• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Problem sheet Advanced Quantum Mechanics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Problem sheet Advanced Quantum Mechanics"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Prof. Andreas Wipf, MSc. Marc Steinhauser November 3, 2019

Problem sheet Advanced Quantum Mechanics

winter term 2019/20

Sheet 3

Problem 5: 2-particle operator 2 points

Given is a 2-particle operator

A = 1 2

X

i6=j

A(i, j)

and a product state for three particles

Ψ = Ψ1(1)Ψ2(2)Ψ3(3).

Calculate (Ψ, AΨ) explicitly for the symmetrized and antisymmetrized product states.

Problem 6: Hartree-Fock approximation for Beryllium-atom 1+4+2 = 7 points Beryllium has been discovered in 1797 by Vauquelin. The nucleus has charge Z = 4and the atom has 4 shell electrons. Let us assume, that the 1sand2sorbitals are lled in the ground state.

1. What is the Slater determinant for the atom in its ground state? Denote, for example, the1s state of the 'rst electron' with spin up byψ100(x11↑.

2. Find the expression for the (approximate) expectation value of the ground state energy, expressed via the so far unknown one-particle wave functions ψ100 undψ200.

3. Derive now the self-consistent Hartree-Fock equation for the one-particle wave functions. In an iterative solution one typically starts with the wave function of the Hydrogen atom (with the correctZ). Determine the ground state energy for the Slater determinant with the wave function of the Hydrogen atom. How close are you to the exact value −14.57e2/a?

Hints: The Slater-determinant depends on the four one-particle wave functions ψn00(xaa,s. Here n∈ {1,2}is the principal quantum number,s∈ {↑,↓}the3-component of the spins anda∈ {1,2,3,4}

enumerates the electrons. Use (for example) the notation ψ100(x33,↑ for the 'third electron' with principal quantum number 1 and spin up.

For the last part of the exercise you will need the following integrals to calculate the mean kinetic energy and nucleus-electron interaction for Hydrogen-wave functions:

Z

d3x|∇ψ100(x)|2 = Z2 a2 ,

Z

d3x|∇ψ200(x)|2 = 1 4

Z2 a2 Z

d3x|ψ100(x)|2

|x| = Z a ,

Z

d3x|ψ200(x)|2

|x| = 1 4

Z a ,

(2)

and the following integrals to calculate the Hartree-Fock-term (direct and exchange term) Z

d3x Z

d3y |ψ100(x)|2100(y)|2

|x −y| = 5 8

Z a Z

d3x Z

d3y |ψ200(x)|2200(y)|2

|x −y| = 77 512

Z a Z

d3x Z

d3y |ψ100(x)|2200(y)|2

|x −y| = 17 81

Z a Z

d3x Z

d3y ψ100(x)ψ100(y)ψ200(x)ψ200(y)

|x −y| = 16

729 Z

a .

Recall that ~2/m=ae2.

Supplementary material: The integrals above can be calculated with the help of a Fourier trans- formation. Let

F(f)(k) = ˆf(k) = Z

R3 f(x)e−ik·xd3x be the Fourer transform of f. Then we have

Z d3x

Z

d3yf(x)g(y)

|x−y| = 1 2π2

Z d3k

(k)ˆg(k)

|k|2 . For example, for f =ψ100 ψ100 andg=ψ200 ψ200 one uses

F(ψ100 ψ100)(k) = 16Z4 (2Z2+|k|2)2

together with the Fourier transform of ψ200 ψ200 to calculate an integral, which is needed to evaluate the Hartree-Fock-term.

Submission date: Thursday, 07.11.2019, before the lecture

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The group shows up in the discussion of the electron spin in non-relativistic quantum mechanics.. Argue that F µν is traceless

(b) Zeigen Sie, dass der Erwartungswert des Positionsoperators dem zweiten New- tons Bewegungsgesetz folgt, wenn das Teilchen in einem beliebigen Zustand ψ(r, t) ist.. Show that

This type of perturbation therefore follows scenario I of quantum multifractality breakdown: Quantum multifractality survives unchanged below a certain characteristic length related

- The possibility that the practice of professionals could be more in accord with the economic interests of the employer than with the health interests of the employees is, in

Submission date: Thursday, 30.01.2020, before

Despite the significant successes of the RIIO-1 price controls, including generally high levels of service delivery, the overall costs to consumers of the transmission and

Einstein'sll criticism of quantum theory (which is actually directed more against what we have called the "popular" view than Bohr's interpreta- tion) is mainly concerned

This is the third time we have found that the familiar world re-emerges through quantum interference between states in which some observable has well-defined values: in § 2.3.3 we