Concluding remarks

Pick a paper on a topic you find interesting

You can always get more information

Read paper

Prepare presentation

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

• Qualität der Ergebnisse („Würde!“) kann durch Qualitätstransparenz verbessert werden. • Qualität der Arbeit („Würde!“) ist

We think that this would be a mistake (Frese & Zapf, 1988) because (a) no study ever measures all stressors at work; (b) objective measures of stressors underestimate

1) Die definierte Zielgruppe der 20 bis 35-Jährigen zeigt Interesse an der CSR- Thematik und nimmt Informationen über das gesellschaftliche Engagement von Unternehmen

Research Findings/Insights: Using a sample of Korean private universities, we find that measures of family control in excess of monetary contributions are negatively related to

For example, for this an individual may loss of competitive advantage over peers or it may provide incomplete or having a questionable track record (Stenmark 2002). Three key

An- schliessend wird anhand von sechs Managementaufgaben (Governance, Strategie, Erfolgs- steuerung, Marketing, Finanzierung und Human Resource Management) gezeigt, welche

This longitudinal research describes how a 50-person management staff, led by a committed chief executive officer (CEO), was able to successfully implement a team-based structure

Die Idee dieses Dokument resultiert daraus, ein effektives, aufbauendes und systematisches Programm für unsere TrainerInnen zu erarbeiten, die einzelnen Module nach