• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

A strategic approach to assess workplace exposure to high-aspect ratio (nano)-materials (HARM)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "A strategic approach to assess workplace exposure to high-aspect ratio (nano)-materials (HARM)"

Copied!
19
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Dirk Broßell

Unit 4.5 „Particulate Hazardous Substances, Advanced Materials“

Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Berlin)

A strategic approach to assess workplace exposure

to high-aspect ratio (nano)-materials (HARM)

(2)

Content

German Standards of the Assessment of Workplace Exposure to HARM What are High-Aspect Ratio Materials (HARM)?

Particle collection, Identification and

counting of hazardous fibers

Can it be applied to nanoscale HARM?

Extension of German Standards Field Study at workplace handling Nanotubes

(3)

High Aspect-Ratio Materials (HARM)

TiO2 - Fibres Mehrwandige Kohlenstoffnanoröhren

Asbest (Krokydolith) β-In2S3 Nanowires

(Templatverfahren)

20 µm

Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) CNTs mit „Megatubes“

5 µm Asbest (Anthophyllite)

(4)

High Aspect-Ratio Materials (HARM)

… respirable biopersistent fibrous morphologies

Risk of HARM is associated with…

Small & airborne Insoluble

& non-cleared

High-aspect ratio

(5)

Assessment of Workplace Exposure to Inorganic Fibers

Personal sampling of workplace atmosphere on nuclear pore filters Sampling inside

beathing zone

„PGP“-type sampler with gold-sputtered nuclear pore filter

Microscope-aided Particle counting

(6)

Counting rules following the German Standard VDI 3492

German VDI 3492 (originally from 1991, new version from 2013)

Manual, visual quantification with microscope (here: SEM example image)

(Some) counting rules:

1. Minimum evaluation area: 0.5 mm² 2. Convention for hazardous fibers

length > 5000 nm

aspect ratio 3:1

200 nm < diameter < 3000 nm

Due to technical resolution limit of phase-contrast microscopes!

(American Standard NIOSH Method 7402: diameter limit 250 nm)

(7)

Determination of

fibre number concentration 𝐶𝑖

𝐶𝑖 = 𝑛𝑖 ∙ 𝐴 𝑁 ∙ 𝑎 ∙ 𝑉

Fibre count Filter area

Number of images Image area

Sampling volume [m³]

EU-exposure limit value: 100.000 F/m³

Germany:

Tolerance level: 100000 F/m³ Acceptance level: 10000 F/m³ Clearance level: 1000 F/m³

If no fibers are found, less than 500 fibers/m³ were present

1 (1/2)

2 (1)

3 (1)

4 (1)

5 (1)

6 (1)

(8)

Application to Nanoscale HARM

Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT)

Main issue:

β-In2S3 Nanowires

30 nm

50 nm Due to lower diameter detection limit of 200 nm,

the German VDI 3492 would not allow counting of relevant nanoscale HARM

(9)

Classification of nanoscale HARM-particles

Category I:

Single fibers identifiable with 1 µm < L < 5 µm

Category II:

closed clusters or agglomerates with L:W > 3:1 and 1 µm < L < 5 µm

Category III (WHO):

Single fibers identifiable with L > 5 µm

Category IV (WHO):

closed clusters or agglomerates with L:W > 3:1 and L > 5 µm

Morphologies typical for nanoscale HARM-particles

(10)

Application of electron microscopy (EM)

SEM image resolution necessary to cover 0.5 mm² area

Image Pixel Size

Images of 1.2 Mega Pixels

Images of 20 Mega Pixels 1 nm 400000 25000 3 nm 44400 2750 5 nm 16000 1000 10 nm 4000 250 20 nm 1000 63

50 nm 160 10

100 nm 40 3

200 nm 11 2

By using EM: No technical limitation like maximum resolution!

Covering all known HARM during

classification would require far too much effort

Manageable number of SEM

images

(11)

Review on MWCNT toxicity (IP tests)

Carcinogenic Effects

No Carcinogenic Effects

[1] Muller, J., et al. (2009) Toxicol. Sci. 110(2): 442-448 [2,17] Murphy, F. A., et al. (2011) Am. J. Pathol. 178(6): 2587-2600 [3,16] Xu, J., et al. (2014)

Cancer Sci. 105(7): 763-769 [4,7-8,15] Nagai, H., et al. (2011) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

108(49)

[5-6,9,11] Rittinghausen, S., et al. (2014) Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11: 59 [10,13] Xu, J., et al. (2012)

Cancer Sci. 103(12): 2045-2050 [12] Sakamoto, Y., et al. (2009)

J. Toxicol. Sci. 34(1): 65-76 [14] Takagi, A., et al. (2008) J. Toxicol. Sci. 33(1): 105-116 [18] Sargent, L. M., et al. (2014) Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11: 3

Strong agglomeration Agglomeration Low agglomeration

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

1 2

5 6

7 8

9

10 11

12 13 14

15 16

17

18

3 4

Mittlere Längem]

Mittlerer Durchmesser [nm]

Mean MWCNT Length m]

(12)

Hypothesis: High Fibre-Rigidity Impairs Lung Clearance Mechanism?

MWCNTs with diameter >20 nm are too rigid to be internalized by alveolar macrophages

Fiber diameter > 20 nm (uncooked spaghetti)

Alveolar macrophage Fiber diameter < 20 nm

(spaghetti soft-boiled)

Internalization by phagocytosis

Lung clearance: Removal of particle by macrophages

Fiber too rigid to be „bent“ by cell membrane Piercing

Flexible fiber becomes tangled

Full internalization

(13)

Proposal to extend VDI 3492 for Nanoscale HARM

Adapted counting rules, when nanoscale HARM might be present on filter samples:

1. Use EM to take images from filter samples

• 20-megapixel images

• X-nm pixel size

• number of images: ca. 60

2. Count hazardous fibres adapted counting rules

• length > 5 µm,

• 20 nm < diameter < 3000 nm

• aspect ratio 3:1

X=20, but can change depending on properties of fibers expected at workplace

(14)

Field study: Workplace handling MWCNT (1)

Assessment of workplace exposure during dispersion of a MWCNT-containing masterbatch

Were fibers released?

Were hazardous fibers (new convention) released?

If yes – how high was the concentration?

Method: Sampling on gold-sputtered nuclear pore filters (0.2 µm pore size)

Questions for assessment strategy:

(15)

Field study: Workplace handling MWCNT (2)

Sample volume: 300 ml

SEM-images on 170 randomly chosen locations on filter

20 megapixel-images at 2000x magnification (1 pixel = 12 nm) gives 3022 µm² area per image

170 x 3000 µm² ≈ 0.5 mm²

1 of 170 images 1 of 2720 image sections

Nuclear pore filter Dispersion process

(16)

Field study: Workplace handling MWCNT (3)

Nr. 2 Nr. 3 (Edge of image, Weighting 0,5)

ca. 8,7 µm ca. 3,4 µm

Nr. 1

Ø ca. 1.1 µm

Ø ca. 1,2 µm

Results: 46 fibre-like objects, but only 3 fibres were found in the 170 images that were clearly CNTs

- Calculated concentration: 8600 F/m³

- CNT-particle don‘t show morphologies fitting the criteria of hazardous HARM length >5µm, 20 nm < diameter < 3000 nm, aspect ratio 3:1

(17)

Software-aided classification of SEM images

Solution

Automatic fiber identification and classification of

All morphology classes: Fibers, hazardous fibres, agglomerates, hazardous agglomerates, clusters

Determination of number concentrations for all classes

The need to evaluate >2000 image sections hinders frequent application of assessment strategy

(18)

Summary

An extension of the German standard VDI 3292 for assessment of workplace exposure to inorgnanic fibers for nanoscale HARM was suggested .

A new lower fiber diameter detection limit (20 nm) was defined on the basis of the scientific theory of rigidity-mediated fiber toxicity.

The new assessment strategy was tested on a worksite handling MWCNT.

CNTs were found, but hazardous fibers were not identified.

Software-aided particle counting could sifnificantly lower the effort to conduct this assessment strategy

(19)

Thank you

Special thanks to my colleagues:

- Volker Bachmann - Nico Dziurowitz - Elisabeth Heunisch - Dominic Kehren - Gabriela Kunkel

- Asmus Meyer-Plath - John Moré

- Sabine Plitzko - Barbara Simonow - Jana Thiel

- Carmen Thim

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The results of the current study showed that the difference between exposure measured using patches and exposure measured using coveralls is lower for exposure situations where

However, preliminary results of the comparison of observed exposure reductions with changes predicted according to the CBT indicated that across different sectors assumed

coveralls, gloves, headband patches, hand wash, head wipe In addition, a fluorescence method was developed and used for all body parts (except hands and head) and exposure

In the next tier (Tier 2) a basic exposure assessment using a limi ted set of easy-to-use equipment is conducted, where as in the highest tier 6 (Tier 3) the latest state-of-the-

Considering data access as one of the key elements in risk assessment the limitation thereof but also limited resources to generate data for in depth analysis of natural hazard

Self- cutting as a means of reducing internal tension emerges in very different circumstances – psychiatric hospitals dealing with inpatients – and is significantly influenced

Epidemiology of Psychiatric Illness, this research unit (especially the work of Assistant Director Neil Kessel) focuses a high level of psychological research resources upon

Communicative self-harm emerges from a psychiatric tradition that focuses upon the social environment and psychiatric illness as communication.. The idea of a cry for help might