• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The influence of hillslope-channel coupling conditions in transport-limited debris-flow catchments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "The influence of hillslope-channel coupling conditions in transport-limited debris-flow catchments"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

252 | INTERPRAEVENT 2016 – Extended Abstracts IP_2016_EA150

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays hazard maps, delineating endangered areas of examined natural processes, are a common tool for spatial planning in Alpine regions. Various countries published guidelines or recommendations for the required hazard assessment (Besson, 1996;

Stötter et al., 1999; Petrascheck and Kienholz, 2003; Steinmann et al., 2008, e.g.). Most of these guidelines are based on a local scale approach and are defined by the spatial identification related to the magnitude and frequency of, for instance, a debris-flow event. Debris flow hazard assessment consists therefore primarily in the determination of the probability of occurrence and its magnitude.

Probability is the likelihood of debris flows to occur in the future, which is a function of the availability of erodible sediments, the occurrence probability of debris slides, and the frequency at which certain intrinsic (location-based) or extrinsic (climatic) thresholds are exceeded (Jakob et al., 2005). Bovis and Jakob (1999) established a differentiation between transport-limited basins in which an almost unlimited amount of sediment is available to feed debris flows (supply-unlimited) and weath- ering-limited basins in which sediment supply and channel recharge rates are lower, and a substantial time period must elapse before the next debris flow is possible (supply-limited). They proposed a

constant threshold over time for supply-limited and transport-limited watersheds with respect to

debris-flow initiation and report nearly

7 times higher debris flow activities in transport- limited basins (~ 8000 m3 a-1).

BACKGROUND

In Alpine regions the amount of water, necessary to trigger a debris-flow event, is mainly correlated to a critical rainfall event. While the study of debris- flow triggering rainfalls has raised a great number of publications (Badoux et al., 2009; Caine, 1980;

Guzzetti et al., 2008; Suwa et al., 2009, e.g.), not

many systematic studies have been made investiga- tions of hillslope-channel coupling conditions as sediment supply agents in transport-limited catch- ments. Unsorted solid material can either originate from active hillslope-channel processes or directly mobilized within the main channel. In this propos- al, hillslope-channel processes refer to those pro- cesses that involve a transfer of slope-forming materials from higher to lower ground, under the influence of gravity, without the primary assistance of a fluid transporting agent. Such hillslope-chan- nel processes can be slow or rapid, shallow or deep and include one or more of the mechanisms of creep, flow, slide or fall (Brunsden, 1979).

HYPOTHESES

The proposed research aims to improve the under- standing of the dynamic system which determines sediment transfer within transport-limited catch- ments. Contrary to the conventional approaches of a static threshold for initiation of debris-flow events over time, this proposal hypothesizes a dynamic extrinsic threshold based on hillslope-channel coupling conditions (active/inactive). Figure 1 illustrates dynamic transport-limited watersheds with respect to debris-flow initiation— considering hillslope-channel coupling. The lower abscissa indicates the sediment contribution over time by active/inactive channel coupled hillslope events.

The arrows mark single events of high volumetric impacts as for instance caused by large landslides.

The sediment contribution of continuous active/

inactive hillslope events as well as single impacts causes a dynamic change of the level of the sedi- ment supply rate. The later directly influences the extrinsic threshold envelope for debris-flow inita- tion. A debris-flow event occurs if the precipitation index of a rainfall event will reach the extrinsic threshold. Beside the geological-geophysical ap- proach, the proposed project will further identify subsystems and their interdependencies like the

The influence of hillslope-channel coupling conditions in transport-limited debris-flow catchments

Christian Scheidl, PhD1; Micha Heiser, MSc1

HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT (ANALYSIS, EVALUATION)

(2)

INTERPRAEVENT 2016 – Extended Abstracts | 253

function of soil on stability and rheological charac- teristics of triggered mass movements, the relevant hydrological conditions and the influence of mitiga- tion measurements.

REFERENCES

- Badoux A., Graf C., Rhyner J., Kuntner R., McArdell B.W. (2009). A debris-flow alarm system for the alpine Illgraben catchment: design and performance. Natural hazards 49 (3), 517-539.

- Besson L. (1996). Les risques naturels en mon- tagne, traitement, prévention. Surveillance. Artès- publialp.

- Bovis M.J., Jakob M. (1999). The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity.

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24 (11), 1039-1054.

- Brunsden D. (1979). Mass movements, Chapter 5, pp. 130-186. Arnold, London.

- Caine N. (1980). The rainfall intensity: duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows.

Geografiska Annaler. Series A. Physical Geography, 23-27.

- Guzzetti F., Peruccacci S., Rossi M., Stark C.P.

(2008). The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update.

Landslides 5 (1), 3-17.

- Jakob M. (2005). Debris-flow hazard analysis. In matthias Jakob and O. Oldrich Hungr (Eds.),

Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena, pp.

411-438.

- Petrascheck A., Kienholz H. (2003). Hazard assessment and mapping of mountain risks in switzerland. In: Rickenmann D. and Chen C.L.

(Ed.), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, pp. 25-38.

- Steinmann F., Papez J., Kozelj D. (2008). Hazard mapping based on the new guideline in Slovenia.

Monitor (08).

- Stötter J., Belitz K., Frisch U., Geist T., Maier M., Maukisch M. (1999). Konzeptvorschlag zum Umgang mit Naturgefahren in der Gefahrenzonen- planung. Mitteilungen IGG 1997/98 , 30-59.

- Suwa H., Okano K., Kanno T. (2009). Behavior of debris flows monitored on test slopes of Kamikami- horizawa creek, mount Yakedake, japan. Interna- tional Journal of Erosion Control Engineering 2 (2), 33-45.

Figure 1. Concept of a dynamic extrinsic threshold in transport-limited catchments with respect to debris-flow initiation.

KEYWORDS

debris-flow; hillslope-channel coupling; sediment supply; transport-limited catchments

1 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, AUSTRIA, christian.scheidl@boku.ac.at

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

We sampled 1000 times the training set (90% of the fluvial response catchments (=158) and the same number of debris-flow response catchments) and the target set (10% of the

Mean rainfall totals of debris-flow triggering storms are comparable for the three meteorological stations and vary between about 33 (Ackersand) and 40 mm (Zermatt), with the.. slight

Total precipitation sums involved in debris flow triggering ranged from below 20 mm for short-duration events to up to over 50 mm on average for the

In last decades, numerical models have been developed for the analysis of hydrogeological problems like mapping hazard areas, definition of velocities, depths and discharges of mud

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of debris-flow activity in a French alpine torrent through (i) the assessment of growth disturbances in trees growing on

9 is architecture of debris flow monitoring system in Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) framework; sensors which are installed in the monitoring station call

Dark grey and schistose clay minerals is plenty in the phyllite of source zone 2, that is very important factor for phyllite weathering along dry-hot valley, half year dry and hot

(Point A, B, C are the specified-output points in the upstream, midstream and downstream respectively, especially point C is the front of final deposition from the