To Restrict or not to Restrict Access: The PhD Candidate’s Intellectual Property
Dilemma
By Kimberly Douglas
Caltech Library System library@caltech.edu
ETD 2003 Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
Caltech
285 Tenure-track faculty
1000 Postdoctoral researchers 900 Undergraduates
1100 Graduate students
$450M Annual Operating Budget
~2000 Peer-Reviewed Papers/Yr 150 PhDs per year
Caltech Library System
• 53 FTEs (14 Librarians, 6 IT Staff)
• 4 Libraries
• 600,000 Volumes
• 3556 Paid Print- Journal Subscriptions
• 2500 Paid E-Journal Subscriptions
• $7,100,000 Annual Budget (FY 03)
Scope of Study
Learn how graduate students make decisions regarding global access to their
theses.
Based on set of submitted ETDs during the voluntary phase at Caltech, ask the authors
why they restricted or withheld access to their ETD.
Questions posed
• 1a What was the specific concern that you addressed by restricting access to your ETD to within the Caltech
network only?
OR
• 1b. What was the specific concern that you addressed by withholding access to your ETD
• 2. Was the action to restrict (or withhold) a joint decision with your thesis advisor?
• 3. Do you have a date in mind to release access to your whole thesis? If so, what date? If not, what reason?
• Please feel free to make any other comments regarding the
Quantitative Data
Total
# Theses
#
Withhld # Restrictd
Whole Thesis
# Restrictd
Portion
Total Withhld
or Restrictd
Survey Respond
Biol 9 3 3 0
Chem 12 2 2 1 5 3
Eng 22 4 1 5 4
Geol 8 1 1 2 1
Math 1 1 1 1
Phys 11 1 1 0
Q1: Why withhold or restrict?
• 2 – Fear of theft of unpublished work currently in patent process
• 4 – Waiting for publication of peer- reviewed paper
• 1 – Couldn’t remember why
• 1 – Do not have permission to publish date in electronic format
Q2: Advisor involvement
• Chemistry yes (3)
• Engineering no (3)
• Geology yes (1)
• Math no (1)
Q3: When will thesis be fully released?
• Chemistry 1 yr / after patent / when paper is published
• Engineering 5 years “to be safe” / can be done now / no answer
• Geology in a few months
• Math in March or April 2003
Conclusions
• Graduate Students want to share results
– Need education as to the rights of authors
• Advisors play major role where patents are involved
– Involve Technology Transfer and faculty in ETD sessions with graduate students, esp. in Chemistry
• Proactive management of withheld and
restricted theses would result in release of more papers