• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

File name Explanation Parameters Abbreviation Unit File type

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "File name Explanation Parameters Abbreviation Unit File type"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

File name Explanation Parameters Abbreviation Unit File type

SAT_ANOMALY_UVic.nc

SAT_ANOMALY_CCSM3.nc

Annual mean anomalies of surface temperature between HE1 and LGM simulations from the UVic ESCM and CCMS3 (Fig. 1a and c in the paper).

Air surface temperature

SAT K

Netcdf PRECIP_ANOMALY_UVic.nc

PRECIP_ANOMALY_CCSM3.nc

Annual mean anomalies of precipitation between HE1 and LGM simulations from the UVic ESCM and CCMS3 (Fig. 1b and d in the paper).

Precipitation PRECIP kg.m-2.s-1

BL_ANOMALY_UVic.nc NL_ANOMALY_UVic.nc GRASS_ANOMALY_UVic.nc DEC_ANOMALY_UVic.nc

Annual mean differences of PFT cover between HE1 and LGM simulations for the UVic ESCM (Fig. 2a, c, e, and g).

The classification into the four PFTs is defined in Table 1 (in the paper), there are Broadleaf evergreen trees (BL), Needleleaf evergreen trees (NL), Deciduous trees (DEC), and Grasses

(GRASS) Plant functional type PFT %

BL_ANOMALY_CCSM3.nc GRASS_ANOMALY_CCSM3.nc NL_ANOMALY_CCSM3.nc DEC_ANOMALY_CCSM3.nc

Annual mean differences of PFT cover between HE1 and LGM simulations for the CCSM3 (Fig.

2b, d, f, and h). The PFTs classification is similar to the UVic ESCM (see also Table 1 in the paper).

BIOMS_LGM_UVic BIOMS_HE1_UVic BIOMS_ANOMALY_UVic

Biome distribution for LGM, HE1 and anomaly between the HE1 and LGM simulations (Fig. 5a, c and e in the paper). The distribution computed from the UVic ESCM model output.

Biome distributions and land coverage:

1= Tropical forest

2= Warm temperate forest 3= Temperate forest 4= Boreal forest

5= Savannah and dry woodland 6= Grassland and dry shrubland 7= Desert

8= Dry tundra 9= Tundra 10= Barren 11= Ice

BIOMS -

BIOMS_LGM_CCSM3 BIOMS_HE1_CCSM3 BIOMS_ANOMALY_CCSM3

Biome distribution for LGM, HE1 and anomaly between the HE1 and LGM simulation (Fig. 5b, d and f in the paper). The distribution computed from the CCSM3 model output.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

ã 2002 Annals of Botany Company Key words: Adenylate levels, energy shortage, fermentation capacity, ¯ooding resistance, habitat zonation, lipid hydrolysis, metabolism, seed

1) Randomly select the training data for one tree. 2) Learn the tree based on the training data. b) If a stopping rule holds do not split the samples. d) Select the best

The dominant tree species (Carpinus, Fagus, and Quercus) were sampled over all four study years to examine whether stomatal responses to elevated CO 2 persisted

We also measured the effects of liana load (number of lianas per tree) on the growth of trees. Hypothetically, a) higher numbers of hosted lianas should hinder the growth of trees

conditions (case) for six tree species. Four chilling condition were studies, e.g. n indicates the number of trees. The difference in mean GDD requirement of leaf-out 486. between

(angelehnt an: Niveaubestimmende Aufgaben für die Grundschule, Englisch,

We provide a logical basis for dynamical evaluation: algebraic closure may fail to exist effectively, but it is possible to build effectively a Beth model of the theory of

First, the average random access time is so excessive that data needs to be extensively clustered and stored sequentially.. This leads to an inefficient mis- match between