• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

RATING SCALE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "RATING SCALE "

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GUIDED WRITING – Rating Scale (Updated: March 2010)

RATING SCALE

TASK ACHIEVEMENT

(Content) COHERENCE & COHESION

(Organization, Linking) GRAMMAR

(Range, Accuracy) VOCABULARY

(Range, Accuracy)

7

all content points included, most 1 content points fully elaborated

• ideas are organised logically throughout the text

• uses a number of appropriate linking devices correctly

good range, uses some complex structures

the majority of sentences are error- free; text contains only minimal errors that do not interfere with

comprehension

good range; varied formulation to avoid repetition

the majority of sentences are error-free;

text contains only minimal errors that do not interfere with comprehension

6

S o m e f e a t u r e s o f 7 a n d s o m e f e a t u r e s o f 5 .

5

all content points included, most 1 content points elaborated

• ideas are generally well organised

• uses a number of basic but appropriate linking devices correctly

sufficient range, uses simple structures and also attempts at more complex structures

• text contains occasional errors but it is clear what he/she is trying to express

sufficient range; can express ideas effectively

• text contains occasional errors but it is clear what he/she is trying to express

4

S o m e f e a t u r e s o f 5 a n d s o m e f e a t u r e s o f 3 .

3

most 1 content points included, two content points elaborated

• ideas are loosely organised

• uses some basic linking devices; these may be repetitive

basic range; uses only simple structures

• text contains frequent errors that can cause some difficulties for the reader

basic range, lexical gaps and repetition occur

• text contains frequent errors that can cause some difficulties for the reader

2

S o m e f e a t u r e s o f 3 a n d s o m e f e a t u r e s o f 1 .

1

most content points are omitted, no elaboration on points covered;

there is considerable irrelevance

• there is a lack of organisation and linking devices

no range, only simple structures attempted

• text contains frequent errors that severely distort the meaning

no range; vocabulary too basic to express ideas adequately

• text contains frequent errors that severely distort the meaning

0

too little language for assessment OR totally irrelevant

1 most: 3 out of 4 content points

IMPRESSION OF GENERAL QUALITY:

2

Appropriate genre, format, length 2, style; text fulfils its purpose completely;

1

Few minor genre and/or format problems; length and/or style problems; text may not fully fulfil its purpose;

0

Several minor or major genre and/or format problems; length and/or style problems; text fails to fulfil its purpose;

2 scripts that are more than 10% over the word limit will no longer be penalized; (see: FAQs, page 4, General Questions No. 1+2; www.isb.bayern.de à Realschule/Guided Writing)

(2)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GUIDED WRITING – Rating Scale (Updated: March 2010)

Guidelines for Raters

TASK ACHIEVEMENT

Check Look for

Depth of coverage

Which content points are included?

Which content points are elaborated?

Which content points are fully elaborated?

Is the content relevant to the task?

details or thoughts that add relevant information to a content point

irrelevant details or thoughts COHERENCE AND COHESION

Check Look for

Organisation and linking of ideas

Is the text coherent?

Is the text cohesive?

logical organisation of ideas

whether the ideas follow one another logically

clear and correct marking of the relationship between sentence parts and sentences

variety and appropriateness of linking devices GRAMMAR

Check Look for

Grammatical range

Is there a range of grammatical structures?

variety of grammatical features (tenses, structures – e.g., comparative structures, modal verbs, auxiliary verbs, etc.) used Grammatical accuracy

Is the grammar correct?

proportion of accurate/inaccurate sentences and clauses

the occurrence and reoccurrence of specific grammatical mistakes

bad grammar leading to unclear meaning VOCABULARY

Check Look for

Lexical range

Is there a range of vocabulary items?

variety of words and expressions used

lexical gaps/repetition Lexical accuracy

Is the vocabulary used accurately?

words used accurately/inaccurately in terms of word choice (meaning), spelling, capitalisation

IMPRESSION OF GENERAL QUALITY

Check Look for

Is the genre appropriate?

text features that help identify the genre (e.g., salutation and signing off in a letter)

the format (layout) appropriate for genre

is the text a whole (has beginning, middle, end)

Is the style appropriate?

whether the text as a whole is suitable in style

and tone for the genre and writing situation

(topic, purpose, audience)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

но считают открывателем таланта молодого писателя [64]. Декларации Гиссинга по поводу его литературных симпатий и, антипатий привлекали иногда внимание критиков,

Supp Table 5: Characteristics of people without a history of hypertension prescribed ACEI/ARB medication classes and associated severe COVID-19 and mortality based on

A short description of the purpose of the command. Some things you need to know about the command, including an example of the status line appropriate to the

This manual describes PC-CAPS, P-CAD's schematic capture program. Chapter 1, INTRODUCTION, provides an overview of PC-CAPS, a schematic capture program. This chapter

● Alle boolschen Funktionen lassen sich auf. Kombinationen von NAND und NOR Gattern

-32-.. 12 b ), die überwiegend darauf beruht, daß die Probe sehr grobe Komponenten beinhaltet, die in der Sedimentationswaage beim Auftreffen auf den Wägeteller

In Ergänzung zu den bisherigen Untersuchungen am OM im EN (siehe auch Abschnitt 3.5) soll mit dieser Arbeit überprüft werden, ob auch in den TOC-armen (< 1,0 Gew.%),

Die Abb.58 stellt den kummulativen Massentransport für das Re- ferenzniveau bei 1500 dbar dar, der aus den Werten der Anoma- lien der dynamischen Tiefen unter