• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Scientific Software – the role of best practices and recommendations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Scientific Software – the role of best practices and recommendations"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 19, EGU2017-PREVIEW, 2017 EGU General Assembly 2017

© Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Scientific Software – the role of best practices and recommendations

Bernadette Fritzsch (1), Erik Bernstein (4), Wolfgang zu Castell (2), Markus Diesmann (3), Holger Haas (4), Martin Hammitzsch (5), Uwe Konrad (6), David Lähnemann (7), Alice McHardy (7), Heinz Pampel (8), Kaja Scheliga (8), Andreas Schreiber (9), and Dirk Steglich (10)

(1) Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany (Bernadette.Fritzsch@awi.de), (2) Helmholtz Zentrum München, (3) Forschungszentrum Jülich, (4) Deutsches

Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, (5) GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam, (6) Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, (7) Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, (8) Helmholtz Association, Helmholtz Open Science Coordination Office, (9) DLR, (10) Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht

In Geosciences – like in most other communities – scientific work strongly depends on software. For big data analysis, existing (closed or open source) program packages are often mixed with newly developed codes. Dif- ferent versions of software components and varying configurations can influence the result of data analysis. This often makes reproducibility of results and reuse of codes very difficult. Policies for publication and documentation of used and newly developed software, along with best practices, can help tackle this problem.

Within the Helmholtz Association a Task Group “Access to and Re-use of scientific software” was implemented by the Open Science Working Group in 2016. The aim of the Task Group is to foster the discussion about scientific software in the Open Science context and to formulate recommendations for the production and publication of scientific software, ensuring open access to it. As a first step, a workshop gathered interested scientists from institutions across Germany. The workshop brought together various existing initiatives from different scientific communities to analyse current problems, share established best practices and come up with possible solutions.

The subjects in the working groups covered a broad range of themes, including technical infrastructures, standards and quality assurance, citation of software and reproducibility.

Initial recommendations are presented and discussed in the talk. They are the foundation for further discussions in the Helmholtz Association and the Priority Initiative “Digital Information” of the Alliance of Science Organisa- tions in Germany. The talk aims to inform about the activities and to link with other initiatives on the national or international level.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

וצ ךליה םער .אוויי טינ טקוקעג רעבא ףיוא עלא ,ןטייקירעווש זיא.

In BPM projects the process models and business rules become central artefacts of the development with high impact on version control?. An example architecture for BPM on

The first step of such a process is the fundamental decision whether or not underlying software should be transferred to the status of open source.. The decision depends on the

ICMJE developed these recommendations to review best practice and ethical standards in the conduct and reporting of research and other material published in medical journals, and

Publication URL mention intensity Total number of URL mentions to the software’s website divided by the number of mentioning publications Source diffusion breadth Total number

Nevertheless, traditional development processes based on a two-stage freezing of requirements often lack the consideration of software and do not recognize it as an essential element

Here we use the bibliographic coupling network, derived from all physics papers that were published in the Physical Review journals in the past century, to try to identify them

Tlle scientific deba.te on desertifica.tion disp1a.y~ a, range of varying arguments on t h e causes of the phenomenon and consequently a.lso on remedies and