• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The Effect of Climatic Variations on Agricultural Risk

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "The Effect of Climatic Variations on Agricultural Risk"

Copied!
21
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Working Paper

THE EFFECT OF c m n c VARIATIONS ON

AGRICULTURAL

RISK

M.L. Parry

T.R.

Carter

August 1984 WP-84-69

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria

(2)

NOT FOR QUOTATION WITHOUT PERMlSSlON OF THE AUTHOR

THE EFFECT OF CLIMATIC

VAFUATIONS ON

AGRICLKTURAL RISK

M.L.

P a r r y

T.R.

Carter

August

1984 WP-84-69

Working Papers a r e interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views o r opinions expressed herein do not necessarily r e p r e s e n t those of t h e l n s t i t u t e or of its National Member Organizations.

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 2361 Laxenburg, Austria

(3)

Over t h e p a s t decade t h e international scientific community and even t h e popular media have been paying increasing attention to long-range c l i m a t e change--the e x t e n t and timing of global warming, shifts in precipitation p a t t e r n s , ecological, economic, and even geo-political effects.

Considerable research attention should obviously be addressed to t h e pros- p e c t s for a n d implications of seminal climate change; such a development could have historic consequences. But t h e global scale a n d t h e long-term n a t u r e of t h e challenge, together with t h e uncertainties still to be resolved, t e n d to make t h e COz/climate issue, as i t is usually presented, a residual claimant for t h e t i m e a n d a t t e n t i o n of national a n d international policy communities. This w o r k n g paper, 7he Effect of Climatic lh'ariations o n AgricILltIL~al

Risk,

approaches t h e problem of c l i m a t e change from a different perspective in t e r m s of both spatial and temporal scales. It addresses "present day impacts from short-term climate variability".

And i t examines, as a case in point, t h e shifts of climate-related risk level a n d agri- c u l t u r a l growth potential for a single crop (oats) in a single locality ( s o u t h e r n Scot- land).

But, however interesting t h i s may be a s a n exercise in analyzing t h e climate- risk issue u n d e r a particular s e t of conditions in a particular a r e a , t h e authors have a l a r g e r objective in mind: t h e y wish t o use t h e i r investigation of change of risk as a building block for assessing the consequences for agriculture of long-term (C02- induced) climate change. Such an approach, I believe, will provide useful guidance for those contemporary officials for whom a relatively remote, world-wide shift on t e m p e r a t u r e a n d precipitation is too emphemeral to appear on already-crowded policy agendas.

Professor Martin P a r r y a n d his associates a t IIASA a r e investigating t h e i m p a c t s of s h o r t - t e r m climatic variations and t h e likely long-term 'effects of COz- i n d u c e d climatic changes on food output a t t h e sensitive margins of production.

This work is p a r t of a two-year effort a n d is expected t o be completed. by December, 1985.

Dr. Chester

L.

Cooper Special Advisor t o the Director Acting Head of t h e Environmental Program

(4)

The t h e s i s of this paper is t h a t impacts from climatic change can be evaluated effectively as changes in t h e frequency of short-term, anomalous climatic events.

These c a n t h e n be expressed a s changes in the level of risk of impact from climatic extremes. To evaluate this approach, t h e risk of crop failure resulting from low lev- els of a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e is assessed for oats farming in southern Scotland.

Annual accumulated t e m p e r a t u r e s a r e calculated for t h e 323-year long tempera- t u r e record compiled by Manley for Central England. These a r e bridged across t o southern Scotland and, by calculating mean levels of risk for different elevations, an average "risk surface" is constructed. I-in-10 and 1-in-50 frequencies of crop failure a r e assumed to delineate a high-risk zone, which is mapped for the 323-year period by constructing isopleths of these risk levels. By re-dravling the risk iso- pleths for warm a n d cool 50-year periods, t h e geographical shift of t h e high-risk zone is delineated. The conclusion is t h a t relatively r e c e n t a n d apparently minor climatic variations in the United Kingdom have in fact induced substantial spatial c b m g e s in levels of agricultural risk. h advantage of expressing climatic change as a change in agricultural risk, is t h a t support programs for agriculture can be re-tuned t o accommodate acceptable frequencies of impact by adjusting support levels t o m a t c h new risk levels.

(5)

CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. Long-Term Variations in Growth Potential 2.1. Selection ,of t h e P a r a m e t e r

2.2. Central England Accumulated Temperatures, 1659-1981 2.3. The Chronology of Accumulated Warmth

2.4. Derivation of Proxy Accumulated Temperatures for Southern Scotland 2.4.1.Bridging from Central England to Edinburgh

2.4.2.Bridging from E b n b u r g h to Southern Scotland 3. The Frequency of Crop Failure

3.1. Method

3.2. Predicting t h e Location of Crop Failure 4. A Risk Surface of Crop Failure

5. Delimiting High-Risk Areas

6. Changes in t h e Frequency of Crop Failure 7. Conclusions

References

-

vii

-

(6)

THE

m C T

OF CLIMATIC VARIATIONS ON AGRICULTURAL RISK

M.L.

P a r r y a n d T.R. C a r t e r

1. Introduction

In t h e field of climate impact a s s e s s m e n t t h e r e h a s been a tendency t o distin- guish between t h e role of short-term climatic variability a n d t h e role of long-term climatic change. One affects t h e range a n d frequency of shocks t h a t society absorbs or to which i t adjusts. The o t h e r a l t e r s t h e r e s o u r c e base, for example t h e agro-climatic resources t h a t can affect farming options a n d t h e patterns of com- parative advantage, which themselves help t o d e t e r m i n e why some crops a r e grown in one place and different crops in another. Follow-ing this line of thought, some studies have a t t e n d e d specifically t o those shifts of cropping zones t h a t might o c c u r a s a result of long-term changes in m e a n c l i m a t e (Williams and Oakes, 1978;

Newman, 1980).

Yet this distinction between s h o r t - t e r m a n d long-term reflects more statistical convenience t h a n an understanding of h u m a n behavior. Few societies or individu- als look far ahead or behind. Farmers, for example, m a y plan over one or two y e a r s but rarely m o r e t h a n five. Any future i m p a c t from long-term changes in m e a n cli- m a t e c a n t h u s be seen a s being embedded in p r e s e n t - d a y impacts from short-term climatic variability; and i t is likely t h a t t h e s e s h o r t - t e r m impacts will remain t h e medium through which a n y long-term change i s felt. The thesis of this paper is, therefore, t h a t impacts from climatic change should be expressed as changes in r i s k of i m p a c t from t h e s h o r t - t e r m anomalous event. One advantage of considering possible impacts from climatic changes in t h i s form is t h a t t h e y c a n be expressed in a language understood by t h e policy-maker. Present-day frequencies of climatic events c a n be u s e d a s a base upon which t o impose effects, such as C02-induced warming, t o obtain modified frequencies reflecting t h e possible impacts of costly,

e x t r e m e events ( s u c h as droughts, floods, cold spells, etc.). Government programs can t h e n be devised t o accommodate specified tolerable levels of risk, by adjusting activities as necessary t o match t h e change in risk.

(7)

In this paper we explore t h e e x t e n t t o which levels or climate-related risk have varied in t h e past, as indicated by t h e instrumental record. Our choice of d a t a and study a r e a was governed by two requirements: firstly, for a long instrumental record (to d e t e c t impacts from s h o r t - t e r m changes in p a t t e r n s or climatic variabil- ity); secondly, t o examine a region where climatic risk is high, and where changes in climatic risk would have a readily detectable effect on t h e economic system.

Subsequently, with a deeper u n d e r s t a n h n g of t h e issue, an investigation of this kind can be extended to regions where climatic risk is less pronounced b u t nonetheless still important.

.

The longest i n s t r u m e n t a l record available is t h a t for t e m p e r a t u r e in Central England compiled by Manley (1953, 1974). This is representative of inland locations in t h e English Midlands a t about 150 feet (46m) above s e a level. At this elevation, however, levels of climate-related r i s k for agriculture a r e n o t high. For a con- venient laboratory, we t h u s n e e d t o look a t upland a r e a s with higher levels of risk.

An appropriate one is the Southern Uplands of Scotland which previous work h a s indicated a s being characterized by highly marginal forms of arable agriculture ( P a r r y , 1975). We shall focus specifically on t h e cultivation of oats which, a t eleva- tions qf a b o u t 340 m in southern Scotland, is n e a r i t s physiological limit.

Howevrr, t h e i n s t r u m e n t a l record for this region extends back only t o 1856.

Only a t Ldinburgh is it e x t a n t for t h e 1Bth c e n t u r y (from 1764). For t h e period before 1764 we m u s t look to t h e data for Central England available from 1659. By bridging between the data s e t s for Central England and Edinburgh, a n d between those for Edinburgh and our upland region, it is possible t o derive a 323-year r u n of t e m p e r a t u r e d a t a for southern Scotland. We shall analyze these data for long-term changes in climatic risk, first in Central England a n d subsequently in s o u t h e r n Scotland, a n d assess t h e i m p a c t of t h e s e changes on marginal agriculture in t h e upland region.

2. Long-Tern Variations ID

Growth

Potential 2.1. Selection of the Parameter

In m a r i t i m e upland a r e a s relatively small increases in altitude generally r e s u l t in m a r k e d foreshortening of t h e growing season a n d a g r e a t reduction i n t h e inten- sity of accumulated warmth (Manley, 1945). Moreover, t h e variability of accumu- lated warmth relative t o t h e m e a n increases with altitude, a n d f u r t h e r contributes t o t h e rapid altitudinal fall in potential for crop grovrfh (Manley, 1951).

For oats, which is m o r e t o l e r a n t of high rainfall, frequent soil waterlogging a n d g r e a t e r soil acidity t h a n a r e wheat and barley, t h e intensity of growing season t e m - p e r a t u r e s i s t h e single m o s t limiting climatic factor. The most effective m e a s u r e of this is one of accumulated t e m p e r a t u r e (or the n u m b e r of groxving degree-days, GDD). Growing degree-days a r e calculated as t h e excess of mean monthly tempera- t u r e ( & ) over t h e base t e m p e r a t u r e (t,), multiplied by t h e n u m b e r of days in t h e m o n t h ( m i ) and cumulated over one year t o give a n annual total (A):

12

A = mi(&-t,) for

fi

r

t b

i =I

We have used a base of 4 . 4 " ~ , one established from phenological studtes a s being appropriate for oats in n o r t h e r n Europe (Nuttonson, 1955), t o calculate annual accumulated t e m p e r a t u r e s for Central England from 1659 t o 1981.

(8)

2.2. Central England Accumulated Temperatures, 1659-1 98 1

Central England t e m p e r a t u r e s were assembled by Manley from several discon- tinuous series into a table of monthly means. This was derived from t h e average of data recorded in Oxford a n d a t a n u m b e r of stations in Lancashire from 1815. Data for the period from 1771 t o 1815 were obtained by averaging t h e departures for each month a t a n u m b e r of inland stations whose records a r e sufficiently long t o be

"bridged" into the l a t e r r u n of data. For t h e period before 1771 d a t a were bridged into the record from a variety of s c a t t e r e d observation points.

From these monthly d a t a accumulated t e m p e r a t u r e s in month-degrees were calculated by Manley (1951) for the period 1751-1949 for sites a t a height of 183 m in t h e English Pennines. However, using t h e full r u n of d a t a , we have calculated growing degree-days a t 46 m ( t h e height represented by t h e Central England tem- perature data) for a 323-year period (Figure 1).

2.3. The Chronology of Accumulated Warmth

The history of t h e s e a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s is, in one s e n s e , a barometer of t h e buoyancy of t h e local farming economy, particularly i n t h e cold, marginal uplands of n o r t h e r n Europe agriculture is so constrained by a growing season which is both s h o r t and lacking in intensity. The m o s t i m p o r t a n t events in this chronology (bearing in mind t h a t i t represents lowland conditions) were probably the cooler-than-average y e a r s , particularly those with less t h a n 90 p e r c e n t of m e a n accumulated warmth (about 1660 GDD). We can classify t h e s e e x t r e m e occurrences into: (1) those t h a t a r e single, isolated extremes (e.g. 1740, 1782, 1860, 1879, 1922);

(2) those t h a t r e p r e s e n t clustered, successive events of two, t h r e e or even more extremes in a row (e.g. 1673-75, 1686-98, 1838-40, 1887-88, 1891-92); and (3) those t h a t represent periods c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a high frequency of s c a t t e r e d , not succes- sive negative e x t r e m e s (e.g. 1812-1 7, 1679-92). Though n o t necessarily mutually exclusive, these could have recognizably h f f e r e n t effects: t h e isolated e v e n t hav- ing a sudden but short-lived impact, while successive e x t r e m e s bring a b o u t increas- ingly greater economic hardship.

For example 1740 saw a spectacularly poor h a r v e s t in Scotland, yet. food shor- tages were made good t h e following s u m m e r (Parry, 1978). Similarly, t h e cool sum- m e r of 1782 delayed t h e upland oats harvest until December. In Aberdeenshire farmers had to shake t h e snow- off t h e crop before cutting (Pearson, 1973). Yet t h e r e was little lasting hardship.

The limited i m p a c t of such isolated events can be c o n t r a s t e d with t h e effects of a r u n of extreme y e a r s which, by forcing f a r m e r s to consume t h e i r seed stocks or spend their cash reserves, could seriously prejudice t h e i r harvests in subsequent years. In this respect, t h e effect of the so-called "Seven Ill Years" of t h e 1690s on the rural population in n o r t h e r n Europe was catastrophic. In Finland a t least a quarter, a n d possibly a t h i r d , of the population &ed in t h e Great Famine of 1696-97 largely as a result of epidemic diseases spreading through a n ill-fed a n d weak popu- lation (Jutikkala, 1955).

Finally, we can d e t e c t t h e cumulative, erosive effect of t h e periods c h a r a c t e r - ized by frequent, b u t s c a t t e r e d extremes. In t h e s e instances, t h e process of recovery was halted a n d reversed by a series of r e c u r r e n t shocks t h a t , over several years, t h e farm economy h a d insufficient s t a m i n a or resilience t o absorb. In the U.K. the scattered e x t r e m e s over 1879-92 slowly brought m o r e and m o r e f a r m e r s to a s t a t e of bankruptcy, particularly because grain prices, held back by cheap imports since t h e repeal of tariffs on Korth American grain, failed t o respond to depressed yields (Perry, 1974; Royal Commission, 1683).

(9)
(10)

S u c h h i s t o r i c a l , ideographic descriptions of t h e e f f e c t s of single, s u c c e s s i v e , and c l u s t e r e d e x t r e m e s a r e , however, n o t a sufficient basis for g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s con- cerning t h e i m p a c t on a g r i c u l t u r e of c l i m a t i c variability a n d of c h a n g e s in t h a t variability. S u c h a basis can only be provided by s t u d y of specific r e s p o n s e s in p a r - t i c u l a r f a r m i n g s y s t e m s . We shall focus specifically on t h e probability of c r o p failure b e c a u s e we believe t h a t t h i s is a m o s t effective m e a s u r e of i m p a c t f r o m c l i m a t i c v a r i a t i o n s . There a r e two r e a s o n s for t h i s . Firstly, m a r g i n a l f a r m e r s , by definition, o p e r a t e n e a r t h e l i m i t s of profitability a n d a r e m o r e c o n c e r n e d with s u r - vival (i-e. probability of t h e i r avoiding failure) t h a n with a c c u m u l a t i n g wealth (i.e.

t h e i r i n c r e m e n t above a m i n i m u m average condition). Secondly, t h e n o n - m a r g i n a l , profit-maximizing f a r m e r knows well t h a t n e t r e t u r n s a r e n o t simply a f u n c t i o n of average yield, b u t also of t h e balance s t r u c k between gambling on "good" y e a r s a n d insuring a g a i n s t "bad" ones (Edwards, 1978).

We shall f o c u s on t h o s e c h a n g e s in probability of c r o p failure t h a t can o c c u r a s a r e s u l t of c h a n g e s of climate. To do t h i s , however, r e q u i r e s a long r u n of d a t a . These a r e o b t a i n e d by bridging a c r o s s t o o u r u p l a n d s t u d y region f r o m t h e C e n t r a l England t e m p e r a t u r e record.

2.4. Derivation of Proxy Accumulated T e m p e r a t u r e s f o r S o u t h e r n S c o t l a n d

A 323-year proxy r e c o r d of a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s for s o u t h e r n Scotlalld was c o n s t r u c t e d by bridging from Central England t o Edinburgh, a n d f r o m Edin- burgh t o a network of 27 s t a t i o n s covering t h e s t u d y a r e a .

2.4.1. Bridging

from

Central England t o Edinburgh

Data for t h e period of overlap between t h e two r e c o r d s (1764-1896) w e r e analyzed t o establish l i n e a r regression e q u a t i o n s , f o r e a c h m o n t h , of Edinburgh t e m p e r a t u r e s on Central England t e m p e r a t u r e s . Correlation coefficients w e r e also recorded, a n d all indicate a close relationship between t h e two s e t s of m o n t h l y t e m - p e r a t u r e s (significant a t t h e 99 p e r c e n t level). A plausible m e a n s of e x t r a p o l a t i n g t h e Edinburgh r e c o r d is, t h e r e f o r e , t o u s e t h e r e g r e s s i o n coefficients a s p r e d i c t o r s of t e m p e r a t u r e s a t Edinburgh for t h e full period, 1659-1931.

2.4.2. Bridging from Edinburgh to Sou t h e r n S c o t l a n d

Twelve regression equations relating m e a n m o n t h l y t e m p e r a t u r e s t o elevation were c a l c u l a t e d , o n e for each m o n t h , f r o m t h e 40-year r e c o r d (1856-1895) for t h e 27 s t a t i o n s (excluding Edinburgh) in s o u t h e r n Scotland. These e q u a t i o n s w e r e u s e d t o e s t i m a t e m o n t h l y m e a n s (1856-95) for a s i t e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of t h e whole region at t h e s a m e a l t i t u d e a s t h e Edinburgh s t a t i o n (76 m). The differences between t h e s e e s t i m a t e s a n d t h e a c t u a l monthly m e a n s for Edinburgh, w e r e t h e n u s e d a s c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s t o a d j u s t t h e proxy Edinburgh d a t a t o obtain longer-term t e m - p e r a t u r e s for t h e study a r e a . We can t h u s derive a 323-year s e t of a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s for s o u t h e r n Scotland, within which t o e x a m i n e t h e f r e q u e n c y of c r o p failure.

3. T h e Frequency of Crop Failure 3.1. Method

For m a n y c r o p s t h e point of "failure" i s a n a r b i t r a r y one b e c a u s e , however small t h e r e t u r n of grain, t h e residue m a t e r i a l (straw, e t c . ) is often valuable as fodder. There is a point, however, where t h ~ g r a i n yield falls so far s h o r t of t h e e x p e c t e d yield o r t h e yield required t o cover c o s t s of i n p u t s s u c h a s s e e d , l a b o r a n d fertilizers t h a t , in economic t e r m s , t h e y e a r ' s v e n t u r e m a y be considered a failure.

Clearly c r o p failure can t h u s be defined in m a n y different ways, e a c h a p p r o p r i a t e

(11)

for different f a r m i n g s y s t e m s a n d c r o p types.

Our definitions a n d d a t a for c r o p failure ref.er t o Red and Blaislie v a r i e t i e s of oats which were c o m m o n l y grown in t h e s t u d y region in t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y . By e x a m i n i n g diaries and f a r m journals for t h a t period we can identify t h e y e a r s of crop failure and, by referring t o t h e meteorological r e c o r d , t h e w e a t h e r of t h o s e dismal s u m m e r s . Empirically, i t h a d been concluded from e a r l i e r work t h a t w h e r e a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s failed t o exceed 970 degree-days o a t s h a r v e s t s were e x t r e m e l y delayed a n d r e d u c e d ( P a r r y , 1978).

Knowing t h e l a p s e r a t e of t e m p e r a t u r e with elevation in t h e region (0.6B°C/100 m, P a r r y . 1976), i t is possible t o c a l c u l a t e , for e a c h y e a r , t h e h e i g h t a t which t h e m i n i m u m a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e i s achieved. Above t h i s h e i g h t , which shifts upwards a n d downwards substantially f r o m y e a r t o y e a r according t o variations in a c c u m u l a t e d w a r m t h , t h e o a t s c r o p would h a v e been long delayed (Figure 2). We t h u s h a v e a p i c t u r e , for t h e period 1659 t o 1981, of t h e year-to-year s h i f t s in t h e h y p o t h e t i c a l u p p e r limit of t h e o a t s c r o p c a u s e d by a n n u a l v a r i a t i o n s in t e m p e r a - t u r e . In t h i s way, c l i m a t i c v a r i a t i o n s c a n be e x p r e s s e d a s t h e spatial variation of a boundary, which s h i f t s a c r o s s a n e c o n o m i c surface: t h u s a f a r m e r who in one y e a r lies on t h e "right" side of t h e boundary and, c e t e r i s pa. :;us, h a s an o a t s c r o p t o h a r v e s t , m a y in a n o t h e r l i e on t h e "wrong" side a n d r e c o u p ver; little. I t is b u t a simple s t e p t o e x p r e s s t h a t f a r m e r ' s position in t e r m s of risk of c r o p failure d u e t o i n a d e q u a t e a c c u m u l a t e d w a r m t h a n d , f u r t h e r m o r e , t o e x p r e s s c l i m a t i c c h a n g e s a s c h a n g e s in t h a t level of risk. Before doing so, however, i t is useful t o explore t h e value of Figure 2 a s a predictive tool i n historical r e s e a r c h and. in s o doing, t o pro- vide s o m e verification of t h e model.

3.2. Predicting the Location of Crop Failure

Following t h e t r i p a r t i t e classification i n t r o d u c e d e a r l i e r , we c a n p r e d i c t t h e locations a t which c r o p failure o c c u r r e d e i t h e r i n indtvidual e x t r e m e y e a r s o r in successive e x t r e m e s , or i n periods with p a r t i c u l a r l y f r e q u e n t e x t r e m e s . Where ade- q u a t e historical i n f o r m a t i o n i s e x t a n t , t h e p r e d i c t i o n s c a n be t e s t e d a g a i n s t histori- cal a c t u a l i t y .

As a n example of t h e p r e d i c t e d i m p a c t from a single, isolated e x t r e m e n-e c a n predict t h a t in t h e cool s u m m e r of 1782, f a r m s l o c a t e d above 300 m ( s e e Figure 2) would h a v e experienced failed o a t s h a r v e s t s . T h e r e is s o m e confirmation of t h i s from a c o n t e m p o r a r y a c c o u n t for t h e high-lying parish of Lauder which r e p o r t s t h a t

"It was t h e end of December before t h e h a r v e s t was finished, a f t e r a g r e a t p a r t of t h e c r o p was destroyed by frost a n d snow. None of t h e f a r m e r s could p a y t h e i r r e n t ; s o m e of t h e m l o s t tn-o h u n d r e d t o five h u n d r e d pounds s t e r l i n g " (Statistical Account of Scotland, 1791-99). T h e r e w e r e s o m e f a r m b a n k r u p t c i e s , with t h e subse- q u e n t a m a l g a m a t i o n of holdings, b u t unlike t h e effect of successive e x t r e m e s in t h e 1690s, t h e parish r e t u r n s for t h e S t a t i s t i c a l Account r e p o r t e d l i t t l e sign of lasting h a r d s h i p in t h e 1790s r e s u l t i n g f r o m t h a t single dismal s u m m e r in t h e p r e c e d i n g decade.

As for t h e c l u s t e r s of consecutively coo1 s u m m e r s , t h r e e would h a v e c a u s e d c o n s e c u t i v e failure above 300 m: 1674-75, 1694-95 a n d 1816-17. More s u b s t a n t i a l r u n s of f a i l u r e would h a v e o c c u r r e d a t h i g h e r levels. For e x a m p l e , above 340 m failure would theoretically h a v e o c c u r r e d i n eleven successive y e a r s from 1688-99 (Figure 2). This elevation appr-oxinlately m a t c h e s t h e a c t u a l u p p e r limit of o a t s cultivation in t h e s e v e n t e e n t h c e n t u r y , s o we can hypothesize t h a t t h e h i g h e s t a r a b l e f a r m e r i n s o u t h e r n Scotland saw failure for 11 c o n t i n u o u s y e a r s in t h e 1690s. In f a c t , a c o m p a r i s o n of t h e m a n u s c r i p t P o n t m a p s dating f r o m a b o u t 1596 with t h o s e of t h e Military Survey of Scotland of 1747-55 i n d c a t e s t h a t few of t h o s e high-lying f a r m s survived: of 32 r e c o r d e d in about 1600, only 10 r e m a i n e d i n t h e

(12)

2 <-

L. f

'7 c ' a .

G g L

ZCR?

3 .C

a 1 2

'pT

C

rci

.5

-6

bii c

L 2 u '

((anal eas anoqe sJaiauJ) apna!alv

(13)

next c e n t u r y .

Less immediately marked b u t probably as enduring in t h e i r effects were t h e periods of more frequent (though s c a t t e r e d ) extremes. The l a t e n i n e t e e n t h cen- tury i s an appropriate example. For this period o u r calculations (Figure 2) point t o harvest failure a t elevations exceeding 310 m for 5 years o u t of t h e 16 between 1877 and 1892. A t these high levels adverse weather and depressed prices were reflected in t h e long-term transfer of arable t o p e r m a n e n t grassland and rough pasture. Offi- cial annual acreage r e t u r n s for t h e region reveal a 5 p e r c e n t reduction in t h e a r e a under crops and grass between 1880 and 1885, a n d reductions of about 1 p e r c e n t every five y e a r s from 1885 t o 1900.

I t

is n o t t h e aim of this paper t o describe t h e s e historical i m p a c t s in any detail. The complicated t a s k of disentangling t h e relative roles of climate, economic and social factors is a m a t t e r for more lengthy t r e a t m e n t elsewhere. Yet it i s apparent from the preceding discussion t h a t , by r e f e r e n c e t o a long r u n of i n s t r u m e n t a l weather data t h a t have been reformulated into' altitudes of crop failure, i t is possible t o identify for a n y particular year o r period, t h e a r e a s m o s t seriously affected by 1;ariations in a c c u m u l a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e .

4. A Risk M a c e of Crop F- dure

With increasing elevation, t h e decrease in t e m p e r a t u r e clearly imposes a g r e a t e r r e s t r a i n t on cultivation, increasing t h e probability of i n a d e q u a t e a c c u m u - lated warmth and crop failure. In an e a r l i e r paper ( P a r r y , 1976) we had assumed annual totals of accumulated warmth t o be normally distributed, a n d found a strongly nonlinear relationship between altitude and risk of c r o p failure, t h e proba- bilities increasing almost exponentially a t certain heights (Figure 3). Subsequently we r e f e r r e d t o this as an a s s u m e d "risk surface" and emphasized t h a t o n e impor- t a n t effect of changes in climate could be t o change t h e location a n d inclination of this risk surface (Carter a n d P a r r y , 1984). We c a n now- discard t h e assumption of normality and, by considering t h e r e a l surface of risk over t h e 323-year period for which we now have data, can e s t i m a t e t h e changes in t h e probability of c r o p failure t h a t have occurred during this long period.

Actual occurrences of crop failure (i.e. years with less t h a n 970 GDD) for t h e period 1659-1961 in southern Scotland were calculated for 10 m intervals. These a r e plotted as frequencies of single a n d two consecutive failures i n Figure 3. The curved lines indicate the corresponding theoretical frequencies for normally distri- b u t e d temperatures. A comparison of a c t u a l and theoretical frequencies indicates a risk surface for single failures t h a t is approximately normal, b u t a distinct clus- tering of cool years results in a s t e e p e r t h a n normal risk surface for consecutive failures. At 340 m (which is approximately t h e limit of cultivation i n t h e region) the r e a l frequency of consecutive failures is m o r e t h a n double t h a t of t h e assumed frequency. 1n some respects,'then, t h e r e a l risk surface is s t e e p e r t h a n expected.

5. Delimiting High-Risk Areas -

I t is also possible to delineate, on t h e basis of this long r u n of d a t a , a high-risk zone in which oats is near its physiological limit and where probabilities of failure a r e very high. lsopleths of c r o p failure frequency reveal t h e d s t r i b u t i o n of these a r e a s (Figure 4). For t h e p r e s e n t we shall adopt the frequencies of l-in-10 and 3 - in-50 a s delineating the upper a n d lower edges of t h e high-risk zone. Ideally the choice of frequencies would be based empirically upon behavioral surveys a t the farm level. But, whatever a r e t h e critical frequencies for certain farming deci- sions, t h e effect of altitude on levels of risk is m u c h the same. For example, on t h e gentle slopes of t h e southern p a r t of t h e study a r e a t h e probability of c r o p failure doubles over a &stance of only about 5 km (Figure 4).

(14)
(15)

St. Abb's

I ,

. ..

. . '

. ,. .. ' :.,.. . ::; ,-;:;: : ,.'.

- .:..=: :.<,. Moorland

1970

.,.-.;-.>:.;

. .

0 -

. , . - 2

- .

4 6 8 1 0 k m

Fig.

4. lsopleths of actual frequency of crop failure in s o u t h e r n Scotland a s defined by years with less t h a n 970 GDD. Figures in p a r e n t h e s e s indicate a c t u a l f r e q u e n c y of 2 consecutive failures.

(16)

6. Changes in the F'requency of Crop Failure

The risk isopleths of 1-in-10 and 1-in-50 a r e average frequencies derived from t h e 323-year record. However, i t is clear from Figure I t h a t a c c u m u l a t e d tempera- t u r e s have varied greatly from one period to a n o t h e r , and Figure 3 i n d c a t e s t h a t these would have produced significant spatial shifts of t h e limit of crop failure. I t follows t h a t t h e high-risk zone is not static b u t , depending on t h e time-scale of study, apparently shifts from year t o year, decade t o decade, a n d c e n t u r y t o cen- tury. A perturbation in t h e climate can t h u s be expressed a s t h e shift of s u c h a risk zone.

To evaluate t h e effect of t e m p e r a t u r e variations t h a t have o c c u r r e d over t h e past 300 y e a r s , we have determined t h e risk surface a n d high-risk zone for cool a n d warm 50-year periods in t h e r e c o r d (1661-1710 a n d 1931-80, respectively), a n d have analyzed t h e i r shift between t h e s e periods.

The shift of the assumed risk surface is considerable, as illustrated by t h e curves in Figure 5. Furthermore, t h e shift of real frequencies (plotted as points) is g r e a t e r still due to t h e higher-than-expected failure frequency in t h e cool period c o n c u r r e n t with fewer-than-expected failures in t h e warm period.

The altitudinal movement of t h e high-risk zone exceeds 85 m, such t h a t t h e line of 1-in-50 frequency for t h e r e c e n t u-arm period lies above even t h a t of t h e 1- in-10 frequency for the cool period, a t t h e nadir of t h e so-called "Little Ice Age". In geographical t e r m s , t h e location of this zone has been radically altered (Figure 6).

Ghile i n t h e l a t e seventeenth century a substantial proportion of t h e foothills (above a b o u t 280 m ) were submarginal to the cultivation of oats, t h e c l i m s t i c limit of cultivation for he modern period stands on average a t 365 m , representing

i

an additional 150 krn of potentially cultivable land.

7 . Conclusions

We have considered elsewhere t h e possible connection between changes of cli- m a t e and changes in t h e use of marginal land (Parry, 1978). Those connections were analyzed on the basis of estimated 50-year averages of t e m p e r a t u r e , t h e argu- m e n t being t h a t long-term changes in climate were t h e changes t h a t , if any, had a n enduring economic effect. However, t h e present analysis of yearly data based on mean monthly temperatures has revealed t h e importance of t h e short-term event, particularly of extreme years. I t has emphasized t h a t an i m p o r t a n t path of i m p a c t from change in average climatic conditions is a change in t h e frequency of e x t r e m e events. Changes in this frequency can be expressed in t e r m s of a shift of the risk surface or of critical boundaries of risk.

M-e have n o t sought to establish these critical levels empirically. That remains t o be done, b u t t h e r e a r e grounds for accepting t h e I-in-50 frequency of crop failure as an approximation of t h e limit t o viable c e r e a l farming in t h e study region. For example, its isopleth for 1931-50 coincides ~ l t h t h e present limit of cul- tivation, or "moorland edge"; a fairly.stable boundary t h a t reflects an a d j u s t m e n t of agriculture t o prevailing economic a n d environmental conditions, and an adjust- m e n t t h a t operates on a decadal r z t h e r than an annual or secular scale.

If t h e r e were a simple causal relationship between climatic risk and the cul- tivation limit then, c e t e r i s parikus, w e v:ould expect both to have shifted in sym- pathy. Not surprisingly t h e actual relationship is far from simple a n d t h e r e a r e many intervening factors. N ~ v e r t h e l e s s , the shifts of risk level and grovrth poten- tial (or of o t h e r derived parameters t h a t have not been considered h e r e ) c a n be taken as a p r e h c t i o n of impact on agriculture; a prediction t h a t c a n be tested against historical records and then, if necessary, reformulated. Subsequently i t should be feasible t o improve our predictions of i m p a c t s from possible f u t u r e

(17)

Altitude (meters above sea level)

Fig. 5. Differences in t h e risk s r ~ r l a c e of crop failure for t h e cqol (1601-1710) and warm (1931.-00) 50-year pcriods in sout,llern Scotlar.~l. Shaded a n d st,ipplcd areas d e n o t e " h i g h - r i s k z o n e s .

(18)

- N -

~1 in 1 0 2 lsopleths of 1-in-10 and 1-in-50 frequency UPPER ME RSE -1 in 50- of crop failure, 1661 -1 710

,--I in 10-0 lsopleths of 1-in-10 -4 in

50--

and 1-in-50 frequency

of crop failure, 1931--80

-

0

2

4 6 8 1 0 k m

Fig. 6. Locational s h i f t of a high-risk zone between t h e cool (1661-1710) a n d w a r m (1931-80) periods. Risk is expressed a s frequency of o a t s c r o p failure.

(19)

c h a n g e s of c l i m a t e by expressing t h e m a s c h a n g e s in t h e frequency of e x t r e m e e v e n t s a n d , t h u s , a s c h a n g e s in level of risk. . One a d v a n t a g e of t h i s a p p r o a c h is t h a t , a s a n adaptive m e a s u r e , a g r i c u l t u r a l s u p p o r t p r o g r a m s could be r e - t u n e d t o a c c o m m o d a t e a c c e p t a b l e levels of risk by a d j u s t i n g s u p p o r t levels t o m a t c h t h e c h a n g e in risk. More g e n e r a l l y , we m a y c o n c l u d e t h a t i f c h a n g e s of r i s k a r e a n i m p o r t a n t possible c o n s e q u e n c e of c l i m a t i c c h a n g e , t h e n we n e e d t o m e a s u r e t h e f r e q u e n c i e s of o c c u r r e n c e of e x t r e m e e v e n t s u n d e r p r e s e n t ( n o r m a l ) c l i m a t i c con- ditions a n d t o u s e t h e s e f r e q u e n c i e s a s a base upon which t o s u p e r i m p o s e t h e effects of a possible f u t u r e c l i m a t i c c h a n g e , t o o b t a i n modified f r e q u e n c i e s of o c c u r r e n c e of s u c h a n o m a l i e s .

(20)

REFERENCES

Carter, T.R., and Parry,

M.L.:

1954, 'Strategies for Assessing Impacts of Climatic Change in Marginal Areas',

Proceedings of t h e 2 n d Nordic S p . p o r i u m o n CZimatic Change, B o c k h o l m

(in press).

Edwards, C.: 1978, 'Gambling, Insuring and t h e Production Function', Agric.

Econ.

Res.

30, 25-28.

Jutikkala, E.: 1955, 'The Great Finnish Famine in 1696-?',

S c a n d . Econ. Hist. R e v .

3, 48-63.

Manley, G.: 1945, 'The Effective Rate of Altitudinal Change in Temperate Atlantic Climates',

Geogrl. R e v .

35, 408-417.

Manley, G.: 1951, 'The Range of Variation of the British Climate',

Geogrl.

J. 117, 43-68.

Manley, G.: 1953. 'The Mean Temperature of Central England, 1698-1952',

Quart.

J.

R . Met. Soc.

7 9 , 242-261.

Manley, G.: 1974, 'Central England Temperatures: Monthly Means 1659 t o 19?3',

Q u a r t .

J.

R. Met. Soc.

100, 389-405.

Kenrman, J.E.: 1980, 'Climate Change Impacts on t h e Growing Season of t h e North American Corn Belt',

B i o m e f e o r o l o g y

7, 128-142, Supplement t o

/nt .

J.

R i o m e f e o r .

24.

Nuttonson. M.Y.: 1955,

m e a t - C Z i m a t e Relationshzps a n d the USE of Phenology

in

Ascertaining t h e Thermal a n d Photo- Thermal R e q u i r e m e n t s of Wheat,

h e r . Inst. Crop Ecology, Washington.

Parry, M.L.: 1975, 'Secular Climatic Change a n d Marginal Agricult.ure',

P a n s . h t , Br. Geog. 64,

1-18.

Parry, M.L.: 1976, 'The Significance of t h e Variability of S u m m e r Yiarmth in Upland Britain',

Weather

31, 212-217.

Parry, M.L.: 1975,

CZimatic L7uznge, Agriculture a n d S e t t l e m e n t ,

Dawson.

Perry, P.J.: 1974,

B r i t i s h f i r m i n g

in

t h e Oreat Depression,

1870-1914, Newton

(21)

Abbott.

P e a r s o n , K G . : 1973, ' S n o ~ ~ s t o r m s in S c o t l a n d , 1782-86', F e a f h e r 28, 195-201.

Royal Commission: 1883, R o y a l C o m m i s s i o n o n

t h ~

D e p r e s s e d C o n d i f i o n s o f A g r i c u l - t u r a l h t e r e s t s ( t h e I h c h m o n d C o m m i s s i o n ) , Cmnd. 2778.

7he S a t i s t i c a l A c c o u n t o f S o t l a n d : 1791-99, Sir J o h n Sinclair ( e d . ) , Edinburgh.

Williams, G.D.V., a n d Oakes, W.T.: 1970, 'Climatic R e s o u r c e s for Maturing Barley a n d Wheat in Canada', in Hage, K.D. a n d Reinelt,

E.R.

(eds.). E s s a y s o n M e t e o r o l o g y a n d C l i m a t o l o g y :

h

H o n o r o f R L c h m o n d

M:

L o n g l e y , Stud. Geogr. Monogr. 3, D e p a r t m e n t of Geography, University of Alberta, E d m o n t o n , Canada, pp.

367-385.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Working Papers a r e interim reports on work of t h e International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions

Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review.. Views or opinions

Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein

Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions

Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein

Working Papers are interim reports on work of t h e International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis a n d have received only limited review.. Views or

Working Papers a r e interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review.. Views or opinions

Working Papers a r e interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review.. Views or opinions