• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

„How to enhance philanthropic impact through social investment”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "„How to enhance philanthropic impact through social investment”"

Copied!
10
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

„How to enhance philanthropic impact through social investment”

Session proposed by The New Eurasia Foundation at EFCs 18

th

Annual General Assembly and Conference

„The New Challenges for Global Philanthropy“

Madrid, June 1

st

– June 3

rd

, 2007

Building effective collaboration for sustainable development.

Experiences from Austria concerning South-East Europe (SEE) Josef Hochgerner

Zentrum für Soziale Innovation

(2)

DEFINITIONS

SOCIAL INNOVATION

• Methods, procedures, solutions that work to better deal with known or new issues of social relevance

• Does not necessarily require financial assets

SOCIAL INVESTMENT

• “Investment with social as well as financial return” (effect, vol.1/1)

• This may become real even for “in kind”

contributions (efforts asserted by volunteers)

MONITORING, EVALUATION and IMPACT ASSESSMENT:

Dispersed knowledge, lack of international standards, no codified tool-boxes Results based approaches (measurement of quantifiable output indicators) vs.

Systems approaches (inter-active learning, concensus on improvements re.

Growing demand for impact analysis

signifies importance of social development

(3)

TRENDS

Three new challenges for global philanthropy

 Emergence of a bio-based knowledge economy in the information society

 In the 21st century efficiency of resources will top labour efficiency

 The internationalisation of research and of funding for social development

 Increasing demand for matching funds (PPP between the public and 3rd sector)

 Research and Philanthropic Foundations are „natural allies“

 Diversification of services required on either sides

 Process monitoring and impact assessment become additional requirements

(4)

Why „South-East Europe“

*)

?

 Historic and cultural neighbourhood

 The most needy region of Europe concerning peace making by economic and social development

 To open up a European perspective

Incomplete selection of public funding schemes available to SEE

 By the European Union

 The CARDS programme (cohesion funds)

 The 6th/7th Framework Programme for Research and Technology Development

 By Austrian government sources

 Development aid East

 Austrian Science and Research Liaison Offices (ASO) in Ljubljana and Sofia

EXAMPLES CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH-EAST EUROPE

*) Addressing a group of countries including the two new (2007) MS Bulgaria and Romania; plus the so-

(5)

AUSTRIAN FUNDS AND MEASURES FOR SEE

Example 1: Development aid East – some figures and focus

Government funds (2002) Total 353 mio € (0.14% GDP, DK: 0.14, NL 0.10) Therof largest sector: 72 mio € Social infrastructure

of which 56 mio € Education and training

8 mio € Public sector and civil society (IB, CB) Method of spending:

Example 2: ASO – Moving from bi-lateral to multi-lateral collaboration

Making impact with small project funds by initiating or complementing trans-border collaboration

Applicant = Beneficiary

AT Government

Various Ministries Agency

[ZSI]

Public tender Winner

8 Services 7 Contract

1 Proposal 2 Request to evaluate

3 Proposal evaluation 4 Report

5 6 Reporting

results 9 Monitoring the progress of the project

10 Final Monitoring

Report and Recommendations

(6)

EU SEE-ERA.NET PROJECT: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS

Example 3:

Creating a funding scheme between national and EU levels, addressing specific research tasks relevant to the region

The project www.see-era.net runs from 2005 until 2009 Major milestone achieved in Nov. 2006:

Pilot joint call for proposals with the participation of 11 of the 15 participating countries

Setting up the Regional Research Programme SEE (ReP-SEE)

Scope of funding of research

• Collaborative Research Projects in the region

• Preparatory grant for Collaborative Research Projects (EU programmes)

• Docking grants for Collaborative Research Projects (EU programmes) Accompanying measures

• Support better ground for joint RTD (capacity building, policy/reg. dev. …) Young Scientists programme (mobility and return/integration fellowships)

Innovation programme (linking SMEs, technology and other innovation centres, ...)

(7)

TRANS-DISCIPLINARY SCIENCE

The classic notion of science in the Industrial Society: „Science, Mode 1“

*)

 Ideas, theories, methods, norms codified in departments („depart-mentality“)

 Powered and controlled mainly by scientific communities

 Organised and regulated by standards established within borders of disciplines

 Discoveries preceed development and implementation

Science in the knowledge based Information Society: „Science, Mode 2“

*)

 Production of knowledge, problem driven research across disciplines

 Decreasing control of scientific communities concerning RTDI-processes

 Increasing relevance of stakeholders and users (Science-Society relations, PuS, ...)

 Practitioners and other professional experts become involved („open innovation“)

_________________

*) Michael Gibbons, Helga Nowotny et al., 1994: The New Production of Knowledge.

The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies; Sage, London

... is there social investment in science as well?

Social innovation is going on in science ...

(8)

OPTIONS FOR PPP IN THE „RESEARCH–APPLICATION–SLALOM“

Time

Knowledge diffusion Knowledge generation Knowledge utilisation Research

Advice

Research Education

Advice

Advice, network co-ordination

Research Research

Educatio n Training

Campaignin gLobbying

Ownership

Ownership Ownership

Lobbyin g

START: Identification of an issue or a „knowledge gap“ e.g. „self-employment of migrants“

Project and programme monitoring, evaluation, impact assessment Project and programme monitoring, evaluation, impact assessment

(9)

IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Lessons learned regarding impact and sustainability

Ownership of the beneficiary: The indispensible requisite

Continuity and matching funds are crucial

Independent process monitoring is required

Comparative analysis of programmes and of project results

Networking among donors, exchange of experience

Ultimate potential of collaboration:

► Identification of development paths in mutual interest

► Co-ordinated time planning and shared investment along the „slalom course“

(10)

Josef Hochgerner Centre for Social Innovation Linke Wienzeile 246 A - 1150 Vienna

Tel. ++43.1.4950442 Fax. ++43.1.4950442-40 email: hochgerner@zsi.at http://www.zsi.at

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Based on the urban metabolism concept we are concentrating all our research and all our efforts into the urban realities, how cities work, what are.. the relations

Kind regards from our ministry for environment and spa- tial planning: we have worked on environmental impact assessments (EIA) for the last 30 years and strategic

This would include public interest in the evaluation of social impact in SEs, possibilities for standardisation of evaluation methods, lessons learned from incorporating

Special training courses have been provided within the framework of the YOUTH programme or on the initiative of the National Agency for the YOUTH Programme to involve different

The new IMPACT 2002+ life cycle impact assessment methodology proposes a feasible implementation of a combined midpoint/damage approach, linking all types of life cycle

Eine kommunale Anlaufstelle für Betroffene erleichtert den pflegenden Angehörigen den Zugang zu den diversen Unterstützungsangeboten und koordiniert den Einsatz von

BFH-Zentrums Soziale Sicherheit zeigt, dass Frauen nach der Pensionierung im Schnitt 37% weniger Rente beziehen als Männer (Fluder, Salzgeber, von Gunten, Kessler, &

Nicht enthalten sind Massnahmen, um die Armut im Alter zu senken oder Armutsrisiken bereits während der Berufsphase zu reduzie- ren.. Die wachsende Anzahl von Personen, die neu