• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Instrument for the assessment of the impact of flood risk measures on risk evolution

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Instrument for the assessment of the impact of flood risk measures on risk evolution"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

256 | INTERPRAEVENT 2016 – Extended Abstracts

Figure 1. Calculation modules resulting in an assessment of the risk evolution and/or reduction.

IP_2016_EA362

THE CONTEXT

Reacting on the extreme floods in the Rhine in 1993 and 1995, the 12th Conference of Rhine Ministers on 22 January 1998 in Rotterdam adopt- ed the „Action Plan on Floods“ of the International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR).

One of the aims of this Action Plan is to reduce flood risk in 2020 by 25% compared to 1995. In 2007 the ICPR was charged with supporting the implementation of the European Floods Directive (FD). In this frame a new Flood risk management plan for the Rhine river basin was published by end of 2015.

The ICPR, supported by the engineering consultant HKV, developed an instrument aimed at evaluating the effect of measures to reduce flood risk and estimating future evolution of flood risk (taking into account the impacts of different measures).

The instrument, which is working in a consistent, reproducible and transparent manner, is available on demand at the ICPR and is applicable to other river basins.

The ICPR uses this tool to assess risk reduction and evolution on the Rhine from 1995 up to now (calculation results will be available by mid-2016) as well as to carry out regular reviews of the impacts of measures on flood risk reduction for the new Flood risk management plan Rhine.

A new instrument to assess flood risk on a macro- scopic scale and evaluate the effects of measures:

The instrument is GIS-based and in the case of the ICPR covers the main stream of the Rhine. Flood maps (e.g. developed under the FD) are the basis for the tool. In addition to the quantification of economic flood risk, modules are developed for quantifying the consequences of risk for human health, to the environment and to culture heritage.

This innovative and flexible instrument can be used to generate information about the effects and effectiveness of flood risk management measures on the reduction of flood risk at a river basin and/

or tributary level, e.g. by assessing every 6 years the impacts of actions taken under flood risk manage- ment plans. In short, the main instrument consists of three interacting calculation modules (Model Builders) resulting in an overall damage risk reduction evolution/reduction (see Fig. 1).

As above mentioned the tool enables the challeng- ing conversion of the effect of measures into an effect on flood risk (see Fig. 2). Flood risk is defined as the product of the flood risk probability and the consequences of floods (with corresponding dam- ages). It can be reduced by lowering the flood probability and/or the potential damage. The flood probability can be altered by e.g. the retention measures available in the Flood Action Plan and the new Flood risk management plan. The ICPR has carried special studies to understand the effects of built and planned retention measures on flood water levels as well as the resulting change of probabilities/frequencies. The results of these studies are integrated in the tool as one element to assess the evolution of damages and risks.

Instrument for the assessment of the impact of flood risk measures on risk evolution

Adrian Schmid-Breton1

HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT (ANALYSIS, EVALUATION)

(2)

INTERPRAEVENT 2016 – Extended Abstracts | 257

Besides a reduction of potential damage can be achieved by other types of measures such as spatial planning, adapted building, flood forecasting and warning as well as crisis management. The whole cycle of flood risk management (prevention, protection, preparedness, crisis management, and recovery measures) is considered in the instrument.

Following innovative methods are used to assess risk for 4 types of protection objectives:

– Human health: In a first step, the affected

population is determined for each flood scenario, separated for different water depth classes.

In a second step, a „security fraction“ per region is used to visualize the population no longer in danger (e.g. due to evacuation).

– Economic activity: The economic damage poten- tial is calculated by combining land use maps (e.g. Corine Land Cover maps for different pe- riods) with stage-damage curves and asset values (e.g. both from the ICPR Rhine Atlas 2001) for the categories settlement, industry, traffic, agri- cultural use and forest. Asset values can be adapted to the actual situation by using the price increase index.

– Environment: To assess environmental risks or damages, the method used in the instrument identifies the impact of potential pollution arising from installations affected by floods (IPPC, SEVE- SO and water treatment plants) on different areas designated for drinking water production and for Natura 2000 (flora-fauna habitat and bird protection)

– Cultural heritage: Cultural damage can be quan- titatively estimated by combining cultural vul- nerability (depending on different types of cul- tural heritage: UNESCO World Heritage, historic sites, historic monuments) and water depths.

CONCLUSION

This new GIS-instrument enables macroscopic/

transboundary flood risk assessment which takes into account the effects of measures on risk reduc- tion in a reproducible and transparent way. From the beginning it has been developed to be flexible and applicable to other river basins.

It uses national or regional data amongst others already available through the implementation of the FD. The tool and related calculation results for the Rhine will be available by mid-2016.

For more information on transboundary flood risk management in the Rhine basin please visit www.iks.org

KEYWORDS

Transboundary flood risk management; flood risk assessment; effects of measures; GIS instrument; Rhine

1 International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR), Koblenz, GERMANY, adrian.schmid-breton@iksr.de Figure 2. This figure shows the calculation flow as well as the different input

data needed for it.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

With increasing public health concern regarding the potential risks associated with chemical exposure, there is a need for more predictive and accurate approaches to risk

The assessment of flood risk involves quantifying three main drivers (Na- tional Research Council, 2015): (a) flood hazard, which is the probability that a flood of a certain

Dedicated to Gerhart Bruckmann on the occasion of his 70th birthday Summary: The conditional-value-at-risk ( C V @R) has been widely used as a risk measure.. The class of coherent

Working Papers a r e interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review.. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE

Background to the risk limits chosen Interplay between risk limits and set of control measures.. Deriving risk-based concentration values for

2.2 Up-dating of the risk management procedures in the Hazardous Substances Committee - Action of the Project Group “Risk Acceptance”.. Steps to be taken in the procedure

Such events are for example the damn break in Glashütte in August 2002, the destruction of the water reservoir Niedów at the Witka River in August 2010, the control and

Therefore, taking benefit of recent advances in their availability, the analysis presented here relies on a micro-scale procedure (Ernst et al. 2010), which involves hazard modelling