• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Recommendations of criteria for development and validation of analytical methods for estimating concentrations of drugs in blood to be used in 24/7 clinical toxicology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Recommendations of criteria for development and validation of analytical methods for estimating concentrations of drugs in blood to be used in 24/7 clinical toxicology"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Recommendations of criteria for development and validation of analytical methods for estimating concentrations of drugs in blood to be used in 24/7 clinical toxicology

Clinical Toxicology Committee GTFCh and Quality Control Committee GTFCh

The majority of emergency methods for clinical toxicological purpose are not quantitative in nature. They are usually used to identify and to estimate the blood concentration of drugs in blood in the context of a fast 24/7 analysis. The estimated amount may then be classified as

“within therapeutic level”, “above therapeutic level” or “within the toxic range”.

The estimation can be based on different approaches such as one-point calibration or an elec- tronically stored multi point calibration.

During validation, the following recommended aspects should be evaluated and the given specifications should be obtained, when such a method is developed.

a) The calibration model (usually linear) has to be established using multiple calibration levels and should include therapeutic up to toxic concentrations of the analytes b) If linearity has been verified one-point calibration is possible, provided the

requirements for accuracy and precision are fulfilled

c) Analytical Limits (lower and upper end of estimated concentration and limit of detection) should be known

d) Bias (within ±30%) of two QCs at upper (80%) and lower (20%) end of the measurement range, determined on 5 different days in duplicate

e) Precision (<30%) of two QCs at upper (80%) and lower (20%) end of the measurement range, determined on 5 different days in duplicate

f) Accuracy, expressed as 95% ß-tolerance interval, should be within ±50% for low and high QC concentrations

g) Matrix effects of LC-MS methods (suppression/enhancement should be within 70- 130% at low and high QC concentrations)

h) In case of multi-analyte procedures, effects of co-eluting analytes on other analytes and/or internal standards should be within ±30% at lower therapeutic and higher toxic concentrations

i) Storage stability of extracted calibrator and QC samples has to be shown in case of reinjection instead of fresh preparation

j) Selectivity using at least n = 6 different blank matrix samples

k) Analyte carry-over (signal of <10% of the lowest calibrator after injection of high QC) LOD= Limit of detection

LLOQ= Lower limit of quantification QC= Quality control

Toxichem Krimtech 2018;85(1):35

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Given the prominent role of Schwann cells for a timely removal of myelin debris and the subsequent support of axonal regrowth and guidance, it appears questionable

Beuing C, Soller JT, Muth M, Wagner S, Dolf G, Schelling C, Richter A, Willenbrock S, Reimann-Berg N, Winkler S, Nolte I, Bullerdiek J, Murua Escobar H Genomic

• Receptions are behavioral features and thus are realized by behavior (e.g., a state

La información de campo de esta investigación forma parte de un proyecto colectivo amplio sobre culturas terapéuticas que dio continuidad a la línea de trabajo desarrollada en

Diese oder eine ähnliche Frage muß man sich wohl als Studierender immer mal stellen. Wenn man die Zeichen der Zeit bzw. der demo- kratisch legitimierten Regierung zu

After having classified the product into the scope of the foodstuffs legislation (cosmetic product), the therapeutic product legislation (medicinal product or

With the addition of a shell program, the MELCOR model (computational tool) and VISOR visualization file (graphical user interface) are used as a desktop simulator of the

As stated in the previous section, algorithms basically differ in three ar- eas: by the number of features used (intra-pair versus inter- pair and intersections only