• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Prof. Dr. Otto May 18, 2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Prof. Dr. Otto May 18, 2011"

Copied!
4
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Linear Algebra II

Exercise Sheet no. 7

Summer term 2011

Prof. Dr. Otto May 18, 2011

Dr. Le Roux Dr. Linshaw

Exercise 1 (Warm up: the trace) Recall Exercise E4.3 about the trace.

LetV:=R(n,n)be theR-vector space of all realn×nmatrices and letSV be the subspace consisting of all symmetric matrices (i.e., all matricesAwithAt=A). ForA,BV, we define

A,B〉:=Tr(AB), where thetraceTr(A)of a matrixA= (ai j)is defined as

Tr(A):=

n

X

i=1

aii.

(a) Show that〈. , .〉is bilinear.

(b) Show that〈. , .〉is a scalar product onS.

Solution:

a) LetA= (ai j),B= (bi j), andC= (ci j)be matrices andλR. Since

A,B〉=

n

X

i,k=1

aikbki

it follows that

A+C,B〉=

n

X

i,k=1

(aik+cik)bki=

n

X

i,k=1

aikbki+

n

X

i,k=1

cikbki=〈A,B〉+〈C,B〉,

〈λA,B〉=

n

X

i,k=1

λaikbki=λ

n

X

i,k=1

aikbki=λ〈A,B〉.

In the same way, we show that〈A,B+C〉=〈A,B〉+〈A,C〉and〈A,λB〉=λ〈A,B〉. b) We have

A,A〉=

n

X

i,k=1

aikaki=

n

X

i,k=1

(aik)2¾0 .

Furthermore, it follows that we have〈A,A〉=0if and only ifA=0.

Exercise 2 (Cauchy-Schwarz and triangle inequalities) (a) (Exercise 2.1.4 on page 60 of the notes)

Let(V,〈. , .〉)be a euclidean or unitary vector space. Show that equality holds in the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, i.e., we havek〈v,w〉k=kvk · kwk, if, and only if,vandware linearly dependent.

1

(2)

(b) (Exercise 2.1.5 on page 60 of the notes)

Let u,v,w be pairwise distinct vectors in a euclidean or unitary vector space (V,〈. , .〉), and write a := vu, b:=wv. Show that equality holds in the triangle inequality

d(u,w) =d(u,v) +d(v,w), or, equivalently,ka+bk=kak+kbk,

if, and only if,aandbarepositive realscalar multiples of each other (geometrically: v=u+s(w−u)for some s∈(0, 1)⊆R).

Solution:

a) Without loss of generality we may assume thatv,w6=0.

Whenvandware linearly dependent, thenw=λvfor someλ. It follows that

k〈v,w〉k=k〈v,λv〉k=kλk k〈v,v〉k=kλkkvk2=kvkkλvk=kvkkwk.

Conversely, suppose that

k〈v,w〉k=kvk · kwk

and writeλ=〈v,w〉〈v,v〉. Then it follows, as in the proof of Proposition 2.1.10 (the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality) on page 59 of the notes, that

〈w−λv,wλv〉=〈w,w〉 −w,v〉〈v,w

v,v〉 =kwk2−kvk2kwk2 kvk2 =0 . So by positive definiteness of the scalar product,w=λv.

b) Note thata,b6=0, becauseu,v,ware pairwise distinct.

Whenb=λawith0< λ∈R, then

ka+bk=ka+λak= (1+λ)kak=kak+λkak=kak+kλak=kak+kbk.

Conversely, whenka+bk=kak+kbk, also(ka+bk)2= (kak+kbk)2. But

(ka+bk)2=〈a+b,a+b〉=〈a,a〉+〈a,b〉+〈b,a〉+〈b,b

¶kak2+2k〈a,b〉k+kbk2,and (kak+kbk)2=kak2+2kakkbk+kbk2.

Thereforekakkbk¶k〈a,b〉k, andkakkbk=k〈a,b〉kby Cauchy-Schwarz. So we know thatb=λafor someλ∈C by Exercise (E3.2). Fromka+bk=kak+kbk, we deduce thatk1+λk=1+kλk, which implies thatλis a positive real.

Exercise 3 (Orthogonal matrices) We consider realn×nmatrices. Set

O(n):={A∈R(n,n) |AtA=En}. Show thatO(n)is a subgroup ofGLn(R).

Solution:

We have to show thatEn∈O(n)and thatO(n)is closed under multiplication and inverses.

SinceEntEn=En, we haveEn∈O(n). Furthermore, forA,B∈O(n), we have (AB)tAB=BtAtAB=BtEnB=BtB=En.

Hence,AB∈O(n). Similarly, one can show thatA−1∈O(n). For the inverse, we first note thatAtA=EnimpliesAt=A−1. Therefore, we have

(A−1)tA−1= (At)tAt=AAt= (AtA)t=Ent =En.

2

(3)

Exercise 4 (Orthogonal vectors)

LetV be a euclidean or unitary space andS={v1, . . . ,vn}be a set of non-null pairwise orthogonal vectors.

(a) Show thatSis linearly independent.

(b) LetuV. Show that the vector

w:=u

n

X

i=1

vi,u

vi,vivi

is orthogonal toS. Note thatPn i=1〈vi,u〉

〈vi,viviis the orthogonal projection ofwonspan(S).

(c) [Parseval’s identity]Suppose thatV is finite dimensional and thatSis an othornormal basis ofV. Show that

〈v,w〉=

n

X

i=1

〈v,vi〉〈vi,w〉 for allv,wV.

(d) [Bessel’s inequality]Suppose thatV is euclidean andSis orthonormal. Show that

n

X

i=1

〈vi,u〉2≤ kuk2 for alluV.

Solution:

a) Supposev1, . . . ,vnsatisfyPn

i=1λivi=0. We need to show that eachλiis zero. For each j=1, . . . ,n, we get that

0=〈vj,0〉=

* vj,

n

X

i=1

λivi +

=

n

X

i=1

λivj,vi〉=λjvj,vj〉,

since〈vj,vi〉=0whenever j6=i. Butvj6=0. Sovj,vj〉 6=0since the scalar product is positive definite. Hence, λj=0for each j=1, . . . ,n. ThereforeSis linearly independent.

b) For each j=1, . . . ,n, we have that

vj,w〉=

* vj,u

n

X

i=1

vi,u

vi,viv +

=〈vj,u〉 −

n

X

i=1

vj,u

vi,vi〉〈vj,vi

=〈vj,u〉 −vj,u

vj,vj〉〈vj,vj

=0 . c) By Lemma 2.3.2, we have thatw=Pn

i=1〈vi,w〉vi. Applying the operation〈v, .〉on both sides, we obtain the result.

d) Settingw:=u−Pn

i=1vi,u〉viwe have

kwk2=〈w,w〉=

* u

n

X

i=1

vi,uvi,u

n

X

j=1

vj,uvj +

=〈u,u〉 −2

n

X

i=1

vi,u2+

n

X

i,j=1

vi,u〉〈vj,u〉〈vi,vj

=〈u,u〉 −

n

X

i=1

vi,u〉2. Sincekwk2≥0, the inequality follows.

3

(4)

Exercise 5 (Jordan normal form for describing processes)

Suppose that we use vectorssn∈R3to describe the state of a3-dimensional system at stepn∈N(for example, the position of a particle in space). The evolution of the system from stagenton+1is given by

sn+1=Asn, where A=

−4 2 −1

−4 3 0

14 −5 5

.

(a) Use a transformation of the givenAinto Jordan normal form in order to get a feasible formula forsn, as a function of the indexnand the initial states0.

(b) Computes100fors0=

 1 3 1

. Solution:

(a) The characteristic polynomial of Ais pA= (1−X)2(2−X), soλ1 =1and λ2= 2are the eigenvalues ofA. The corresponding eigenspaces are 1-dimensional, with generators

 1 2

−1

 forVλ1 and

 1 4 2

 forVλ2. So the Jordan normal form ofAhas two blocks, one of size 2 and one of size 1. As

(AE3)2=

3 −1 1

12 −4 4

6 −2 2

,

dim(ker(A−E3)2) =2. Hence, the Jordan block of size 2 has entries 1 on the diagonal. Therefore the Jordan normal form ofAis

J=

1 1 0

0 1 0

0 0 2

.

To find a matrixSsuch thatA=SJ S−1, we take as third columnu3=

 1 4 2

, an eigenvector with eigenvalue 2, and as

second column an element ofker(AE3)2\ker(AE3), for exampleu2=

 0 1 1

. The first column will then be

u1= (AE3)u2=

 1 2

−1

. Hence, S=

1 0 1

2 1 4

−1 1 2

. We havesn=Ans0=SJnS−1s0. Furthermore

Jn=

1 n 0

0 1 0

0 0 2n

.

(b) Fors0=

 1 3 1

=

 1 4 2

−

 0 1 1

, we have

sn=2n

 1 4 2

−

 0 1 1

−n

 1 2

−1

. Hence, s100=2100

 1 4 2

−

 100 201

−99

.

4

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

To estimate the demand for currency equation and to calculate the size of the underground economy, it uses a set of explanatory variables that includes variables considered to

Empirical results through a fixed effects regression model show that government size has a negative effect on growth mainly through hampering capital

To analyze the welfare gain from allowing for differentiated patent protection across sectors, this study develops a two-sector quality-ladder growth model in which patent breadth is

Because emissions in Annex 1 countries are expected to continue to rise under the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario and because the emissions targets will not become binding until

Provided that higher marginal taxes induce people to more unreported economic activities and that higher likelihood of detection works in the opposite direction,

!It asserts two immediately testable hypotheses concerning the cross-section relationship between the size and growth of firms: (a) that firms of different size-classes have the

Children of 7, 9, and 11 years of age, as well as 17-year-olds, drew figures in a series of ready-made spatial axes systems, which (a) logically increased in dimensional complexity

The Impact of Firm Size and Market Size Asymmetries on National Mergers in a Three-Country Model.