0 Errata der 6. Auflage

• Page 22, second line of the page: You write: ”Then σ is recurrent if and only if every non-sink vertex fires in the stabilization of σ + β.” I don’t think this is true (take

• page 59, proof of Proposition 8.1.3: In the third display in this proof, and every time from there onwards until the end of page 59, you’re using the letter “λ 1 ” as a

the same holds for the word w 0 , because the simple factor u is unaffected by the change that transforms w into w 0 (indeed, the change only modifies unpaired letters, but there are

• (5.5): Maybe it wouldn’t hurt to mention that ”ring” means ”not necessarily unital ring” here.. • Proof of (5.6): On the last line of page 20, you write I g

When you write “One of the important con- sequences of the mere existence of this formula is the following” on page 8, you suddenly switch from GL n to general Lie groups; it would

Proof of the equality between (3.18a) and (3.18c): The matrix B is column- pseudo-commutative, and thus has column-symmetric commutators, and therefore has weakly

• page 1, Abstract: In the first sentence, the subsentence “subset of sequences satisfying a degree-m linear recursion, i.e... Errata to “On finite sequences satisfying

This formula is easy and known, but since you are defining polarization, you might as well mention this formula, as you are using it several times (for example, you silently use