• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 10

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 10"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 10

Mathematisches Institut der LMU – SS2009 Prof. Dr. P. M¨uller, Dr. A. Michelangeli

Handout: 30.06.2009

Due: Tuesday 7.07.2009 by 1 p.m. in the “Funktionalanalysis II” box

Questions and infos: Dr. A. Michelangeli, office B-334, michel@math.lmu.de Grader: Ms. S. Sonner – ¨Ubungen on Wednesdays, 4,30 - 6 p.m., room C-111

Exercise 27. Let f ∈L1loc(Rd) (d>1, integer). Prove that Z

Rd

f ϕdx= 0 ∀ϕ∈Cc(Rd) f = 0 a.e.

(Recall the notation: L1loc is the family of (equivalence classes of) functions that, once re- stricted to any compactK, are inL1(K), whileCcis the family of infinitely differentiable and compactly supported functions.) Hint: introduce the mollifiers jm(x) := mdj(mx), m N, for some positivej ∈Cc(Rd) supported in the ball of radius 1 centred at the origin and with R

Rdj(x)dx = 1. By means of Lemmas 47 and 48 in the Funktionalanalysis class last semester you may show that the identity R

Rdf ϕdx = 0 for all ϕ Cc(Rd) implies f ∗jm = 0 as a smooth function and then you may exploit the L1-limit as m→ ∞.

Exercise 28. (This exercise proves Lemma 2.31 stated in the class.) Let Ω be an open, non-empty set ofRd(d>1, integer). LetT :D(Ω)→Cbe a linear complex-valued functional on the space of test functions over Ω. Prove that

T ∈ D0(Ω)









∀K ∃C > 0 ∃m∈N0 :

|T(ϕ)|6CX

|α|6m

b

pK,α(ϕ) ∀ϕ∈ DK(Ω)

Recall that DK(Ω) ={ϕ∈ D(Ω) : supp(ϕ)⊆K}and that bpK,α(ϕ) = sup

x∈K

|Dαϕ(x)|.

1

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

This characterisation of the spectrum of A usually goes under the name of Weyl’s criterion: it says that the points of spec(A) are “almost eigenvalues”.. of A (i.e., Aϕ n ≈ λϕ n

(Hint: the natural way to proceed is to construct explicitly the approximating step function. To this aim, observe that the range of f can be covered by a finite and conveniently

Prove that, due to (∗∗), the limit operator defined in (∗) is unique (i.e., independent of the approximating sequence of simple functions one considers) and (∗∗) holds for

10.4) Prove that the operator-valued function R 3 t 7→ e tA is norm-continuous on R and Lipschitz norm-continuous on any bounded subset of R. Estimate such a constant.. 10.5) Prove

Compare this result to the general statement of the Weyl’s criterion (→ Exercise 3): actually that statement does not exclude that the whole Spec(A), not only Spec ess (A), might

1 This goes beyond the standard example of the Dirac measure, which is singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure, but not continuous (it is a pure point

(Hint: connect this problem with Exercise 19 above and use the thesis stated there. To be sure to have fixed all the details, check the role played in this construction by

The high gain of the mechanical resonance can be utilized for disturbance rejection or motion tracking... Problem (a)iv: