• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

An alternative method for determining GPS receiver phase biases

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "An alternative method for determining GPS receiver phase biases"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 17, EGU2015-12042, 2015 EGU General Assembly 2015

© Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

An alternative method for determining GPS receiver phase biases

Tobias Kersten and Steffen Schön

Hannover, Germany (kersten@ife.uni-hannover.de)

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) is used in a broad variety of applications to determine very economically high precision parameters for positioning, navigation and timing. In comparison to traditional differential approaches, PPP with undifferenced phase measurements is highly attractive, since the effort on the user side can be reduced to minimum, e.g. due to an unnecessary reference station. The quality of obtained position solutions is comparable to those obtained from a differential approach.

One of the most important limiting factor is the long integration time to determine (float) ambiguities. Fur- thermore, it is critical to consider adequately all occurring error sources. In this context, receiver phase biases are one of the limiting factors and very complex to model. At least they are highly correlated with the ambiguities during the estimation process, (Laurichesse et al. 2009).

This contribution presents an alternative method to estimate carrier phase biases of different GPS/GNSS receivers and signals w.r.t. a reference receiver. Receiver phase biases are estimated on a zero baseline and in combination with a very stable and precise clock (H-Maser) using single differences. The presented method will be discussed in detail. This includes a critical look to the estimability of bias values for several GPS/GNSS receivers as well as a discussion on the stability and universality of these bias values. Finally relative phase biases are quantified and it will be discussed how GPS/GNSS observation equations have to be extended, to take these bias values correctly into account.

References:

Laurichesse D., Mercier F., Berthias J.P., Broca P., Cerri L. (2009): Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination, In: NAVIGATION, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, Volume 56, Number 2, pages: 135 - 149

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

First results using the Hannover Concept of absolute antenna calibration to determine elevation dependent Code Phase Vari- ation (GDV) were discussed in [7] and [8] for several

PTB and National Physical Laboraty ( NPL ) via IPPP links are performed. The im- pact of frequent dead time due to the limited duty cycle of the clocks on the sta- tistical

https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.153198 | downloaded: 31.1.2022 Xinyuan Mao, et al., Impact of satellite dynamics parameterization on precise orbit determination of Sentinel-3 43rd

Two different reduced-dynamic baseline solutions with resolved carrier phase ambiguities are computed for the time period of the year 2007. For the first solution, denoted in anal-

Nevertheless, it could be shown that the esti- mated UPD corrections allow for a PPP solution with ambiguity fixing at the user-side, which is extremely precise and stable as soon

3: Comparison of mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range (IQR) of horizontal deviations in [m] for static baseline solutions in 3 h observation windows.. Forest

Oceanic and solid Earth tides induce periodic signals in the Earth rotation parameters (ERP), i.e., the pole coordinates (x p ; y p ) and universal time (UT1) or length of day

With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice, the copyright of the article changed on [10 May 2021] to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under