An automated Fpg-based FADU method for the detection of oxidative DNA lesions and screening of antioxidants
Nathalie Müller
a,1, Maria Moreno-Villanueva
a,1, Arthur Fischbach
a, Joachim Kienhöfer
a, Rita Martello
a, Peter C. Dedon
b,c, Volker Ullrich
a, Alexander Bürkle
a,∗,2, Aswin Mangerich
a,b,∗∗aUniversityofKonstanz,MolecularToxicologyGroup,DepartmentofBiology,D-78457Konstanz,Germany
bDepartmentofBiologicalEngineering,MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology,77MassachusettsAvenue,Cambridge,MA02193,UnitedStates
cCenterforEnvironmentalHealthScience,MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology,77MassachusettsAvenue,Cambridge,MA02193,UnitedStates
Keywords:
DNAdamage FADU
Genotoxicitytesting Antioxidants Highthroughput Massspectrometry
a b s t r a c t
Theoxidationofguanineto8-oxo-2-deoxyguanosine(8-oxo-dG)isoneofthemostabundantandbest studiedoxidativeDNAlesionsandiscommonlyusedasabiomarkerforoxidativestress.Overthelast decades,variousmethodsforthedetectionofDNAoxidationproductshavebeenestablishedandopti- mized.However,someofthemlacksensitivityorarepronetoartifactformation,whileothersare time-consuming,whichhamperstheirapplicationinscreeningapproaches.Inthisstudy,wepresenta formamidopyrimidineglycosylase(Fpg)-basedmethodtodetectoxidativelesionsinisolatedDNAusing amodifiedprotocoloftheautomatedversionofthefluorimetricdetectionofalkalineDNAunwinding (FADU)method,initiallydevelopedforthemeasurementofDNAstrandbreaks(Moreno-Villanuevaetal., 2009.BMCBiotechnol.9,39).TheFADU-FpgmethodwasvalidatedusingaplasmidDNAmodel,mimick- ingmitochondrialDNA,andtheresultswerecorrelatedto8-oxo-dGlevelsasmeasuredbyLC–MS/MS.
TheFADU-FpgmethodcanbeappliedtoanalyzethepotentialofcompoundstoinduceDNAstrandbreaks andoxidativelesions,asexemplifiedherebytreatingplasmidDNAwiththeperoxynitrite-generating moleculeSin-1.Moreover,thismethodcanbeusedtoscreenDNA-protectiveeffectsofantioxidantsub- stances,asexemplifiedhereforasmall-molecule,i.e.,uricacid,andaprotein,i.e.,manganesesuperoxide dismutase,bothofwhichdisplayedadose-dependentprotectionagainstthegenerationofoxidativeDNA lesions.Inconclusion,theautomatedFADU-Fpgmethodoffersarapidandreliablemeasurementforthe detectionofperoxynitrite-mediatedDNAdamageinacell-freesystem,renderingitanidealmethodfor screeningtheDNA-protectiveeffectsofantioxidantcompounds.
1. Introduction
Avarietyofreactiveoxygenandnitrogenspecies(ROSandRNS) aregeneratedinbiologicalsystems,eitherendogenouslyfromcel- lularmetabolismand inflammatoryreactionsorexogenouslyby avarietyofchemicalsorionizingradiation(Delaneyetal.,2012;
Kasaietal.,1986).ROSandRNScanreactwithDNAmolecules, resultinginawidespectrumofdamageproducts(Delaneyetal., 2012;Tretyakovaetal.,2012).Duetothelowoxidation poten- tialofguanine,deoxyguanosine(dG)oxidationproducts,suchas
∗Correspondingauthorat:MolecularToxicologyGroup,DepartmentofBiology, UniversityofKonstanz,D-78457Konstanz,Germany.
∗∗Correspondingauthorat:MolecularToxicologyGroup,DepartmentofBiology, UniversityofKonstanz,D-78457Konstanz,Germany.Tel.:+4907531884067.
E-mailaddresses:alexander.buerkle@uni-konstanz.de(A.Bürkle), aswin.mangerich@uni-konstanz.de,amang@mit.edu(A.Mangerich).
1 Theseauthorscontributedequally.
2 SharedSeniorAuthorship.
8-oxo-2-deoxyguanosine(8-oxo-dG)and theformamidopyrimi- dineFapy-dG,areamongthemostprominentDNAlesions(Delaney etal.,2012;NeeleyandEssigmann,2006).Althoughefficientrepair mechanisms for oxidative DNA lesions exist, i.e., baseexcision repair(BER),theirformationcanaffecttheefficiencyoftranscrip- tional processes (Khobta et al., 2010; Kitsera et al., 2011) and suchlesionscan beboth cytotoxic and mutagenic(Christmann etal.,2003;Delaneyetal.,2012;Shibutanietal.,1991).Inaddi- tiontothenucleargenome,mitochondrialDNA(mtDNA)canbe damaged by ROSand RNS generated duringmitochondrial res- piration (Kazak et al., 2012). Thus, superoxide radicals (O2−•) lackingfromtheelectrontransportchaincanreactwithdiffusible nitricoxide(NO)producedbynitricoxidesynthasestogenerate ONOO− and severalhighly reactivemetabolites.In this respect, itwasshownthatmutationsinmtDNAplayaroleindegenera- tivediseasesofthecentralnervousandendocrinesystems,heart, kidneyandskeletalmuscle(Wallaceetal.,1998,1999).Ingen- eral,theassessmentof oxidativeDNA damagehasbeenwidely usedasa biomarkerof oxidativestressinexperimentalaswell
Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-250512
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.05.006
16
asin epidemiological studies (Dizdaroglu, 2012; Ravanatet al., 2012).
SeveralmethodsforthedetectionofoxidativeDNAlesionshave beendeveloped,butresultsvaryconsiderablydependingonthe differentanalyticalsystemsand thesourceofDNAused(Anson etal.,2000;Ravanat,2012;RossnerandSram,2012).
High-performanceliquid chromatographycoupledwithelec- trochemicaldetection(HPLC/ECD)hasbeenoneofthefirstmethods usedfor8-oxo-dGmeasurement(Floydetal.,1986;Ravanat,2012).
Themethodisbasedonthefactthatthelowoxidationpotential of8-oxo-dGallows specificand sensitivedetection in theone- electron oxidation mode. However, its disadvantages include a risk for the inductionof highlevels of artifactuallesion and a lackofinternalcalibration(Ravanat,2012).Methodsbasedongas chromatographycoupledtomass spectrometry(GC/MS)havea tendencytooverestimate 8-oxo-dGlevelsby10- to 50-fold,in partduetotheacidicconditionsoftheDNAhydrolysisaswellas hightemperatureduringthederivatizationstep(Ravanat,2012).
Pre-purificationofsamplesbyHPLC,orloweringofthederivatiza- tiontemperatureoradditionofantioxidantshavebeensuggested toavoidthistypeofartifact(HalliwellandDizdaroglu,1992).At present,oneof themostspecificand sensitivemethods forthe detectionofawide spectrumofDNAoxidation productsrepre- sentsreversephaseHPLCcoupledESItandemmassspectrometry (LC–MS/MS)whichdoesnotrequirederivatizationpriortomass spectrometricanalysis(Cadetetal.,2002;Mangerichetal.,2012;
Ravanat,2012;Taghizadehetal.,2008;Tretyakovaetal.,2012).
Incontrasttochromatographicmethods,immunologicalmeth- odsdemandlittlesamplepreparation andallowtheanalysisof apanelofsamplessimultaneously(RossnerandSram,2012).For example,ELISAtestarewidelyusedasafastandcheapmethodfor detecting8-oxo-dGinhumanfluids(Cookeetal.,2006).However, theusageofsuchimmuno-chemicaltechniquesremainslimited, becauseofweakantigenicityandchemicalselectivityoftheanti- bodiesused, assignificantcross-reactivitywiththeundamaged nucleobaseshasbeendescribed(Mitchelletal.,2002;Serranoetal., 1996).
Finally,thecometassay(orsinglecellelectrophoresisassay), alkalineunwindingandalkalineelutiontechniquescanbeused todetectawidespectrumDNAlesions(GedikandCollins,2005;
Ravanat,2012; Wood et al., 2010). These methods requireuse ofglycosylases, suchasformamidopyrimidine glycosylase(Fpg) or endonuclease III (EndoIII) that specifically convert the oxi- dizedandmodifiedpyrimidineandpurinebasesintoDNAstrand breaks,whichin turncanbedetectedina very sensitiveman- ner(Pflaumet al.,1997; Ravanat,2012).Differentvariations of thesemethodshavebeendeveloped,includingcomet-basedassays thatenablehigh-throughputassessmentofcellularDNAdamage (Wood etal.,2010)and methodsthatcombinethecometassay andinsitufluorescenthybridization(FISH)todetectoxidizedbases atthesequencelevel(Shaposhnikovetal.,2011).Alimitationof glycosylase-basedmethodsisthattheyrelyonthecompleteenzy- maticprocessingofalldamagedbasespresentandthesubstrate specificityoftheglycosylase(Ravanat,2012).Forexample,Fpgis notentirelyspecificfor8-oxo-dGonly,asitwasreportedtorec- ognizealsootheroxidationproductssuchasFapy-dGandFapy-dA sites(Pougetetal.,2000)aswellasalkylationdamage(Speitetal., 2004).
Similartothecometassay,theautomatedFADUassayallows thequantificationofDNAstrandbreaksinwholecellsinahigh- throughputmanner(Brunneretal.,2012;Debiaketal.,2011;Garm etal.,2013;Kappesetal.,2008;Mangerichetal.,2010;Moreno- Villanuevaetal.,2009,2011).Thismethodisbasedonapartial denaturation/unwindingofdoublestrandedDNAundertime-and temperature-controlledalkalineconditionsina96-well-platefor- matusing an automated liquid handling device. Subsequently,
addition of the fluorescent probe SYBR Green is employed to quantifythestateofDNAunwinding,i.e.,fluorescenceintensities inverselycorrelatedwiththenumberofDNAstrandbreaks.The objectiveofthecurrentstudywastodevelopanFpg-basedFADU methodtodetectoxidativeDNAdamage ina highthrough-put mannerbyadaptingoftheautomatedFADUassayandtovalidate thismethodbycomparingitwithresultsfromLC–MS/MSanalysis.
2. Materialsandmethods
AllchemicalswereofanalyticalgradeandobtainedfromSigma–Aldrich,Fluka orMerck.
2.1. FADU-Fpgmethod 2.1.1. PlasmidDNAtreatment
AsaDNAmodelsystem,a14-kbpplasmid(pAcHLT-A-His6)wasamplified inEscherichiacoliDH5cellsandextractedusingaDNApurificationGigaPrepKit (Qiagen).EachDNAsamplewaspreparedintriplicatescontaining104gofDNA.
SamplesweresupplementedwithuricacidorMnSOD(AbFrontier)andtreatedwith 100–400MfreshlypreparedSin-1(Calbiochem)for40minat30◦C.Sampleswere thendividedintoaliquotsof4gand100gofDNAforFADUandLC–MSanalysis, respectively.
2.1.2. Fpgtreatment
Eachsamplewasincubatedwith8UFpgandNEB1Buffer(NewEnglandBiolabs) for30minat30◦C.Samplesweredilutedin280lFADUsuspensionbuffer(250mM meso-inositol,10mMsodiumphosphate,1mMMgCl,pH7.4)andquadruplicates weretransferredintoa96-wellplatewhichwaspositionedintotheFADUpipetting robot.
2.1.3. AutomatedstepsoftheFpg-FADUassay
Theliquidhandlingdeviceaswellasitspositioninghavebeendescribedpre- viously(Moreno-Villanuevaetal.,2009).Theoriginalprotocolwasadaptedto optimizethemethodforthedetectionofFpg-generatedstrandbreaksinacell-free system.Thetemperatureofthecoolingdevicewasmaintainedat2◦Cthroughout theentireexperiment.First,70lofFADUureabuffer(9Murea;10mMNaOH;
2.5mMcyclohexyl-diamine-tetraacetate;0.1%sodiumdodecylsulfate)weredis- pensedintoeachwell.Immediatelythereafter,70lofalkalinebuffer(0.425parts FADUureabufferin0.2MNaOH)wasadded.Thesubsequentincubationstepof theoriginalprotocolwasomittedtoavoidtotalunwindingoftheplasmid.Avol- umeof140lofneutralizationbuffer(14mM-mercaptoethanol;1Mglucose)was addedatarateof200l/s.Finally,156lofSybrGreen(MoBiTec)diluted1:8.33in waterwasaddedandsamplesweremixedbypipettingavolumeof400lupand downatarateof100l/s.Fluorescenceintensitywasmeasuredina96-well-plate fluorescencereaderat492nmexcitation/520nmemission.
2.2. 8-oxo-dGdetectionbyLC–MS/MS
2.2.1. DNAhydrolysisanddephosphorylationofnucleotides
DNAwasdesiccatedundervacuumandhydrolyzedtonucleosidesbyacombi- nationofnucleaseP1,DNaseI,phosphodiesteraseI(USB-Affymetrix,SantaClara, CA),andalkalinephophataseinthepresenceofdeaminaseinhibitorsandantioxi- dantsasdescribedpreviously(Taghizadehetal.,2008).Enzymeswereremovedby centrifugationat16,400×gfor20minthrougha10,000MWcut-offspinfilter(Pall).
2.2.2. ReversephaseHPLCpre-purification
ALC-10ATHPLCsystemfromShimadzuwasusedfor8-oxo-dGpre-purification equippedwithaPhenomenexSynergi4-mHydro-RPC1880A(250mm×4.6mm) column.Asolventgradientofacetonitrilein8mMammoniumacetatewassetata flowrate0.7ml/min(forgradientcompositionseeSuppl.Table1).Thedetectionwas performedusingUV–visspectroscopyat260nm.The8-oxo-dGcontainingfractions werecollectedataretentiontimeofapproximately37–42min.
2.2.3. LC–MS/MSanalysis
8-oxo-dGquantificationwasperformedwithanHPLC(Waters2695Separa- tionsModule)coupledtoatriplequadrupolemassspectrometer(WatersMicromass QuattroMicro).AreversedphaseHypersil-GoldcolumnC18(ThermoScientific;
150mm×2.1mm;3mparticlesize)wasusedandelutedisocraticallywith98.5%
ofH2Osupplementedwith0.1%aceticacidand1.5%ofacetonitrilesupplemented with0.1%aceticacidataflowrateof0.3ml/min.Detailedchromatographicsett- ingsarelistedinSuppl.Table2.22.5lofeachsamplewasanalyzedinasingle LC/MS–MSrun.ThemassspectrometerwasusedintheESI+MS/MSmodewith settingsindicatedinSuppl.Table3.Fordetection,themultiplereactionmonitoring (MRM)modewasused,andtransitionofm/z284.0→168.0for8-oxo-dGwasmoni- tored.Allmeasurementswereperformedintechnicalduplicates.Theareafromone samplewasconvertedintoamountinfmolusingexternalcalibrationcurves.The averagewascalculatedfromthetechnicalduplicatesinfmol.
Fig.1. WorkflowoftheFADU-Fpgmethod.
3. Results
3.1. AnalysisofSin-1-inducedDNAdamageinaplasmidDNA model
HerewepresentanovelFpg-basedmethodtodetectoxidative DNAdamageinacell-freesystem(Fig.1),usingamodifiedprotocol oftheFADUassay(Debiaketal.,2011;Moreno-Villanuevaetal., 2009,2011).
A14-kbpplasmid,mimickingthemtDNAmolecule,wastreated withtheONOO−generator3-morpholinosydnonimine(Sin-1).Sin- 1 is thought tomimic thephysiological situationin cells as it decomposestoproduceequimolaramountsofNO•andO2−•and thestable end-productSin-1C(Fig. 2).Thisresultsin a contin- ualfluxofONOO− overextended periodsresultinginoxidative andnitrosativeDNAdamage(Fig.2)(Cuietal.,2013;Dedonand Tannenbaum,2004;Feelischetal.,1989;Hoggetal.,1992).Itwas shownpreviouslythattheDNAdamageprofilegeneratedbySin- 1mainlycomprisesFpg-sensitivelesionsandtoa lesserextend alsoDNAsinglestrandbreaks(Epeetal.,1996).ToconvertSin- 1-inducedoxidativeDNAlesionsintosingle-strandbreakthatcan bedetectedbytheFADUmethod,theoriginalFADUprotocolwas adaptedbyincubatingSin-1-treatedDNAwithFpg(Fig.1).There- after,samplesweredilutedinasuspensionbuffer,distributedin a96-wellplateandsubjectedtothesuccessiveautomatedaddi- tionofsolutionsbytheliquidhandlingdevice(Fig.1).ThenSYBR Greenfluorescencewasdeterminedusinga96-well-platefluores- cencereader.TheoriginalFADUprotocolwasfurthermodifiedto adaptthemethodfortheapplicationtodetectFpg-sensitiveDNA lesions.Thedilutionofthealkalinebuffer,thesuppressionofthe alkalineunwindingstepandthemaintenanceofaconstanttem- peratureat2◦Cwerenecessarytopreventcompleteunwinding oftheDNAandtoallowasensitivedetectionoftheFpg-induced strandbreaks.Thetotalhands-ontimerequiredforthesestepsis lessthananhourandthenumberofsamplesanalyzedconcurrently isabout20inquadruplicates.Throughputcanbefurtherenhanced
byincreasingthenumberof96-wellplatesprocessedatthesame timebythepipettingrobot.
TodetermineoptimalworkingconcentrationofFpg,samples wereincubatedwithincreasingconcentrationsofFpgafterDNA had beentreated with400MSin-1 (Fig. 3A). The number of Fpg-sensitivelesionsdetectedinthepresenceofSin-1increased until a threshold wasreachedstarting at an Fpgconcentration of 0.1U/l. This concentration, at which all Fpg-sensitive sites were cleaved, wasused for all subsequent FADU experiments.
It isimportanttonotethatSin-1 onlyaffectedDNAunwinding in thepresenceof Fpg(Fig.3B),thus implyingthat inoursys- tem,Sin-1generatesmainlyoxidativeDNAlesionsanddoesnot directly generate DNA singlestrand breaks in large quantities.
ThismayberelatedtothefactthatONOO− reactswithCO2 to formONOOCO2−(DedonandTannenbaum,2004).WhileONOO− itself,mainlycausesdeoxyriboseoxidation(i.e.,strandbreaks)and someguanineoxidation,ONOOCO2−causesmainlyguanineoxi- dation(DedonandTannenbaum,2004).ItislikelythattheSin-1 concentrationsasusedinourexperimentalsettingarenotusing upthedissolvedCO2 inthebuffer,resultinginthegenerationof ONOOCO2−.Thisinformationisofhighrelevanceasotheroxidiz- ingagents,suchasH2O2,havebeenshowntodirectlygenerate DNAsinglestrandbreaksalongsidetooxidativedamage,render- ingthespecificdetectionofoxidativeDNAlesionsinthesecases particularlybiased(unpublishedobservation).
TostudytheeffectofincreasingSin-1concentrationsonthe generationofoxidativeDNAlesions,plasmidDNAwastreatedwith Sin-1concentrationsupto400M.Fpg-sensitiveDNAlesionssig- nificantlyincreasedwithSin-1concentrationsinadose-dependent manner(Fig.4A).Itwasanessentialpartofthisworktovalidate theFADU-Fpgmethodby comparingittoanotherstate-of-the- art analytical method used for the detection of DNA oxidation products.Tothisend,8-oxo-dGlevelswereanalyzedinthesame samplesinparallel byLC–MS/MS. Asimilarapproach wasused previouslytocalibrateanFpg-basedCometassay(Pougetetal., 2000).Previousstudiesdemonstratedthat8-oxo-dGlesionsmake
18
N N
II!
<c 1 \
II!
<c . . ! \
N- N 0 N- N 0
/ \ _ / / \ _ /
\ Sin lA
~
~
0ONOOCOi
nitrosoperoxycarbonate
··!r'> ~
... A)--\
0 •ONOO peroxynitrite
dO
".,~~>=0 ... A)--\
8 oxo dO dR and other damage
products
.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No·
Sin IC
Fig. 2. Sin-1-induced formation of8-ox~G in DNA.
up of 75% of the total number Sin-1-induced Fpg-sensitive DNA damage sites (Epe et aL, 1996), suggesting that 8-oxo-dG forma- tion gives a conservative estimate for the number of Fpg-sensitive guanine oxidation events. In our study basal levels of 8-oxo-dG, as determined by LC-MS/MS, were in the range of 1-10 lesions per 106 bp which is consistent with published reference values (Ravanat, 2012; Taghizadeh etal., 2008). The resulting curve ofSin- 1-induced 8-oxo-dG lesions confirms the dose-dependent increase of oxidative lesions observed in the FADU-Fpg method (Fig. 48).
Results obtained from the FADU-Fpg and the LC-MS/MS analy- sis showed similar sensitivity and a highly significant positive correlation (r2 of 0.998) (Fig. 4C) indicating that the FADU-Fpg method indeed detects oxidative DNA lesions in a sensitive and dose dependent manner.
A
~so~ 40 c: ~
"' 30
f:!
0~ 20 c:
Cl) 10
"'
E
-•· w/o Sin-1 -s- 400 11M Sin·1
•
.--)
~ u 0
···I"· . .- ....
~.-..
~.... .
~,... .,.-... '
-r-t
0 0.1
Fpg [U]
10
3.2. Scavenging ofSin-1 oxidation in a plasmid DNA model
The automated FADU-Fpg method requires little sample prepa- ration and offers a rapid and reliable measurement of oxidative lesions, thus making it a suitable method for screening the antiox- idant properties of enzymes and small molecules.
To study the antioxidant properties of MnSOD, which catalyze the dismutation of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogenperoxide, plasmid DNA was supplemented with increasing concentrations of MnSOD (0.94-75 ng/~tl) prior to Sin-1 incubation. Both FADU-Fpg and LC-MS/MS measurements highlight the ability of MnSOD to scavenge ONoo- and concur in demonstrating a dose-dependent protection of the DNA against Sin-1-induced oxidation by MnSOD (Fig. SA and B). Again, a highly positive correlation between results
B 5'
40000~
fl
30000 c: Cl)~
e
0 ::s ii:
20000 10000
Fig. 3. (A) Fpg treatment leads to dose-dependent strand break formation in plasmid DNA treated with Sin-!. Plasmid DNA was treated with or without 400 ~M Sin-1 and then incubated with increasing concentrations of Fpg ( 4-800 mU/~1). (B) Samples treated without or with 400 ~M Sin-1 (without Fpg incubation). Experiments were performed in quadruplicates and data are expressed as means± SEM.
FADU
0 100 200 300 400 0
10 20 30 40 50
*
*
Conc. Sin-1 [μM]
Decreaseinfluorescence[%]
LC-MS/MS
0 100 200 300 400 0
5 10 15
20 *
Conc. Sin-1 [μM]
Foldinductionof8-oxo-dG comparedtocontrol
Correlation FADU vs LC-MS/MS: Sin-1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0
10 20 30 40
50 r2=0.998
Fold induction of 8-oxo-dG compared to control
Decreaseinfluorescence[%]
A B C
Fig.4.Sin-1inducesFpg-sensitiveDNAlesionsand8-oxo-dGinplasmidDNAinadose-dependentmanner.PlasmidDNAwastreatedwithincreaseinconcentrationsofSin-1 (50–400M).DNAdamagewasanalyzed(A)byFADU-Fpgand(B)byLC–MS/MS(8-oxo-dG).(C)Alinearregressionanalysiswasperformed.Samplesofeachexperiment weredistributedintoaliquotsforFADU-FpgandLC–MS/MSmeasurements,respectively.Datarepresentmeans±SEMof3independentexperiments.FADUexperimentswere performedintechnicalquadruplicates,LC–MS/MSmeasurementsintechnicalduplicates.r2representsthelinearregressioncoefficient.Statisticalanalysiswasperformed byone-wayANOVAtestfollowedbyBonferroni’sposttest,*P<0.05.
frombothmethodswasobserved,withr2=0.89(Fig.5C),how- ever,theFADU-Fpgmethodshowedhigherreproducibilitythan LC–MS/MSmeasurements.
Uricacidisproducedfromxanthinebyxanthineoxidase.Itis knowntobeapowerfulantioxidantthatisabundantlypresentin humanblood(Amesetal.,1981).Afterapre-incubationofplasmid DNAwithuricacidinconcentrationsupto100M,sampleswere treatedwith100MSin-1.BothFADU-FpgandLC–MS/MSmea- surementsrevealedadose-dependentdecreaseinSin-1-induced oxidativeDNAlesionsstartingatauricacidconcentrationof25M (Fig.6AandB).CompleteprotectionofDNArequireduricacidcon- centrationsabove50M.Valuesmeasuredbybothmethodsagain correlatedwellwithanr2=0.96(Fig.6C).
4. Discussion
The main drawback of available Fpg-based and LC–MS/MS- basedmethodsistherequirementofelaboratesamplepreparation andprocessingsteps.Wehavebeenabletoovercomethislimita- tionbyestablishinganFpg-basedmethodfordetectingoxidative DNA damagelesions inisolated DNA onthebasis of the high- throughput FADU method (Brunner et al., 2012; Debiak et al., 2011; Garmet al., 2013;Kappes et al., 2008; Mangerichet al.,
2010;Moreno-Villanuevaetal.,2009,2011).TheFADU-Fpgmethod wasvalidatedusingaplasmidDNAmodelmimickingmtDNAin combinationwiththeONOO−generatorSin-1(Fig.2).AnFpgpre- incubation step hasbeen added to the original FADU protocol thatallowsthedetectionofoxidativeDNAlesions,bygenerating strandbreaksthatcanbedetectedbytheFADUmethod.Wehave controlledthevalidityofthemethodbymeasuring8-oxo-dGlev- elsusingLC–MS/MSanalysiswhichallowsunambiguouschemical selectivity(Taghizadehetal.,2008).
AnotableadvantageofthemodifiedFADU-Fpgmethodover the HPLC-based methods is the quantity of DNA necessary for theanalysis.While25–50gisrequiredforLC–MS/MSanalysis, only 1gof plasmid DNA per measurement was sufficient for theFADU-Fpgmethod.Moreover,theLC–MS/MS-basedmethodis unfavorableforscreeningpurposes,becauseitisrathercostlyand time-consuming.Inparticular,samplesmustundergoanumberof criticalprocessingsteps,i.e.,digestion,dephosphorylation,filter- ing,vacuum-concentration,pre-purificationbyHPLC,andanalyte detectionbyLC–MS/MS.Also,samplesarepurifiedandanalyzed sequentiallybyHPLCandLC–MS/MS,demandingadditionaltime.
Foranumberof20samplesmeasuredinquadruplicates,atime periodofaround3daysisrequired.Incontrast,thesameamountof samplescanbemeasuredwiththeFADU-Fpgmethodinlessthan
FADU
0 5 10 15 20 25
0.1 1 10 100
0
* * *
Conc. MnSOD [ng/μl]
Decreaseinfluorescence[%]
LC-MS/MS
1 2 3 4
0.1 1 10 100
0
Conc. MnSOD [ng/μl]
Foldinductionof8-oxo-dG comparedtocontrol
Correlation FADU vs LC-MS/MS: MnSOD
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0
5 10 15 20 25 r2=0.89
Fold induction of 8-oxo-dG compared to control
Decreaseinfluorescence[%]
A B C
Fig.5. MnSODprotectsDNAagainstSin-1-inducedDNAdamageinadosedependentmanner.PlasmidDNAwastreatedwith100MSin-1andsupplementedwithincreasing concentrationsofMnSOD.Oxidativedamagewasanalyzed(A)byFADU-Fpgand(B)byLC–MS/MS(8-oxo-dG).(C)Alinearregressionanalysiswasperformed.Samplesofeach experimentweredividedintoaliquotsforFADU-FpgandLC–MS/MSmeasurements.Datarepresentmeans±SEMof3independentexperiments.FADU-Fpgexperimentswere performedintechnicalquadruplicates,LC–MS/MSmeasurementsintechnicalduplicates.r2representsthelinearregressioncoefficient.Statisticalanalysiswasperformed byone-wayANOVAtestfollowedbyBonferroni’sposttest,*P<0.05.
20
FADU
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
1 10 100
0
****
Conc. uric acid [μM]
Decreaseinfluorescence[%]
LC-MS/MS
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
1 10 100
0
* ***
Conc. uric acid [μM]
Foldinductionof8-oxo-dG comparedtocontrol
Correlation FADU vs LC-MS/MS: Uric Acid
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0
10 20 30 40 r2=0.96
Fold induction of 8-oxo-dG compared to control
Decreaseinfluorescence[%]
A B C
Fig.6. UricacidprotectsDNAagainstSin-1-inducedDNAdamageinadose-dependentmanner.PlasmidDNAwastreatedwith100MSin-1andsupplementedwith increasingconcentrationsofuricacid.Oxidativedamagewasanalyzed(A)byFADU-Fpgand(B)byLC–MS/MS(8-oxo-dG).(C)Alinearregressionanalysiswasperformed.
SamplesofeachexperimentweredividedintoaliquotsforFADU-FpgandLC–MS/MSmeasurements.Datarepresentmeans±SEMof3independentexperiments.FADU-Fpg experimentswereperformedintechnicalquadruplicates,LC–MS/MSmeasurementsintechnicalduplicates.r2representsthelinearregressioncoefficient.Statisticalanalysis wasperformedbyone-wayANOVAtestfollowedbyBonferroni’sposttest,*P<0.05.
halfaday.ThefactthatintheFADU-Fpgmethodmanysamples canbeprocessedina96-wellplatesimultaneouslybytheauto- matedliquidhandlingdevicenotonlyincreasesthroughput,but alsoensuresequaltreatmentofsamples.
Despite the reported approximate specificity of Fpg toward DNAoxidationandalkylationdamage(Pougetetal.,2000;Speit etal.,2004), theside-by-sidecomparison oftheFADU-Fpg and theLC–MS/MSmethodsinourstudyresultedinhighlysignificant positivecorrelationsofFpg-sensitiveDNA lesionsand8-oxo-dG levels(Figs.4–6).ThisstronglyindicatestheabilityoftheFADU-Fpg methodtodetectoxidativeDNAdamage.
Oneimportantlimitationofourmethodisthat,sofar,itcan- notbeappliedtodetermineoxidativeDNAdamageincells,due tohighconcentrationsofureaintheFADUcelllysisbuffer,which isnecessaryforcompletecelllysis,butwhichinterfereswithFpg activity.Moreover,currentmethodsusedforextractionofgenomic andmtDNAfromcellsintroducesignificantlevelsofDNAstrand breaks,whichisincompatiblewithFADU-Fpgmeasurements.For thisreason,theFADU-Fpgmethodiscurrentlyrestrictedtothe plasmidDNAmodelasreportedinthisstudy.Furtheroptimization andadaptationsofthemethodareindicatedtoovercomethese limitations.
Ontheotherhand,theFADU-Fpgmethodinitscurrentstateis asimple,rapidandreliablehigh-throughputalternativeformea- suringrelativelevelsofoxidativeDNAdamageinplasmidDNA.A comparabletechniquethathasbeenusedformanyyearsusesiso- latedDNAfromthebacteriophagePM2incombinationwithDNA glycosylasesandelectrophoreticseparationofsupercoiled,circu- larandlinearDNA(Epeetal.,1993,1996).Thismethodallowseasy andreliabledetectionofawiderangeofDNAlesions,howeverin itspresentform,isnotavailableinanautomatedversion.Asan alternativetothismethod,theFADU-Fpgmethodisparticularly suitableforscreeningpurposes,e.g.,tostudyprotectiveeffectsof antioxidantsubstances,asourexperimentswithMnSODanduric aciddemonstrate(Figs. 5and6).Theprotective effectsofthese compoundsfollowcomplexchemicalmechanisms:Whileuricacid actsasageneralscavengerofROS(Amesetal.,1981),theprotec- tiveeffectofMnSODmayberelatedtoreduceddecompositionof Sin-1,duetoMnSOD-mediatedscavengingofsuperoxide(Feelisch etal.,1989),ordirectDNAprotectiveeffectsbybindingofMnSOD toDNA(Kienhoferetal.,2009).
Recentlythe valueof theFADU-Fpgmethod intoxicological andpharmaceuticalresearchhasbeendemonstratedin astudy
inwhichthebiochemicalmechanismsoftheneuroprotectiveand anti-inflammatoryeffectsofminocycline,asemisyntheticderiva- tiveoftetracycline,wereinvestigated(Schildknechtetal.,2011).In thisstudy,theFADU-Fpgmethod,whichisdescribedandvalidated hereindetail,wasusedtodeterminetheperoxynitrite-scavenging propertiesofminocycline.Theloweffectiveconcentrationof5M for 50% inhibition determined in that study corresponds with standardconcentrationspresentinbrainafterrepeatedoralintake, asdeterminedinclinicalstudies(Schildknechtetal.,2011).
Inconclusion,theFADU-Fpgmethodcombinesthesensitivity andreliabilityofanFpg-basedassayforthedetectionofoxidative DNAlesionswiththedecreasedoperationtimeandhighthrough- putof an automated procedure. For this reason, theFADU-Fpg methodrepresentsausefultoolforscreeningDNA-damagingand antioxidantpropertiesofsubstancesintoxicology,pharmacology, andinthefoodindustry,wherethedevelopmentofnutraceuticals iscurrentlyofhighpriority.
Conflictofinterest
Theauthorshavedeclarednoconflictofinterest.
Acknowledgments
ThisworkwassupportedbyGrantBU698/6-1fromtheDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft(DFG).FundingwasalsoprovidedbytheUS NationalInstitutesofHealth(GrantsES002109andCA026731).
References
Ames,B.N.,Cathcart,R.,Schwiers,E.,Hochstein,P.,1981. Uricacidprovidesan antioxidantdefenseinhumansagainstoxidant-andradical-causedagingand cancer:ahypothesis.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.78,6858–6862.
Anson,R.M.,Hudson,E.,Bohr,V.A.,2000. Mitochondrialendogenousoxidative damagehasbeenoverestimated.FASEBJ.14,355–360.
Brunner,S.,Herndler-Brandstetter,D.,Arnold,C.R.,Wiegers,G.J.,Villunger,A.,Hackl, M.,Grillari,J.,Moreno-Villanueva,M.,Bürkle,A.,Grubeck-Loebenstein,B.,2012.
UpregulationofmiR-24isassociatedwithadecreasedDNAdamageresponse uponetoposidetreatmentinhighlydifferentiatedCD8(+)Tcellssensitizing themtoapoptoticcelldeath.AgingCell11,579–587.
Cadet,J.,Douki,T.,Frelon,S.,Sauvaigo,S.,Pouget,J.P.,Ravanat,J.L.,2002. Assess- mentofoxidativebasedamagetoisolatedandcellularDNAbyHPLC–MS/MS measurement.FreeRadic.Biol.Med.33,441–449.
Christmann,M.,Tomicic,M.T.,Roos,W.P.,Kaina,B.,2003. Mechanismsofhuman DNArepair:anupdate.Toxicology193,3–34.
Cooke, M.S.,Singh, R.,Hall, G.K., Mistry, V., Duarte,T.L.,Farmer, P.B.,Evans, M.D.,2006. Evaluationofenzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassayandliquid chromatography-tandemmassspectrometrymethodologyfortheanalysisof 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2-deoxyguanosineinsalivaandurine.FreeRadic.Biol.Med.
41,1829–1836.
Cui,L.,Ye,W.,Prestwich,E.G.,Wishnok,J.S.,Taghizadeh,K.,Dedon,P.C.,Tannen- baum,S.R.,2013. Comparativeanalysisoffouroxidizedguaninelesionsfrom reactionsofDNAwithperoxynitrite,singletoxygen,andgamma-radiation.
Chem.Res.Toxicol.26,195–202.
Debiak,M.,Panas,A.,Steinritz,D.,Kehe,K.,Burkle,A.,2011.High-throughputanal- ysisofDNAinterstrandcrosslinksinhumanperipheralbloodmononuclearcells byautomatedreverseFADUassay.Toxicology280,53–60.
Dedon,P.C.,Tannenbaum,S.R.,2004. Reactivenitrogenspeciesinthechemical biologyofinflammation.Arch.Biochem.Biophys.423,12–22.
Delaney,S.,Jarem,D.A.,Volle,C.B.,Yennie,C.J.,2012.Chemicalandbiologicalconse- quencesofoxidativelydamagedguanineinDNA.FreeRadic.Res.46,420–441.
Dizdaroglu,M.,2012. OxidativelyinducedDNAdamage:mechanisms,repairand disease.CancerLett.327,26–47.
Epe,B.,Ballmaier,D.,Roussyn,I.,Briviba,K.,Sies,H.,1996.DNAdamagebyperoxyni- tritecharacterizedwithDNArepairenzymes.NucleicAcidsRes.24,4105–4110.
Epe,B.,Pflaum,M.,Boiteux,S.,1993. DNAdamageinducedbyphotosensitizersin cellularandcell-freesystems.Mutat.Res.299,135–145.
Feelisch,M.,Ostrowski,J.,Noack,E.,1989. OnthemechanismofNOreleasefrom sydnonimines.J.Cardiovasc.Pharmacol.14(Suppl.11),S13L22.
Floyd,R.A.,Watson,J.J.,Wong,P.K.,Altmiller,D.H.,Rickard,R.C.,1986. Hydroxyl freeradicaladductofdeoxyguanosine:sensitivedetectionandmechanismsof formation.FreeRadic.Res.Commun.1,163–172.
Garm,C.,Moreno-Villanueva,M.,Bürkle,A.,Petersen,I.,Bohr,V.A.,Christensen, K.,Stevnsner,T.,2013.AgeandgendereffectsonDNAstrandbreakrepairin peripheralbloodmononuclearcells.AgingCell12,58–66.
Gedik,C.M.,Collins,A.,2005.Establishingthebackgroundlevelofbaseoxidationin humanlymphocyteDNA:resultsofaninterlaboratoryvalidationstudy.FASEB J.19,82–84.
Halliwell,B.,Dizdaroglu,M.,1992.ThemeasurementofoxidativedamagetoDNA byHPLCandGC/MStechniques.FreeRadic.Res.Commun.16,75–87.
Hogg,N.,Darley-Usmar,V.M.,Wilson,M.T.,Moncada,S.,1992. Productionof hydroxylradicalsfromthesimultaneousgenerationofsuperoxideandnitric oxide.Biochem.J.281(Pt2),419–424.
Kappes,F.,Fahrer,J.,Khodadoust,M.S.,Tabbert,A.,Strasser,C.,Mor-Vaknin,N., Moreno-Villanueva,M.,Bürkle,A.,Markovitz,D.M.,Ferrando-May,E.,2008.DEK isapoly(ADP-ribose)acceptorinapoptosisandmediatesresistancetogenotoxic stress.MolCellBiol28,3245–3257.
Kasai,H.,Crain,P.F.,Kuchino,Y.,Nishimura,S.,Ootsuyama,A.,Tanooka,H.,1986.
Formationof8-hydroxyguaninemoietyincellularDNAbyagentsproducing oxygenradicalsandevidenceforitsrepair.Carcinogenesis7,1849–1851.
Kazak,L.,Reyes,A.,Holt,I.J.,2012. Minimizingthedamage:repairpathwayskeep mitochondrialDNAintact.Nat.Rev.Mol.CellBiol.13,659–671.
Khobta,A.,Anderhub,S.,Kitsera,N.,Epe,B.,2010.Genesilencinginducedbyoxida- tiveDNAbasedamage:associationwithlocaldecreaseofhistoneH4acetylation inthepromoterregion.NucleicAcidsRes.38,4285–4295.
Kienhofer,J.,Haussler,D.J.,Ruckelshausen,F.,Muessig,E.,Weber,K.,Pimentel,D., Ullrich,V.,Bürkle,A.,Bachschmid,M.M.,2009.Associationofmitochondrial antioxidantenzymeswithmitochondrialDNAasintegralnucleoidconstituents.
FASEBJ23,2034–2044.
Kitsera,N.,Stathis,D.,Luhnsdorf,B.,Muller,H.,Carell,T.,Epe,B.,Khobta,A.,2011.
8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanineinDNAdoesnotconstituteabarriertotranscription, butisconvertedintotranscription-blockingdamagebyOGG1.NucleicAcidsRes.
39,5926–5934.
Mangerich,A.,Herbach,N.,Hanf,B.,Fischbach,A.,Popp,O.,Moreno-Villanueva,M., Bruns,O.T.,Burkle,A.,2010.Inflammatoryandage-relatedpathologiesinmice withectopicexpressionofhumanPARP-1.Mech.AgeingDev.131,389–404.
Mangerich,A.,Knutson,C.G.,Parry,N.M.,Muthupalani,S.,Ye,W.,Prestwich,E.,Cui, L.,McFaline,J.L.,Mobley,M.,Ge,Z.,Taghizadeh,K.,Wishnok,J.S.,Wogan,G.N., Fox,J.G.,Tannenbaum,S.R.,Dedon,P.C.,2012.Infection-inducedcolitisinmice causesdynamicandtissue-specificchangesinstressresponseandDNAdamage leadingtocoloncancer.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.109,E1820–E1829.
Mitchell,D.L.,Meador,J.,Paniker,L.,Gasparutto,D.,Jeffrey,W.H.,Cadet,J.,2002.
Developmentandapplicationofanovelimmunoassayformeasuringoxidative DNAdamageintheenvironment.Photochem.Photobiol.75,257–265.
Moreno-Villanueva,M.,Eltze,T.,Dressler,D.,Bernhardt,J.,Hirsch,C.,Wick,P.,von Scheven,G.,Lex,K.,Burkle,A.,2011. TheautomatedFADU-assay,apotential high-throughputinvitromethodforearlyscreeningofDNAbreakage.ALTEX 28,295–303.
Moreno-Villanueva,M.,Pfeiffer,R.,Sindlinger,T.,Leake,A.,Muller,M.,Kirkwood, T.B.,Burkle,A.,2009. Amodifiedandautomatedversionofthe‘Fluorimetric DetectionofAlkalineDNAUnwinding’methodtoquantifyformationandrepair ofDNAstrandbreaks.BMCBiotechnol.9,39.
Neeley,W.L.,Essigmann,J.M.,2006. Mechanismsofformation,genotoxicity,and mutationofguanineoxidationproducts.Chem.Res.Toxicol.19,491–505.
Pflaum,M.,Will,O.,Epe,B.,1997.Determinationofsteady-statelevelsofoxidative DNAbasemodificationsinmammaliancellsbymeansofrepairendonucleases.
Carcinogenesis18,2225–2231.
Pouget,J.P.,Douki,T.,Richard,M.J.,Cadet,J.,2000. DNAdamageinducedincells bygammaandUVAradiationasmeasuredbyHPLC/GC–MSandHPLC-ECand Cometassay.Chem.Res.Toxicol.13,541–549.
Ravanat,J.L.,2012. Chromatographicmethodsfortheanalysisofoxidativelydam- agedDNA.FreeRadic.Res.46,479–491.
Ravanat,J.L.,Cadet,J.,Douki,T.,2012.OxidativelygeneratedDNAlesionsaspotential biomarkersofinvivooxidativestress.Curr.Mol.Med.12,655–671.
RossnerJr.,P.,Sram,R.J.,2012.Immunochemicaldetectionofoxidativelydamaged DNA.FreeRadic.Res.46,492–522.
Schildknecht,S.,Pape,R.,Muller,N.,Robotta,M.,Marquardt,A.,Burkle,A.,Drescher, M.,Leist,M.,2011.Neuroprotectionbyminocyclinecausedbydirectandspecific scavengingofperoxynitrite.J.Biol.Chem.286,4991–5002.
Serrano, J., Palmeira, C.M., Wallace, K.B., Kuehl, D.W., 1996. Determination of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in biological tissue by liquid chromatogra- phy/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun.MassSpectrom.10,1789–1791.
Shaposhnikov,S.,Thomsen,P.D.,Collins,A.R.,2011. Combiningfluorescentinsitu hybridizationwiththecometassayfortargetedexaminationofDNAdamage andrepair.MethodsMol.Biol.682,115–132.
Shibutani,S.,Takeshita,M.,Grollman,A.P.,1991. Insertionofspecificbasesduring DNAsynthesispasttheoxidation-damagedbase8-oxodG.Nature349,431–434.
Speit,G.,Schutz,P.,Bonzheim,I.,Trenz,K.,Hoffmann,H.,2004. Sensitivityofthe FPGproteintowardsalkylationdamageinthecometassay.Toxicol.Lett.146, 151–158.
Taghizadeh,K.,McFaline,J.L.,Pang,B.,Sullivan,M.,Dong,M.,Plummer,E.,Dedon, P.C.,2008.QuantificationofDNAdamageproductsresultingfromdeamination, oxidationandreactionwithproductsoflipidperoxidationbyliquidchromatog- raphyisotopedilutiontandemmassspectrometry.Nat.Protoc.3,1287–1298.
Tretyakova,N.,Goggin,M.,Sangaraju,D.,Janis,G.,2012. QuantitationofDNA adductsbystableisotopedilutionmassspectrometry.Chem.Res.Toxicol.25, 2007–2035.
Wallace,D.C.,Brown,M.D.,Lott,M.T.,1999.MitochondrialDNAvariationinhuman evolutionanddisease.Gene238,211–230.
Wallace,D.C.,Brown,M.D.,Melov,S.,Graham,B.,Lott,M.,1998. Mitochondrial biology,degenerativediseasesandaging.Biofactors7,187–190.
Wood,D.K.,Weingeist,D.M.,Bhatia,S.N.,Engelward,B.P.,2010.Singlecelltrapping andDNAdamageanalysisusingmicrowellarrays.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.
107,10008–10013.